Are The Payroll Jobs Reports Merely Propaganda Statements?

Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts

US economics statistics are so screwed up that they do not provide an accurate picture.

Consider the latest monthly payroll jobs report. According to the report, in January 151,000 new jobs were created. Where are these jobs? According to the report, 69% of the new jobs are accounted for by retail employment and waitresses and bartenders. If we add in health care and social assistance, the entirety of the new jobs are accounted for. This is not the employment picture of a First World economy.

According to the report, in January the retail sector added 57,700 jobs. Considering that January is the month that followed a disappointing Christmas December, do you think retailers added 57,700 employees? Such a large increase in retail employment suggests an expected rise in sales, but transportation and warehousing lost 20,300 jobs and wholesale trade added only 8,800.

Perhaps it is mistaken to think that employment in these sectors should move together. Possibly the retail jobs, if they are real, are part-time jobs replacing a smaller number of terminated full-time jobs in order that employers can avoid benefits costs. If this is the case, then the retail jobs are bad news, not good news.

The reported unemployment rate of 4.9% is misleading as it does not count discouraged workers. When discouraged workers are added, the actual rate of US unemployment is about 23%, a number more consistent with the decline in the labor force participation rate. In January 2006 the labor force participation rate was 66%. In January 2016 the labor force participation rate is 62.7%.

The government has a second official unemployment rate that counts short-term discouraged workers (discouraged for less than one year). That rate, known as U-6, is 10%, twice the “headline rate” which is always the U-3 measure that excludes all discouraged workers not currently looking for a job.

In his reports John Williams (shadowstats.com) explains that the jobs reported can be an artifact of seasonal adjustments. Perhaps a simple way of seeing the influence of seasonal adjustments is to compare the not seasonally adjusted jobs numbers for December 2015 and January 2016. These numbers are 144,112,000 jobs in December and 141,123,000 jobs in January, a decline of 2,989,000. However, with seasonal adjustments the January number rises to 143,288,000 and the December number falls to 143,137,000, producing a January jobs gain of 151,000.

Payroll jobs are the number of jobs, not the number of employed people. Many of the payroll jobs are part-time. In order to make ends meet, some people hold two or more part-time jobs. In contrast to the 143,288,000 reported payroll jobs, civilian full-time employment is about 123,000,000.

Another factor that distorts the jobs reports is the birth-death model. Based on John Williams’ expertise, I have often reported on this effort by the BLS to estimate the net of unreported jobs losses from business closures and the unreported jobs gains of new start-ups. Here is John Williams in his latest report on the January payroll jobs:

“Historically, an upside-bias process was created for payroll-employment reporting simply by adding in a monthly “bias factor,” so as to prevent the otherwise potential political embarrassment to the BLS of understating monthly jobs growth. The “bias factor” process resulted from such an actual reporting embarrassment, with the underestimation of jobs growth coming out of the 1983 recession.

“That process eventually was recast as the now infamous Birth-Death Model (BDM), which purportedly models the relative effects on payroll employment of jobs creation due to new businesses starting up, versus jobs lost due to bankruptcies or closings of existing businesses.

“Separately there is a preset upside bias, plus a presumed net additional “surplus” of jobs added
on to the payroll estimates each month as a special add-factor. In current reporting, the aggregate average overstatement of monthly employment change easily exceeds 200,000 jobs per month. These details and section shall be updated fully in the pending Supplement.”

The assertion that the US economy has been in recovery since June of 2009 is not consistent with the quantity and quality of the jobs reflected in the payroll jobs reports. The number of new jobs is not sufficient to prevent the labor force participation rate from declining, and the pay associated with the jobs is not sufficient to leave consumers with enough discretionary income to drive an economy based on consumption.

The financial presstitutes do not explore these issues. They merely report the numbers that the official releases emphasize and ask no questions about them. Therefore, the decline in American economic prospects receives no attention. The Federal Reserve can even report that half of American 25 year-olds live at home with their parents without causing alarm. They do this not from choice but from necessity. They simply cannot find jobs that pay enough to support an independent existence. You would think that this would be an issue of national concern.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
February 7, 2016 6:25 pm

At 4.9% unemployment there aren’t enough easily available workers to fill the open positions and wages go up as companies try to hire each others workers away from them.

This is why we need more millions of immigrants and H1b’s, to keep us from falling into economic collapse from a simple shortage of available workers to fill our jobs market.

Ask just about any Congressthing, Democrat or Republican, they’ll tell you how bad it is and why new immigration and H1b legislation is so badly needed to solve the problem.

Cricket
Cricket
February 7, 2016 7:32 pm

The fact that Catepillar isn’t selling any heavy equipment and empty cargo ships will transport you across the ocean for the low low price of $300K should tell you all you need to know…we are in a deep global depression and things are going to get much worse before it gets better.

Our rulers say the solution is to bring in millions of genuine unwashed masses, who suck up our social programs, not contribute or assimilate and rape our women and children…is it any wonder that Trump can rise in a world like this?

kokoda
kokoda
February 7, 2016 8:37 pm

Anon…..I assume that was sarcasm.

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
February 7, 2016 9:32 pm

Q. Are the payroll jobs reports merely propaganda?

A. Yes!

General
General
February 7, 2016 10:13 pm

What we need is the equivalent of the French Revolution 2.0 to clean out the traitors in the Feral (Federal) Government. Purely hypothetical, of course.

rhs jr
rhs jr
February 7, 2016 11:48 pm

They should change the name of the monthly BLS Jobs Report to simply the Bull Shit Report.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
February 8, 2016 12:23 am

The bureacrats in the BLS probably have no idea that the numbers they’re spewing out are garbage. If they do, then should be indicted for treason, along with all the fuckers that planned & executed 911. And I’m not talking about Muslims.