QUOTES OF THE DAY

“The war in Syria has no clear national security connection to the United States and victory by either side will not necessarily bring in to power people friendly to the United States.”

Rand Paul

“If Barack Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has ensured – for the very first time in history – that the United States will be on the same side as al-Qa’ida.”

Robert Fisk

“So what, we’re about to become al-Qaeda’s air force now?”

Dennis Kucinich

“The sole beneficiary of this apparent use of poison gas against civilians in rebel-held territory appears to be the rebels, who have long sought to have us  come in and fight their war.”

Pat Buchanan

“The president has no constitutional authority … to take this nation to war … unless we’re attacked or unless there is proof we are about to be attacked. And if he does, if he does, I would move to impeach him.”

Joe Biden – 2007

“The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”

Barack Obama – 2007

“Starting this fire will be like a spark in a large store of gunpowder, with unclear and unspecified outcomes and consequences”

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
taxSlave
taxSlave
August 31, 2013 9:54 am

Robert Fisk is wrong. The US government created al-Qa’ida.

Stucky
Stucky
August 31, 2013 9:54 am

Kerry and his fuktard Dem friends reamed Bush a new asshole for starting the Afgahn war unilaterally … when the fact of the matter is lots of countries supported the war effort.

But now Ketchupboy and Oreo are almost literally acting alone (I think only the Frenchfrogs are all in)!!!

Piece of shit lying hyporcritical dickcunts, every one. It gets tiring repeating that.

AWD
AWD
August 31, 2013 10:26 am

Obama, like Bush, is carrying out the wishes of the Saudis.

“The party that stands to benefit the most is Saudi Arabia, and they won’t even be doing any of the fighting. They have been pouring billions of dollars into the conflict in Syria, but so far they have not been successful in their attempts to overthrow the Assad regime. Now the Saudis are trying to play their trump card – the U.S. military. If the Saudis are successful, they will get to pit the two greatest long-term strategic enemies of Sunni Islam against each other – the U.S. and Israel on one side and Shia Islam on the other. In such a scenario, the more damage that both sides do to each other the happier the Sunnis will be.

There would be other winners from a U.S. war with Syria as well. For example, it is well-known that Qatar wants to run a natural gas pipeline out of the Persian Gulf, through Syria and into Europe. That is why Qatar has also been pouring billions of dollars into the civil war in Syria.

So if it is really Saudi Arabia and Qatar that want to overthrow the Assad regime, why does the United States have to do the fighting?

Someone should ask Barack Obama why it is necessary for the U.S. military to do the dirty work of his Sunni Muslim friends.”

AWD
AWD
August 31, 2013 10:29 am

[imgcomment image[/img]
[imgcomment image[/img]