WILL THE POLICE STATE GROW IN 2014?

Will 2014 be the tipping point? Will more Edward Snowdens appear and keep the fight against the police state going? Will the police state go too far and finally meet with significant and broad resistance? Will the regeneracy of this 4th Turning be the people versus the police state? Time will tell.

Life in the Emerging American Police State: What’s in Store for Our Freedoms in 2014?

Police State

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
—George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Vol. 1

In Harold Ramis’ classic 1993 comedy Groundhog Day, TV weatherman Phil Connors (played by Bill Murray) is forced to live the same day over and over again until he not only gains some insight into his life but changes his priorities. Similarly, as I illustrate in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, we in the emerging American police state find ourselves reliving the same set of circumstances over and over again—egregious surveillance, strip searches, police shootings of unarmed citizens, government spying, the criminalization of lawful activities, warmongering, etc.—although with far fewer moments of comic hilarity.

What remains to be seen is whether 2014 will bring more of the same or whether “we the people” will wake up from our somnambulant states. Indeed, when it comes to civil liberties and freedom, 2013 was far from a banner year. The following is just a sampling of what we can look forward to repeating if we don’t find some way to push back against the menace of an overreaching, aggressive, invasive, militarized government and restore our freedoms.

Government spying. It’s hard to understand how anyone could be surprised by the news that the National Security Agency has been systematically collecting information on all telephone calls placed in the United States, and yet the news media have treated it as a complete revelation. Nevertheless, such outlandish government spying been going on domestically since the 1970s, when Senator Frank Church (D-Ida.), who served as the chairman of the Select Committee on Intelligence that investigated the NSA’s breaches, warned the public against allowing the government to overstep its authority in the name of national security. Church recognized that such surveillance powers “at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide.” Recent reports indicate that the NSA, in conjunction with the CIA and FBI, has actually gone so far as to intercept laptop computers ordered online in order to install spyware on them.

Militarized police. With almost 13,000 agencies in all 50 states and four U.S. territories participating in a military “recycling” program, community police forces across the country continue to be transformed into outposts of the military, with police agencies acquiring military-grade hardware—tanks, weaponry, and other equipment designed for the battlefield—in droves. Keep in mind that once acquired, this military equipment, which is beyond the budget and scope of most communities, finds itself put to all manner of uses by local law enforcement agencies under the rationale that “if we have it, we might as well use it”—the same rationale, by the way, used with deadly results to justify assigning SWAT teams to carry out routine law enforcement work such as delivering a warrant.

Police shootings of unarmed citizens. Owing in large part to the militarization of local law enforcement agencies, not a week goes by without more reports of hair-raising incidents by police imbued with a take-no-prisoners attitude and a battlefield approach to the communities in which they serve. Sadly, it is no longer unusual to hear about incidents in which police shoot unarmed individuals first and ask questions later, such as the 16-year-old teenager who skipped school only to be shot by police after they mistook him for a fleeing burglar. Then there was the unarmed black man in Texas “who was pursued and shot in the back of the neck by Austin Police… after failing to properly identify himself and leaving the scene of an unrelated incident.” And who could forget the 19-year-old Seattle woman who was accidentally shot in the leg by police after she refused to show her hands? The lesson to be learned: this is what happens when you take a young man (or woman), raise him on a diet of violence, hype him up on the power of the gun in his holster and the superiority of his uniform, render him woefully ignorant of how to handle a situation without resorting to violence, train him well in military tactics but allow him to be illiterate about the Constitution, and never stress to him that he is to be a peacemaker and a peacekeeper, respectful of and subservient to the taxpayers, who are in fact his masters and employers.

The erosion of private property. If the government can tell you what you can and cannot do within the privacy of your home, whether it relates to what you eat or what you smoke, you no longer have any rights whatsoever within your home. If government officials can fine and arrest you for growing vegetables in your front yard, praying with friends in your living room, installing solar panels on your roof, and raising chickens in your backyard, you’re no longer the owner of your property. If school officials can punish your children for what they do or say while at home or in your care, your children are not your own—they are the property of the state. If government agents can invade your home, break down your doors, kill your dog, damage your furnishings and terrorize your family, your property is no longer private and secure—it belongs to the government. Likewise, if police can forcefully draw your blood, strip search you, and probe you intimately, your body is no longer your own, either. This is what a world without the Fourth Amendment looks like, where the lines between private and public property have been so blurred that private property is reduced to little more than something the government can use to control, manipulate and harass you to suit its own purposes, and you the homeowner and citizen have been reduced to little more than a tenant or serf in bondage to an inflexible landlord.

Strip searches and the loss of bodily integrity. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was intended to protect the citizenry from being subjected to “unreasonable searches and seizures” by government agents. While the literal purpose of the amendment is to protect our property and our bodies from unwarranted government intrusion, the moral intention behind it is to protect our human dignity. Unfortunately, court rulings undermining the Fourth Amendment and justifying invasive strip searches have left us powerless against police empowered to forcefully draw our blood, strip search us, and probe us intimately. For example, during a routine traffic stop, Leila Tarantino was allegedly subjected to two roadside strip searches in plain view of passing traffic, while her two children—ages 1 and 4—waited inside her car. During the second strip search, presumably in an effort to ferret out drugs, a female officer “forcibly removed” a tampon from Tarantino. No contraband or anything illegal was found.

Invasion of the drones. As corporations and government agencies alike prepare for their part in the coming drone invasion—it is expected that at least 30,000 drones will occupy U.S. airspace by 2020, ushering in a $30 billion per year industry—it won’t be long before Americans discover first-hand that drones—unmanned aerial vehicles—come in all shapes and sizes, from nano-sized drones as small as a grain of sand that can do everything from conducting surveillance to detonating explosive charges, to middle-sized copter drones that can deliver pizzas to massive “hunter/killer” Predator warships that unleash firepower from on high. Police in California have already begun using Qube drones, which are capable of hovering for 40 minutes at heights of about 400 ft. to conduct surveillance on targets as far as 1 kilometer away. Michael Downing, the LAPD deputy chief for counter-terrorism and special operations, envisions drones being flown over large-scale media events such as the Oscars, using them to surveil political protests, and flying them through buildings to track criminal suspects.

Criminalizing childish behavior. It wouldn’t be a week in America without another slew of children being punished for childish behavior under the regime of zero tolerance which plagues our nation’s schools. Some of the most egregious: the 9-year-old boy suspended for allegedly pointing a toy at a classmate and saying “bang, bang”; two 6-year-old students in Maryland suspended for using their fingers as imaginary guns in a schoolyard game of cops and robbers; the ten-year-old Pennsylvania boy suspended for shooting an imaginary “arrow” at a fellow classmate, using nothing more than his hands and his imagination; the six-year-old Colorado boy suspended and accused of sexual harassment for kissing the hand of a girl in his class whom he had a crush on; and the two seventh graders in Virginia suspended for the rest of the school year for playing with airsoft guns in their own yard before school.

Common Core. There are several methods for controlling a population. You can intimidate the citizenry into obedience through force, relying on military strength and weaponry such as SWAT team raids, militarized police, and a vast array of lethal and nonlethal weapons. You can manipulate them into marching in lockstep with your dictates through the use of propaganda and carefully timed fear tactics about threats to their safety, whether through the phantom menace of terrorist attacks or shooting sprees by solitary gunmen.  Or you can indoctrinate them into compliance from an early age through the schools, discouraging them from thinking for themselves while rewarding them for regurgitating whatever the government, through its so-called educational standards, dictates they should be taught. When viewed in light of the government’s ongoing attempts to amass power at great cost to Americans—in terms of free speech rights, privacy, due process, etc.—the debate over Common Core State Standards, which would transform and nationalize school curriculum from kindergarten through 12th grade, becomes that much more critical. These standards, which were developed through a partnership between big government and corporations and are being rolled out in 45 states and the District of Columbia, will create a generation of test-takers capable of little else, molded and shaped by the federal government and its corporate allies into what it considers to be ideal citizens.

The corporate takeover of America. The corporate buyout of the American political bureaucracy is taking place at every level of government, from the White House all the way to the various governors’ mansions, and even local city councils. With Big Business and Big Government having fused into a corporate state, the president and his state counterparts—the governors, have become little more than CEOs of the Corporate State, which day by day is assuming more government control over our lives. The average American has no access to his or her representatives at any but the lowest level of government, and even then it’s questionable how much really gets through. Never before have average Americans had so little say in the workings of their government and even less access to their so-called representatives. Yet one of the key ingredients in maintaining democratic government is the right of citizens to freely speak their minds to those who represent them. In fact, it is one of the few effective tools we have left to combat government corruption and demand accountability. But now, even that right is being chipped away by laws and court rulings that weaken our ability to speak freely to the politicians who govern us.

James Madison, the father of the Constitution, put it best: “Take alarm,” he warned, “at the first experiment with liberties.” Anyone with even a casual knowledge about current events knows that the first experiment on our freedoms happened long ago. Worse, we have not heeded the warnings of Madison and those like him who understood that if you give the government an inch, they will take a mile. Unfortunately, the government has not only taken a mile, they have taken mile after mile after mile after mile with seemingly no end in sight for their power grabs.

If you’re in the business of making New Year’s resolutions, why not resolve that 2014 will be the year we break the cycle of tyranny and get back on the road to freedom. As I’ve said before, it’s time for a second American revolution.

Reprinted from Rutherford Institute.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
NickelthroweR
NickelthroweR
January 1, 2014 6:33 pm

I’m not a big fan of trend predictions of gloom. Perhaps I’m somewhat of an optimist but that big and bad police state requires an incredible tax base in order to function. Last time I checked, those in power have done everything imaginable to drive as many as possible into the underground economy. The taxes required to fund all of this is simply going away as our largest cities race towards bankruptcy.

I also suspect that the trend towards 3d printing and in home small scale manufacturing means that we’ll be able to develop counter-measures faster than the state/corporate behemoths. They can’t shut the internet down without shutting themselves down and that means that we’ll network and improvise faster than they can.

This “trend” is already beginning as Congress has approval ratings in the single digits. This trend is already beginning as the number of American that turn to the main stream media for their news has simply hit rock bottom. We have 320 Million Americans and CNN often has fewer than 40,000 viewers. The trend is already beginning as Americans bought enough firearms this year to arm the 15 largest armies in the world – all of ’em. The trend is already beginning as you can talk to people about prepping and not appear as a crazy person.

These police state measures are simply acts of desperation that do nothing but infuriate the population even more.

Llpoh
Llpoh
January 1, 2014 7:51 pm

Nickelthrower – police can self-fund except in really poverty stricken areas.

All the govt has to do is pass a few more laws that have fines as penalties – spitting on sidewalks, speeding, reduce or eliminate legal parking spaces, mandate lawns be below 2 inches, etc.

Collect fines, and harass the public. Of course the police state will grow.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
January 1, 2014 8:28 pm

Obviously “something” is out of balance with our society in general, when about any “topic” is followed by the word “crisis”. Everything cited in your piece is a cause or result of the same in-balance.
Question is, what do we clear-thinking hillbillies do to solve it?

TeresaE
TeresaE
January 2, 2014 10:12 am

The holidays are a time where I get together with a variety of flavors of our “middle class.”

At Wigalia, I was surrounded by a personal cloud of sadness and it took me a while to figure out why.

Quick background, Wigalia celebration is the Christmas Eve celebration for my Polish in-laws.

His family has more busine ss owners than the average family, but still contains a breadth of financial, and social, backgrounds.

We have two teachers, one full, one part-time sub, both union-dues paying – one pays but receives nothing for it, part-time no longer get any of the perks

One GM accountant, actual employee, not contract

One employee for a mid-sized foreign owned auto supplier, travels the world, is also gay

Eight small biz, or self-employed, a group which contains one retired Vietnam vet,but still working part-time on his own biz. Two are government contractors (one with 15 employees), one realtor. The remaining own businesses with employees.

One state retiree.

Also included: one construction worker, one whom works in “rehabilitation” for insurance and government.

When the subject came up about the NSA and militarized police, I was the ONLY one whom didn’t believe that “if you are doing nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about, it keeps our children and country safe.”

This family cannot be the only one so entrenched, and clueless.

There ain’t no “fixing” this. It has gone on too long, is too entrenched, too much power was allowed to congregate, too much bullshit has become accepted as “fact” (bullshit stats about importance of police, drug use, or prostitution come to mind, same problem our health knowledge suffers from).

The “fix” is going to mean a revision to the third world, probably a brutal one.

Yes, Nickle, the funding will run out, I just don’t know how you could possibly believe that would mean the cops have to shut down.

THEY will control all the food, weapons, roads, hospitals, etc.

THEY, and their families, will eat, THEY, will have first access to any available energy/fuel, THEY will be the first entitled to medicine. THEY will continue to show up for work and kill or harass us citizens even if there is no more money left in paychecks.

The “rich” (or he whom holds the most important things, like water, food, insulin), will still pay them even after the well of taxpayers has dried up.

This is the way of man, and this world. Those that enlist and vigorously defend the power structure and status quo are fed and clothed and treated better than the rest. All the way until the day new management takes over. Then many just change their shirts and caps and go right on doing the same thing for the new team. Bank on it.

The Bible says that God warned us about asking to be governed by institutions of man. Sadly, most Christians are completely unable to see what he was warning us of, even as we are forced to live it everyday.

Better luck in the next life. Maybe there we listen to god’s words and self-rule, instead of abdicating the responsibility to men whom quickly become entrenched, egotistical, greedy, and corrupted.

Stucky
Stucky
January 2, 2014 10:33 am

I saw on Druge a couple days ago that 40,000 (forty fucking thousand) new laws were passed last year … State and Federal.

Each and every new law carries penalties of either fines or prison.

So, duh! Every year in ‘murika becomes more and more repressive.

BUCKHED
BUCKHED
January 2, 2014 1:15 pm

“If government officials can fine and arrest you for growing vegetables in your front yard, praying with friends in your living room, installing solar panels on your roof, and raising chickens in your backyard, you’re no longer the owner of your property.”

FUCK…you NEVER own your property…the gooberment has a permanent lien in the form of property taxes

. My farm was paid for 1947…in cash by my grandmother….67 years later I’m still paying property taxes on it. If I stop they’ll sell it at auction…in a heartbeat…not for the “fair market value ” but taxes owed on it.

So please spare me with the BULLSHIT about owning your own home.

Wyoming Mike
Wyoming Mike
January 2, 2014 2:31 pm

[imgcomment image[/img]

BUCKHED
BUCKHED
January 3, 2014 12:46 pm

W Mike…I worked on the MRAP’s and MATV’s…..5 bucks worth of bullets makes it an inoperable piece of crap.

Thinker
Thinker
January 7, 2014 9:39 pm

Voluntary Government Checkpoints Spark Backlash

Checkpoints, which the government insists are voluntary, are creating a backlash because of the presence of uniformed police officers. Some police departments won’t participate anymore.

A tactic used by the federal government to gather information for anti-drunken and drugged driving programs is coming under criticism in cities around the country, and some local police agencies say they will no longer take part.

The tactic involves a subcontractor for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that uses off-duty but uniformed police at voluntary roadside checkpoints where motorists are asked on their behavior behind the wheel. In some cases, workers at the checkpoints collect blood and saliva samples, in addition to breath samples. NHTSA has said previously that the surveys do not collect any DNA. Drivers are not charged at the checkpoints.

In an era of rampant distrust of the federal government and in the wake of the Obama administration’s National Security Agency surveillance scandal in which the agency has collected telephone calling records from millions of unsuspecting Americans, the checkpoints have come under intense criticism in several cities this year.

“Five years ago it would have been a different story,” says St. Charles County, Mo., Sheriff Tom Neer, who recently authorized deputies to participate in a checkpoint in his St. Louis suburb and saw a public backlash. “There’re just such strong anti-government feelings among people. Under the circumstances, I would not allow them to do it again. It’s just because of the perception.”

The NHTSA has conducted the surveys for more than 40 years, in cities across the USA and usually at roughly 10-year intervals. In many cases, off-duty, uniformed police officers randomly wave motorists over; they are then asked by workers for subcontractor Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation if they will participate in the voluntary survey. Drivers who decline are allowed to leave.

However, the mere presence of uniformed officers gives the checkpoints an aura of authority, says Mary Catherine Roper, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania. She is studying the issue there after motorists complained about a survey checkpoint last month in Reading.

“We have a whole bunch of rules about when police can pull you over,” she says. “It looks like an exercise of official authority when a cop pulls you over. People assume it’s mandatory, and of course you’re going to stop. That’s a constitutional problem right there.

“Normally, police cannot pull you over unless they have a good reason for thinking you’ve done something wrong,” Roper says. “There’s no exemption to the Constitution for conducting a survey. They’re pulling people off the road.”

She suggests “there are lots of other places you can talk to drivers. You could hand out notes at a toll booth asking them to participate. You could do them at highway rest stops. There are a lot of ways to do this that do not involve … the government forcing you off the road.”

This year’s round of surveys is only the second time that data have been obtained on drug use by drivers.

In an e-mailed statement, NHTSA defended the surveys: “Each year, close to 10,000 people die in drunk driving crashes: 27 people a day, or one person every 53 minutes, according to data (from NHTSA),” the statement says.

“To better understand the issue, the agency has regularly conducted its National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drugged Driving in communities across the country for over 40 years,” according to the statement. “The survey provides useful data about alcohol and drug use by drivers, and participation is completely voluntary and anonymous. More than 60 communities across the country will participate this year, many of which participated in the previous survey in 2007. NHTSA always works closely with state and local safety officials and local law enforcement to conduct these surveys as we work to better inform our efforts to reduce drunk and drugged driving.”

Drivers have reportedly been offered $10 for cheek swabs and $50 for blood.

The checkpoints spurred complaints in November from drivers in the Fort Worth area. Fort Worth Police Chief Jeffrey Halstead apologized for his officers’ participation on the department’s Facebook page. He added: “Any future Federal survey of this nature, which jeopardizes the public’s trust, will not be approved for the use of Fort Worth police.”

And in June, Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley, a Republican, said the stops were “bad timing” after drivers complained about checkpoints in St. Clair County and Bibb County, both near Birmingham. State officials investigated and found that motorists didn’t report “undue pressure” to participate, but suggested to Bentley that state police refrain from helping with future studies.

Neer said six of his off-duty, uniformed officers were “duped” into moonlighting at the checkpoints. “Our department coordinator got information from the subcontractor, and came to me,” Neer says. “I approve all overtime compliance with private entities. They wanted to know if we’d provide a couple of deputies just for security.”

At the Dec. 6 and 7 checkpoints, uniformed deputies in marked cruisers flagged down motorists and showed them to a marked area alongside the road where a NHTSA subcontractor asked if they wanted to participate in the survey. Those who declined were allowed to leave, Neer says.

He says he had not expected the deputies to actively participate, but only to provide security.

Pacific Research could not be reached for comment.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/06/government-checkpoints-driving/4265633/