The Crush

Guest Post by Eric Peters

Hidden in VW’s announcement yesterday that it was “setting aside” nearly $9 billion to buy back – and destroy – about half a million diesel-powered cars convicted of “cheating” Uncle’s emissions tests was a statement by CEO Matthias Mueller that tells us how craven – and divorced from reality – car company CEOs are these days.Mueller lead

Mueller told reporters that VW will undergo a “wide-ranging transformation” that will end up with the company “focusing more” on “digital services” and “zero emissions” vehicles; that it would be sinking money into “mobility services” such as ride-sharing apps and car-sharing.

Because it looks like selling cars – economically and functionally viable cars –  isn’t working much for them.

Well, it was.

But not anymore.

Because Uncle.

Instead of $22k TDI Jettas that can go 50-plus miles on a gallon of fuel, VW’s Matthias wants to “focus” on Germanic Teslas like the electric Golf – which costs almost $30,000 and goes maybe 70 miles on a full charge. VW can’t send me an eGolf to review because the thing can’t make it here in a single trip, in a single day.

Not unless it is carried here on a flatbed.TDI image

But the eGolf is “zero emissions” and that makes it politically appealing to politically correct CEOs like Mueller, whose “customer” is Uncle… not us.

If this weren’t the case, VW would be defending its excellent – and hugely popular – TDI-powered cars instead of crushing them. And not “focusing” on electrified idiocies such as the eGolf.

Mueller told reporters VW intends to “make electric cars one of (its) hallmarks” by 2020, by which time – less than four years from now – it plans to introduce 20 new electrified idiocies, notwithstanding the eGolf’s great success (not) and notwithstanding utterly absent market demand for cars that struggle to go anywhere and which need a very long umbilical cord to get there. And which also cost Ludicrous Sums of money and even then still can’t be sold at a profit without open-ended “help” from Uncle.

Reading between the lines – you can almost see the type – Matthias intends to ditch diesels (politically incorrect) in favor of … electric cars.shining pic

Because they are “clean” (and, of course, politically correct).

Whether they work being – apparently – beside the point.

It’s crazier than Nicholson in The Shining. The “cheating” TDIs about to be crushed – in what has got to be the most disgusting mass-display of wastefulness and stupidity outside of the Kasich for President campaign – would every one of them easily pass Uncle’ s circa 2000 (model year) emissions fatwas.

Were those cars “dirty”?

Really?

At the time, they were touted as exceptionally “clean.”eGolf

Which of course, they were.

Nothing produced since the late 1970s could accurately be described as “dirty.” Once new cars got smart catalytic converters (three-way, with oxygen sensors and the air-fuel ratio constantly fine-tuned by a computer and the fuel precisely metered by fuel injection) emissions became a non-issue, if the issue was air quality and so on.

And new cars have had all that since at least the late 1980s.

But emissions became a political issue – and the public (with the passive connivance of rollover CEOs  like Mueller) has been gulled into believing that Great Work remains perpetually to be done (at whatever cost) to reduce emissions to nil.because Uncle

Well, that’s been done – years ago.

Or damned close to it, anyhow.

As I’ve written about so many times in the past it is beginning to make my teeth ache, 95-plus percent of the exhaust stream of new cars is water vapor and carbon dioxide. Inert gasses that have nothing whatsoever to do with air pollution.

Cars are “clean.” Have been “clean”…. for decades.

This includes VW’s cars.

These agenda-dicks who “caught” VW “cheating” could do a public service by taking some of the “affected” TDI cars and seeing whether they meet Uncle’s standards circa 2000 or even 2005.

My bet is they would.

And if so, then their being tarred-and-feathered as “dirty” is disgustingly dishonest. Remember: Half a million owners of perfectly sound cars are going to be pressured to hand them over to be destroyed over a fractional difference in emissions output that absolutely no one can point to any actual harm resulting from.

Why isn’t anyone – Herr Mueller? – asking about that… ?VW badges

What harm has been caused by a TDI-powered VW car “emitting”  – says Uncle – “up to 40 times” (but probably a lot less than) a third of a percent more of whatever Uncle has his panties in a bunch about? Define the thing, dammit. Show me a victim before you crucify me.

Or throw away half a million perfectly good cars and flush almost $9 billion dollars down the got-damned toilet.

No wonder Trump is surging.

When the ship is sinking, you grab whatever you can to stay afloat.

Whatever Trump’s flaws, he’s got balls.

Too bad Herr Mueller lacks them.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Persnickety
Persnickety
May 5, 2016 10:55 am

Someone should rescue all those TDIs and make some really kick-ass offroad vehicles, generators, small airplane engines, etc…

If the diesels can’t easily be made to meet emissions requirements (which are arbitrary!), why not just put gas engines into them and sell them as previously owned, new engine cars?

penpal
penpal
May 5, 2016 10:59 am

My take is that Uncle is protecting US automakers from imports,

uncle bozo did the same thing to toy-rota, with the “accelerator” issue. another red herring.

US cars makers can not compete with imports, on quality, or design.

my last US was a Ford Bronco, did not make it past 70k before the rear axle gave out. plus 1/2 the bolts were metric anyways.

now, the older cars, they were tanks, my old chevy nova, it was indestructible.

Germany will probably sell these buy backs to the desert rats, who will mount 50 cals on the roof and go cruising for camel burgers.

SKINBAG
SKINBAG
May 5, 2016 11:01 am

We are living in strange times indeed.

I do wonder why any sane person running a business would do these things ? I can almost understand where the politicians are coming from – they have an agenda and it’s not their money that they are pissing away. We are spending too much time trying to maintain ‘political correctness’, which robs time from actually getting things done. And the money that it wasted / thrown down the rat hole, etc., is mind boggling. These sort of issues stray so far from what is practical as venture into ‘Alice in Wonderland’ sort of crazy. I guess we should expect this sort of stuff to become more common place as the years pass.

I guess it is time for me to jump into the MOBILITY APP development business. If the CEO of a multi billion dollar company says that’s where he is going then it’s a pretty safe bet that’s where the BIG money is to be made.

politikalyogi
politikalyogi
May 5, 2016 12:24 pm

This is a mirror of the policy model that O established with ‘cash for clunkers’ only the fundamentals differ. Now Europe is under siege, self induced it seems, and big brother controls are on the agenda. Europe is not the US geographically, much less miles to drive in general. So abandon petrol and make umbilical tethered short ranged vehicles ubiquitous. This retrofit gives 800.000 Muslim immigrants work for a decade and nails down techno society into a tighter rat maze. Mueller’s expression doesn’t look like he has a gun to his head. Crushing good cars is almost as effective as a blood sacrifice for making a dent in numb skull society. If it is successful in Europe then it can be marketed globally. New World Order…

NickelthroweR
NickelthroweR
May 5, 2016 12:50 pm

Greetings,

Isn’t there a volcano or something that the cars could be launched into? I mean, if VW is going to have get rid of perfectly good working cars then why not do so in the most dramatic fashion possible.

Iconoclast421
Iconoclast421
May 5, 2016 12:55 pm

The goal must be to simply remove excess vehicles from the market in any way possible. It certainly makes no sense to destroy perfectly good vehicles because they might be some small fraction above some arbitrary limit. The act of producing and destroying vehicles incurs its own emissions costs, which far exceed the amount of excess emissions from these vehicles.

Gator
Gator
May 5, 2016 4:10 pm

As iconoclast said, there are too many new vehicles and not enough buyers. Gotta protect bailed out GM from honest competition.

It will undoubtably produce more emissions and pollution making half a million new cars and destroying these than it would letting them ride out their useful lives. But this isn’t about pollution, it’s about control. It this wasn’t the case, they wouldn’t be wafting the caste resources, energy, and capital to do something so stupid.

Aquapura
Aquapura
May 5, 2016 4:11 pm

“US cars makers can not compete with imports, on quality, or design.”

That’s an outdated claim. US manufacturers have made strides in the past 10+ years while the once infallible Japanese models aren’t what they were back in the 1990’s as they’ve let their build quality slide dramatically. The European models have never really been higher quality than American counterparts as they mostly sell brand name cache, minus VW perhaps.

Protecting domestic manufacturers is a facetious claim as most manufacturers, including European and Asian have major development and assembly operations in N. America. The VW debacle can be laid entirely on the environmentalists, but the fact of the matter remains, the company cheated. I have little doubt that had Ford or GM done similar the greenies would be any less harsh on them.

I still think Mr. Peter’s has a huge hard-on for VW diesels, for whatever reason, and is spilling a ton of digital ink making himself look more like a lunatic each time. Emission standards, right or wrong, are a policy and what VW did I liken to doping to win the tour de france.

Where’s the article titled “What the fuck Volkswagen, I used to love you just like Lance Armstrong??”

Chrisjames
Chrisjames
May 5, 2016 4:34 pm

These idiotic emissions standards are now coming to farmers. At 35 horsepower or greater you have to burn urea diesel fluid. In your tractor. So not only do I need a tank for diesel, now I have to store that over priced crap also. Now, I don’t want to pollute. But is my tractor dirtier than a fucking cruise missile? In the name of the environment everything I do is over regulated but the government blows shit up expending drastic levels of poisonous emissions. Farcical idiocy at best.

starfcker
starfcker
May 5, 2016 6:26 pm

January 17th all this bullshit ends.

Bullock
Bullock
May 5, 2016 6:45 pm

Isn’t starfcker going to be disappointed when he finds out his saviour has duped him. Just like the hopey change guys promises.

Still hard to believe anyone would think that the people that helped cause the mess are somehow going to clean it up.

Observer
Observer
May 5, 2016 6:57 pm

I’ve always observed that the most likely reason diesel is demonized in the modern US is because it can’t run on the government-subsidized corn ethanol.

Think on that for a minute, and it’ll all make sense.

Pauncho
Pauncho
May 6, 2016 12:02 am

Everything is political. Germany is split between the pols, who want to continue licking Uncle’s balls
( stay in NATO/EU ), and manufacturers, who want to kick Uncle’s balls (trade with Russia). I hope
VW has learned to STFU. Next to be investigated for emissions? Mercedes.
Hope BMW has gotten the message.