New Study Blames COVID on NIH, University of North Carolina — Finds Fauci and Baric’s Fingerprints on Pandemic Bug

Via The Defender

Critics have long questioned why the National Institutes of Health would fund experiments by University of North Carolina of Chapel Hill professor Ralph Baric to develop a technique for hiding evidence of human tampering in laboratory-created super viruses.

Critics have long questioned why the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would fund experiments by University of North Carolina of Chapel Hill (UNC) professor Ralph Baric to develop a technique for hiding evidence of human tampering in laboratory-created super viruses.

Aided by some $220.5 million in National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) funding, Baric developed a so-called “Seamless Ligation” technique, which he boasted could perfectly conceal all evidence of human tampering in laboratory-created viruses. Baric nicknamed his invention the “no-see’m” method.

Now a new study, “Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV2,” published on the preprint server bioRxiv, shows that — apparently unbeknownst to Baric — the “seamless ligation” concealment gimmick leaves its own minute but legible signature.

Most momentously, these same researchers have discovered that damning signature in the genome of the virus that causes COVID-19.

Baric’s technique has long been controversial. “It’s the artist that doesn’t sign his name to the painting; the virologist that doesn’t put his signature into the virus to let us know whether or not it is emerging naturally or whether it is produced in a laboratory,” said Jeffrey Sachs, chair of The Lancet COVID-19 Commission, a task force that investigated the origins of COVID-19.

“All of it says, my God, there was really a big, very risky research agenda underway.”

This month, Sachs published the results of his 22-month investigation in The Lancet, including the damaging conclusion that COVID-19 was probably laboratory-generated and that the technology probably came from NIH-funded science.

Referring to Baric’s seamless ligation methodology, evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein observed:

“It’s the exact opposite of what you would do if your interest was public health. Public health scientists would be marking their enhancements with red flags — not devising ways to hide them. The only reason you would want a concealer is to advance a sinister purpose — such as illegal bioweapons development — some mischief that the scientist didn’t want traceable back to his lab.”

Baric taught his “no-see’m” method to the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s (WIV) “Bat Lady” Shi Zhengli in 2016. In return, Baric received Chinese coronaviruses collected by Shi from bats in Yunnan province. (Scientists have linked the COVID-19 genome’s pedigree to closely related bats.)

Shi and her colleagues at the Wuhan Institute subsequently demonstrated their mastery of Baric’s high-risk technique in a series of published — and highly controversial — gain-of-function experiments at the Wuhan lab. It has been even more puzzling to his critics that Baric, again with NIAID funding, chose to share this dangerous technique for weaponizing pathogens with Chinese scientists who have clear links to the Chinese military.

Experts say that the implications of this new study could be far-reaching. By pointing the finger at Baric, the study raises the possibility of potentially devastating liability for the NIAID and the University of North Carolina and other parties.

Scientists, including those close to Dr. Anthony Fauci, have repeatedly pointed out that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has genomic sequences that appear inconsistent with natural evolution: The COVID-19 virus is no longer infectious in bats, and its spiked protein feature — which is unknown in this family of coronavirus — includes numerous mutations that make it ideally infectious in humans.

The closest known coronavirus relative — a coronavirus from the Wuhan lab — is 96.2% identical to SARS-CoV-2. The peculiar spike accounts almost completely for the entire 3.8% difference. Oddly, there are multiple novel mutations in the spike and almost none in the rest of the genome.

Natural evolution would be expected to leave mutations distributed evenly across the genome. The fact that virtually all the mutations occur on the spike led these scientists to suspect that that particular Wuhan lab coronavirus collected by Shi Zhengli is the direct progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 and that its new spike was implanted through engineering.

However, the unmistakable fingerprints of lab engineering were absent — leaving many experts wondering whether Baric’s technique was used to assemble a novel coronavirus with the engineered spike while removing the evidence of lab generation.

This new study connects the biological breadcrumbs that link federally funded research to a global pandemic. That trail leads directly to UNC and NIAID.

The authors of the study — a team of researchers from Duke University, University Clinics of Würzburg and an industry group — identified a characteristic signature in the amino acid code. That indelible artifact could only have emerged from Baric’s “no-see’m” methodology.

In an interview last spring, Baric himself confessed, that at the time the pandemic began, only two or three labs in the world were using his protocol – including his UNC lab and the WIV.

The study’s authors’ conclusions rest on the presence of unique sites in the COVID-19 virus. These sites allow special enzymes called “restriction enzymes” to cut the DNA into building blocks of unique size that then can be “stitched together in the correct order of the viral genome,” according to the study’s authors.

Essentially, Baric’s technique leaves behind unique spellings in the “genetic vocabulary.” The new words include “odd spelling choices” subtly distinguishing them from typical viral vocabulary.

The magic of Baric’s “no-see’m” technique is to invisibly weave these telltale “spelling” changes into the viral sequence between relevant genes without altering the viral protein. This is like changing the “spelling” of the word without changing its meaning; the casual listener will never notice the difference.

The research team used forensic tools to drill down on minute “spelling differences” in the SARS-CoV2 genome that betray laboratory tampering using the “no-see’m” technique.

Consider how a Brit would spell “colour,” “manoeuvre” or “paediatric.” The choice to spell a word in a certain way can reveal your nation of origin. Similarly, these nearly imperceptible changes in the viral sequence give away the laboratory origins of this virus.

In sharing his seamless ligation technique with Shi Zhengli, Baric assured that the WIV possessed all the required elements of the assembly process. EcoHealth Alliance’s infamous DEFUSE proposal describes the same techniques in detail. (submitted to The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, in 2018).

The world now has proof positive that SARS-CoV2 is an engineered laboratory creation generated with technology developed by Ralph Baric with U.S. government funding.

Prosecutors and private attorneys representing clients injured by the COVID-19 pandemic now have a smoking gun. The gun points at humanity. Forensic scientists have now successfully lifted faint but precise fingerprints from the lethal pistol’s grip and trigger. Those fingerprints belong to the NIAID and the University of North Carolina.

Baric is Fauci’s favorite gain-of-function scientist. The cascade of NIAID funding to Baric and his UNC lab has financed 152 studies approaching a quarter-billion dollars.

Those federal grants have made Baric the global kingpin of gain-of-function science. In conformance with standard practice, it is probable that UNC pockets one-quarter to one-half of NIH’s financial felicities to Baric for “administrative costs.”

These monumental payments have probably incentivized UNC to turn a blind eye to Baric’s reckless experiments and to his controversial decision to transfer his dangerous technologies to a Chinese military laboratory known to suffer from deficient safety protocols and shoddy construction that make it, in the words of Congressional investigators, less secure than a “dentist’s office.”

UNC’s role in enabling the questionable conduct may have precipitated a global pandemic that could easily give rise to liability for negligence.

UNC and NIAID’s liability is now clear. But do we have positive proof that the Wuhan lab created the monstrosity that caused COVID-19?

The cumulative evidence strongly suggests that the Wuhan lab used Baric’s methodologies to cobble together the chimeric virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic. But a few missing puzzle pieces still prevent us from definitively proving that this dangerous construction project occurred at the Wuhan lab.

As The Lancet Commission report concluded, the released emails show that NIH’s Dr. Francis Collins, NIAID’s Fauci and EcoHealth Alliance’s Peter Daszak, and others are continuing to collaborate with Shi Zhengli and Chinese officials to suppress the public release of information that would allow us to complete this picture. Stay tuned!

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
35 Comments
I’m old
I’m old
November 9, 2022 7:45 pm

This is old news. Wuhan Flu strain started in NC, moved to Canada with Chinese “researcher” doctor to Canada, then off to. Wuhan Lab. All around 2017- 19.

YourAverageJoe
YourAverageJoe
  I’m old
November 9, 2022 8:21 pm

Yeah, I think I had it November 2019, but we called it the flu and boy it was a doozy.
Tamiflu got me thru it though.
As for Faucci, death by ball peen hammer is to lenient for him.

Ooze the other one
Ooze the other one
  YourAverageJoe
November 9, 2022 9:02 pm

I know about 5 people who had the same flu as you and I did in November 2019. I know where I contracted it: at an open-air pavilion with food court and live music in the Glendale shopping district by the loop 101. Lots of military and civilians mixing during the onset of cold weather.

I’d like to suggest a man-made thunderstorm comprised of about a billion rusty razor blades and a billion dirty syringes falling on the head of Fauci. Oh, we’d give him an umbrella, for sure…. just as the 100% lemon juice hail pellets the size of donkey balls pelt him into a literal, yes, literal pulp. No hurry, we can make it last a full week.

Ken31
Ken31
  Ooze the other one
November 9, 2022 10:28 pm

I got it Dec 19 and it wasn’t bad, just weird (not much mucous, or throat soreness and not as achy, but very unpleasant). Then in Jan 20 I got the regular flu, so I know it wasn’t that. I had been treating my body like shit for years, so I am not surprised I got 2 different bugs back to back.

Puggy The Great
Puggy The Great
  Ken31
November 9, 2022 11:06 pm

Is that you Fauch??? Get out from under the bed. Time to meet your punishment. Tarred and feathered in every country in the whole wide world, and one country at a time.. Cruel and unusual punishment?? You betcha. What a despicable example of our species. Drum his memory from history, burn his house down, and salt his front lawn. put his name on the Beagle hall of shame. I bet he kicks old ladies in the shins too. Remove the name Fauci from the history of mankind.

Other unusual punishments welcome

Jerms And Germs
Jerms And Germs
  I’m old
November 9, 2022 9:44 pm

You are all confusing several different things.

1.) Proof of virus tampering documented (fwiw) in the recent research paper that was not Old News (posted 10/20/22 – did you read it? NO…but i read all 17 pages).

2.) Potential gain-of-function research in Canada and elsewhere prior to the paper referenced from 10/20/22.

3.) Belief that you got this flu virus in 2019. So. WTF does that have to do with the paper that states there is an overwhelming probability, based on known techniques that provide repeatable evidence, of lab-based genomic tampering?

4.) That tamiflu is somehow not the choice of a total dumbass. Good try at narrative insertion though Your Average Ken!

The first 3 tactics, I mean comments, above are:

– disparage…”old news”
– disparage…2019 news & distract (tamiflu)
– disparage…about 5 people in 2019…then distract with blood rage anecdote

Funny how these tactics come out when fraud and liability start being proven.

When narratives are destroyed, the evidence is attacked, denied, diminished, anything to prevent you from reading it.

Read the paper and then decide if it is credible and not “old news”. Just click ” new studyc at the top of the article.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Jerms And Germs
November 10, 2022 1:49 am

Cunt, I posted the article from 2015 here in 2019 where the gain of function research on a novel coronavirus was being developed at Chapelhill.

Jyrms And Gyrms
Jyrms And Gyrms
  Anonymous
November 10, 2022 9:25 am

That’s great. So what. We all knew about the stories about GOF research there and in Canada. That story was widely available and talked about on a lot of alt sites. THAT is “old news”.

Are you really so obtuse that you don’t understand the differences between the two pieces of information, research goals, and conclusions released years apart?

Simply pointing to GOF research does nothing. We all knew it was going on. Many labs around the world do GOF research. What was needed was a method to identify which person or lab did the research and made Covid, and do so with a high probability of accuracy.

The paper cited in the article above FROM 10/20/22, does exactly that.

It identifies, with a very high probability, the specific fingerprints (of lab created viruses) that are known to be an original process created by Baric and then taught to Bat Lady in China for cash/perks AND OTHER VIRUSES from bats. Those fingerprints are found in the Covid virus.

That is a solid piece of evidence to say there is a high probability that it came from either Baric, Bat Lady or BOTH.

I guess you would end investigation there because any new info. on the topic would be “Old News” in your tiny monkey brain.

The next step is actually to see if there is a way to identify exactly which lab/person created it.

NONE of that was “old news”. It is new and important information building on known information.

It is forming up to point the finger for liability and potential criminality, whether law is enforced or not.

tony
tony
November 9, 2022 10:45 pm

it is true that baric and fauci are mass murderers, but all of this wuhan and unc crap is a cover-up. the plandemic was predicated on the false pcr test and the fake science that viruses are infectious and pathogenic. the massive deaths in wuhan were due to 5g. so go get your “vaccine” and boosters, so you can prevent and stop the transmission of “covid”.

baric produced a compound which could be trotted out as a fake prop – look ma! we found a virus under the microscope. oh my god! we have to shut down the country and do operation warp speed to kill everyone after making everyone take a pcr test and wear a muzzle – a chain link fence to keep mosquitoes out of the back yard.

KaD
KaD
November 9, 2022 11:22 pm

Lipid nanoparticles in covid jabs “stick” to bodily organs, reveals Pfizer study

flash
flash
  KaD
November 10, 2022 5:30 am
Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
  flash
November 10, 2022 4:34 pm

Flash,

Please provide the link for this video. Chase me around TBP if need be please.

Gadsden flag
Gadsden flag
November 10, 2022 12:30 am

Released intentionally by the same folks that would push Europe into an energy free winter and the Ukraine into a modern holodomor.

flash
flash
  Gadsden flag
November 10, 2022 5:56 am

Deep Shekels ?

aka.attrition
aka.attrition
November 10, 2022 2:47 am

Nothing will happen

Anonymous
Anonymous
  aka.attrition
November 10, 2022 5:09 am

Unless we make it happen:

After Tuesday, Time To Consider Radical Ideas

And Nuremberg 2.0. We the people, not they, the .gov.

Why wait ’til Sunday?

All day, every day: https://www.classicalwcrb.org/#stream/0

aka.attrition
aka.attrition
  Anonymous
November 10, 2022 8:34 am

Llpoh: If Not Now, When?

flash
flash
November 10, 2022 5:27 am

Ron Unz been sayin’ this from the beginning… Covid is a Deep Shekel black op ran out of the belly of the beast, the Pentagram.

flash
flash
November 10, 2022 5:59 am

Pension whores and parents that clot shot babies deserve a special place in hell.

flash
flash
November 10, 2022 6:09 am

comment image

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
  flash
November 10, 2022 6:24 am

Propaganda

flash
flash
  Glock-N-Load
November 10, 2022 8:50 am

Tell us you were stupid enough to take the clot shot without telling us you took the clot shot.

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
  flash
November 10, 2022 4:24 pm

No one lost all 4 of their children. That is outright bullshit.

Oh, and you know I didn’t take the jab. I’ve only said it about 20 times now.

Don’t ruin your reputation by being a loon.

aka.attrition
aka.attrition
  Glock-N-Load
November 10, 2022 10:09 am

Propaganda in what way? This person is a real Twitter user and the tweet is genuine

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
  aka.attrition
November 10, 2022 4:25 pm

I call bullshit. No one lost all 4 of their children to the jab. Total bullshit.

aka.attrition
aka.attrition
  Glock-N-Load
November 10, 2022 4:58 pm

She means her kid’s grandparents all died. Not her kids.

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
  aka.attrition
November 10, 2022 5:33 pm

I call bullshit on that also.

Paleocon
Paleocon
November 10, 2022 6:56 am

Virologists did an eye roll at the original gain-of-function mutation ban. Make it a felony and see what happens.

flash
flash
November 10, 2022 7:04 am
flash
flash
  flash
November 10, 2022 8:49 am

ha ha ha…propaganda.

n
n
  flash
November 10, 2022 1:03 pm

I like the other guys reaction.
Feel good moment.

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
  flash
November 10, 2022 4:26 pm

What made him keel over, flash? Can you prove it?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Glock-N-Load
November 10, 2022 6:35 pm

Who farted?

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
  flash
November 10, 2022 4:27 pm

I’m still waiting for billions to drop dead. Any day now?

SGT SNUFFY
SGT SNUFFY
November 10, 2022 8:59 pm

THE WIFE AND I DEISCOVERED THIS CRAP BACK IN JAN 2020 WHEN THE OUTBREAK IN CHINA TOOK OFF, A COUPLE OF THE RESEARCH SCIENTIST WORKING ON THE COVID VIRUS WERE TRYING TO GET OUT THE INFORMATION WHERE IT ORIGINATED AND HOW IT ESCAPED THE LAB IN WUHAN. THE COVID 19 (2019 RELEASE DATE) WAS DEVELPOED IN THE USA BEFORE 2014, DURING THE 2014 YEAR ALL THE RESEARCH PAPERS, THE RAW MATERAILS AND SAMPLES WERE PACKED UP BY THE NIAID, THE NIH AND THE U OF NORTH CAROLINA AND SHIPPEDD OFF THE CHINA WHERE IT GOT OUT PREMATURELY AND THE REST IS HSITORY. IT WAS DEVELPOED AS A BIO WEAPON AS WAS IT’S VACCINE WHICH ISN’T A VACCINE AT ALL. ALL THE INFOR ABOUT THE WHOLE CRAP SANDWICH WAS OUT THERE IN 2020.