The Fruit Company

Guest Post by starfcker

Tired of listening to all the paid for economist shills such as Hilsenrath, Krugman, Zandi, pretending to not understand why our economy doesn’t take off? They understand. The function of our economy is a simple thing. And if you have been confused by their attempts to confuse you, this should simplify your understanding of how our economy worked, when it was working. I’ll give it two quick stories, and class will be over.

First, a real life example. I had a cash sale one day. quite rare for a wholesale business. The gentleman paid for his purchase with three 100 dollar bills. I immediately took the money and paid a man that I owed. The next morning, that guy went to another friend of mine’s business, and spent the same three hundred dollar bills. That friend went and paid his property taxes that afternoon in cash, including those same three hundred dollar bills. in less than 24 hours, that $300 had skipped through four sets of hands before ending up in the tax assessor’s office.

If you ever hear terms like velocity of money, and multiplier effect, this is what those terms mean. That $300 got spent 4 times in 24 hours, so it actually counted as $1200 in business activity, GDP, whatever you want to call it. So the multiplier was x 4, in a mere 24 hours. Let’s just call it a week, multiply that $1200. x 52. Even weekly, at that rate, those measly three 100 dollar bills could multiply to over $62,000. a year. And everybody got their piece of that pie through effort, by getting out there and chasing it, no redistribution necessary. And that’s just one example, and a tiny example at that.

Let’s take a second example. I’m going to make this one up. What if you had a giant publicly traded multinational company, let’s call it the Fruit Company. What if, the Fruit Company had all of its factories overseas, chock full to the brim with slaves, so they didn’t have the burden of wages? What if, the Fruit Company structured its business so it appeared as if all its profits were from its overseas operations, so it paid no taxes? What if, the Fruit Company shafted its owners, the shareholders, and didn’t want to pay dividends? And what if the government that hosted the fruit company’s operations, gave the young and dumb, gigantic, un-payable loans to buy the fruit companies products? And let’s just say the Fruit Company could borrow at virtually no cost, as much money as they desired to pay their bills. And what if, despite all that, the Fruit Company was given access to the greatest consumer market in the world tariff free?

Well, you might end up with a situation where the Fruit Company would begin to stack up unimaginable amounts of money, since most of the costs businesses face have been eliminated. So, let’s just say the Fruit Company stacked up more money than any company ever in the history of the world. I’m going to keep my numbers round, just so this is easy. Let’s pick a big number say, 200 billion dollars. Good for them, right? Wrong. Companies like the Fruit Company would indeed kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. Think about how a real company might operate in a real world economy. Let’s just say the Fruit Company paid taxes at a rate of 25% on that money. You may or may not think that’s a good thing, but that’s 50 billion dollars helping to fund the operation of our country.

Let’s just say the Fruit Company paid out 50 billion of those dollars in dividends to its owners the shareholders. I mean think about it, who owns that money, the fruits that run the place, or the shareholders? I always hear the worn trope, corporations exist to make their shareholders money, no other reason. Not my opinion, but for the sake of this argument, ok, whatever. And what if instead of having slaves, the Fruit Company actually paid people to build its products. Let’s just say they spent 50 billion of those dollars on wages. Let”s just say the average Fruit Company working stiff made 20 bucks an hour, or 40 grand a year. Do you realize that 50 billion would pay 62,500 people 40 grand a year for 20 years? 40 grand a year is enough to buy a home and raise a family. We wouldn’t have to bicker about the minimum wage, would we? And at the end of this onslaught of taxes, dividends, and wages, the Fruit Company would still have 50,000 million dollars left of idle cash just sitting in the bank. No velocity or multiplier happening there. But Hilsenrath doesn’t think you should save.

In the meantime take all those taxes, dividends, and wages and start putting a multiplier to them the way I did with my three 100 dollar bills. Remember, now we’re talking about 150,000 million dollars. Do you think a multiplier of that money might help our economy? This is only one imaginary company . Look at the damage this sort of behavior would do to the actual functioning of our economy. Ok, enough fairy tale. In real life,there is such a thing as a fortune 500. I’m sure they don’t all have 200 billion dollars sitting in the bank, but they certainly could all be contributing to the American economy in ways that they currently choose not to. Economic treason, i believe Pat Buchanan called it. So, if you ever wonder why our economy doesn’t work, think of my three 100 dollar bills and my imaginary Fruit Company.

Any questions?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
June 16, 2015 8:25 am

I think Greece is a Communist country with a lot of “Fruit Companies” that don’t pay taxes (a small USA but they can’t print dollars). .

wip
wip
June 16, 2015 8:39 am

Social and economic responsibility has left the building.

dc.sunsets
dc.sunsets
June 16, 2015 10:23 am

With vast scale comes impenetrable anonymity, obscurity and secrecy, and under those conditions only the most angelic of humans don’t become psychopathic criminals.

A small town might be able to keep the monster within most of us caged. Anything larger than that is riven with toxic corruption.

What we see today is simply becoming the apogee of this axiom.

Stucky
Stucky
June 16, 2015 1:19 pm

starfcker

Nice to see you do an original work. I really like the simplicity of it — simple, in a good way — that non-finance guys like me can understand.

Well done!

starfcker
starfcker
June 17, 2015 1:45 am

Thank you, stuck. I love the original content on this site. I’m going to try to figure out how to contribute to it. Right now, training wheels, you know? But I’m serious about it, and plan on getting better.

Chris Webb
Chris Webb
June 18, 2015 3:08 am

Maybe I misunderstood the article, but are you saying that companies avoiding government imposed extortion are the cause of our economic decline?

starfcker
starfcker
June 18, 2015 6:41 am

Maybe you misunderstood the article. Reading is fundemental

charles p. smith
charles p. smith
June 29, 2016 9:25 pm

I just tripped across this article.

Seems to me that Mr. Starfcker is espousing Keynesian economics, which is the cornerstone and bedrock of all liberal/Democrat/socialist/progressive economic thinking. Also, I think some of those astute Hayekian economists have shown that the multiplier effect – that is adding to the GDP multiple times – is a myth and that GDP is only increased once – the first 300 dollars. I am asking this not because of difference in opinion from Mr. Starfcker on where the US should go and how to get there, but as a hope that Mr. Starfcker might look deeper into the economic arguments concerning the multiplier effect. And to that end there may be an alternative economic tool or argument that generates the same result as Mr. Starfcker makes above. thanks and keep swingin man.