42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks

42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks

Painting by Anthony Freda

Governments from Around the World Admit They Do It

There are many documented false flag attacks, where a government carries out a terror attack … and then falsely blames its enemy for political purposes.

In the following 42 instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admits to it, either orally or in writing:

(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.

(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.

(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and falsely blame it on the Nazis.

(6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).

(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.

(11) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.

(12) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.

(13) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

(14) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

(15) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

(16) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

(17) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

(18) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(19) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.

(20) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

(21) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

(22) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

(23) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).

(24) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.

(25) Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).

(26) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

(27) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.

(28) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.

(29) Senior police officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that – in July 2001, at the G8 summit in Genoa – planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.

(30) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

(31) Similarly, the U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction (despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers).

(32) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

(33) United Press International reported in June 2005:

U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

(34) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

(35) Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).

(36) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.

(37) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.

(38) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.

(39) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.

(40) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

(41) The former Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others.

(42) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.

In addition, two-thirds of the City of Rome burned down in a huge fire on July 19, 64 A.D. The Roman people blamed the Emperor Nero for starting the fire. Some top Roman leaders – including the Roman consul Cassius Dio, as well as historians like Suetonius – agreed that Nero started the fire (based largely on the fact that the Roman Senate had just rejected Nero’s application to clear 300 acres in Rome so that he could build a palatial complex, and that the fire allowed him to build his complex). Regardless of who actually started the fire, Nero – in the face of public opinion accusing him of arson – falsely blamed the Christians for starting the fire. He then rounded up and brutally tortured and murdered scores of Christians for something they likely didn’t do.

We didn’t include this in the list above, because – if Nero did start the fire on purpose – he did it for his own reasons (to build his palatial complex), and not for geopolitical reasons benefiting his nation.

So Common … There’s a Name for It

The use of the bully’s trick is so common that it was given a name hundreds of years ago.

“False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.

The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack.

Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for naval, air and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.

Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags

Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:

“A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! “In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
27 Comments
flash
flash
February 9, 2015 10:23 am

just a few good ole’ Company boys murdering a few insignificant folk to get the MIC a nice hot cup of weapon sales brewed up.

The CIA’s Phoenix Assassination Program

But Phoenix went far beyond aspirations of “winning” in Vietnam. The program utilized a “by any means necessary” strategy to warfare that included the use of random assassination and the FABRICATION of enemy atrocities in order to rally the civilian population around U.S. forces. PRU operators routinely targeted the backwater villages of Vietnam, killing at least 20,000 civilians as later admitted by CIA Director William Colby, and 40,000 civilians as estimated by the South Vietnamese Government. The slaughter of villages was frequently blamed on the Vietcong, while PRU’s ran rampant in the jungles, physically mutilating victims in order to draw greater emotional reactions from Southern citizens as well as oblivious Americans back home.

Rise Up
Rise Up
February 9, 2015 10:51 am

Many false flag operations coincide with “excercises” or “drills”, that become live events:

9/11/2001 – “The Joint Chiefs (Myers) and NORAD were conducting a joint, live-fly, hijack Field Training Exercise (FTX) which involved at least one (and almost certainly many more) aircraft under US control that was posing as a hijacked airliner.”

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/060704_tripod_fema.html

“In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn’t terrorism — it was to be a simulated accident.

“Officials at the Chantilly, Virginia-based National Reconnaissance Office had scheduled an exercise that morning in which a small corporate jet would crash into one of the four towers at the agency’s headquarters building after experiencing a mechanical failure.”

http://www.prisonplanet.com/agency_planned_exercise_on_sept_11_built_around_a_plane_crashing_into_a_building.htm

Boston Marathon bomb:

“…a recent Boston Globe report openly admits that the entire charade was completely staged, having been planned months in advance as part of a Department of Homeland Security (DHS)-funded exercise targeting patriots and militiamen as terrorists.

“An attempted cover for the actual false flag event that allegedly killed three people back in April, the DHS-funded drill, known as “Operation Urban Shield,” was intended to take place during the summer, according to the Boston Globe – that is until the “real” event beat it to the punch. But the drill itinerary so closely resembles what actually occurred the day of the bombings that even the mainstream media source responsible for bringing it to light could not help but point out this incredible “coincidence,” which bears all the classic marks of a government-initiated false flag attack.”

http://www.naturalnews.com/040898_boston_marathon_false_flag_terror_drills.html

Sandy Hook School:

“A newly discovered Federal Emergency Management-Department of Homeland Security document designated “For Official Use Only” reveals plans for a “Site Activation Call-down Drill Exercise Plan,” otherwise known as a “Mass Casualty Drill.

“The plan, created on October 8, 2012, explicitly references a scenario where the “Mass Death of Children at a School By Firearms” is followed by a “Suicide or Apprehension of [an] Unknown Shooter.

“The 20-page document further instructs the “Use of Media” to be employed for “For Evaluation” and “for Information Distribution.”

“While the date for the drill is marked “December 14, 2012″ on the document’s cover page, on page 12 under Chapter 2: Exercise Logistics, the event is scheduled one day earlier. “The Preparation for Mass Casualty Drill will be conducted on 12/13/12 beginning at 8:00AM. Exercise play is scheduled until the exercise director/Controller determines that the exercise determines that the exercise objectives have been met. Everyone must sign in with Controller upon arrival.”

[imgcomment image[/img]

“Dec 14, 2012

FEMA L-366 Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters

The goal of the course is to enable participants to improve their community’s mitigation and emergency operations plan specifically regarding the needs of children. The course will provide them with the information needed to address the unique needs of children prior to, during and following disasters. It will also provide them guidance and direction on how to form coalitions and how to become advocates for the unique needs of children in all aspects of emergency management.”

http://www.ct.gov/demhs/ical/eventDetail_page.asp?date_ID=CAC9C6C9CD83CDC9C7

flash
flash
February 9, 2015 10:52 am

If we do anything to violate the gazillion Federal laws, we have nothing to fear ,right G-man?

The Singularity Is Already Here – It’s Name Is Big Data

We kill people based on metadata.
– Gen. Michael Hayden, former head of the NSA and CIA
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-08/singularity-already-here-its-name-big-data

[imgcomment image?ts=1418413534[/img]

Oppression Instead of Admission

They have facial recognition embedded now in electronic billboards, cameras on every lamppost — over thirty million already — chips on supermarket shelves that record what merchandise you look at. The FBI’s Next Generation Identification system can now identify people just by looking at their faces, with all that data streaming from tens of millions electronic spy eyes and chips, and soon remote identification by iris scans, palm prints, voice analysis, DNA signature and even walking stride will be possible as well. There is Trapwire, exposed through Julian Assange’s Wikileaks, that sieves all this raw surveillance data for patterns of “suspicious activity.” And now there are “pre-crime surveillance cameras” too, thanks to BRS Labs, that we should all be grateful to know, identify criminal activity before it happens.

And that’s not counting the drones. There are about 18,000 state and local law enforcement agencies in the United States, increasingly employing surveillance drones. There is a whole alphabet soup of federal law enforcement agencies, and who knows what fleets of drones and other devices they too deploy. And that’s not talking about the dedicated spying agencies such as NSA and the whole large domestic and global U.S. government spying program revealed by Edward Snowden.

[Phone eavesdropping] Such spying includes access to all electronic communications of anyone — no court-order required and no Constitution consulted. Snowden revealed among other things, and it was verified by the Washington Post, that 90% of individuals monitored by the NSA are ordinary, innocent Americans. According to a lawsuit [pdf] by several former NSA employees, “The NSA has the capability to do individualized searches, similar to Google, for particular electronic communications in real time through such criteria as

target addresses, locations, countries and phone numbers, as well as watch-listed names, keywords, and phrases in email.” It can also seize and store “most electronic communications passing through its U.S. intercept centers.”

All for your own security, tovarisch. And there is a giant training regimen going on to get you used to the idea that your constitutional rights, your privacy, even your privates, are not your own but your benevolent, caring government’s as represented by its stalwart thirty million or so employees (federal, state and local, and growing on steroids).

Oppression Instead of Admission

flash
flash
February 9, 2015 11:07 am

[imgcomment image?w=500&h=837[/img]

John Coster
John Coster
February 9, 2015 11:23 am

I wrote what’s below in response to a post by Saker in which he talks about the other West, people disgusted by what the US is doing in Ukraine and elsewhere. Saker talks about a carpenter who wrote him, an example of just such people. Saw this, so I dropped the comment here instead. Looks like the subject of false flags is getting more popular. That was not what Saker’s comment was about in any direct way.

Yes, there is another West, although its citizens are beleaguered, and of course, we Americans, those at least who still believe in the Bill of Rights, share a common enemy with the Russians. The horrifying reality, the conclusion, we cannot escape from, try as we might, is that the same folks who promoted the coup in Ukraine, previously brought us the coup in the United States. Granted, we haven’t seen open warfare in our streets except in the guise of a false flag attack, but it’s clear that America’s foreign policy is not being carried out for the benefit of US citizens. It is controlled by the same cabal that brought us 9/11 and the Iraq War. I suppose their interests are aligned with various powerful factions in international banking, with expansionist schemers in Israel and with the corporations that have sucked a major part of America’s productivity into the machinery of war. The coup had many beneficiaries who’d rather look the other way and take the money. Sure, we have a blemished past. Deception by government and controlling elites is nothing new. But 9/11 marks a full blown descent into a delusional view of the world and as such the defacto overthrow of the US.

It is too tedious to enumerate all the absurdities passed off as truth in “official” accounts of 9/11. These have been cataloged by David Ray Griffin and many other serious scholars, but suffice it to say that three massive steel framed buildings can’t collapse in the exact manner of a controlled demolition because two of them are hit by airplanes, those two having been designed to withstand just such an event. Hence, we are drawn kicking and screaming to the very unpleasant conclusion that treasonous elements in the United States and their tacit collaborators are controlling much of what is happening around us. Please someone, show me an alternative explanation for the obvious lies which have been rammed through the media, the lunatic denials of reality such as the NY Times’ failure to pay any attention to the 9/11 collapse of the enormous building 7 into a neat pile of dust.

It would be nice if somehow, the Neo-cons and their benefactors would just take their ill gotten gains and leave us to restore some form of sanity. It seems unlikely even though there are recent signs that some of our European allies may be reexamining their allegiance to the madmen in the Beltway. Is the largess of a declining empire really worth the risk of war and freezing in the dark? Maybe there is some hope that enough people will stop playing ball to prevent catastrophe. There is a special kind of ignorance, a privilege shared by the super rich and powerful, which endangers us all. I think that’s what characterizes so many of Washington’s collaborator class. It’s easier for us carpenters and humble yeomen to see what seems so obvious.

Well that’s enough ranting for one morning. I’m probably a fool for going on and on and not using an alias when I write these comments. WTF, my great granddad times 5 signed the Declaration of Independence and almost got hung so I can’t allow myself to be too much of a chicken shit. Like the Carpenter I have very little money for anything these days, but a small Canadian label has put out a collection of my recordings and anyone who buys it from the link posted here by Admin (Lost Horizon) will enable me to contribute half the sale net to TBP. Just send a note to the effect that you’d like a contribution to TBP. And please feel free to disabuse me of any foolish paranoid notions I may harbor about the evil empire. I know I’ve inherited the hot headed temperament of my Scottish ancestors.

BUCKHED
BUCKHED
February 9, 2015 12:27 pm

“(39) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists”

Add one Kenyan to the above note…President Obozo .

Not sure if I saw this here or another site .

http://patdollard.com/2012/09/obama-vetting-1979-newspaper-article-by-valerie-jarrett-father-in-law-reveals-start-of-arab-purchase-of-u-s-presidency/

Rise Up
Rise Up
February 9, 2015 12:55 pm

@john coster: “…failure to pay any attention to the 9/11 collapse of the enormous building 7 into a neat pile of dust.”

Thank you for using that word-dust. Besides Building 7, both twin towers collapsed in a pile of dust as well. There should have been stories-tall layers of debris, as in when a huge structure such as a football stadium or other structure is brought down, plus a corresponding seismic reading. Neither was present in this event. Whether the cause was micro-nukes pre-planted or some directed energy weapon/technology (re: Dr. Judy Wood), is still to be determined. But it definitelhy wasn’t the planes. The “official” commission report on 9/11 blamed fire. Bullshit–NIST hired Underwriters Labs to test the melting of structural steel at the temperatures reportedly created by jet fuel and the test steel did not melt. Then they doubled the temperature and it still didn’t melt. So the NIST didn’t use those tests in their final report since it didn’t substantiate their theory.

http://www.seattle911visibilityproject.org/rwtcpdf.pdf

flash
flash
February 9, 2015 1:05 pm

@ John Coster

Well said, Sir!

+1000

Rise Up
Rise Up
February 9, 2015 2:10 pm

@admin: “Another JP Morgan murder suicide. Right?”

That link has a distrubing term – “Death Derivatives”. WTF?

As Bank Deaths Continue to Shock, Documents Reveal JPMorgan Has Been Patenting Death Derivatives

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
February 9, 2015 4:04 pm

@Admin & John Coster: Admin, please make his comment a post. Talk about knocking one out of the park!

IraK, exposing swivel-eyed loons, fruitcakes, tin-hatters, and anti-Semites,
IraK, exposing swivel-eyed loons, fruitcakes, tin-hatters, and anti-Semites,
February 9, 2015 5:15 pm

Why do we have to keep reading false flag theories put forward by history twisters, I-hate-the-Staters, conspiracy nuts, anti-Semites, and others.

From the post above: “(31) … many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers.”

A reference in the quote is to a September 8, 2012 Washington’s Blog article. The article includes this paragraph,
“While many people say that Israel only spied on the hijackers – and didn’t withhold actionable intelligence from the U.S. government – others, including some former military officials (like [Alan Sabrosky, (Ph.D, University of Michigan)… a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College]), allege that Israel withheld information from the U.S. or even had a hand in the attacks, pointing to suspicious activities regarding moving vans and explosives on 9/11. See this, this, this, this and this.”

On June 27, 2011 Sabrosky wrote an article for Veterans Today. He said, ““I am also absolutely certain as a strategic analyst that 9/11 itself, from which all else flows, was a classic Mossad-orchestrated operation. But Mossad did not do it alone.”

Other references (“this, this, this, and this” in the Washington’s Blog quote) are to a YouTube video titled “Mossad Truck Bombs on Sept 11,’ and to news articles on the same subject.

I invite anyone of you to read about 911 on the many internet sites that cover the subject. Make up your own minds. I think you’ll come to the same conclusion that I have. Arab terrorists, armed with box cutters, planned and carried out the 911 attacks. They happened to catch the US napping and were successful. Any conclusion involving Israel is completely unsupported, except by wild-eyed theorists. Never has and never will Israel do anything to harm America, her citizens, or her rightful place as leader of the free world.

Econman
Econman
February 9, 2015 5:36 pm

It’s amazing an idiot like the commenter about can’t see shit clearly even though his head is shoved completely up his own ass.

Probably a comment by some paid government drone/thief/parasite.

Econman
Econman
February 9, 2015 5:39 pm

…commenter above, not about. Fucking autocorrect.

Rise Up
Rise Up
February 9, 2015 8:26 pm

” Arab terrorists, armed with box cutters, planned and carried out the 911 attacks.”

@Irak, why have all experienced pilots said that the manuevors into the twin towers were NEAR IMPOSSIBLE, and the strike on the Pentagon (if it was an airplane) WAS IMPOSSIBLE at that speed and ground clearance. I’ll take their experienced opinion over yours every time.

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 9, 2015 8:56 pm

The Obama communists are destabilizing the US as well.They are bring it down hard. Noticed Americans are all Obamas targets and enemies,even more so if white and Christian,Military.Notice the poor little white boys in public re education camp school now targets of the Communist regime for poptart infractions.Holder said black kids are not to be disciplined in any public school.

BiggyTmofo
BiggyTmofo
February 9, 2015 11:20 pm

https://storify.com/BrecksvillPatch/here-s-what-people-are-saying-about-the-attempted

Basically the FBI was spying on the Occupy movement in Cleveland, Ohio and found 5 idiots who probably couldn’t lite a firecracker in a parking lot and set them up to blow up a large depression era bridge. The occupy movement had stated to report anyone who advocated and planned violence because the FBI was most likely the ones tricking fools to do this. The FBI would then discredit the movement and claim that they saved us from a terrorist attack. Not that the movement didn’t discredit itself and lost effectiveness very quickly. I was very careful not to say this in public but only in private as it seemed very easy to spot. Many smarter guys and gals through better research have much more to say about this especially how the government used spied and undermined movements that challenged the status quo. It wasn’t about safety but spying. Most folks are too blind to see this reality but the truth is getting out there and the MSM is now on it too. No one hides it anymore as it’s out in the open.

Alyssa
Alyssa
April 13, 2015 9:35 pm

Thanks for the auspicious writeup. It in fact used to be a
leisure account it. Look advanced to far brought agreeable from you!
However, how can we keep in touch?

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
April 13, 2015 10:42 pm

SSHHHHH……………..Dutchman believes it is all real. Don’t wake him, he likes the sweet lies the matrix whispers in his ear.

SSS
SSS
April 13, 2015 11:29 pm

“@Irak, why have all experienced pilots said that the manuevors into the twin towers were NEAR IMPOSSIBLE, and the strike on the Pentagon (if it was an airplane) WAS IMPOSSIBLE at that speed and ground clearance. I’ll take their experienced opinion over yours every time.”
—-Rise Up

As a 20-year instructor pilot and flight examiner in the U.S. Air Force, I will tell you straight up that a fucking rookie in the cockpit could have flown those planes into the twin towers and Pentagon. Is that enough experience for you? Will you take my word for it? Of course, you won’t. It doesn’t fit your story line.

As for your “if it was an airplane” that hit the Pentagon, just three questions? Where did the flight that didn’t hit the Pentagon go? What do you say to the 200-plus eyewitnesses who saw the airplane hit the building? How do you explain the clearly identifiable American Airlines debris photographed on the grounds of the Pentagon right after the attack?

Stucky
Stucky
April 13, 2015 11:48 pm

SSS

Talking to 9-11 Truthers is like pissing up a rope. I do give you extra points for trying, though.

Zarathustra
Zarathustra
April 14, 2015 12:10 am

Okay Stucky, you knew this was coming:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWvwuEmUfx8

Zarathustra
Zarathustra
April 14, 2015 12:21 am

SSS says:

As a 20-year instructor pilot and flight examiner in the U.S. Air Force, I will tell you straight up that a fucking rookie in the cockpit could have flown those planes into the twin towers and Pentagon. Is that enough experience for you? Will you take my word for it? Of course, you won’t. It doesn’t fit your story line.
______________________________

As a 20 year instructor pilot, etc., you must also realize that hitting a three story building with a commercial airliner flying at a high rate of speed was an act of expert piloting, unlikely to be accomplished by a novice.

SSS
SSS
April 14, 2015 1:13 am

“As a 20 year instructor pilot, etc., you must also realize that hitting a three story building with a commercial airliner flying at a high rate of speed was an act of expert piloting, unlikely to be accomplished by a novice.”
—-Zara @ SSS

The Pentagon is five stories high, not three. It remains the largest office building in the world. Just aim. If you miss your target, you’ll hit some part of the building. Even a Persian lover like you could do it.

And an expert would have hit the other side of the building (facing the Potomac River) where the Secretary of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff have their offices. What else you got for me, Zara? Bring it.

Zarathustra
Zarathustra
April 14, 2015 1:21 am

SSS says:

The Pentagon is five stories high, not three. It remains the largest office building in the world. Just aim. If you miss your target, you’ll hit some part of the building. Even a Persian lover like you could do it.

And an expert would have hit the other side of the building (facing the Potomac River) where the Secretary of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff have their offices. What else you got for me, Zara? Bring it.
_______________________

I am not a pilot, but if I were, considering that the Pentagon is a sprawling building, but not high, I would have come in at a steep angle, with the likelihood of a successful strike much more likely.

Sensetti
Sensetti
April 14, 2015 2:19 am

Riddle me this. Why waste your time considering these bullshit topics that have been hashed and rehashed. What are you going to change? How will your conversation affect or alter any future event?
It’s a fucking waste of time.

Stucky
Stucky
April 14, 2015 3:17 am

“Why waste your time considering these bullshit topics that have been hashed and rehashed. What are you going to change? … It’s a fucking waste of time.” —— Sensetti

You just wasted YOUR time telling people they wasted THEIR time. That’s some funny shit right there.

You’ve been a cranky fuker lately. Wazzup wif dat?

Not sure what your beef is with False Flags. They occurred in the past, they occur now, and they WILL occur in the future. Seems to me to be a pertinent topic. And even if not, you do know that you can just skip a topic if you don’t like it. Right?