The Empires’ Plan for a Nuclear First Strike

9 comments

Posted on 5th June 2014 by Zarathustra in Economy |Politics |Technology

, , , ,

Are You Ready For Nuclear War?

Pay close attention to Steven Starr’s guest column, “The Lethality of Nuclear Weapons.”http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/05/30/lethality-nuclear-weapons/ Washington thinks nuclear war can be won and is planning for a first strike on Russia, and perhaps China, in order to prevent any challenge to Washington’s world hegemony.

The plan is far advanced, and the implementation of the plan is underway. As I have reported previously, US strategic doctrine was changed and the role of nuclear missiles was elevated from a retaliatory role to an offensive first strike role. US anti-ballistic missile (ABM) bases have been established in Poland on Russia’s frontier, and other bases are planned. When completed Russia will be ringed with US missile bases.

Anti-ballistic missiles, known as “star wars,” are weapons designed to intercept and destroy ICBMs. In Washington’s war doctrine, the US hits Russia with a first strike, and whatever retaliatory force Russia might have remaining is prevented from reaching the US by the shield of ABMs.

The reason Washington gave for the change in war doctrine is the possibility that terrorists might obtain a nuclear weapon with which to destroy an American city. This explanation is nonsensical. Terrorists are individuals or a group of individuals, not a country with a threatening military. To use nuclear weapons against terrorists would destroy far more than the terrorists and be pointless as a drone with a conventional missile would suffice.

The reason Washington gave for the ABM base in Poland is to protect Europe from Iranian ICBMs. Washington and every European government knows that Iran has no ICBMs and that Iran has not indicated any intent to attack Europe.

No government believes Washington’s reasons. Every government realizes that Washington’s reasons are feeble attempts to hide the fact that it is creating the capability on the ground to win a nuclear war.

The Russian government understands that the change in US war doctrine and the US ABM bases on its borders are directed at Russia and are indications that Washington plans a first strike with nuclear weapons on Russia.

China has also understood that Washington has similar intentions toward China. As I reported several months ago, in response to Washington’s threat China called the world’s attention to China’s ability to destroy the US should Washington initiate such a conflict.

However, Washington believes that it can win a nuclear war with little or no damage to the US. This belief makes nuclear war likely.

As Steven Starr makes clear, this belief is based in ignorance. Nuclear war has no winner. Even if US cities were saved from retaliation by ABMs, the radiation and nuclear winter effects of the weapons that hit Russia and China would destroy the US as well.

The media, conveniently concentrated into a few hands during the corrupt Clinton regime, is complicit by ignoring the issue. The governments of Washington’s vassal states in Western and Eastern Europe, Canada, Australia, and Japan are also complicit, because they accept Washington’s plan and provide the bases for implementing it. The demented Polish government has probably signed the death warrant for humanity. The US Congress is complicit, because no hearings are held about the executive branch’s plans for initiating nuclear war.

Washington has created a dangerous situation. As Russia and China are clearly threatened with a first strike, they might decide to strike first themselves. Why should Russia and China sit and await the inevitable while their adversary creates the ability to protect itself by developing its ABM shield? Once Washington completes the shield, Russia and China are certain to be attacked, unless they surrender in advance.

The 10 minute report below from Russia Today makes it clear that Washington’s secret plan for a first strike on Russia is not secret. The report also makes it clear that Washington is prepared to eliminate any European leaders who do not align with Washington. http://rt.com/shows/the-truthseeker/162864-us-plans-strike-russia/A transcript is provided by Global Research: http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-plans-first-strike-attack-on-russia-or-china/5384799

Readers will ask me, “What can we do?” This is what you can do. You can shut down the Ministry of Propaganda by turning off Fox News, CNN, the BBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, by ceasing to read the New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times. Simply exit the official media. Do not believe one word that the government says. Do not vote. Realize that evil is concentrated in Washington. In the 21st century Washington has destroyed in whole or part seven countries. Millions of peoples murdered, maimed, displaced, and Washington has shown no remorse whatsoever. Neither have the “christian” churches. The devastation that Washington has inflicted is portrayed as a great success. Washington prevailed.

Washington is determined to prevail, and the evil that Washington represents is leading the world to destruction.

9 Comments
  1. Westcoaster says:

    Thanks for posting this Zara, and I hope PCR has armed security, ’cause he’s been very “truthy” as of late.

    5th June 2014 at 3:04 pm

  2. Balzytch says:

    giphy.gif

    5th June 2014 at 4:36 pm

  3. Stucky says:

    “Washington believes that it can win a nuclear war with little or no damage to the US.” —- PCR

    I LOVE Paul Craig Rogers’ writings. But, I’m calling bullshit on the above quote.

    First, the supplied evidence is scant and inconclusive (I read the links.) For example, both leading Russian and American warmongers are asked if they realize that exploding only 1% of both side’s nukes would lead to an extinction even. Both said “no”, and so the conclusion is made that nuke war is much more likely. That’s weak!!

    Second, regarding all those Studies and Papers …. that’s ALL they are. Academic and military high-brow bullshit, mental masturbation to consider every conceivable possibility, sometimes just for the helluvit, sometimes to scare the masses and dumbass pols, sometimes to get more funding, always to benefit military hardware manufacturers and leechfuk bankers.

    That’s NOT to say I consider a nuke war to be an impossibility. In fact, it’s probably more likely than not. However, it WON’T be because one side thinks it can win …. nobody, absolutely nobody is that goddamn stupid … not even HNIC Oreo.

    5th June 2014 at 5:21 pm

  4. MuckAbout says:

    When did Paul Craig Rodgers loose his mind?

    The only time a nuclear weapon will be used is by accident – which is a 100% possibility sooner or later – or by some rag head idiot who wants his 17 virgins pops a stolen nuke somewhere that causes a mistaken reaction that results in an extinction event.

    I hereby swear off Roberts’ writing.. Except for dropping the MSM as any useful source of information or truth. But I did that years ago.

    MA

    5th June 2014 at 6:05 pm

  5. MikeG says:

    If your wondering how the Russians could possibly know what our nuclear war plan is, then you need to learn what the START treaty is. And maybe read a few books. “Stockpile” is a good one, so is “The Effects of Nuclear Weapons” 1968 edition.

    And seriously, who couldn’t figure out what a nuke worthy target is in a country after looking at a population density map and using google earth to find it’s military bases? This article is just trying to scare the ignorant.

    6th June 2014 at 2:14 am

  6. Econman says:

    Those in charge of the USA / 4th Reich are insane.

    Everyone is thinking rationally trying to figure out what they’d do.

    They’ve used depleted uranium ammo in the Mid East wars, which is a war crime. They’ve destroyed how many countries & have 900 military bases. They’ve used how many false flags in addition to 9/11? In the 60s, they wanted to undertake Operation Northwoods.

    These wackos would rather take the entire planet down than lose power. These are psychotic sociopaths.

    6th June 2014 at 2:30 am

  7. gilberts says:

    Uh, I could have sworn Barry shafted the Poles 4 years ago on the missile base. I could be wrong, but I remember how we left their PM in the lurch after he expended a great deal of political capital trying to get his people to buy into the missile base. I believe we jilted the Poles in August 2008. Otherwise, I would probably be there right now selling slupees and burgers and renting cars and drycleaning suits and marketing Polish Girls Want to Meet You dating events to GIs, like any good camp follower…

    6th June 2014 at 10:55 am

  8. gilberts says:

    Econ-I spoke to the folks at KI4U.com prior to a visit to the MiddleEast a few years back. According to them, and they’re nuclear engineers, the DU is not a threat and it does not offer an increased rad threat to you. The guy I talked to DID tell me the background radiation over there is naturally elevated for some reason. I took detection gear (dosimeter pens, nukalert, field meter) with me and I never saw anything to cause concern. That being said, I would still avoid it if I could, i.e. avoiding tanks with big scorch marks and melted holes…

    6th June 2014 at 2:59 pm

  9. N8 says:

    Totally with stucky couldn’t have said it better. Paul is usually spot on about a lot of stuff but worst thing I’ve read of his

    6th June 2014 at 5:14 pm

Leave a comment

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.