The Anthrax Coverup Exposed

Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts

Graeme MacQueen’s 2014 book, The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy, has been vindicated by the head of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation.

Four and one-half months ago I posted a review of MacQueen’s book. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/12/02/2001-anthrax-deception-case-domestic-conspiracy/ The hired government apologists, the despicable presstitute media, and the usual gullible patriots greeted the book with screams of “conspiracy theory.” In fact, MacQueen’s book was a carefully researched project that established that there indeed was a conspiracy–a conspiracy inside the government.

MacQueen’s conclusion stands vindicated by Richard Lambert, the agent in charge of the FBI anthrax investigation who has turned whistleblower. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/04/head-fbis-anthrax-investigation-calls-b-s.html

It was obvious to any person familiar with the techniques that governments use to erode liberty by destroying the protection given to citizens by law that the purpose of the anthrax letters, especially the letters to senators Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle, was to raise the fear level in order to guarantee the passage of the tyrannical PATRIOT Act.

The PATRIOT Act was a decisive blow against American liberty. The act has served to negate the US Constitution in the 21st century and to endow the federal government with unaccountable and tyrannical powers.

In a court filing, Richard Lambert says that as the agent in charge of the investigation he was obstructed and impeded in his investigation for four years by the FBI’s Washington Field Office, by apathy and error from the FBI Laboratory, by erroneous legal decisions, and by politically motivated communication embargoes from FBI Headquarters.

As Lambert has filed a case in US District Court, it will be difficult for Washington to have him assassinated. However, Washington can still use its presstitutes against him.

Lambert says that there was far more exculpatory evidence in Bruce Ivins behalf than there was orchestrated circumstantial evidence against him. Ivins was Washington’s scapegoat after the orchestrated case against Steven Hatfill fell apart and Washington had to pay Hatfill $4.6 million for defamation. Lambert says the evidence was not sufficient for a court conviction of Ivins, who conveniently died or was murdered, and thus could be blamed without conviction.

Scientists have conclusively proven that the anthrax in the letters was advanced bio-weapons technology to which Ivins had no access.

Lambert’s accusations filed in federal court have the capability of exposing the entire 9/11 deception. It will be interesting to see if Washington can again prevail over law and truth and whether the American public will remain insouciant and content in their Matrix existence.

Update: Both Senator Leahy and Senator Daschle were in positions capable of blocking the neo-Nazi PATRIOT Act. Both senators had negotiated with the Bush regime changes in the act that made it less tyrannical. However, the changes were not in the final draft of the act sent to Congress. Consequently, Leahy and Daschle were resisting the rush to passage. I have often wondered if Leahy and Daschle understood the anthrax letters to be Washington’s warning: “Get out of the way of Tyranny or we will kill you.”

9
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
flash
flash

more shit from the police state stain on cloak of lady Liberty..

American Justice – FBI Lab Overstated Forensic Hair Matches in 95% of Cases, Including 32 Death Sentences
The American justice system is broken
American Justice – FBI Lab Overstated Forensic Hair Matches in 95% of Cases, Including 32 Death Sentences

The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.

Of 28 examiners with the FBI Laboratory’s microscopic hair comparison unit, 26 overstated forensic matches in ways that favored prosecutors in more than 95 percent of the 268 trials reviewed so far, according to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the Innocence Project, which are assisting the government with the country’s largest post-conviction review of questioned forensic evidence.

The cases include those of 32 defendants sentenced to death. Of those, 14 have been executed or died in prison.

“These findings are appalling and chilling in their indictment of our criminal justice system, not only for potentially innocent defendants who have been wrongly imprisoned and even executed, but for prosecutors who have relied on fabricated and false evidence despite their intentions to faithfully enforce the law,” Blumenthal said.

http://www.infowars.com/american-justice-fbi-lab-overstated-forensic-hair-matches-in-95-of-cases-including-32-death-sentences/

doubleguns
doubleguns

So simple to get Americans to give up liberty in place of safety.Unfortunately the safety we need is from our own police states. Franklin must be puking in his grave.

flash
flash

Get us out of the US!

If Canada and the United States can be separate nations without being denounced as being in a state of impermissible “anarchy,” why may not the south secede from the United States? New York State from the Union? New York city from the state? Why not Manhattan secede? Each neighborhood? Each block? Each house? Each person?

—Murray N. Rothbard

Olga
Olga

http://www.claritypress.com/MacQueen.html

I bought and read it this year – very well written and informative.

He makes the claim – of which I have no way of verifying – that one of the initial Anthrax victims was the husband of the real estate agent that showed several of the 9/11 hijackers around Florida.

If true that is one hell of a coincidence.

TE
TE

So many coverups, so many false flags and red herrings. So many faulty scientific studies, poisonous brain-altering, mandated chemicals, so many lies and deaths and torturous years for us peons.

And we both consent, and continue to ask for it.

Everytime someone says, “there ought to be a law” or “the government needs to do something…” I just smile and ask, “exactly how many hours are you willing to work a year to pay for that? And exactly how many “accidental” death by cops are you willing to stomach to save one life?”

I’ve yet to get an answer. All I can hope is their complete bewilderment leads to questioning of their government as God belief systems.

Probably not, my hub sure as hell won’t believe this guy until Lester Holt tells him too.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster

To me, PCR’s money sentence is this one: “Lambert’s accusations filed in federal court have the capability of exposing the entire 9/11 deception”
Let’s hope to God he’s right and those actually responsible for this horrific stain on the American conscience are finally brought to justice.

bb

Why waste your time with Anthrax when destroying the power supply would destroy civilization as we know it. The Chinese and Russians have the capabilities to put us back in the stone age. I’m sure some terrorists group could figure it out.Take out the electricity and you take out the water supplies.

yahsure
yahsure

Sounds like nuthin but good times ahead! The evening news keeps pushing Hillery,Like she is the answer to our problems.
Cloward and Piven.

flash
flash

comment image

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading