THE POLICE WILL GO DOOR TO DOOR TO CONFISCATE YOUR GUNS WHEN ORDERED

47 comments

Posted on 5th March 2014 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , ,

This douchebag doesn’t want to discuss the U.S. Constitution. He will do whatever his superiors order him to do. He will kick in your door and TRY to take your guns. Watertown was the beginning. Know your enemy.

CT State Police Spokesman Lt. J. Paul Vance

CT State Police Spokesman Lt. J. Paul Vance says state police will go door to door confiscating guns if they are ordered.

AmmoLand Gun News

AmmoLand Gun News

Manasquan, NJ --(Ammoland.com)- The State of Connecticut says that all citizens must register rifles and high capacity magazines, or be charged will a felony. As many as 350,000 people could face heavily armed police smashing down their doors and be charged with a felony.

The legislature of Connecticut says that a registration is needed so they can know where the guns are. Yet at the same time, they are sending threatening letters to gun owners. So they already have records of who has purchased certain guns. The fact is, that the Connecticut legislature fully intends to confiscate hundreds of thousands of firearms anyway. The registration process will simply make it easier to confiscate, because you acknowledge that you still own a firearm that the state already suspects that you own.

In a recorded phone call Connecticut State Police Spokesman Lt. Vance was reached at at (860) 685-8290 and says that state police would comply with an order from the state to conduct door to door gun confiscations.

Experts claim that as many as 350,000 people are in violation of the law, and over 100,000 of those people could face felony charges. That means over 3.6% of the entire adult population of Connecticut has been transformed into a felon by the new registration law. Roughly one in twenty Connecticut homes could have their doors smashed in by heavily armed law enforcement seeking to confiscate firearms.

Read more: http://www.ammoland.com/2014/02/ct-state-police-would-participate-in-gun-confiscations/#ixzz2v63gSTNe

Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

47 Comments
  1. sensetti says:

    Democratic politics at its finest. Republicans want you to keep your guns.

    Is there a difference between the two parties, without a doubt.

    5th March 2014 at 9:26 am

  2. overthecliff says:

    Remember who your enemies are. Make a list and check it twice. Know who is naughty and nice. Wait for Santa Claus to come to town.

    If people are afraid to work for the progressives, they can`t be slave masters.

    5th March 2014 at 9:32 am

  3. juicebox says:

    I have to wonder how many people would fight it if they came to their door for their guns
    I wonder how many people fighting it that it would take before they stopped
    how fast would the national guard be called out?

    5th March 2014 at 9:37 am

  4. Bostonbob says:

    This is how it begins.
    Bob.

    5th March 2014 at 9:38 am

  5. overthecliff says:

    Don`t fight the police. You will loose. Get even or maybe revenge.

    5th March 2014 at 9:39 am

  6. surgeongeneralchaos says:

    I’m no dentist, but I’d knock someones teeth down their throat if they showed up at my crib trying to confiscate anything.

    5th March 2014 at 9:39 am

  7. chuckitfurther says:

    ditto

    5th March 2014 at 9:40 am

  8. ragman says:

    So,350,000 lawful gun owners will be overrun by about 500 state Gestapo? And all of these gun owners posess at least one AR15 style rifle, mags and ammo? Is there something wrong with this picture?

    5th March 2014 at 9:53 am

  9. harry p. says:

    i actually had this recording forwarded to me on monday and listened to it and was disgusted, he accuses her of being un-America? Fascist pigfuk. but i decided not to post it and try to do less projecting of my hate for copfuks, every here adn everyone i know 100% knows my position, time to take a break from beating that pile of pulverized horse. also why i posted the non-copfuk LEO video yesterday. if i created a post for every copfuk incident that comes across my eyes I wouldn’t have time to sleep.

    there are a lot of weekend commando and guys who love to talk tough and think about a modern “hot” civil war.
    there are a lot of people that hate big govt and see the intrusions as major inconveniences and begrudgingly accept them.
    But this subject for many is their “line in the sand” and is truly non-negotiable.

    bullets-first.jpg

    many think the majority will line up but from the guesstimates in CT 10-15% complied with the law and turned in/registered as their owners dictated. that’s the type of support that makes prohibition of anything DOA.

    the caller was obviously fishing but the questions she was asking are the uncomfortable but necessary questions everyone should be asking of their govt officials and LEO’s and deciding for themselves how they will respond if/when the time arrives and prepare accordingly.

    that-escalated-quickly.png
    this is how revolutions start.

    5th March 2014 at 10:00 am

  10. harry p. says:

    ragman,
    it isn’t the 500 or so gestapo troopers that are the worry, it’s when reinforcements are provided by the Feddies. we all know if there was a skirmish between CT copfuks and people not allowing their firearms to be confiscated, a state of emergency would be declared, Obama would provide teh necessary support to maintain “law and order”. imagine a ruby ridge or branch davidian situation.
    i also suspect the vast majority of Rethuglican leadership would advocate appeasement, for people to submit and then go through the court system.

    they-shot-them.jpg

    5th March 2014 at 10:07 am

  11. Maddie's Mom says:

    The police are your friends.

    They are there to protect and rescue you.

    This should help…..

    It’s come all the way from Iraq and Afghanistan, and is new for northeastern Oklahoma. A mine-resistant armored personnel carrier is the latest tool for Bartlesville police. It’s a $700,000 gift from a state program that repurposes military vehicles for local law enforcement.

    “We want to rescue us, as well as the citizens; keep everybody safe. And if we can do it on Uncle Sam’s dime, it’s even better,” said Detective Nathan Mellen with the Bartlesville Police.

    Bixby police also received a similar vehicle.

    http://www.newson6.com/story/24887891/armored-vehicle-makes-its-way-to-bartlesville-police

    I wonder where Det. Mellen thinks Uncle Sam gets his dimes? lmao

    What does “We want to rescue us” mean, exactly? And why did that come before “as well as the citizens”? ;)

    5th March 2014 at 10:11 am

  12. Hollow man says:

    We don’t have enough people in prison yet. Now they can add a hundred thousand or so in one reach around the state.

    5th March 2014 at 11:01 am

  13. Stucky says:

    “So,350,000 lawful gun owners will be overrun by about 500 state Gestapo?” —– ragman

    The 350,000 are widely dispersed. A few copfuks — 2,3, or 4 — show up at your door, hands on their guns, “Surrender your weapons!!” —– watchya gonna do? The 350k are of no use to you.

    Lt Vance doesn’t want to talk about the Constitution. Doesn’t care. He simply follows orders …. ANY orders. And he believes he is the “master”. It would be nice, wonderful, an act approved by god .. if some patriot citizen would blow that fascistFuk’s face off, but that’s unlikely to happen. The sheep are scared.

    I don’t condone or partake in violence but I celebrate it when evil bastards are separated from their heads.

    5th March 2014 at 11:21 am

  14. Zarathustra says:

    What the fuck does Law Enforcement have to do with the Constitution?

    You people are crazy.

    5th March 2014 at 11:38 am

  15. Stucky says:

    “What the fuck does Law Enforcement have to do with the Constitution?” —– Zarathustra

    Quit jerking off to naked Palestinian women and BUY A FUCKING CLUE, dumbass.

    fourth-amendment-graphic-1.jpg?w=535&h=401

    5th March 2014 at 12:09 pm

  16. flash says:

    Collectively cops have proven themselves reckless and stupid to stupid to be allowed to carry guns.

    5th March 2014 at 12:37 pm

  17. flash says:

    A nation afflicted with kudzu stupid….posted on wrong thread….shoulda’ went here.

    There is absolutely no way to defeat the stupid outside of partitioning the states into red or blue states via force if necessary….other than this drastic division ,freedom loving Americans can kiss their individual liberties goodbye….forever.
    Just like any cancer, collectivism/stupid has to be surgically removed if the host is to survive long term.

    MILLER: Huge majorities on East Coast support national gun registry
    New poll of voters in Virginia, New York and New Jersey
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/4/huge-majorities-on-east-coast-support-national-gun/

    5th March 2014 at 12:51 pm

  18. BUCKHED says:

    juicebox….how fast..Hmmm….I know how fast I’d do it.

    Until folks are welling to sacrifice everything they have ,they’ll sheepishly go along. When a man is willing to make the ultimate sacrifice which includes his family then the powers that be will need to be very afraid .

    5th March 2014 at 1:19 pm

  19. Persnickety says:

    Ragman gets today’s prize. I really don’t see this happening past day 1…

    Oh, and the thing about armored vehicles and such… you can’t actually live in them for any length of time, nor can you do anything even remotely resembling policing. There’s a reason why the infantry still exists, and it’s not for lack of APCs.

    All in all, just a sign that collective stupid is on the rise. I simply wish that the fascist slime on the east coast would get their totalitarian nazi dream (nightmare) and leave the rest of us out of it. Those of you on the east coast who don’t think of yourselves as fascist slime, now would be a good time to move.

    5th March 2014 at 1:42 pm

  20. sensetti says:

    WTF? Are there Republicans out there wanting to take your guns away? Most of the Time the NRA backs Republican candidates although not always, there are a few dims who are pro gun but very few.

    Although the NRA’s agenda usually aligns with that of the GOP, the powerful group also adheres to what it calls “an incumbent-friendly” policy: If an incumbent and a challenger candidate have equally strong records protecting gun rights, the incumbent gets the endorsement, regardless of party.
    The result: Of the 20 most endangered incumbent House Democrats in the country – based on race ratings by The Washington Post’s “The Fix” – 14 have received the endorsement of the NRA’s Political Victory Fund.

    5th March 2014 at 1:51 pm

  21. Rise Up says:

    @flash, you should realize that polls can be worded to produce the outcome desired by the pollster/poll. Also you left this out of your mention of the referenced link/article:

    “NRA Spokesman Andrew Arulanandam pointed out that the poll appears skewed.

    “Given the exceptionally high numbers of support for President Obama and Hillary Clinton in this poll, it isn’t surprising that there would be high numbers of support for draconian gun control proposals,” he told me.

    The poll does seem skewed with too many liberals and Democrats. None of the colleges said they asked party affiliation of the respondents.”

    5th March 2014 at 2:34 pm

  22. harry p. says:

    sensetti,
    Back in the day they wanted to limit ownership and set up roadblocks, the NRA supported the National Firearms Act and Gun Control Act of ’68.
    Much of their lobbying work early on supporting gun control eroded the right to keep and bear arms while increasing govt power over firearms, and the 2nd amendment still hasn’t recovered., it is only in the last 40-50 years that they have become drastically more libertarian and they still have a long ways to go.
    i prefer the GOA and don’t trust the NRA at all.

    5th March 2014 at 2:44 pm

  23. bb says:

    These progressives think they are morally and intellectually superior to you so by grabbing your guns they are doing society a favor.They really think they are good ,noble and Fair .Gun owners are evil , hateful and have low intelligence.That’s why there can not be any reconciling with these people.They are the enemy of you ,constitution ,nation and what freedoms we have left.

    5th March 2014 at 3:01 pm

  24. ragman says:

    Stucky: If 3 or 4 show up at your door you had better have a plan. Either give in and possibly be killed along with your family or say “NO” and quite possibly be killed after taking a few of them out first. I absolutely don’t want to see this but the state of CT has passed an Un Constitutional law and people are defiant. This fucker Vance needs to be the first to go!

    5th March 2014 at 3:32 pm

  25. Persnickety says:

    @ragman: if any door-to-door starts, only fools will stay at home.

    Also, meant to mention earlier, I am 100.000% unsurprised that the state police spokesman is going on record stating that the police will do whatever they are told to do. Shocked! Shocked I say! The real question is what those police will actually do if given such an order.

    5th March 2014 at 3:39 pm

  26. harry p. says:

    persnickety,
    that is a good point, if 85% of the people refused to register and only 1% of the remaining 85% plan on going down like Butch and Sundance that is still in teh neighborhood of 3-4 thousand people.
    the copfuks will truly be in danger under those circumstances and we all know they hold “officer safety” above all else.

    Lance in particular is a piece of shit though, he did quite a bit of grandstanding after sandy hook.

    5th March 2014 at 3:49 pm

  27. Thinker says:

    In all reality, someone will file a lawsuit contesting the Constitutionality of the law before the cops start beating on any doors, effectively stopping them until it’s determined to be legal, or not. We’d finally find out how the “well-regulated” part of the 2nd Amendment is going to be interpreted in this brave, new world.

    But yes, if the cops do start breaking down doors and people take a stand against them, I daresay it would take just a few LEO deaths before remaining LEO choose not to enforce the law, troops are called in, or the law is repealed out of recognition of its sheer stupidity.

    5th March 2014 at 4:46 pm

  28. Frenchie says:

    do like in any other country that face this kind of problem:
    buy some shitstains piece of guns that you will declare and give to the cops if needed, and prepare to bury your most valuable items in sealed containers.
    choose some shit guns or carbines that shoot the same kind of rounds than the ones you intend to keep. so you can continue buying ammos without triggering the red light.
    don’t use your credit card and buy with cash
    don’t park the car next to the gunsmith (well known from the Frenchs that buy in Switzerland)
    make your rounds yourself
    keep just an anonymous 12 ga for home, so even if they find it, it won’t be jail as if they found a badass AR.

    as for armored vehicules, Ukrainians just showed how to deal with it.

    Obummer is from the same international socialist team as our SOB in chief hollande.
    DON’T underestimate their will to destroy your liberties. maybe you will discover that Sandy Hook was a false flag decades from now. the shootings will repeat until guns are forbiden, expect it.

    situation fucked-fucking solutions

    5th March 2014 at 4:58 pm

  29. Punk in Drublic says:

    They would have to do it to every house all at once. Or shut down all communications. The first person to get raided would call/tweet/email/post on TBP/ send out smoke signals….. to anyone and everyone. A trash bag, roll of duct tape and 2 minutes: I could hide my hunting rifle so no one would find it. I can think of about 10,000 places to stash it.

    “Give us your guns!”

    “Uh… It was stolen…”

    “Search the place!”

    When the internet goes dark, that will be your cue.

    5th March 2014 at 5:04 pm

  30. AWD says:

    Good luck with that, fucking Yankees. Let’s see ‘em try that shit down here below the Mason Dixon line.

    obama-out-control-battaile-politics-1367382832.jpg

    the_experts_agree_gun_control_works.jpg

    5th March 2014 at 5:08 pm

  31. AWD says:

    I’ve heard it remarked that the American Civil War (War for Southern Independence, War of Northern Aggression, etc.) never really ended; we’re just at half time. In line with this sentiment, I’m more and more of the belief that no war ever truly ends; it just quiets down for a spell. And, like nausea, it comes in waves.

    Marx and Engles articulated, and Trotsky championed, the idea of a “permanent revolution”—a ceaseless campaign of all against all to achieve Communism’s grand objectives (i.e., the destruction of Capitalism and the imposition of the “dictatorship of the proletariat”). Like most things Marxist, the only novelty in the thought is its Utopian insanity; the core idea—permanent revolution by the commoners—was something already established by our own founders.

    Our “Revolutionary War” was what gave revolutions a good name (for it was not only morally just, but also triumphant). Because of this, it is easy to be lulled into a false sense of security that the issue was resolutely decided upon. Freedom rules! Yeah!

    Of course, we’d be fools to believe this.

    Our founders, having fought a literal war for individual liberty, understood clearly that the struggle for liberty doesn’t end when the treaty is signed. The rapacious hunger for total power is endemic to the human condition, and thus the endeavor for freedom is a permanent revolution.

    In the words of Thomas Jefferson, “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.”

    Or, in the words of Benjamin Franklin, “A Republic, ma’am…if you can keep it.”

    To keep our Republic requires eternal vigilance. And when that vigilance yields a whiff of tyranny? Well, then, a little rebellion now and then is a good thing.

    In the situation we find ourselves in today, we are getting far more than a whiff of tyranny. The entire nation reeks of it. And so patriots are not looking at a “little” rebellion, but a full-on resurfacing of a hot war for independence unlike anything seen in this nation since 1861.

    All [hot] wars have their flashpoints—their North Bridges, their Fort Sumters, their assassinations of archdukes. If our nation’s struggle to regain its independence from enemies domestic—from opulent totalitarians in all levels of government hell-bent on making serfs of us all—does go hot, my guess is that flashpoint will be somewhere in Connecticut…the “Constitution State”.

    I’d suggest anyone not familiar with what’s happening in Connecticut familiarize himself with the situation pronto. And those boned up on the subject, I look forward to your perspective. Am I off my rocker, or is there a serious potential for the first domino to fall here?

    Read more at http://angrywhitedude.com/2014/03/flashpoint-connecticut/#rhJfTGYckkTkdjM1.99

    5th March 2014 at 5:11 pm

  32. AWD says:

    03f116e5c1ee8a1786a3df223db25c85.jpg

    5th March 2014 at 5:14 pm

  33. llpoh says:

    I concur with Punk – a great many guns will be reported stolen.

    A great many guns will be buried in backyards and such.

    And there will be cops that die if they go door to door trying to confiscate guns. Civilians, too. It will be a major clusterfuck.

    5th March 2014 at 5:50 pm

  34. Billy says:

    “This is how it begins.” — Bob

    Indeed…

    Never figured Connecticut to be where the doom of our time would be fought… history has a way of playing games with you… surprising you when you ain’t lookin’…

    If the State pushes the issue, this is going to end badly…

    But, the State is in an awkward position now – they passed this stupid ‘registration’ bullshit under the guise of ‘needing to know where the weapons are’… and few complied.

    Then, they issued letters to gun owners warning them to register their weapons… which begs the question: “If they needed registration to ‘know where the guns are’, then how did they know who to send the letters to?”

    They tipped their hand. They know damn well who has what, meaning there is a list somewhere – a database that the Supreme Court has already said is unconstitutional – and they used that list to mail the warnings. Which means the “reason” about needing registration to know where the guns are is pure bullshit… a law predicated on a bald-faced lie.

    But now that their hand is tipped, their subterfuge laid bare, and hundreds of thousands of citizens are telling them to fuck off… they can either repeal their stupid law in the face of massive non-compliance, or they can resort to the mailed fist. And, more often than not, when you publicly embarrass elected officials, they want payback…

    Yeah… this will end badly. Blood will be spilled over this idiocy…

    The folks who are non-compliant in Connecticut are in the right, morally and legally, as far as I’m concerned.

    5th March 2014 at 8:10 pm

  35. indialantic says:

    For every assault weapon or large capacity magazine that is successfully confiscated, two or three more will eventually take their place. For every legal gun owner killed or imprisoned (by this unconstitutional CT state law), five gun owners will take his/her place.

    In addition, the demand letter from Commander Dickhead of the CT State Police Special Licensing and Firearms Unit states that these “illegal” guns and magazines may also be “removed from the state” as an acceptable option. Yes? Whack the Mole anyone?

    Before commencement of “Operation Clusterfuck” by the CT State Police, let’s do a trial/test run first. Okay?

    Let’s put 400 cats in a big cage, release them, and then “herd them” down to the fucking Vet’s office located five miles away. Then, do a cat count.

    5th March 2014 at 8:45 pm

  36. NIck A says:

    Think about it for just one moment.

    The USA is BY FAR the World’s biggest spender on “Things Military”, and that does not just comprise the “big stuff” (capital armaments); it also comprises a hell of a lot of very “interesting” specifically anti-personnel ordnance, including chemical and biological agents, all that could be quite useful in “population management” should the need arise.

    So, the very stark reality is that, if TPTB decide that an unarmed population better fits their needs, then unarmed you will be.

    Or Dead.

    Your choice.

    6th March 2014 at 4:42 am

  37. Nonanonymous says:

    Nick, you’re wrong, the numbers are against them, and they know it, even it CT. Not that I want to prove it.

    6th March 2014 at 6:12 am

  38. indialantic says:

    I accidentally down-arrowed your above post, Nonanonymous. Sorry.

    6th March 2014 at 6:24 am

  39. VandalBill says:

    It is time for the great many gun companies that are in Connecticut and throughout the rest of New England to stand up for 2nd amendment rights. But I suppose the government contracts is enough to ensure their silence.

    6th March 2014 at 7:15 am

  40. Clam attack says:

    Clusterfuckery at its finest. As stucky might say, what a bunch of useless cunts!

    6th March 2014 at 8:43 am

  41. Anonymous says:

    just another way to fill private prisons with new law breakers.

    6th March 2014 at 9:15 am

  42. Billy says:

    The more I look at that Cunt-necticut State Police Thug Lt… the more I am reminded of Elmer Fudd…. I mean, just look at that stupid fucking hat. Now that I think about it, he looks like what would happen if Elmer Fudd fucked a turkey…

    Career copfuks like him, I’ve seen his type before. So used to getting his way, he thinks the whole fucking world revolves around him… I KNOW he’s a fucking prick, even without ever meeting him. The look on his face says everything… the whole “protect and serve” thing? To ‘serve’ someone means that you are working for THEM.

    But this fucking arrogant asshole? No, he thinks WE exist to provide him position… that we are little better than stock animals.

    Push the issue, Elmer… let’s see how far you get.

    6th March 2014 at 11:20 am

  43. indialantic says:

    “So, the very stark reality is that, if TPTB decide that an unarmed population better fits their needs, then unarmed you will be.”

    A bold statement, Nlck A. We shall soon see.

    6th March 2014 at 1:01 pm

  44. Mary Malone says:

    A second amendment activist was arrested at his Pennsylvania home for gun registration violations AFTER his Facebook posts alerted NJ gun owners about pending legislation and hearings.

    The NJ Second Amendment Society circulated a notice that a Committee of NJ Assembly was meeting on Monday, March 3rd and was holding hearings to “debate” limiting state gun owners to 10 bullets per magazine, instead of the existing 13.

    The NJ2AS posted on Facebook, asking NJ gun owners to show up at the hearing. NJ were urged to call, email, and fax opposition to latest state onslaught of 2nd Amendment.

    Suddenly, word got out the hearing was cancelled.

    Monday evening, we learned the activist received a phone call from NJ State Police, saying they uncovered some issues in his gun permit application. The activist said, “Well, that’s interesting. But I don’t live in NJ. I live in PA.”

    Shortly thereafter, the PA State Police showed up at his home and arrested him.

    Guys, we are in that scary place. The state operatives are confiscating guns that are lawfully held by US citizens who have 2nd Amendment rights.

    They are monitoring all communications and using any excuse they can to retaliate against people standing up against the tyranny.

    “First they came for the gun-owners” in EVERY country where Marxist/Communists/Fascists were about to “transform” the government from representative form to a statist controlled nation.

    America needs to wake up. We are running out of time….

    6th March 2014 at 3:16 pm

  45. TeresaE says:

    They won’t confiscate guns for no reason, out of the blue, or outright. First some disaster or “attack” will occur (like our dollar going to shit, another false-flag terror attack, hurricane, whatever), then Marshall Law will be implemented, then all those directives that Clinton, Bush II and Ob ama signed will be dusted off and used.

    At that point it won’t be the Staties going door-to-door, it will be Canadian or Mexican troops (Bush signed the Treaty supporting this), or Federal Contractors of the Blackwater (not sure that is right, Black something) type.

    Yep, the PTB have known that American soldiers and neighbors will have a hard mental time disavowing our Constitution and killing their friends and families. Our foreign neighbors and the contractors won’t have those same issues.

    The story about the guy being arrested is chilling as hell. I’m glad I don’t have any rifles or handguns. That is my only saving grace for now.

    7th March 2014 at 12:03 pm

  46. Frenchie says:

    wake the fuck up and start hiding basic survival firearm everyone!

    why do you think they are itching for a war against Russia?
    Putin said he would crash the dollar in case of war… this is the point, they want to hide their utter economic failure and blame on Russia, and take total citizen control by the way.
    Kennedy threatened Russia of war during the Cuban crisis, now you can bet Ukraine will ask NATO to settle in and that US antimissile stations will be built at the Russian border. it will be a case of war

    black market anyone?
    wake up, time is short. this serious shit

    7th March 2014 at 12:38 pm

  47. Ray Marks says:

    I don’t know where anyone got the idea that ANYONE will be going door to door to confiscate guns, but it sounds like someone spreading bad rumors. Now what I DO see as possible, is officers being sent door to door to confiscate those horrible assault rifles that Obama just outlawed. I say good, we don’t need terrorists weapons in our country, we are a non terrorist state.

    26th April 2014 at 4:36 pm

Leave a comment

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.