SEDITION

Some incredibly damning evidence presented in this article. Obama and his minions gave half a BILLION dollar worth of arms to an enemy of the United States (al Qaeda). If this isn’t treason, I don’t know what is.

Thanks to the Daily Mail, a British news source. I doubt we’ll here anything about this on the bought off USSA MSM.

1. Treason , sedition mean disloyalty or treachery to one’s country or its government. Treason is any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one’s government. Sedition is any act, writing, speech, etc., directed unlawfully against state authority, the government, or constitution, or calculated to bring it into contempt or to incite others to hostility, ill will or disaffection; it does not amount to treason and therefore is not a capital offense.

null

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if US hadn’t ‘switched sides in the War on Terror’ and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

-Citizens Committee on Benghazi claims the US government allowed arms to flow to al-Qaeda-linked militants who opposed Muammar Gaddafi
-Their rise to power, the group says, led to the Benghazi attack in 2012
-The group claims the strongman Gaddafi offered to abdicate his presidency, but the US refused to broker his peaceful exit
-The commission, part of the center-right Accuracy In Media group, concluded that the Benghazi attack was a failed kidnapping plot
-US Ambassador Chris Stevens was to be captured and traded for ‘blind sheikh’ Omar Abdel-Rahman, who hatched the 1993 WTC bombing plot

By David Martosko, U.s. Political Editor 22 April 2014

The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn’t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.

The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.

She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.

‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..

‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’

The weapons were intended for Gaddafi but allowed by the U.S. to flow to his Islamist opposition.

‘The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’

Some look at it as treason,’ said Wayne Simmons, a former CIA officer who participated in the commission’s research.

Retired Rear Admiral Chuck Kubic, another commission member, told reporters Tuesday that those weapons are now ‘all in Syria.’

‘Gaddafi wasn’t a good guy, but he was being marginalized,’ Kubic recalled. ‘Gaddafi actually offered to abdicate’ shortly after the beginning of a 2011 rebellion.

‘But the U.S. ignored his calls for a truce,’ the commission wrote, ultimately backing the horse that would later help kill a U.S. ambassador.

Kubic said that the effort at truce talks fell apart when the White House declined to let the Pentagon pursue it seriously.

‘We had a leader who had won the Nobel Peace Prize,’ Kubic said, ‘but who was unwilling to give peace a chance for 72 hours.’

In March 2011, Kubic said, U.S. Army Africa Commander General Carter told NBC News that the U.S. military was not actively targeting Muammar Gaddafi. That, Kubic revealed, was a signal to the Libyan dictator that there was a chance for a deal.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2610598/Group-US-switched-sides-War-Terror-facilitating-500-MILLION-weapons-deliveries-Libyan-al-Qaeda-militias-leading-Benghazi-attack.html#ixzz2zksBllu8

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Billy
Billy
April 24, 2014 7:26 am

[img]https://sp1.yimg.com/ib/th?id=HN.608002975067737225&pid=15.1[/img]

[img]https://sp1.yimg.com/ib/th?id=HN.608054003574309013&pid=15.1[/img]

[img]https://sp1.yimg.com/ib/th?id=HN.608007879918814629&pid=15.1[/img]

[img]https://sp3.yimg.com/ib/th?id=HN.608032567393780883&pid=15.1[/img]

Stucky
Stucky
April 24, 2014 7:42 am

What difference does it make?

Stucky
Stucky
April 24, 2014 7:46 am

“Sedition is any act, writing, speech, etc., directed unlawfully against state authority, the government, or constitution, or calculated to bring it into contempt or to incite others to hostility, ill will or disaffection;” ——— from the article

I try to commit sedition against this shitpile government whenever I can.

Does that make me a bad man? Am I in trouble?

Billy
Billy
April 24, 2014 8:01 am

Does that make me a bad man? Am I in trouble? — Stuck-O

Yep. It makes you a horrible person. NONE shall question the Almighty Government! Don’t you know your place, you grovelling little weasel? How DARE you question the Great and Powerful Oz! Oh, wait… wrong movie…

I’m right there with ya, Stuck… I love this Republic enough to give my life for it… but I despise – LOATHE – my government and I’ll fuckin badmouth it any chance I get…

Keep on keepin on bro..

Stucky
Stucky
April 24, 2014 8:02 am

Nice article. Interesting info. But, really, where do you think this is going to wind up …. an impeachment? HA!! The head Nigger in charge is totally fuckin’ immune from ……… everything.

Impeachment? That’s rayciss!!!!
[imgcomment image[/img]

wip
wip
April 24, 2014 8:42 am

By definition, this article is a form of sedition, no?

overthecliff
overthecliff
April 24, 2014 10:53 am

Stuck, stop being socautious and tell us what you really think.

overthecliff
overthecliff
April 24, 2014 10:54 am

This article and comments are not seditious because they are not unlawful. Yet.

bb
bb
April 24, 2014 12:19 pm

Obama is a lying Marxist piece of shit .I hate this administration .I have no love in my heart for the people that voted for him.Especially the ones that voted twice for him.I even hate watching Fox news and it is the better network or used to be.My heart has grown cold.

ASIG
ASIG
April 24, 2014 12:35 pm

Let’s not forget that Gaddafi had 144 tons of gold. With the US orchestrating the overthrow of Gaddafi, is anyone so naïve as to believe that the US is not going to care who ends up with the gold? So my question would be, what did the US do to make sure “THE RIGHT PEOPLE” got the gold? Or more to the point who has the gold?

My quick calc I figure 144 tons of gold = approx.$ 6 BILLION.