ARMY OF ARMED FEDERAL BUREAUCRATS

“The gun in the hands of law-abiding citizens serves to hold in check arrogant and aggressive government. Guns in the hands of the bureaucrats do the opposite. The founders of this country fully understood this fact.”Ron Paul – 1997

10
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Billy
Billy

Didn’t agree with every utterance from Ron… still don’t. But the guy should have been President. Would have been light-years better than the parade of circus freaks we’ve had over the last couple decades…

This particular clip is solid gold. Our progeny will look back on this and ask themselves why we didn’t do anything to stop the statist thugs..

bb

I like Ron Paul on economics but no so much on foreign policy.I agree he would be a lot better then Obama and the last two clowns.

SSS

In the film clip, the seats in Congress behind Ron Paul were EMPTY.

Tells you all you need to know about how well government operates today.

Stucky

“I like Ron Paul on economics but no so much on foreign policy.” ———bb, Village Scholar

What don’t you like about his foreign policy. Please provide some specifics.

Wyoming Mike
Wyoming Mike

Yes BB, enlighten us with your burgeoning wisdom.

Nonanonymous

OK, Billy, I’ll bite. Why didn’t we do anything about it?

BB obviously doesn’t have a clue. Even so, US foreign policy is a sticky issue. What would you have done at the end of WWII, including the Korean War and Vietnam?

Reagan continued the wars of US imperialism beginning with Grenada, which someone said was the bone headed. You guys are so brilliant, care to explain?

Stucky

Nonanonymous tries to draw flies with vinegar.

With his attitude, I’m sure he’ll get dozens of responses.

Nonanonymous

You seem to be doing an OK job of it. Too bad you didn’t answer the question, not that I was expecting one.

If Americans wanted change, they would vote for it. The only change they want is to continue the status quo, which is unsustainable, so their rights will be continually eroded as the state has to take more and more control to hold things together.

I wasn’t trying to attract flies, you fucking idiot.

SSS

“US foreign policy is a sticky issue. What would you have done at the end of WWII, including the Korean War and Vietnam? You guys are so brilliant, care to explain?”

Ok, I’ll bite.

End of WWII: pretty much what Truman did.

Korea: North Korea stated it, Ike stopped it. So far, so good. Then there’s …..

Vietnam: If a president like Ike were in office, it would have never happened. But that lying, duplicitous piece of shit Lyndon Johnson essentially was itching for a fight, and he got his hook with the questionable Gulf of Tonkin incident. That fucker turned American foreign policy, and America, upside down. Bastard. Total, complete bastard.

So what would I have done? Same as Ike did when he had a chance to stick America’s snoot into Vietnam after the French garrison surrendered at Dien Bien Phu in 1954. He did NOTHING. Suez crisis in 1956? Ike did NOTHING (except piss off the British and French). Formosa crisis in 1958? Ike did NOTHING.

That answer your question, Nonanon?

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading