Al Qaeda In Syria Changed Its Name And Now The US Is Arming Them

Submitted by Dan Wright via ShadowProof.com,

Though many scoffed when the Al Qaeda affiliate in Syria, Jabhat Al-Nusra, rebranded itself Jabhat Fateh Al-Shamthat cosmetic change was apparently enough to convince the US government to start sending them arms.

In the recent push by rebels in the city of Aleppo, Al-Nusra/Al-Sham took a leading role and was reportedly among the rebels groups who received US weapons. Those weapons will first be used to kill Syrian government troops and after that, well, who knows?

Many, if not most, of the rebel groups fighting the Syrian government are jihadist and few have any serious objection to Al-Nusra participating in their operations, especially given that Al-Nusra has proven to be one of the most effective groups on the battlefield. If Al-Sham and fellow Sunni jihadists prevail over Syrian government forces, a genocide will likely commence against religious minorities in Syria, starting with the Alawites and moving on to other Shiites.

From the Atlantic Council:

“Fateh al-Sham’s support extends beyond the immediate political and military opposition. Roshd Virtual University in Istanbul, Turkey offered 100 scholarships to the children of the fighters who participated in Aleppo’s battle. The opposition’s desperation to change the balance of power in Syria has made them embrace Fateh al-Sham and turn a blind eye to the fact that it was until recently the Nusra Front, an internationally designated terrorist group with ties to al-Qaeda.

 

“According the Syria analyst Charles Lister, there is a significant subsection of the Syrian opposition that does not oppose Fateh al-Sham’s participation in Aleppo related military operations. Moreover, Lister said that opposition forces fighting in Aleppo received for the first time American weapons that are normally designated for forces fighting the Islamic State (ISIS). The opposition’s takeaway is that the United States does not object to preserving the balance on the ground with the Syrian regime, even if doing so indirectly bolsters Fateh al-Sham.”

While it would be a mistake to say this is the first time the US gave assistance to Al Qaeda-linked rebels in Syria, it is a pretty stunning digression from earlier claims from US officials that assisting Al Qaeda and ISIS was completely off limits. Now the US is arming them in one of the most crucial battlefields of the Syrian Civil War.

Then again, Al-Nusra/Al-Sham claims it no longer is within the Al Qaeda network (though they also appear to still hold much of the same beliefs). I guess a rebrand is all it takes for the US to take a group from sworn enemy to ally worthy of receiving anti-tank weapons.

What could go wrong?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Fiatman60
Fiatman60
August 28, 2016 1:29 pm

Perhaps if we stop arming these groups, that would help our current situation a whole lot??? No weapons = no conflict.

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
  Fiatman60
August 28, 2016 3:21 pm

There’s no money in that which is why your owners consider you a peon that NEEDS them to run your life for you.

Bea Lever
Bea Lever
August 28, 2016 1:57 pm

News Flash******************

The US created Al-CIA-Duh and trained, armed and funded them before the “name change”. Same for ISIS.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
August 28, 2016 2:44 pm

This is what you’re voting for if you vote for Hillary Rotten Clinton.

unit472
unit472
August 28, 2016 3:15 pm

Why we in the US should care what flavor of Islam various groups in a middle eastern civil war belong too escapes me. Whether we should be involved at all is the real question. We don’t really care who prevails in the civil wars in Central Africa but then there are no outside players or regional powers involved so if some African warlord wants to slaughter his enemies in the name of Allah, God or Oil we don’t care as long as he doesn’t make videos that humiliate our official dogma.

Now Syria is a bit trickier as there are important regional players. Israel, Turkey, Egypt, Iran etc all with an interest in the outcome. Then there is Russia which has no real interest in the region other than mischief making and the fact that jihadist’s from Chechnya, Dagestan and other Islamic regions of the former USSR are a major component of Islamic State.

If Putin wants a piece of this Tarbaby I’m willing to let him have it but that does not mean we can’t arm groups we ( or our traditional allies) favor. Yeah Surface to Air missiles are probably not a good idea for obvious reasons but mortars, anti tank missiles and the like are cheap and give the US some leverage over those we are arming without risking a lot of blowback.

kokoda
kokoda
  unit472
August 28, 2016 4:57 pm

unit472….Russia is almost land-locked except for a trip to the N. Pole. The Black Sea ports are crucial and Russia has a longtime naval base in the Syrian port city of Tartus, which is even more crucial to avoid Turkey (NATO member) via the Black Sea.

Yes, the weapons supplied to Syria are important, but second fiddle to sea/ocean constraints. Russia is also building its sea forces.

Gay Veteran
Gay Veteran
  unit472
August 30, 2016 10:23 am

“…Then there is Russia which has no real interest in the region other than mischief making and the fact that jihadist’s from Chechnya, Dagestan and other Islamic regions of the former USSR are a major component of Islamic State….”

jeez, did you actually read what you wrote??? Russia fears ISIS going into former parts of the USSR and then into Russia

“…If Putin wants a piece of this Tarbaby I’m willing to let him have it but that does not mean we can’t arm groups we ( or our traditional allies) favor….”

who is this “we”? you sending YOUR money?

AC
AC
August 28, 2016 4:34 pm

Gosh, I wonder why that might be . . . .

http://www.dw.com/en/putin-calling-strategic-shots-in-syria/a-19504175

You have to wonder why the US military is doing the bidding of the Saudi government. Looking at who else stands to benefit from the Qatari/Saudi pipeline is eye opening:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan_gas_field
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamar_gas_field

http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/largest-natural-gas-reserve-discovered-in-israel-worth-approximately-95-billion-1.334111

Anonymous
Anonymous
August 28, 2016 10:00 pm

Obama is bring Syrians into US and wants our legal guns/ rights.Leaving no protection.Closed Walmarts /Fema camps.Say no to gov micro chip