OCCUPY PISSES OFF EVERYONE

The editorial below was in my paper yesterday. It really grabbed my attention. It was from Dale McFeatters of the Scripps News Service. They are a liberal leaning organization. Their editorials skew to the left. They are sick and tired of Occupy Wall Street. They say it is time to go home and work through the existing establishment rules, regulations and captured party system.

Mayor Bloomberg is an Independent. He is sick and tired of Occupy Wall Street. He destroyed their encampment site yesterday and is fed up with their tactics. He also happens to be a multi-billionaire whose wealth was created from selling his product to Wall Street.

The Mayor of Phila is an ultra-liberal who just won re-election in this bastion of Democratic politics with 75% of the vote. He went on TV this week and said he is fed up with Occupy Phila and their refusal to move when his City Hall construction project begins.

The Mayor of Oakland makes the Mayor of Phila look like a conservative. She ordered an all out attack on the Occupy Oakland encampment.

Fox News and the Wall Street Journal despise the Occupy Wall Street movement and spew lies and misinformation about the movement 24 hours per day. They are the mouthpiece of right wing neo-con Rupert Murdoch, a multi-billionaire. The NY Daily News has been highly critical of the movement and is owned by left leaning Mort Zuckerman.

The narrow minded people who are easily led by the MSM buy into the various storylines spun by a media that does not want this movement to gain traction. They are distracted by minutia when the big picture is so disgusting. They applaud as young people brave enough to fight the elements and make a stand against corruption are bludgeoned and imprisoned for exercising their right to free speech and public assembly, while remaining silent as Wall Street bankers committed the crime of the century – absconding with trillions of American middle class wealth.

Step back for a moment and think. Who is the enemy? Is it really the thousands of young people just starting their lives and lashing out against a system that is designed to benefit Wall Street bankers, Mega Corporations and politicians of both parties in Washington DC?

The enemy is clear to me. The entire financial/corporate/political establishment is corrupt, dysfunctional, and benefits only the ruling oligarchy of this country. The nation’s lifeblood has been sucked dry by these vampires. The entire system has been hijacked by the few. You can call it crony capitalism or corporate fascism, but the bottom line is that the average American is getting screwed and the people getting the most screwed are the Millenial generation that is being left with an un-payable debt burden, no jobs, and no hope for a better tomorrow. This is why they are enraged. This is why they are protesting.

The self righteous Boomer generation leaders who control the levers of power in Washington DC, Wall Street and the corporate boardrooms do not want the system to change. They like the system just fine. Therefore, they hate a movement that threatens their wealth, power, and status. Both parties are frightened by the Occupy movement. The left and the right have their talking points and the existing system works just fine as they both get enriched as the country plunges deeper into debt by $4 billion per day.

The non-thinking and willfully ignorant people of this country need to snap out of their daze and think for themselves. The endless propaganda spewed at them day after day has dulled their sense of right and wrong. The Occupiers have begun to open the eyes of some people. They have forced a discussion of issues the establishment wants to keep buried. Neither Bush or Obama has attempted to go after the criminals on Wall Street. That is the tell. Both parties are captured. The Dodd-Frank bill was a toothless 700 page waste of time written by bank lobbyists.

When I see people and pundits declare the Occupy Movement irrelevant, I laugh at their utter stupidity. Would hundreds of billions been transferred from the criminal Wall Street banks to credit unions without the Occupy Movement spurring this effort? Would the $5 per month debit card fee inflicted on Americans by the criminal Wall Street banks been withdrawn without the rage and anger of the Occupy Movement? The answer is NO. Wall Street hates having the Eye of Mordor focused on their criminal and immoral activities.

This movement will not die because police thugs kick them out of parks using their 100,000 rules, regulations, ordanances, laws, and curfews. A society that depends on so many laws to “protect” its citizens has descended into a moral cesspool. I don’t need laws to tell me right from wrong and moral from immoral. The heart of these protests is a system that is broken. There will be many different solutions offered by those that are angry, but the BIG PICTURE is that the system must be brought down. It will not fix itself. Tinkering on the edges will not fix it.

We are in the midst of a Fourth Turning. It is a chaotic and confusing time. Anger, misery and bloodshed are a given. The existing social order will be swept away. That is guaranteed. What replaces it will be up to us. I’ll support any movement that spits in the eye of the establishment. I’ll support people like Ron Paul that want to tear down the established order. Everyone will need to choose sides. There is no fence sitting during the Fourth Turning. I hope you are pissed off. I know I am. 

Editorial: Occupy protesters have made their point. Now go home

Submitted by SHNS on Mon, 11/14/2011 – 15:20

In 1981, a group of demonstrators set up camp outside a British air base to protest the government’s decision to allow U.S. nuclear-tipped cruise missiles to be based there.

The Greenham Common Women’s Peace Camp initially generated a great deal of publicity, inspired imitators in other countries, sporadically tried to block access to the air base, and perhaps reached its zenith in 1983 when as many as 70,000 people turned out for one of their demonstrations.

The women survived several attempts by police to evict them, and eventually the authorities left their tent cities alone, as long as the women, and they were almost all women, confined themselves to picketing, leafleting and chanting.

In 1991, thanks to a nuclear-arms treaty with the Soviet Union, the last of the cruise missiles were removed, taking with them, one would have thought, the reason for the camp. But the women stayed on for nine more years, expressing an increasingly vague and inchoate commitment to “peace.” Many of the Greenham women cited a sense of unity, sisterhood, shared purpose and, when pressed, little desire to return to the humdrum routine of their former lives.

One senses that, in accelerated fashion, the Occupy Wall Street movement has arrived at that point. On Wall Street and in cities across the country, the protesters have effectively made their point about income inequality — the 1 percent versus the 99 percent; lopsided tax breaks given to hedge-fund managers and the proclivity of Wall Streeters to lavishly reward themselves regardless of whether their performance merits it. And, yes, economically the great middle class has been stagnant for a decade or more.

As the Occupy movement drags on — the first encampment went up Sept. 17 — the issues that inspired it are receding in the public consciousness and the issue has increasingly become the encampments themselves.

There have been problems of noise, sanitation, isolated incidents of crime and violence and the inevitable run-ins with police, but generally the Occupy movement has been a benign one. But its time in the public square is over. Public space meant for the enjoyment of the many should not be arrogated to advance the interests of the few.

Go home. Find political candidates who share your views and go to work for them. Raise money. Man phone banks. Knock on doors. Help the poor and minorities and those with limited English get government IDs in states that have passed voter-suppression laws.

And don’t forget to vote yourself. It really works in this country. Always has.

(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, http://www.scrippsnews.com)

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
80 Comments
FRED FLINTSTONE
FRED FLINTSTONE
November 16, 2011 4:20 pm

Or I will let your dirty little secret out of the closet, AWD:[img]http://www.flickr.com/photos/feastoffools/2293487220/[/img]

FRED FLINTSTONE
FRED FLINTSTONE
November 16, 2011 4:21 pm

[img]http://www.flickr.com/photos/feastoffools/2293487220/[/img]

FRED FLINTSTONE
FRED FLINTSTONE
November 16, 2011 4:22 pm

Guess yer camera shy.

AWD
AWD
November 16, 2011 4:22 pm

Fred:

Don’t start none, there won’t be none. Not sure what internet rambo is, but, next to Stucky and Lipoh, I can and will administer a shit-packing on anyone who asks.

FRED FLINTSTONE
FRED FLINTSTONE
November 16, 2011 4:31 pm

Hey! I don’t wear glasses!

thc0655
thc0655
November 16, 2011 4:32 pm

Even the liberal Philadelphia Inquirer is turning against Occupy Philadelphia. Ultra liberal columnist Monica Yant Kinney wrote the following piece mocking them and Tony Auth drew a cartoon doing the same.
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/20111116_Monica_Yant_Kinney__Occupy_Philadelphia_denizens_should_go_home_before_their_movement_loses_relevancy.html

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
November 16, 2011 4:44 pm

Because, thc, the ows movement would not bend to their co-opting.

I’m glad talk radio and msm is “against” them… because the forme is a bunch of lying shit bag prozac-popping nardskins, in my opinion.

I love the smell of whining coming from the slimey tube.

Let them squirm.

TeresaE
TeresaE
November 16, 2011 4:54 pm

AWD says:

Fred:

Don’t start none, there won’t be none. Not sure what internet rambo is, but, next to Stucky and Lipoh, I can and will administer a shit-packing on anyone who asks.

Shit-packing?

Interesting choice of words AWD, very interesting indeed.

llpoh
llpoh
November 16, 2011 5:37 pm

Stuck – which side of the see-saw are you on? Seems to me you are struggling with this – first you post an article on one side, then the other.

Admin – you will be so pleased to know that I didn’t find much to object to in your pre-amble. (A couple of over the top descriptive sentences, but just a bit of literary license in the end.) Well done and well argued. (Seriously – no joke, just in case you are wondering.)

However, I still do not believe that OWS will be a major catalyst. I believe that it has generated a lot of publicity. But I also think that there has been a significant amount of bad press, which seems to be escalating – MSM or not – and that “mainstream” folks will not join in in sufficient numbers to see OWS press urgent change.

I still believe that only a major financial collapse will drive the needed change. Until then, I expect the sheeple will stay rooted in front of their big screen TVs munching on McDonalds, and considering their next SUV purchase. Only when these things are lost will they move. That is my opinion, anyway. OWS will perhaps nudge away at the periphery and perhaps plant a seed of an awakening, but it will take a massive economic shock to awaken the masses.

Muck About
Muck About
November 16, 2011 5:58 pm

@LLPOH: Obviously, as a prime mover of the business sect, you are biased on the side of “no riots until there’s nothing left to loose” group.. I can understand why.

Look at OWS as a painful pimple on a corrupted elephants ass – an “innie” by the way – you know the kind that when you squeeze it, instead of popping out like a well behaved pimple instead makes a dive beneath the epidermis and chub, vanishing until you’re through screwing around with it – then it pops back up and hurts some more.

I have to say, I’m kind of proud of that simile. I hope OWS finds it useful in staying the course, popping up here and there, being a pain in the political ass and diving beneath the chub when shot at by bean bags and tear gas canisters, all the while Alt-Media spreading joy and pictures of those unfortunate enough to get whacked in the process.

I’m not as sure as you are that it has to go as far as “nothing left to lose”. There are a lot of younger people (unemployed) out there that are no considered “main stream” in the context of thee and I.

I’ll continue to support them in whatever feeble way I can, encouraging them to do their thing while guarding against injury to this old bod. A little tear gas I can handle but I’d hate like Hell to get smacked in the noggin and lose a nose and a pair of glasses to a bean bag. Or worse.

Have a great AZ evening..

MA

Muck About
Muck About
November 16, 2011 5:59 pm

(By the way – I spelled it “loose” to see if could jar Smokie out of hiding.)

MA

llpoh
llpoh
November 16, 2011 6:03 pm

Muck – the pimple analogy seems about right. They will be a nuisance. I just don’t see the pimple growing into melanoma until the financial system implodes in a big way. And I have no problem with doing a bit of protesting. Might consider it myself if I can remain safe, as you pointed out. I think I will try to miss the joy of teargas, though. That life-experience I will try to do without.

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
November 16, 2011 6:20 pm

Many Americans, from all political ideologies, including OWieS, are coming to understand that corruption, cronyism, lobbyism, in DC is the reason our republic is on the wrong track and that the same two party system that caused the mess cant possibly defuse the bomb they fabricated.

In that I agree with the OWieS.

Beyond that I dont have any real idea HOW they propose to do away with corruption or have seen what I consider a viable plan from the OWieS.

Taxing the 1% isnt, I say, workable. It will, IMO, raise government revenue that the politicians will only be too happy to spend from special projects to more military operations. Romney is already talking about big increases in military spending.

The OWieS remind me of a thing we called shotgun maintenance.Its where one takes a shotgun, aims it at the car, plane, boat etc, fires, and then says “replace everything that got hit” to fix a problem they havent been able to identify .

Muck About
Muck About
November 16, 2011 6:28 pm

@LLPOH: Consider the chance that the uncooperative pimple will eventually turn into a suppurating, festering, boil of significant size and disturbing continual pain that it may drive TPTB into rash over-reaction and significant backlash.. Time will tell. I give it 40/60 that it will, depending on who eventually gets involved. If some name brand troops get tangled up in it, I’d go 70/30 for a positive outcome.

If it goes to the point of nothing left to lose, then it’s 100/0 and run for the hills.

MA

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
November 16, 2011 6:36 pm

Kill Bill:

The cane.

I propose the cane.

A Real American
A Real American
November 16, 2011 6:49 pm

“Many Americans, from all political ideologies, including OWieS, are coming to understand that corruption, cronyism, lobbyism, in DC is the reason our republic is on the wrong track and that the same two party system that caused the mess cant possibly defuse the bomb they fabricated.”

Direct democracy, you lunk-heads. Some guy on here advocates it. People voting, controlling the proposition of legislation. Removal of politicians. Redo, reset, “of the people, by the people, for the people” in reality. Or, keep bitching and complaining. That’s all your good at anyway.

Dave
Dave
November 16, 2011 7:05 pm

AWD: Forget the apology, just get back in the shower with Jerry Sandusky and feel good about yourself.

Stucky
Stucky
November 16, 2011 7:20 pm

“Stuck – which side of the see-saw are you on? Seems to me you are struggling with this – first you post an article on one side, then the other. ” ———— llpoh

Ha! That’s because I have NOT made up my mind yet. Not enough data, and the data I have looked at changes too often.

At this point, the best I can do is say I like certain aspects of OWS, and also dislike others.

THE LIKES

1. Getting the message out that Wall Street is corrupt … the 1% … end the fed.

Hard to believe that people didn’t already know this. Whatever. OWS has brought the issue to the forefront, and that’s very, very good.

2. FOX, other neocons, and even CNN hates them.

I like anything these people hate. Kinda like, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

3. Their commitment and passion.

It takes a lot of both to sleep on a concrete slab, out in the open air, being deprived of even basic creature comforts ..

4) Civil Disobedience !!!!

I love that a lot. We need more of it. Eventually there will be a lot more. Fuck cops. Fuck mayors. Fuck their stupid made up rules. On the other hand, this is VERY mild pussified disobedience. C’mon! Refusing to disperse? Sleeping in the park? Pussies. Are there any Black Panthers out there they can consult? I mean the 60’s riots … now THAT was something!
.
.
The Dislikes

1) Organized chaos.

Their lack of structure, organization, demands, goals. They seem to represent everything to everybody. Some folks see this as a strength. I do not.

2) Bigger or More Involved Government

Keep number one above in mind, it does seem that their “solution” is basically more-of-the-same … only different. They want to throw the bums out … but replace them with better bums. If this is ultimately the OWS position then I will be wishy-washy no longer. I’ll be dead set against it. But or now, we shall wait and see.

Mary Malone
Mary Malone
November 16, 2011 7:22 pm

OWS crackdown in 18 cities a DHS/FBI coordinated move.?Washington’s Blog thinks so…

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/homeland-security-coordinated-18-city-police-crackdown-on-occupy-protest.html

Stucky
Stucky
November 16, 2011 7:25 pm

In a moment of brief clarity, Stucky realizes that Mary Malone does not read his posts or click on his links.

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
November 16, 2011 7:46 pm

Stuchenalzheimers:

[img]http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQBQrlLhGkF7e9H51fj7Jk2K8XNya4HmCYY90z6GrCpYrn6yqw4zBxrPziRxA[/img]

Novista
Novista
November 17, 2011 12:26 am

stuckie

I really liked that ANDREA PEYSER hit piece. It’s a great template, including the scatology and stereotypes, if you haven’t got the skill to write swill.

As for OWS … “Their lack of structure, organization, demands, goals.” Did you ever possibly consider that is their strength? Those four terms could generally describe the Democrat party, or Republican, or Wall St itself.

It’s not a political protest, it’s a social movement — and that is what flummoxes MSM. They can’t identify a leader to attack, so they find innumerable prototypes. They cannot understand anything that is not a hierarchy; that’s all they know, they work in them.

Of course, there is somewhat the example of (the original) Diogenes, wandering around with his lantern. No organization there. Demands? He made none. Goals? Sure. When someone finally asked what he was doing, he said, “Looking for an honest man.”

Sometimes less really is more.

Diogenes
Diogenes
November 17, 2011 10:39 am

Novista:

Exactly

“I know nothing, except the fact of my ignorance” Diogenes (the original)

Joe Motor
Joe Motor
November 18, 2011 2:21 am

Many inside the Occupy movement are supporting this new document “For the 99% – The New Common Sense” ? This is big on the internet and many inside the Occupy movement, as well as others are supporting this. Why is the mainstream media ignoring this ?

http://pastebin.com/gm2UV08D