There is an 800% Higher Probabability Americans Will be Killed by Police Than by a Terrorist

boston_police

The Ferguson incident has exposed the underbelly of the United States and now everyone is starting to pay attention that there is a higher risk of being killed by police even when they chase or shoot at people who need not be you. The risk is 800% greater that you will be killed by POLICE rather than a terrorist. The Economist has reported the death by police so far are ZERO in Japan and Britain, 8 in Germany and 409 in America.

NormanRockwell

But that is not the half of it. Since 911, the police have killed more people than the terrorists are claimed to have done in those attacks. It is getting to the point that if you see a policeman in the USA, you better try to move away. This is no longer the ’50s. If there is a cat in the tree, my bet they will try to shoot it first but probably take down the tree with the hail of bullets. Police seem to think they have the right to play soldier and war games on the streets of America.

Montesquieu-3

Charles-Louis de Secondat Montesquieu, baron de La Brede et de (1689-1755) was truly perhaps the most influential of the political French philosophers who did more to alter the course of the world than anyone of this time. He gave us the separation of power for the structure of the United States and the Second Amendment – right to bear arms.

Savoy Prince

In Vienna, Montesquieu met the political leader and soldier, the Prince Eugene of Savoy (1663-1736), whose political discussions helped spark ideas within Montesquieu expanding his understanding of government. It was this encounter between Montesquieu and the Prince of Savoy that shaped the right to bear arms. For Prince of Savoy was considered even by Napoleon as one of the seven greatest strategists in military history. He fought against the Turks (1683-1688, 1697, 1715-1718) and he fought against the French in the War of the Grand Alliance (1689-1691). He was the teacher of even Frederick the Great of Prussia (b 1712; 1740–1786) who he shaped into a brilliant military strategist. The Prince of Savoy also fought in the War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714), but he was plagued by a rumor that he was really the illegitimate son of King Louis XIV of France that he perpetually denied. Yet, Louis XIV was always ashamed of such offspring and he restrained Eugene’s ambitions as if he was perhaps his son so that after 20 years of living in Paris and at Versailles, he left France and offered his talent to Leopold I (1640-1705), Holy Roman Emperor who was fighting the Turks. He distinguished himself in the siege of Vienna in 1683 and his military career was born.

Prince of Savoy acquired a brilliant skill and the wisdom that allowed him to see that military victory was merely an instrument for achieving political ends. He was Europe’s most formidable general who was wounded 13 times himself, yet always faced a world of cunning foes with conspirators at his back that he regarded as the “hereditary curse” of Austria serving three emperors, Leopold I, Joseph I, land then Charles VI. Of these men, Prince of Savoy considered that the first had been a father, the second a brother, but with the third, he was just the hired help.

 

The Prince of Savory came to see that standing armies would be easily used. A talented general, he realized that there should be no armies and that would reduce war. The brilliant insight of the Prince of Savoy greatly influenced Montesquieu, that it laid the foundation for the right to bare arms, as the Second Amendment to the United States constitution for the idea was to eliminate standing armies that feed the cycle of war returning the nation to the very was Rome began – with citizen militias.

PepperSpray-US

The Police are out of control and have become standing armies within the civilian population. They are truly our greatest risk to national security that should be defined as the welfare of the people not the safety of government. This will be the greatest threat to our liberty moving forward into 2020 domestically.They are trained to see us as the enemy for they are there to protect government from the people. Of course there are always individual exceptions. Some can be turned. This was the key to winning the revolution in Ukraine. Turn the police against government and you stand a chance to win freedom.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
August 25, 2014 8:56 am

As founding and sole member of the Anti Euphemism League, I’m also anti-acronym. I distrust anyone who uses “L.E.O.” Maybe “cop” was originally an acronym, but that’s my preferred term. “Pigs” may make a comeback.

Roy
Roy
August 25, 2014 9:18 am

I am also opposed to Euphemisms and also acronyms, especially undefined acronyms. Say what you mean without trying to be clever or cute.

Leobeer
Leobeer
August 25, 2014 10:11 am
Stucky
Stucky
August 25, 2014 10:13 am

““Pigs” may make a comeback.” ——– Iska Waran

I’m voting for “copfuk”.

One thing I love about Armstrong is his strong understanding of historical events … and how they relate to TODAY. He’s one of the very best out there, in that regard.

I am going to change his last sentence ever so slightly; —— “Turn the police against government and you stand a [90%] chance to win freedom.”

That’s not scientific. It could a larger percentage, or less. And I’m not taking the military into account. The point is, he is 100% correct. The only thing standing between evil leaders and the people who want to hang them …. are their copfuk protectors. God help those fucking bastards if cops no longer defend them.

Stucky
Stucky
August 25, 2014 11:30 am

Cop Kills Wyoming Police Department’s Own Dog

Chalk up yet another dead dog onto the scoreboard of animals killed by police in this sick new era of search and destroy law enforcement.

Usually the furry, four-legged victims are shot and killed execution style, often in front of the owners in overly aggressive raids. Some times at the wrong address and others during trespassing as in a recent incident in Chicago. This time however, it was just plain stupidity as a police officer from a hick Wyoming town called Mills left the department’s own K9 animal locked in a police vehicle to suffocate on a summer day.

Details are provided in a report from the website of the Casper Star-Tribune that is entitled “Mills police officer faces charge in death of K9 left in hot car”:

A Mills police officer faces an animal cruelty charge following the death of a police dog that he allegedly left in a hot patrol car for several hours.

Zachary Miller, who has been with the police department for four years, is charged with misdemeanor animal cruelty in connection with the death of K9 officer Nyx, a drug detection dog.

The officer left the dog in his patrol car for more than six hours while the vehicle was parked outside the police department, according to an investigator’s affidavit filed in Natrona County Circuit Court. The car was running, but the air conditioning was off and the windows were up. “It’s not normal to leave a car running that long,” said Mills police chief Bryon Preciado. “I’m not justifying it. He shouldn’t have been here that long.”

Preciado said there is no policy on the time frame for leaving police dogs in patrol cars. The affidavit states Miller arrived at the police department at 5:30 a.m. on July 9. Miller left shortly after to respond to a call with the only other officer working that day, Jake Bigelow. The two returned to the police department with Nyx in the vehicle about 6 a.m.

The officers went inside the department, leaving the dog in the car, and did not return to the car until about 12:20 p.m. The outside temperature had gone from 53 to 86 degrees, according to the affidavit. Police dogs are allowed inside the station, Preciado said.

During the time the officers were inside Miller was training Bigelow on patrol-duty procedures. Miller is no longer a training officer, Preciado said.

The story of the broiling of poor Nyx is indicative of some of the low-grade types that police work often attracts as well as a reflection of poor training. If officer Miller was indeed involved in “training” another officer the only thing that was taught was how not to treat a department and public asset as well as how to kill a dog.

The negligence in the animal’s death is not only embarrassing but a waste of taxpayer dollars. This is something that is more often seen by some mouth-breathing moron of the type that leaves their own children in hot vehicles for extended periods of time, which like actual police shootings of dogs happens all too frequently in our star-spangled Idiocracy.

This sad and lamentable tale of the stupidity of an agent of the government has drawn widespread attention. Reuters reports on it “Wyoming officer charged over death of police dog in hot car”, it is in The Guardian “Officer charged in hot-car death of police dog”, the New York Daily News “Wyoming cop charged with animal cruelty after death of K9 dog left in hot squad car” and dozens of other sources. The Casper Star-Tribune also reports on protests by animal rights activists “Protesters call for action after death of Mills K9 officer Nyx” who should perhaps be a bit more visible during an actual “puppycide” pet assassination than an egregious act of idiotic negligence such as this.

.
http://carryingaflag.blogspot.com/