US VERSUS THEM, WE WILL WIN

The thing is guys, all’s we have ever asked is TO BE LEFT ALONE.

That’s it.

Clueless infected ball sacks like this Barrett shitbird are completely ignorant of American History. And I will prove it.

Craven Infected Ball Sack: “Larry Pratt has scary ideas about firearms. Rolling Stone this week published a fascinating profile of the head of Gun Owners of America, which opposes any regulation whatsoever of firearms.”

As if this is a new, novel and “scary” idea…

Prior to 1933, there were NO REGULATIONS regarding firearms ownership whatsoever on the Federal level. None. Zero. Nada. Nichts. In fact, prior to 1933, it was assumed by SCOTUS that the IIA meant that every man had the right to the arms of the Infantryman. Including select fire weapons, bayonets, tripod mounted medium machineguns, grenades, mortars and even Infantry Guns (smallish artillery pieces deployed by the Infantry of the day).

It was so common, you could order a Thompson Submachine Gun, a bunch of 100 round drum magazines and crates of ammo through a Sears catalog. Delivered to you, personally, through the US Mail. No stupid, insipid background checks that did jack shit, no hoops to jump through, no gun police to look up and down every orifice of your body before “allowing” you to own them… you just thought it up and did it. With the court’s blessing.

Not a very “new” or “scary” idea. Bed-wetting faggots like Barrett would have us all up in arms over such an idea, when our Grandfathers LIVED it.

More:

Then came 1933 and that fucking cripple FDR. Using the excuse of sensationalized gangster violence – turf wars during Prohibition – they rammed through the National Firearms Act of 1933 (it was rammed through in ’33. Became effective in ’34). Thing is, the fucking GOVERNMENT ITSELF was responsible for creating and fostering the criminal environment that allowed the rise of the gangsters via Prohibition and the black market booze trade.

But NFA34 is bullshit writ large. A smoke-screen. We got played.

By the time NFA 34 came around, Prohibition had been repealed and the gangster turf wars were over. The problem was solved.

The FDR Administration knew which way SCOTUS had ruled in the past. So, they decided to sell NFA 34 as “a revenue generating measure” – $200 tax, per gun. This bullshit is specifically prohibited – using excessive taxation to ban something. The cost of a Thompson SMG at the time was about $200, depending on model, etc. The average line worker at Ford only made about $150 per month, take home. Which is only $1800 a year.

Which means if you wanted a Thompson, you would not only have to blow over a month’s wages during the height of the Depression, but you had to come up with ANOTHER $200 on top of that just to pay the “tax”. This amounted to 25% of your yearly wages. This is the DEFINITION of prohibitive taxation…

We know NFA34 is bullshit because for over 40 years, it was classified under the Department of Trade. Remember, it was a REVENUE GENERATING MEASURE – not “gun control”… their own words, not mine.

But even that is bullshit because you know how many NFA weapons were “registered” in 1935?

One.

I wonder what the Government did with all that loot they “generated” by ramming through NFA34?

It was challenged, of course. Some rube, I have since forgotten his name, got himself arrested. Not for making illegal hooch, but because his shotgun was 1/16th of an inch too short. He got a lawyer and fought it. And he won. It was appealed. He won on appeal. It was appealed again. He won on the 2nd appeal. The government was getting it’s ass kicked.

Then came SCOTUS. “For some reason” the guy – I think his name was Miller – didn’t show up at court. Neither did his lawyer. You’d think that a guy on a winning streak and his lawyer would just blow off arguing – and winning – in front of SCOTUS would have made it a point to show up.

SCOTUS, having only the Government’s man present, decided to hear the case anyway. I know – What the fuck? Right? – The Government’s man, of course, lied his craven ass off and SCOTUS found NFA34 to be “constitutional”…. we KNOW he lied his craven ass off because we have the court transcripts.

The fact is that SCOTUS at the time was packed with FDR cronies is of little concern to Ball Sacks like Barrett. Or the fact that Mr. Miller and his lawyer were never heard from again. Literally. They just fell off the face of the earth. Which leads me to believe that that fucking cripple FDR didn’t want his legislation shot down, so he had his cronies “disappear” Mr. Miller and his lawyer. Fucking killed them and buried the bodies someplace where they would never be found.. can’t win if you can’t argue your case.

Ball Sack Barrett is, of course, totally ignorant of all this. Which is bad enough. The alternative – that he is aware of all this, but chooses to misrepresent history anyway – means that he is one evil, lying, worthless piece of shit.

And you WON’T win. Haven’t you seen all the videos showing the cops being outfitted with MILITARY grade arms, vehicles, UNIFORMS, albeit a different color,,,, DHS bought 1.5 BILLION rounds of hollow point ammo. Even the FDA has been armed to the teeth.

How many Republicans have taken a stand AGAINST all of this, a handful at the most,, the rest are marching to the same drummer.

All it takes is ONE lawmaker to invoke impeachment proceedings. Do you see any Repubs stepping up to the plate? No, they all learned what was done to Kennedy as a result of Executive Order 11110. Look it up. Imagine, a LIBERAL tried to take back the constitutional imperative that ONLY the government has the right to issue the currency of the nation. Any Republicans willing to take the chance? Not a chance in hell.

The petrodollar is rapidly losing its status as the world’s reserve currency and when all those printed pieces of paper start coming home in a flood, massive infaltion will be the result. The economy and financial system will collapse and civil war will be the result. I certainly hope we win but talk is cheap,,, once the bullets really start flying,,,

This is why they’re trying to start a war with Russia, via Ukraine. They do it every single time. Gives them an excuse to lock down the country and run everything from Washington. Everything, food distribution, YOUR money in YOUR bank account, fuel, electricity,,, you name it. If a city resists too strongly, they’ll just blow up a few substations on the outskirts. You might have a Coleman stove to fry your baloney with but when THAT runs out?

Sorry, you’re fucked and you’re clueless.

Do any of the gun control advocates ever push for the disarmament of the government? If guns are dangerous, then it would stand to reason that it doesn’t matter who has them. So guns themselves are necessary in order to enforce laws, edicts, etc. The real problem then would be who is statistically more likely to misuse them? Civilians or governments? Can we get a body count and then decide?

Gun control advocates are almost always totalitarian types, i.e. My philosophy is correct and yours is wrong, therefore you have to accept my ideology and I don’t have to accept yours.The government agrees with me and will use there guns to make sure that you comply with my will. Who can argue with that kind of logic?

Gun control advocates are almost always the most uninformed people in the world in the use and mechanics of these tools. They don’t own them, have never used them, don’t know how they operate, what the names of the parts are, etc. You wouldn’t listen to a doctor who didn’t know the parts of the human body were or what function they performed, why would you take policy advice from someone who is ignorant of the subject?

Gun control advocates never seem to make the connection between the use of firearms by criminals (who by their very nature ignore laws and edicts) and the use of firearms by responsible citizens. Crime rates in gun free zones are ALWAYS higher than in areas where gun ownership is ubiquitous. The failure to observe readily available facts in an effort to create a more violent and dangerous environment for everyone ought to be a reason to ignore rather than accept their arguments.

I own and use firearms in the same way I own and use power tools as they were intended to be used. I understand their functions, how to maintain them, how to handle them safely and when required for the task at hand. I would no more accept a ban on my possessions and their use than I would try and ban motor vehicles and fast food even though both of those cause far more deaths and physical harm than firearms ever have.

The problem, once again always boils down to those who advocate for human freedom and personal responsibility and those who champion tyranny and the complete submission of the individual to the State. At the point of a gun.

Isn’t it ironic, dontcha think?

Raging Against Self Defense: A psychiatrist Examines The Anti-Gun Mentality By Sarah Thompson, M.D.

Read this article a long time ago…. only place I can find it anymore is over on JPFO. If you use the techniques listed, it drives the anti-gun crowd bat-shit. 🙂 I literally had one guy yelling at me “GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!” Heh, heh…

http://jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/ragingagainstselfdefense.htm

The Rolling Stone article was probably the worst article ever written….anywhere! John Ross’ “Unintend Consequenses” is an incredibly well written novel that happens to contain the history of the un-constitutional gun control “laws” passed in the USofA. A must read for all Patriots. A perusal of the writings of our Founding Fathers, the Federalists, and most importantly the Anti-Federalists will indicate that these folks intended that the average American Citizen would have access to exactly the same weapons that the standing army had. Muskets. FF to 2014 and that equates to select-fire ARs, AKs, MP5s, M14s or whatever else your little heart desires. The purpose is to counteract tyranny and this is why Obongo, Pelosi, Fineswine, Schumer, ETAL are shitting in they pants. They are petty tyrants and they know that the Great Unwashed(us) must be disarmed before we can be enslaved. Good luck with that!

Fuck them Gun Grabbin God Damn Democrats and that black bastard they call Dear Leader.

Been workin tons of hours the last four months. I read TBP some, never have time to post.

But …….Tonight I have my drink on.

[img[/img]

Billy said in response to pietropaulo:
“Do the rest of us a favor. Shut the fuck up. Pretty please. And go crawl back down your hole, you Saul Alinsky fanboi dick sucking defeatist fag… ”

I don’t agree with Billy often, at least not in writing, but I’m in full agreement here. Just STFU pietropaulo because you’ve already been beaten before the battle started.

Think outside he box folks.

the “They are coming to get MY Guns” rhetoric may well be just another means to stir the populace up. Push a little harder, and the gun fan club will start to organise rallies (and in the land of the NSA don’t think for one moment that “The Management” would not use such gatherings as an intelligence bonanza!)

Names, addresses (via vehicle index plates), local cell phone call logs (with the ability to cross link call origination and destination in realtime), bingo – hard evidence of “who’s who” and who would be the best target for enhanced surveillance.

Maybe “they” intend society as it exists now to collapse, and “they” have already planned the outcomes. It is hardly beyond reasonable possibility that “their” plan is to withdraw from society, cut off e.g. power, and sit back while the carnage develops – carnage where the hyped-up “Gun Crowd” do their population management for them (and take the casualty hit on “their” behalf).

Then? the “Gun Crowd will have outlived their usefulness, and will be conveniently eliminated, probably by chemical or biological means (cheap “Pest Control” mentality), or maybe via very well equipped (as in 21st century hardware / communications / support) and trained mercenaries.

Impossible outcome? If so then why are those in power knowingly stirring up dissatisfaction amongst the “well armed and dangerous” crowd? Seems to me as an outside observer, a case of deliberately kicking the Hornet’s nest: There MUST be a reason for this repetitive action, and even the most cursory review of recent events should suggest that any such reason will be far from benign.

A case of “Know your Enemy”, and “Forewarned is forearmed”??

No doubt time will tell . . . . .