“Payback’s a Bitch”: Rural Wisdom and the Gathering Storm

Guest Post by Fred Reed

ConFlag

The furor over the Confederate flag, think I, has little to do with the Confederate flag, which is a pretext, an uninvolved bystander. Rather it is about a seething anger in the United States that we must not mention. It is the anger of people who see everything they are and believe under attack by people they aren’t and do not want to be—their heritage, their religion, their values and way of life all mocked and even made criminal.

The talking heads inside Washington’s beltway, in editorial suites in New York, do not know of this anger. They do not talk to people in Joe’s Bar in Chicago or in barbecue joints in Wheeling. They are cloistered, smug, sure of themselves. And they are asking for it.

We are dealing with things visceral, not rational. Confusing the two is dangerous. Hatreds can boil over as syllogisms cannot. The banning of the flag infuriates, for example, me. Why? Although a Southerner by raising, I would far prefer to live in New York City than in Memphis. Yet I value my boyhood in Virginia and Alabama. My ancestors go back to the house of Burgesses, and I remember long slow summer days on the Rappahannock and in the limestone of Athens, Alabama.

When the federal government and the talking heads want to ban my past—here, permit me to exit momentarily the fraudulent objectivity of literature—I hate the sonsofbitches.

A lot of people quietly hate the sonsofbitches.

To them, to us, the Confederate flag stands for resistance to control from afar, to meddling and instruction from people we detest. It is the flag of “Leave me the hell alone.” And this Washington, Boston, and New York will…not…do.

A surprise may be coming.

What is the anger about? Most visibly, but far from uniquely, race: the illegals, the Knock-Out game, and Washington’s protection of both. The racial hostility that pervades the country today is largely the doing of the talking heads and its perverse social policies. The rancor is unlike anything I have seen.

Curious. When I was a lad ages ago, I thought well of Brown vs. the School board. Southerners said that integration would never work and they were right, but what came before was just wrong. I thought so then, and I think so now. I favored the civil-rights acts. I reluctantly favored affirmative action (I was very young) thinking it meant a hand up instead of an entitlement. I wrote hopefully of the prospect of educating blacks.

But look what happened. We now see forced hiring of the incompetent as a right, endless accounts of blacks destroying shopping malls, burning cities, brutally attacking whites in gangs, and the giving to blacks of anything they want because they are black. You don’t like the Confederate flag, Jesse? Why then, it must go. Whatever you say, Jesse.

It wasn’t this way, but it is now. It is getting worse. But there is far more than race.  We now are compelled to live in a national sexual-freak show. Day after day after day the media are full of trans-this and trans-that, of homosexual marriages, all thrust in our faces, a parade of prancing peculiarities demanding and demanding and demanding. People who dare not say so are sick of it.

It isn’t viciousness. I don’t know anyone who wants to persecute the erotically baroque. Poofters in particular are usually bright, productive, decent people, and do not attack whites in wheel chairs with hammers. Yet I weary of their endless tedious concerns. I say, go. Go with God, but for God’s sake go. Or just shut up. That would do as well.

I, we, will be told, “But Fred, homosexuality is natural.” So is hemorrhagic tuberculosis. So is sadism. So is genocide.

Any sexual predilection can be called natural, and arguments can be made for all of them: Polygamy, or marriage with a sheep, or copulating on a public bus, or sex with girls of nine years. (How about, “Sex is natural. Children are erotic: Don’t they play doctor? Little girls are only afraid of it because of puritanical conditioning by society. Oral sex feels good, and adults do it, so why not…? Why shouldn’t her father gently teach her….” And so on.)

And crime is out of control, protected by a President and Attorney General with whom we, so many Americans,  have nothing in common, who dislike us,  and who want to disarm us and flood our country with illegal and incompatible aliens.

Do  you think that wanting a gun is silly? Last week I started getting emails: “Chuck got shot.” On Breitbart I found that Chuck De Caro, a journalist and friend for so long that I forget how I met him, had checked into a motel in Albuquerque with his wife, whereupon an armed dirtbag tried to rob them and perhaps worse. I suppose that a white couple in their sixties must have seemed a soft target. Oops. It wasn’t a swell career move. Chuck is ex-Special Forces and a longtime war corresponden. Threatening his wife doesn’t fly well with him.

Anyway, Chuck apparently had other ideas about being robbed and perhaps killed.  He also had a handgun. In the ensuing gunfight, he was hit several times and rushed to the hospital. Chuck will be okay, the dirtbag less so. He escaped to the parking lot, where he decided to lie down and bleed to death. A good choice. The news stories didn’t describe the perp, which meant…. Decaro

This gem, Tomorio Walton, is, or was, a career criminal and was, of course, on parole. Can you guess why so many of us want guns and carry permits? Characteristically I had to find the photo in  the Mail Online, an English paper.

Then there is the de-Christianizing of the country. Religion, both historically and currently, is a potent thing. Play with it at your risk. It is not always  really a matter of religion. Many of us, I among them, are not believers but value Christmas and its traditions. But no. We must not have nativity scenes or sing Christmas carols on public streets. Easter-egg hunts are unconstitutional. Mommy Washington doesn’t like them, and we have to do what Washington says.

Unless, of course, one day we don’t.

We are winding a spring.

bloody-beatdown

Standard beatdown of white man by black mob at Fourth of July in Cincinnati. Almost a daily occurence. The media will hide it. This is not a part of my culture. Why do we put up with it?

Stoking the flames under the pressure cooker is the unending, ever-tightening control of every aspect of life by Washington. People inside the city’s beltway, a venue I know well, do not understand what they are playing with. They are sure that they know best, and they are going to make us toe the line.

Federal bureaucrats  tell people in Casper, Laredo, and Knoxville what they can and cannot teach their children in the schools, what religious practices they may have and what their children may eat. They set curricula, determine to whom bakeries must sell cakes, decide who can marry what, and with whom we must associate.

I could go on. There is quiet fury about open borders, the forced acceptance of criminal aliens, of 100,000 Somalis by Minnesota, the endless wars, the declining standard of living, the insane censorship (say “nigger” and your career of thirty years ends) and the ungodly surveillance. Washington pushes, pushes, and pushes, thinking that with just enough pressure, we will all come to kowtow.

What if one day we don’t?

And there is governmental corruption, the sense—“realization,” I would say—that Washington is entirely in the hands of the arms manufacturers, of the Israeli lobby, of big pharma and ethnic lobbies and, well, anyone who bribes Congress. Elections are a sham, serving only to decide the division of the spoils for eight years. All decisions of importance are carefully kept out of the public’s hands.

Maybe Washington will always get away with it. Maybe it won’t. White Americans are an obedient and passive people, easily cowed, but maybe enough will prove enough. Maybe things will blow. Maybe jurisdictions will just ignore the feds, as begins to happen.

But it is dangerous. The economy declines, people out of college can’t get jobs, the ghettoes simmer, automation surges across the board, and one day soon we will have cutbacks in the entitlements. When groups begin competing for dwindling resources, things will get ugly. It could explode. It really could. You might be surprised how many people out there think, “Bring it on.” Not a good idea, but we go that way.

Tick Tick. Tick.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
111 Comments
Gil
Gil
July 14, 2015 3:00 am

So BackTable’s happy to erase some 300 years of technology if he gets the supposed freedom and self-reliance he wants? How many would die to achieve this? Which “undesirable” group would that include. There’s the sulking tone a toddler as if to say “if I don’t get what I want I will raze the land until I get it.”

Backtable
Backtable
July 14, 2015 9:01 am

Gil, I won’t “get” anything. As to rolling back 300 years of technology, it won’t go that far but it may certainly seem farther to some. When this country has another “Lehman moment,” and rest assured it’s already well underway, the outcome is going to be exceedingly unpleasant for all.
For anyone not familiar with factoring, let me give a brief primer on how industry (e.g., General Motors payroll, among many, many others) operates.

Factoring is a form of credit extended in exchange for the pledging of accounts receivable. If you’re a large trucking operator, you pledge the accounts payable to your firm within the next 90 days for a slightly discounted lump sum of quick cash today (literally within 48hrs.). This cash is available to fund the immediate needs of your operation. This process, known as “factoring,” is a primary source of commercial credit throughout US industry and provides a huge amount of money to corporations outside of the traditional lending routes.

When Hank Paulson stood in front of cameras in 2008 to announce we were facing the end of the world as we know it, he wasn’t far off the mark. What few people understood then or now, is how short-term credit works. When the derivatives market blew up, no one knew who would be solvent by the end of the week. Suddenly, no one would extend credit, potentially not even AAA over-night credit, much less 30-60-90 day stuff. Cash becomes absolute king under such a setting.

Fast forward. When, not if, but when we meet our next “Lehman moment,” it will be on a magnitude of scale multiples of times larger than 2008. I won’t go into what this present administration promised to do about “cleaning up Wall St.,” or any of the other bullshit promises made but not kept. Yeah, Gil, all politicians lie, it’s how they get elected, but this one didn’t know where to stop and as such has failed magnificently to deliver. A technique by the way that’s just great for building trust in the electorate.

Question: when short-term credit seizes up again, and the trucking industry doesn’t roll, how fast do you think this country comes to a standstill? Everything, we’re talking EVERYTHING in this country moves by truck. And that’s just one small corner of the economy that’s going to get hit. What about rail? What about air transport? Shipping? They all require short-term financing. And we’re not even touching on the astronomical figures that will be involved to prop up the mega-banks and investment firms holding tens of trillions in cascading derivatives, which by the way will be priority one for our crony leadership. After all, it’s their political donors who are the main bond and shareholders in these institutions. These elites will be screaming bloody murder for rescue (as usual), and given the Fed’s track record, they’ll get it. Everyone else will be distant second.

Point being, Gil, I don’t want what’s coming. I don’t think anyone does. But it’s all baked in. It won’t be about “rolling back 300 years of technology” so much as rolling back 100 years of frivolous cultural demands. When the primary concern is getting sustenance, shelter, and electricity, NO ONE is going to put the “rights of the LGBT,” or any other group for that matter at the forefront of their attention. And any special-interest group naïve enough to believe otherwise will do so at their peril. Making frivolous demands in a near-survival mode setting is an instant way to become outcast.

What I want is irrelevant. That’s my point entirely. Everybody “wants” something. The question is not what someone “wants.” The question is what are they willing to do to “earn” it? This concept seems to elude a large swath of society at the moment. That’s okay. I nor anyone else need do anything to ensure this changes. The nature of our precarious circumstances will automatically see to it. Unfortunately for some, particularly those used to receiving rather than providing, this is going to be very difficult to accept.

If you disagree with me, fine. My being right doesn’t solve anything. I’m simply pointing out that what’s coming will by default go a long way in resetting our cultures priorities. If it doesn’t our nation won’t remain in its present state.

Gil
Gil
July 14, 2015 10:44 am

Actually the worse possible thing for you BT is that nothing in particular happens. Life goes on as per as usual and you get to do nothing but continuing to complain.

DRUD
DRUD
July 14, 2015 10:57 am

Again, Backtable, couldn’t agree more. So refreshing to find someone who understands things as they are–a vastly complex system of costs and benefits, incentives and unintended consequences. I enjoy technology, use technology avidly, make my living from technology, but also often wish I had been born 1-2 centuries ago, before this new Pandora’s Box was opened quite so wide. Technology brings us marvels unimagined by anyone who came before us, but

DRUD
DRUD
July 14, 2015 11:05 am

the related costs are only now beginning to become apparent. We have worshiped at the twin alters of growth and convenience for the past several decades, and why would we? Everyone wants tomorrow to be bigger and better than today, and everyone wants convenience. But the costs may very well be devastating. Growth ALWAYS has limits and when things are easy to acquire (convenient) they lose their value.

We have latched onto growth and convenience as a culture and yes, those priorities WILL change because they MUST change. They are inherently unsustainable. You are also correct that it matters not who is “right” and that being “right” changes nothing. Cultural changes begin as individual changes. All that can be done is to prepare oneself, attempt to improve oneself, and wait for others to do the same.

Backtable
Backtable
July 14, 2015 12:54 pm

Gil, I don’t know how old you are and therefore have no idea of your experiences with life, but one thing you can certainly recognize is that change is constant and as a physical law of the universe it always will be (SEE Entropy).

Change is coming. How dramatic no one can predict, but if you have any real experience in the world (me, 25+ yrs. in the investment/legal industry), you’ve seen it unfold before your eyes: the repeal of The Glass-Steagall Act; The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000;The Patriot Act; The National Defense Authorization Act; the suspension of Financial Accounting Standards Board rules in banking…the list is long and growing…), you come to understand that The Powers That Be have purposefully structured the system in such a way as to ensure that no matter what changes, they retain the power. Throughout recorded history this has always been the objective of those in power. It always will be.

I’m not going to argue with you. As someone deeply involved in the industry, I know what I saw coming before the dot.com (aka “dot.bomb”) debacle. I know what I saw coming prior to the 2008 meltdown. And I know what I see coming next. I, like you, can only base my decisions on what I believe the future holds. I’ve told you what I generally see unfolding. If you see otherwise, please share and support your explanations with examples. I’m open to a convincing argument and given what I see on the horizon would personally welcome someone who has a brighter vision of the future and the tangible data to support it.