Hussein Obama, 50; America, 0:More Adventures in Multiculturalism

 

Orlando? So what else is new? Why the excitement? I am puzzled that everyone is  distraught over a perfectly ordinary act of terrorism by a perfectly ordinary Muslim terrorist. We have seen these attacks before and will see them again. They grow monotonous, like car crashes. They are as interesting as a commercial break.

Why the surprise? We know Muslims kill Christians. We know they stone adulteresses to death. We know they drive airplanes into buildings. We know they mutilate women. We know they bomb airliners. We know they destroy historic monuments. We know they kill their daughters for losing their virginity. We know they kill homosexuals. We know they make coordinated mass attacks on cities. We know they are incompatible with societies of the First World. We know they have to respect for our laws. We know they hate us.

Knowing all of this, what do we do? Why…of course! What else? We import more of them. Nothing could make more sense. Ten thousand Syrians, coming to your neighborhood. Thank you, Obama. Thank you in advance, Hillary.

More precisely, Hussein Obama imports them. A black President with Islamic roots, barely American, who dislikes white people and recruits immigrants of his two ethnicities as hard as he can. We get utterly unassimilable Somalis in Minnesota, and all the Muslims he can find. Fifty gay men have just paid the price.

For Hussein’s policy.

The man fascinates me. The two worst actors that America has suffered since Lincoln are Osama bin Laden and Hussein Obama. They easily fit into any list of history’s most effective and influential men, being true geniuses. For a few hundred thousand dollars and an army of a couple of dozen, bin Laden stunningly humiliated America on international television, turned the country into a police state frightened of everything, inspired abrogation of its Constitution, and sucked the country into unending wars. On a cost-benefit basis, it was astonishing. He up-throttled national decline and has Americans hopping barefoot in airports while recordings on subways tell us to watch each other and report “suspicious behavior.”

Hussein Obama is in the same majestic league. He has said that he wants to “transform” America, and he has, has he ever, by simply doing what he wants. He found and exploited the hidden weakness in American government, which is that nobody has the balls to tell him “No.” He has won by sheer force of will. You’ve got to hand it to the guy: he’s good.

He has set the stage for, at least, unending divisiveness and very possibly for civil war. He will bring in as many more incompatible savages as he can before leaving office, and Hillary, if elected, will be Obama continued by other means. Amazing. The combined militaries of Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany could not do as much lasting harm as this one man.

Why does he do it? Look at it as revenge for slavery. Obama bin Osama, I strongly suspect, does. Our post-racial President is in fact the most racial.

For those killed by Omar,and their families and friends, there is nothing amusing about the slaughter. In a certain abstract sense, there is. America is like a man beating on his thumb with a hammer and yelling, “Oh! Ouch! Oooh! It hurts!” Why doesn’t he just stop? Well, that would be hammer-phobic. Countries deserve what they tolerate. They even more deserve what they encourage.

From Drudge:Imam speaking in Orlando said gays must be killed out of ‘compassion’…

Hmmmm. Might this not be homophobic? I dare not say so, for fear of being thought Islamophobic. Which I am not. No. I suffer from Islamonausea.

It seems that gays have to be killed on the authority of some Fourth Century towel rack. It is because the Religion of Peace says so. If a televangelist in Kansas said that homosexuals had to be killed for Jesus, the entire zoo of talking heads would be on him like lice on a leper and the FBI would gin up fraudulent charges. Watch the media for the outrage that won’t exist as they cover up. You can bet that Hussein Obama will say nothing against his own people.

From the standpoint of a curmudgeon, to which ashen-souled tribe I belong, the events in Orlando provide the gray satisfaction of confirmation. We in our dismal trade derive no joy from unavoidable sufferings springing from the routine malice of existence—cancer, automobile wrecks, birth defects—but we thrive on the self-inflicted, on the finger-hammerings accompanied by cries of “Ouch!” We observe that Muslims are nothing but trouble anywhere, so we import Muslims. We observe that diversity is the chief source of bitter strife in the world, so we open the borders. When seeking employees, we deliberately hire people who can’t do the job. In our universities we purposely admit those who neither can nor want to learn. Then, when the obvious, the predictable, indeed the inevitable unexpectedly occurs, we insist that it really didn’t, or shouldn’t have, or wouldn’t have, or something, and do it again. In its way it is wonderfully funny.

Unless of course you are among the dead.

In Paris the day after Orlando, another Mohammedan emissary of peace stabbed to death a policeman and his wife. (“Allahu Akbar: ‘Mohamed Ali’ Stabs Cop on Street, Slits Throat of Wife…”)

Yes, Paris, the city in which heartwarming Muslims have carried out coördinated simultaneous bombings, killed editorial staffs of publications that irked them, burned banlieues and countless cars and successfully intimidate the police. Mon dieu! What can these isolated incidents have in common? Nobody knows. Perhaps the perpetrators were troubled youth.

Actually the comic people are only those who generate a personal reality-distortion field and do hilariously foolish things. At the top of the political dunghill it is not stupidity but design. Or so it must be…mustn’t it? One expects academics to gibber and squeak, and neurally-challenged columnists and rabble studentry and talking heads and so on. It takes some very serious believing to believe that the governments of England, France, Holland, Sweden, Denmark and America are too stupid to have noticed what Muslims do, and what they are doing to those countries. Yet governments cover up, hide identities, punish observation as “hate speech,” and keep pumping the barbarians in.

Why? Opening America’s southern borders make sense because it makes money for those for whom it makes money. Who profits from flaming arrondissements, explosions in subways, and dead gays?

Ah, but the irony is delicious. London, once master of most of the world, has become a branch office of Pakistan and now has a Muslim mayor, who sets about correcting the morals of the English. No photos of women in skimpy clothes, you degenerate rascals. Can caning be far behind?

It does a curmudgeon good.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
65 Comments
Credit
Credit
June 17, 2016 9:56 am

black is a color, and negroid is a race. white is the absence of color, and caucasoid is a race. yellow is not brown, and mongoloid is a race. we don’t use those words any more because others will frown at us. i was taught these human classifications in elementary school, but now am expected to juggle euphemisms for these words depending on the times. words change meanings so easily these days that simple communication fails.

words are tools. some of the sneakiest right now are “progressive (totalitarian), tolerant (demanding), rights (benefits), and social equality (socialism).

some manipulative phrases used now are “these are our common values as Americans,” “diversity is our strength,” and “we are a nation of immigrants.” -all are used for pushing agendas

watch the words, they are being used against you.

Full Retard
Full Retard
June 17, 2016 10:43 am

Everybody be nice to Credit, he speaks the truth and is a credit to this diverse and progressive group.

Llpoh
Llpoh
June 17, 2016 10:13 pm

Bea – 52% of US school children are non-white.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
June 17, 2016 11:28 pm

Llpoh
That is public school that is 52% non- white. Whites left those indoctrination centers and moved their children to private schools. Include public school numbers in the national numbers and you have a different story.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
June 17, 2016 11:32 pm

Also add in home school numbers. Small segment but almost completely white.

Llpoh
Llpoh
June 17, 2016 11:40 pm

Bea – quit being an ignoramus and pull your head out of the sand. You are totally ignoring reality:

“AccorThe minority population is expected to rise to 56 percent of the total population in 2060, compared with 38 percent last year. When that happens, “no group will have a majority share of the total and the United States will become a ‘plurality’ [nation] of racial and ethnic groups,” the U.S. Census states. The minority-majority trend reflected among 5-year-olds is the beginning of that shift.ding to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2014 there were more than 20 million children under 5 years old living in the U.S., and 50.2 percent of them were minorities.

Parents who identified their child as white with Hispanic origin were the largest minority, making up 22 percent of the 19.9 million children under age 5, followed by African American children, who make up 15 percent. ”

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
June 18, 2016 12:04 am

When the free shit is cut off, and it will be cut off, these numbers will shift. A lot can happen in the next 44 years up to 2060. I thought you were speaking of present day Merika. We iz still solid in the majority. Agree they are multiplying like rats.

Llpoh
Llpoh
June 18, 2016 12:15 am

Bea – my point is that the demographics have hit the point of no return.

Birth rates favor non-whites, and they are going to continue to do so. Cutting off free shit will cut birth rates. But the die is cast. Unless the US starts evicting illegals in huge numbers, which it will not, and stops importing “refugees”, by around 2050 whites will not be the majority.

Numbers do not lie.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
June 18, 2016 12:20 am

Then by 2050 or 2060 (We) who still live here will have to migrate to a whiter area just as you have done but like I said a lot can happen in that amount of time.

Llpoh
Llpoh
June 18, 2016 12:28 am

Oz is full. Totally full. No room at the inn. Try Iceland.

Full Retard
Full Retard
June 18, 2016 12:44 am

LLPOH, thank you for the numbers. I was in 7th grade in ’66 when the news came about that in the future, there would be a population explosion. The move was afoot to encourage immigrant families and Catholics to cut back on the baby-making. Two is plenty. I wasn’t a lot of pressure, this aint China, but it became accepted that new couples ought ot look at two as a max.

There was an old guy lamenting that his daughter took the central planning message to an extreme, she had her tubes tied. “When I was a kid, he said, I had so many cousins I thought I was rich.” He could not understand his only child and her husband’s decision to go childless.

Just last week, I was calling my mom. She mentioned that everybody in our family has only two kids. It’s the result of that public school indoctrination. That and economics. Parents who have one or two girls keep trying for the boy but then they quit.

I’m going over all this because the impression given here is that minorities are screwing like rabbits and flooding the USA with brown anchors. I think there is going to be some growth but cutting back child-bearing to less than replacement results in what we have today: more oldsters than young-uns.

Llpoh
Llpoh
June 18, 2016 1:58 am

EC – I think it is new immigrants and blacks, not so much established, and whites are not having many kids at all.

Full Retard
Full Retard
June 18, 2016 2:10 am

Yeah, the new method of coping is to have meal ticket babies or anchor babies. All the while, white peeps are having animal babies – pets. It is all short sighted, oh sure, it makes economic sense now but I’m glad my parents didn’t put the iPhone bill before kids.

Full Retard
Full Retard
June 18, 2016 2:12 am

Of course they never got brainwashed with the persistent mantra – I don’t want to bring kids into this fucked up world. Like what, it was perfect back in the black plague days? Back when most folks died at 46?

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
June 18, 2016 2:14 am

Administrator says:
Bea

I think Muck meant AWD.”

I think Mucks thong may be cutting off blood to a vital piece of anatomy.