Trump-eteers vs. Westcoaster-ites

You’re both friggin idiots.  And I mean that in the most sincerest possible manner.


Author: Stucky

I'm right, you're wrong. Deal with it.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
38 Comments
Bea Lever
Bea Lever
March 1, 2016 2:18 pm

Elites love it when the sheep are occupied with drivel, makes it easier to clean out their pockets.

card802
card802
March 1, 2016 2:40 pm

Right?

We cheer for R’s or D’s as if they were a favorite sports team.

Too bad when our team loses we don’t demand a new coach or quarterback, we just jeer the other loser team more.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 1, 2016 2:55 pm

Vote for Trump and make a difference, otherwise vote for more of the same.

Mahtomedi
Mahtomedi
March 1, 2016 3:23 pm

The Establishment Republicans say that Trump isn’t a Republican though. So that kind of defeats your argument right there. Vote Trump.

Gator
Gator
March 1, 2016 3:28 pm

So true, stucky. This shit sounds EXACTLY like the ‘hope and change’ nonsense Obama used during his campaign. It is identical. How many of you guys laughed your asses off at the rubes falling for it ? I’m guessing most of you. Now you are falling for the EXACT SAME THING. it would be hilarious if it wasn’t so sad and pathetic. Actually, it’s still pretty hilarious.

Hopefully you guys don’t hang on to the illusion of ‘make America great again’ for as long as the dems held on to ‘hope and chains’ but you’ve already proven yourselves equally gullible, so I’m guessing you’ll still be true believers til the end.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
March 1, 2016 3:31 pm

[imgcomment image[/img]

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
March 1, 2016 3:33 pm

[imgcomment image[/img]

Francis Marion
Francis Marion
March 1, 2016 3:33 pm

2 Corinthians 11:14

No wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.

Stucky I’m afraid I don’t fit in here. I don’t trust any of them. Anywhere. Period.

Mahtomedi
Mahtomedi
March 1, 2016 3:38 pm

Gator says: “This shit sounds EXACTLY like the ‘hope and change’ nonsense….”

Really?? I don’t remember the part about getting the Beaners back to their side of the Rio Grande in Obama’s hopey-changey shtick.

harry p.
harry p.
March 1, 2016 3:41 pm

stucky,

[imgcomment image[/img]

Administrator
Administrator
March 1, 2016 3:43 pm

Last Chance for America?

01 Mar, 2016 by Thomas Sowell

The “Super Tuesday” primaries may be a turning point for America — and quite possibly a turn for the worse. After seven long years of domestic disasters and increasing international dangers, the next President of the United States will need extraordinary wisdom, maturity, depth of knowledge and personal character to rescue America.

Instead, if the polls are an indication, what we may get is someone with the opposite of all these things, a glib egomaniac with a checkered record in business and no track record at all in government — Donald Trump.

If so, the downward trajectory of America over the past seven years may well continue on into the future, to the point of no return. Democrat Susan Estrich says that it is “fun” watching Donald Trump. She may be able to enjoy the spectacle because Trump is Hillary Clinton’s best chance of winning the general election in November.

Even if the FBI’s investigation leads them to recommend an indictment, the Obama administration is not likely to indict Hillary.

No doubt “The Donald” is entertaining, and he has ridden a wave of Republican voter anger against the Republican establishment, which has repeatedly betrayed them, especially on illegal immigration.

But these political problems are a sideshow, in a world where Iran is guaranteed to get nuclear weapons and North Korea, which already has them, is developing long-range missiles that can reach American cities. Iran is also developing long-range missiles.

Then there are the international terrorist organizations from the Middle East — many sponsored by Iran — whose agents have had easy access to the United States across our open border with Mexico.

We will need the cooperation of nations around the world to keep us informed of these terrorist organizations’ activities, and to help disrupt the international money flows to terrorists.

Those nations know that helping the United States makes them targets of terrorism. So they have to weigh how much they can rely on America, before they risk their own national survival by cooperating with us against the terrorists.

Is Donald Trump someone who would inspire such confidence among leaders of other countries? Already Trump’s irresponsible rhetoric has caused a backlash in Mexico and there has also been an attempt in Britain to ban him from setting foot on British soil.

We need all the allies we can get, from countries around the world, including Muslim allies in the Middle East. The last thing we can afford, at this crucial juncture in history is a president who alienates allies we have to have in a war against international terrorists.

On the campaign trail, Donald Trump’s theatrical talents, including his bluster and bombast, may be enough to conceal his shallow understanding of very deep problems. But that will not cut it in the White House, where you cannot clown or con your way out of problems, and where the stakes are matters of life and death.

Trump’s acting like a bull in a china shop may appeal to some voters but, in the world as it is, he may well cost us our last chance to recover from the great dangers into which the Obama administration has gotten this nation.

We already have an ego-driven, know-it-all president who will not listen to military or intelligence agency experts. Do we need to tempt fate by having two in a row?

Despite Donald Trump’s string of primary vote victories, he has not yet gotten a majority of the Republican votes anywhere. But although most Republican votes are being cast against him, the scattering of that vote among so many other candidates leaves Trump with a good chance to get the nomination.

Everyone understands that the best chance for stopping Trump is for that fractured majority vote to consolidate behind one candidate opposed to him. But who will step aside for the good of the country?

When we think of American military heroes who have fallen on enemy hand grenades to save those around them, at the cost of their own lives, is it really too much to ask candidates — especially those who present themselves as patriots — to give up their one political chance in a zillion this year for the sake of the country?

Voters have a responsibility too. They might well ask themselves: Do I plan to use my vote to vent my emotions or to try to help save this country?

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
March 1, 2016 3:44 pm

Gator said:
” Now you are falling for the EXACT SAME THING. it would be hilarious if it wasn’t so sad and pathetic. Actually, it’s still pretty hilarious. ”

I already tried pointin’ that out to ’em gator. They’re all hooked deep and not buyin’ it! Hook. Line. Sinker.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
March 1, 2016 4:19 pm

Trump has proven over and over again that he’s not afraid to use fraud as a means of enriching himself. Developments with his name that collect up-front money then never get built. Trump University, which is still fighting a class-action suit by former “students”. 4 bankruptcies. The list goes on & on.

Hitlery should be in prison for Benghazi, should be in prison or at least indicted for spewing state secrets from her “server-in-a-closet”. Quid pro quo deals with foreign states donations to the Clinton “Foundation”, and a colder than an iceberg campaign style when she’s out to “meet the folks”.

And then there’s Bernie Sanders, who has honorably served his constituents as an Independent over the years by listening to their problems and earnestly trying to provide solutions. No scandals, just public service. Voted against the wars in the sandbox and doesn’t want us involved in more wars. Wants to break up the big banks and tax Wall St. Had huge marches in 70 cities across America just yesterday.

Why the fuck do you think I’m voting for Bernie Sanders? Join me!

Southern Sage
Southern Sage
March 1, 2016 4:21 pm

Reading Stucky I have only one thought. Why is this man so enthralled with the idea of Civil War II, which is sure to come if Trump is not elected. This is a nationalist movement, not an economic paper exercise or a political kabuki dance. If America ceases to be white, it ceases to be America, period. I know. I have lived in majority non-white countries for many years. I know what the future holds if the trend is not stopped and reversed. Stucky, your children and grand-children will curse you for your blindness.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 1, 2016 5:14 pm

Westie,

Sanders is a Maroon that can’t even beat Hillary.

You really think he can do any of the absolutely unaffordable things he talks about doing?

If so you’re one too.

Weedhopper
Weedhopper
March 1, 2016 5:49 pm

Any asshole can complain about the situation…it takes hard work and sacrifice to make change possible. What have you done Stucky?…besides complain!?

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
March 1, 2016 6:34 pm

No matter how well Trump does in the primaries, the party elite will never let him get the nomination. They will rewrite the rules and block him. Third party run won’t save him either but would hand the election to Hitlery.

Unfriendly
Unfriendly
March 1, 2016 6:40 pm

Weedhopper’s a troll. That’s all you gotta’ know.

Mahtomedi
Mahtomedi
March 1, 2016 7:08 pm

@Stucky

Yes, I think Trump could make a difference. Now maybe it will only be to slow the Titanic from 30 knots down to 15, but that’s still a ‘difference’. And every fucking third-worlder who won’t end up in the U.S. will make a ‘difference’ to someone who won’t have them in their city.

ottomatik
ottomatik
March 1, 2016 8:22 pm

Stuck- Your analysis is flawed either way. Trump, will certainly make a difference, that said so will Bernie.
In all my life I have never seen such a line up paraded against a single canindate, never, and I suspect you have not either.
So either it’s the establishment you so verbosely expose above, realizing we hate them and deftly anti-signaling their favorite candidate with false vitriol to guide our vote or they fuckin hate him as much as we hate them.
I will acknowledge it could be the former and its a scam, but I personally believe most of those shitbags hate Trump and I would love to give them the gift that keeps on giving.

ottomatik
ottomatik
March 1, 2016 8:28 pm

Is Trump a Birther?
Is Trump a Truther?
If President how bad could he fuck shit up with an Attack Dog AG and Tuther,Birther fantasy’s, yep, Trump.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
March 1, 2016 8:34 pm

@Anonymous coward: If you’re so afraid to give even a screen name, then I don’t have time to debate you. And for the record, national polls show Hitlery losing to Trump while Sanders will mop the floor with him. Remember, Bernie is an Independent running as a Dem. Most voters these days identify how? As Independents.

Francis Marion
Francis Marion
March 1, 2016 9:32 pm

“Why the fuck do you think I’m voting for Bernie Sanders?”

You had me on your side right up until this statement. Then I had to down arrow you.

The answer to ending corruption is not socialism.

“Join me”

I’m already living it brother.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
March 1, 2016 9:37 pm

What is your favorite match up and projected outcome of popular vote percentage?
I’ll go first.

1. S – T Best match. Sanders by 54%
2. S – C
3. S – K
4. S – R
5. C – T Trump is the man by 87%
6. C – C
7. C – K
8. C – R

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
March 1, 2016 9:39 pm
Overthecliff
Overthecliff
March 1, 2016 10:19 pm

Even if Trump is real he can’t fix the disaster that is coming. Twenty trillion dollars and growing. It can’t be fixed.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 1, 2016 10:24 pm

Westie,

I use no screen name because I seek no personal fame or recognition. I’m quite content to be just an anonymous face in the crowd of discussion.

But the reason you won’t “debate” me has nothing to do with a screen name opr lack of one (since you fail to address similar questions with those carrying the fame of a screen name), it is because you cannot and the reason you cannot is that you have nothing other than wishful thinking to present in place of facts for your claims.

FWIW, simply answering a very valid question with a factual answer is not “debating” someone.

Sanders can’t even beat Hillary anyway so it is rather moot for anything other than entertaining speculation about a hypothetical and unrealistic situation.

Gator
Gator
March 1, 2016 10:26 pm

@mahtomedi – you are missing the forest for the trees. It’s rhetoric designed to appeal to the dumber base of the party by telling them exactly what they want to hear. The specifics aren’t important. The result is the same. Convince dumb people that you are going to solve all their problems by making a few vague promises and pushing a couple hot button issues. It’s exactly what Obama do, just the republican version. If you all are too dumb to see through it, there’s probably nothing I can do to open your eyes. I only hope y’all are man enough to admit you were wrong when reality rears it’s ugly head. It will.

As far as our children and grandchildren cursing us goes, you guys participating in this farce are the problem, not those of us smart enough to see it for what it is – bullshit.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 1, 2016 10:27 pm

Overthecliff,

You’re probably right but I’d rather go down swinging at it than just whimpering about it.

Trump is the only one that will even make a realistic effort to stop the probable collapse of our way of life and the destruction of our nation.

starfcker
starfcker
March 1, 2016 10:44 pm

Anon, I’m in agreement with you on trump. The only problem with using anon as a screen name is it seems hard to be sure you are carrying on a dialogue with the same person. The website default is anon.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
March 2, 2016 12:39 am

Well, there’s Anon, there’s An Anon and maybe even Al Anon. Take your pick and address any of those. I never understood why Stucky hated Anon so much but lately I have seen the light and coming from Anonymous, it is pretty dim. Still, not as dim as the black light from Mahtomedi.

There’s a light
A certain kind of light
That never shone on me.
Must be Mahtomedi
It is you…
It is you…
The BeeGees

Phil from Oz
Phil from Oz
March 2, 2016 3:47 am

It will be interesting to see how the rest of the World reacts to whoever gets the nomination (by means legitimate or otherwise . . . .)

By then the “National Deficit” will be beyond $20 Trillion, and the total deficit (unfunded liabilities) will be very considerably more – in the order of $200 Trillion, so whoever gets the “Big Job” will be wanting to keep in VERY good terms with those holding the debt – National (US Citizenry), AND International.

Balancing the needs and desires of two groups whose interests may be diametrically opposed will need extra-special skills – skills that ALL the “Candidates” do not appear to possess.

Happy reading (US in mid – 2017) – http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-06-17/day-2017

Weedhopper
Weedhopper
March 2, 2016 6:53 am

No Unfriendly, I’m not a troll. I’m just a guy who took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies…foreign and domestic. In other words, I’m against you and Stucky. Now bitch away on the internet while you accomplish nothing…and leave the leadership to the adults. A response from you or Stucky is neither required nor desired.

flash
flash
March 2, 2016 7:10 am

Who is Donald Trump?

Who is Donald Trump?

No reasonable person can believe that any of the establishment candidates will slash federal spending, rein in the Federal Reserve, cut burdensome business regulations, reform the tax code, or eliminate useless federal departments (the Departments of Education, Housing and Urban Development, Energy, etc.). Even Ronald Reagan was unable to eliminate the Department of Education. (Of course, getting shot at tends to make a person less of a risk-taker.) No reasonable person can believe that any of the nation’s major problems will be solved by Rodham, Bush, and the other dishers of donkey fazoo now eagerly eating corn in Iowa and pancakes in New Hampshire.

Many Americans, and especially Trump supporters, have had it with:

Anyone named Bush

Anyone named Clinton

Anyone who’s held political office

Political correctness

Illegal immigration

Massive unemployment

Phony “official” unemployment and inflation figures

Welfare waste and fraud

People faking disabilities to go on the dole

VA waiting lists

TSA airport groping

ObamaCare

The Federal Reserve’s money-printing schemes

Wall Street crooks like Jon Corzine

Michelle Obama’s vacations

Michelle Obama’s food police

Barack Obama’s golf

Barack Obama’s arrogant and condescending lectures

Barack Obama’s criticism/hatred of America

Valerie Jarrett

“Holiday trees”

Hollywood hypocrites

Global warming nonsense

Cop killers

Gun confiscation threats

Stagnant wages

Chevy Volts

Clock boy

Pajama boy

Mattress girl

Boys in girls’ bathrooms

Whiny, spoiled college students who can’t even place the Civil War in the correct century

…and that’s just the short list.

Trump supporters believe that no Democrat wants to address these issues, and that few Republicans have the courage to address these issues. They certainly know that none of the establishment candidates are better than barely listening to them, and Trump is their way of saying, “Screw you, Hillary Rodham Rove Bush!” The more the talking head political pundits insult the Trump supporters, the more supporters he gains. (The only pundits who seem to understand what is going on are Democrats Doug Schoen and Pat Caddell and Republican John LeBoutillier. All the others argue that the voters will eventually “come to their senses” and support an establishment candidate.)

But America does not need a tune-up at the same old garage. It needs a new engine installed by experts—and neither Rodham nor Bush are mechanics with the skills or experience to install it. Hillary Rodham is not a mechanic; she merely manages a garage her philandering husband abandoned. Jeb Bush is not a mechanic; he merely inherited a garage. Granted, Trump is also not a mechanic, but he knows where to find the best ones to work in his garage. He won’t hire his brother-in-law or someone to whom he owes a favor; he will hire someone who lives and breathes cars.

“How dare they revolt!” the “elites” are bellowing. Well, the citizens are daring to revolt, and the RINOs had better get used to it. “But Trump will hand the election to Clinton!” That is what the Karl Rove-types want people to believe, just as the leftist media eagerly shoved “Maverick” McCain down GOP throats in 2008—knowing he would lose to Obama. But even if Trump loses and Rodham wins, she would not be dramatically different than Bush or most of his fellow candidates. They would be nothing more than caretakers, not working to restore America’s greatness but merely presiding over the collapse of a massively in-debt nation. A nation can perhaps survive open borders; a nation can perhaps survive a generous welfare system. But no nation can survive both—and there is little evidence that the establishment candidates of either party understand that. The United States cannot forever continue on the path it is on. At some point it will be destroyed by its debt.

Yes, Trump speaks like a bull wanders through a china shop, but the truth is that the borders do need to be sealed; we cannot afford to feed, house, and clothe 200,000 Syrian immigrants for decades (even if we get inordinately lucky and none of them are ISIS infiltrators or Syed Farook wannabes); the world is at war with radical Islamists; all the world’s glaciers are not melting; and Rosie O’Donnell is a fat pig.

Is Trump the perfect candidate? Of course not. Neither was Ronald Reagan. But unless we close our borders and restrict immigration, all the other issues are irrelevant. One terrorist blowing up a bridge or a tunnel could kill thousands. One jihadist poisoning a city’s water supply could kill tens of thousands. One electromagnetic pulse attack from a single Iranian nuclear device could kill tens of millions. Faced with those possibilities, most Americans probably don’t care that Trump relied on eminent domain to grab up a final quarter acre of property for a hotel, or that he boils the blood of the Muslim Brotherhood thugs running the Council on American-Islamic Relations. While Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s greatest fear is someone giving a Muslim a dirty look, most Americans are more worried about being gunned down at a shopping mall by a crazed lunatic who treats his prayer mat better than his three wives and who thinks 72 virgins are waiting for him in paradise.

The establishment is frightened to death that Trump will win, but not because they believe he will harm the nation. They are afraid he will upset their taxpayer-subsidized apple carts. While Obama threatens to veto legislation that spends too little, they worry that Trump will veto legislation that spends too much. You can be certain that if an establishment candidate wins in November 2016, his or her cabinet positions will be filled with the same people we’ve seen before. The washed-up has-beens of the Clinton and Bush administrations will be back in charge. The hacks from Goldman Sachs will continue to call the shots. Whether it is Bush’s Karl Rove or Clinton’s John Podesta who makes the decisions in the White House will matter little. If the establishment wins, America loses.

flash
flash
March 2, 2016 7:41 am

Just doing the work of god..
[imgcomment image[/img]

Goldman Sachs Puts Its Only Trump Donor On Administrative Leave
http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/01/goldman-sachs-puts-its-only-trump-donor-on-administrative-leave/#ixzz41kU0ORAp