ONE OF THE ALL-TIME GREATEST INVESTMENT MYTHS EXPOSED

Men Believe What They Want to Believe

 

Let’s begin with a quote in Latin. That will put us in the right mood – reaching for the eternal verities:

 

Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt.

 

piggybankAs Martin Wolf recently informed us:  Cautious savers no longer serve a useful economic purpose

 

That was penned by Julius Caesar in De Bello Gallico, his account of the Roman conquest of Gaul.

We didn’t know what it meant either, until last night. In case your Latin is a little rusty, we will give you a little WD-40. It means “Men willingly believe what they wish to be true.”

At least, they believe it as long as they can…

As long as stocks rise, for example, they believe the economy is recovering nicely… and that they will get richer and richer just by owning little pieces of someone else’s business.

 

 

caesarJulius Caesar, a keen study of human nature. His insights into the frailties, foibles and vanities of men were a major factor in the success of his wars of conquest.

 

The Problem with “Investing”

They call it “investing.” But that is mere flattery. Someone else already did the investing when they built the factories and developed the business.

“Investing” means you are doing something that will result in more or better products and services in the future… something that improves productivity and makes us better off.

When someone buys shares in a company in an IPO, he is investing his capital to help that company create future production. But when you buy someone else’s shares in the secondary market (on an exchange) all you’re doing is buying out someone else’s position and allocating your savings to some financial instrument.

Will the price of your shares go up? Or down? Who knows? One business grows. Another shrinks. You cannot consistently know, in advance, which will be which.

And taken together, the shares in a nation’s businesses are unlikely to consistently grow at a faster pace than the economy. In the US, for example, over the last six years, real GDP growth has averaged 0.9% a year. But stocks have gone up more than 130% in the US.

How is that possible? Well, first, earnings rose. Businesses ditched expensive labor… halted new projects… trimmed down… and boosted profit margins. They also benefited from low-cost financing, which reduced their interest expenses.

Then the liquidity produced by QE and ZIRP needed a place to go. It could not get to the consumer, because households were still cutting back on debt and wages were actually going down. So, it stayed in the financial sector, pushing up asset prices.

Result: stock prices far in excess of GDP growth.

 

S&P and GDP

S&P 500 Index with real GDP roughly indexed to 1000 at the beginning of the observation period – via St. Louis Ferderal Reserve Research – click to enlarge.

Perverting the System

But you were probably concerned about our garden party here in France, weren’t you? Well, despite the drippy forecasts, the rain held off. What a lucky break! The guests could spread out on the lawn. Otherwise, they would have had to squeeze into the house.

Among the guests was an attractive French woman in her 70s, an economist…

“I am so annoyed by Monsieur Piketty. He has become famous. The rest of the world must think we French economists are a bunch of idiots. Imagine … Keynesianism … the class struggle … the envy of the rich … it’s as though these were new ideas that hadn’t been thoroughly discredited. I don’t know why they take Piketty seriously in the US. I thought American economists were smarter than that…”

We rose to defend our countrymen:

“Oh … no. American economists are as dumb as the rest of them. They all seem to believe capitalism needs to be carefully controlled. By them, of course. Then they control and pervert the system… it blows up… and they blame it on capitalism. I think there is a catastrophic episode of that coming down the pike.”

“They distort asset prices with QE and ZIRP. Then people invest their money foolishly – because they are reacting to the distorted asset prices. Just look at the US stock market. It is near an all-time high… even though the economy is barely growing. The prices are based on two things that can’t possibly continue: cost cutting and zero-interest-rate policies. Stock prices could easily be cut in half.

“But this time, it’s not just a few foolish investors who will lose money. It will be millions of ordinary investors and business people… and households… and governments that depend on tax revenues.

“We could be looking at a major problem. And it will be blamed on capitalism…”

Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt,” our guest concluded.

“Yes, madam, the canapés are very nice,” we replied.

 

pic_giant_042314_SM_Piketty-Gets-it-WrongNeo-Marxist Piketty: warming up long discredited and truly bad economic ideas (he has that in common with Keynes actually). No wonder etatistes all over the world love him.

(Photo via orf.at / Author unknown)

 

The above article is from Diary of a Rogue Economist originally written for Bonner & Partners. Bill Bonner founded Agora, Inc in 1978. It has since grown into one of the largest independent newsletter publishing companies in the world. He has also written three New York Times bestselling books, Financial Reckoning Day, Empire of Debt and Mobs, Messiahs and Markets.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
bb
bb
August 11, 2014 2:42 pm

He got that right. When the collapse happens the media will blame it on the market instead of the Federal Reserve and government policies. They will then take control of what’s left of the real economy.

Econman
Econman
August 11, 2014 5:24 pm

Impressive bb. bb knows more than Paul Krugman.

B
B
August 11, 2014 8:20 pm

Envy of the rich is different than disgust of that part of the rich elite who have been able to use their wealth to game the system in their favor through various methods, i.e., corrupt politicians, the Federal Reserve, etc., that give them an unfair advantage. They are crooks olain and simple.

Jackson, with comments on saving, living soft, and eating dainty,
Jackson, with comments on saving, living soft, and eating dainty,
August 11, 2014 11:59 pm

I’m having trouble following the argument for “One of the All-Time Greatest Investment Myths Exposed.” Maybe it’s because I disagree with the proponent.

My investment adviser these many years has been an old pirate, Mr. Long John Silver. I’ve followed his advice and I’ve done well by it. Long John advised, “Tain’t earning now, it’s saving that does it and you may lay to that.” Long John added, “The course I lay (is that) I puts it all away, some here, some there, and none too much anywheres, by reason of suspicion.”

Silver’s philosophy did well for him and it’s worked like a charm for me too. I suggest too that after finding employment and a few years of living close to the mast, you can, like Silver and I did, live comfortably and build up a fortune besides. He’s how Long John described it once money’s put away and is working for you. “Ah, but I’ve lived easy in the meantime, never denied myself o’ nothing my heart desires, and slep’ soft and ate dainty all my days.”

Mr Chen
Mr Chen
August 12, 2014 12:46 am

And in the end all it costs you is a little stretching of the neck.