Ann Coulter and the Manufacture of Pedophilia

Enough. I shall go deep into the Okefenokee Swamp, dwell in  a hut of clay and wattles made, and live on crocodile meat and watermelons. The modern world is too much for me.

I have just read ¡Adios, America!  by Ann Coulter, and discovered that Mexico, my current home, is a suppurating moral sore where  men of fifty can legally screw little girls of twelve. Yes. It is perfectly legal.  I know this is true because Miss Coulter says it is true. All a drooling pervert has to do is sweet-talk the child.“Hey, leetle girl, want an ice-cream cone? I geeve you a nice toy eef you let me….”

I am grateful to Miss Ann for the information. I have lived thirteen years in Mexico without encountering this astonishment. The Mexicans have not heard of it either. Mexican attorneys are unaware of it. The penal codes are barren of it. She in lone splendor knows of this officially sanctioned child-molestation..

Specifically she says  that the age of sexual consent in Mexico is “12 in all but one Mexican state and 14 in the other.”

Twelve? My god, that’s barbaric. This is certainly what Miss Ann is peddling as the nature of Mexico and Mexicans. Of course all manner of gullible websites picked this up. Mexico, we are to believe, is now a freefire zone for doing children. Why, it’s legal.

But is it true?

Let us look at the actual law. In the newspaper business of earlier times, this was called “research” or “reporting,” and was thought to be good form in writing for publication.

Penal Code of the State of Jalisco Artículo 142-M.

“A quien tenga cópula o cópula equiparada, con una persona menor de edad o en una persona que no tenga la capacidad de comprender el significado de las cosas o de resistir el hecho, se le impondrá una pena de:”

“On one who copulates or the equivalent of copulation (“cópula equiparada”means penetration with anything other than a penis) with a person of minor age or who does not have the capacity to understand the significance of the act or to resist the act, will be imposed a penalty of:”

“1 Tres meses a cinco años de prisión, cuando la víctima tenga entre quince y menos de dieciocho años de edad y el acto se realice con su consentimiento por medio de la seducción, la cual se presume salvo prueba en contrario, o por medio del engaño;”

“1 Three months to five years of prison, when  the victim is between fifteen and eighteen years of age and the act is realized with his or her consent by means of seduction, which shall be presumed unless there is proof to the contrary, or by means of deception”

“2 Ocho a quince años de prisión, cuando la víctima tenga entre quince y menos de dieciocho años de edad y el acto se realice sin su consentimiento, o cuando sea una persona que no tenga la capacidad de comprender el significado de las cosas o de resistir el hecho;”

2 Eight to fifteen years of prison when the victim is between fifteen and eighteen and the act is realized without his or her consent, or when the victim lacks the capacity to understand the significance or to resist. ”

3 Doce a veinte años de prisión, cuando la víctima sea menor de quince años de edad.”

Twelve to twenty years of prison when the victim is less than fifteen.

Maybe that sounds to you like license to screw little girls of twelve. To me it sounds like a long time in a Mexican jail. I do not recommend confusing the two.

The foregoing is the law in Jalisco, where I live. Similar laws exist in the other states. At risk of boring the reader, I offer another example from a randomly selected state: .

For the state of Campeche: 

“Artículo 164 Comete el delito de estupro el que realice cópula con el consentimiento de persona mayor de catorce y menor de dieciocho años, independientemente de su sexo. Al que cometa el delito de estupro se le impondrán de seis meses a tres años de prisión y multa de doscientos a cuatrocientos días de salario.”

“Article 164: He commits statutory rape who copulates, with consent, with a person of more than fourteen years of age but less than eighteen, regardless of the person’s sex. A punishment of six months to three years of prison will be imposed on the perpetrator and a fine of four hundred days of salary.”

The age at which a young female can legally engage in sex with any consenting adult without restriction is…eighteen.

Now, Miss Ann could have discovered this in ten minutes on Google. (In fairness, though, it may be that internet service hasn’t reached New York.) Why didn’t she? The penal codes for all of Mexico are easily found here. Is she deliberately deceiving the reader (translated from the prissy journalese, this means “lying”) or is she so ideologically inflamed as to accept without checking anything derogatory about anything she doesn’t like? Actual malice? Reckless disregard for truth? Incompetence? Or just Miss Ann?

She is fiercely opposed to immigration from the Third World, which is reasonable since it is probably going to leave America poorer and bitterly divided forever. Yet it seems to me that she should stay within telemetry range of truth. Her book would be useful if she had done so. Instead it is a sustained partisan shriek, often lapsing into the silly.

For example, the subtitle is “The Left’s Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole.” I picture myself talking to my good left-liberal friend Diana:

Me: “Hey, Di, are you planning to make America into a third-world hellhole?”

Di: “Why, yes, Fred! I’m on the disease-importation committee.”

Come on, Ann. Grow up. This isn’t journalism. If it were any more slanted it would be vertical. Unsupported charges of encouraging pedophilia wouldn’t get past a desk editor at the Weekly Reader.

If she is so sloppy in her research–the most charitable explanation–regarding things I know about, how am I to accept her word on things I can’t check?  And this stuff isn’t appreciated by Mexicans since it encourages every pervert north of Laredo to come down to prey on their children.

As so often happens when I read of Mexico in the American press, I see little resemblance to the country I  live in. She tells with satisfied dudgeon of the inherent filthiness of Mexicans, who strew trash everywhere. Dirty diapers, plastic bags, used condoms, garbage. Really?

In the last few months, thanks to a major road trip, I have been in Guadalajara, Arandas, Aguas Calienties, Leon, Durango, Rosario, Mazatlan, Ls Paz, Cabo San Lucas, Jamai, San Pedro Itzican, and Loreto, among others. None was strewn with trash. My neighborhood is not strewn with trash.

I found myself wondering: has this tow-headed dragon even been to Mexico? Latin America? The book looks to be a protracted Google search. In her pronouncements about Third World hell-holes, she sounds like the sort of pampered geographic virgin who would go to Cornell—actually, she did go to Cornell—and derives her knowledge of Latin America from having eaten at Taco Bell.

Hell holes exist in the Third World, whatever precisely that is: much of the Moslem world, probably all of black Africa, India, Gaza—but aside from Belize, maybe Nicaragua, and Guatemala, there probably isn’t one below the Rio Bravo (I have never been to Nicaragua or Venezuela.)

Miss Ann is herself a curious piece of work. She is in her mid-fifties, but on her book jackets looks like a hot babe of twenty-two. Achieving this must require enough makeup to fill a peanut-butter sandwich, and I suspect that she has worked a couple of copies of Photoshop into smoking ruins.  Do we have here a narcissistic attention-freak? A reporter might be a better idea.

¡Adios America! energetically favors ending immigration to America, a  good idea which will not be adopted, but her unending railing against the Left ensures that the book will be read only by people who already agree with it. How bright is that?

Enough of hellholeagenesis. I am off to the Okefenokee, to live peacefully among water moccasins and weird-looking birds.

25
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Capn Mike
Capn Mike

Say Hi! to Skink!

falconflight
falconflight

“Article 164: He commits statutory rape who copulates, with consent, with a person of more than fourteen years of age but less than eighteen, regardless of the person’s sex. A punishment of six months to three years of prison will be imposed on the perpetrator and a fine of four hundred days of salary.”
===
Sounds like it would be worth the risk for someone so inclined. I mean police there have plenty of manpower with the NarcoCartels under control. Further, since age 14 can give consent, notwithstanding the “statutory” prohibition, I mean said society is certainly telegraphing its priorities. What percentage of the Mexican population in particular, is without potable water? Another national priority…

Persnickety
Persnickety

I have no desire to live in Mexico, but my travels there have shown me a country closer to what Fred describes than to what Ann describes. In fact, Mexico reminds me heavily of the less-white parts of California, which probably isn’t surprising since it’s largely the same people in both.

Mexico’s severe problem is that the statutory law often doesn’t indicate what happens in real life. Once upon a time the US followed its statutory law, at least to some extent, but we are far down the path of being another Mexico in this regard.

AC
AC

I’m surprised that the Mexicans haven’t codified in their laws the appropriate bribes to buy your way out of prosecution for various offenses.

DC Sunsets

Most of the folks flowing into the US from other places now are their least, not their best & brightest.

A customer of mine from years ago, a Mexican immigrant physician, pointed out that the successful people in Mexico (and there are many, many, many of them) stay in Mexico. He was the exception to the rule, someone who liked the US and (over a career) made a ton more money here than he would have in Mexico.

It is largely Meso-Americans, largely of western aboriginal heredity, who are flocking to North America now. They are clearly changing the face of the countries in North America, and in ways most upper middle class people do not appreciate.

Tim
Tim

Cap’n Mike: I gave you a thumbs up, because I’ve read all of Carl Hiassen’s books. Good reference, that.

Where’s Billy when you need him? He could refute this entire article with a few swift strokes of his keyboard. When he and El Chuco were having their most vicious verbal wars, how many times did we have to read this:

“Mexico….is a suppurating moral sore where men of fifty can legally screw little girls of twelve.”

So, either it’s true, or it’s not true. Fred lives in Mexico, Ann & Billy do not.

What say you, Billy?

DC Sunsets

The “We Are the World” Narrative of 1970-2000 is rapidly changing to a more xenophobic Narrative.

The map is not the territory. The old map was full of happy faces (and misrepresented reality in a positive spin) while the next dominant map will be full of skulls and crossbones, which also will be a misrepresentation in the other direction.

It is part of the sine wave of human social behavior. We are promised a much less peaceful domestic situation, especially once the reservoir of “plenitude” breaks its dam and washes these fat, dumb and happy times away.

falconflight
falconflight

What percentage of illegal aliens are responsible after committing various crimes, for prison populations at the state and local level? Eh? 30%?

BUCKHED
BUCKHED

Well…from my own personal experience, I was offered a beautiful Latina who was only 14…of course I was 14 at the time too and with my parents. We always had a great time in Mexico but that was back in the early 70’s .

Ann needs to remember that the Mooslum’s are the ones who prefer children or goats if they aren’t available .

Desertrat
Desertrat

Fred’s likely correct about the general cleanliness within Mexico, but I doubt that he’s spent much time in the border towns along the Rio Grande. Going south toward Camargo from Ojinaga, Chihuahua (across from Presidio, Texas), the downwind side of the nicely-paved highway is heavily littered with paper, disposable diapers and plastic bags.

The outskirts of Juarez, Nuevo Laredo and Matamoros are no better.

Persnickety
Persnickety
Stucky

There are a group of people … they are known as True Patriotic Americans … who NEED to tear down other countries and their cultures, even to the point of outright lies and fabrications, in order to make the USA!USA!USA! sound better in comparison.

Ann Coulter, one of the most vacuous, stupid, butt ugly, neocon, worthless pieces of shit in America is on of their chief spokesman. I truly wish she would literally drop dead …. today would be a good day for that.

USA! #1 !!!
USA! #1 !!!
USA! #1 !!!
USA! #1 !!!
USA! #1 !!!
USA! #1 !!!

(The Ministry Of Propaganda requests that you keep repeating the above until you believe the bullshit. Or, just buy Ann’s book.)

Overthecliff
Overthecliff

The impression that most Gringos have of Mexico is that the law is what the enforcer says it is and he can be influenced by MONEY… That is pretty much the same system we have, only the Mexicans are more open and honest.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster

Ann Coulter is about as female as Caitlyn Jenner. Check out that adam’s apple!

Anonymous
Anonymous

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America#Federal_Law

“In Mexico, criminal legislation is shared between the federal and state governments. The federal law establishes the age of 12 as the minimum age of consent, while the age at which there are no restrictions for consensual sexual activities is 18 (sex with someone 12-18 is not illegal per se, but can still be open to prosecution under certain circumstances). Local state laws may override the federal law. In practice, the decision as to whether or not to prosecute is left to state authorities regardless of the younger person’s age. At state level, the minimum ages of consent vary between 12 (and puberty in a few states) and 15, while the age at which there are no restrictions for consensual sexual activities vary from 16 to 18 (most common 18).”

Kill Bill
Kill Bill

MAnn Coltrane..neo-kook manwhore.

kokoda
kokoda

Persnickety………..from your link

‘He’s only 18, and he looked like an innocent boy,’ Ada Shane said.

Ada must have very bad vision.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

A lot of the Mexicans here get pregnant in their teens. There’s also a lot of garbage in the neighborhoods they dominate. I don’t really care how most people live in Mexico. I are how they live when they get here, and a lot of them are a train wreck. Coulter’s right overall. If Mexico were so great, Americans would be sneaking into Mexico, not the other way around.

Stucky

I see flash the thumbs manipulator, the piece of shit coward, the misogynist, is at it again.

B
B

Ann is a little skanky has been that has lost the limelight. The only way she can get any attention is if she says something ridiculous and disgusting. What a sad, sad, human being. Nobody pays any attention to her anymore. She has become a joke to any thinking person.

IndenturedServant

“I suspect that she has worked a couple of copies of Photoshop into smoking ruins.”

LOL! Too funny. Ann Coulter is about as believable as Robert S. Finnegan.

IndenturedServant

AC says:
“I’m surprised that the Mexicans haven’t codified in their laws the appropriate bribes to buy your way out of prosecution for various offenses.”

As a turd whirled nation, Mexico is not as advanced as the USA yet.

MuckAbout

Since the monkey’s have discussed the thread to death, I’ll comment on the author.

Ann Coulter has her head up her cunt. She a rabble rousing bitch who writes for one thing. M-o-n-e-y.

‘nuf said..

MA

Persnickety
Persnickety

Iska said: “A lot of the Mexicans here get pregnant in their teens. There’s also a lot of garbage in the neighborhoods they dominate. I don’t really care how most people live in Mexico. I are how they live when they get here, and a lot of them are a train wreck.”

Well, what if we rounded up the people in our ghettos and sent them to Mexico as illegal invaders? How do you think they would live there – would it be the Hamptons, or Compton?

How would Mexico respond if we dumped millions of our poor people on them?

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

I think you’re making my point, Persnickety. No country wants be invaded by the drecks of another country. The only difference is that Mexico wouldn’t be so stupid to allow it.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading