Get ‘em while they’re young, what George Orwell warned against. The schools are once again forward!ing their progressive agenda. The propaganda will not end until the Constitution and Bill of Rights are fully discredited, and all remnants of our independence are crushed. Most iphone staring idiots probably don’t care, they can’t think anyway. The creation of America 2.0 rolls on unabated.
Texas Schools Teaching Boston Tea Party As “Terrorist Act”
Mike Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,
Absolutely remarkable… and in Texas to boot! As I have said for years, pretty soon anyone that disagrees with Washington D.C., Federal Reserve policies and rule by TBTF Wall Street criminal banks will be labeled a “terrorist.” That is where all this is headed.
From CBS Houston:
HOUSTON (CBS Houston) – The most historical instance of protesting against taxation without representation is now being taught in Texas schools as a terrorist act.
As recently as January of this year, the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative included a lesson plan that depicted the Boston Tea Party, an event that helped ignite the American Revolution, as an act of terrorism.
“A local militia, believed to be a terrorist organization, attacked the property of private citizens today at our nation’s busiest port,” wrote the teachers in charge of organizing the curriculum about the Boston Tea Party. “Although no one was injured in the attack, a large quantity of merchandise, considered to be valuable to its owners and loathsome to the perpetrators, was destroyed. The terrorists, dressed in disguise and apparently intoxicated, were able to escape into the night with the help of local citizens who harbor these fugitives and conceal their identities from the authorities.
WHEN PATRICK HENRY SAID:
“GIVE ME LIBERY OR GIVE ME DEATH!”
HE WAS ANGRY.
I CAN’T BLAME HIM.
WE OWE OUR DEMOCRACY TO ANGRY WHITE MEN LIKE HIM.
GOD BLESS THEM ALL.
ThePessimisticChemist says:
From the viewpoint of the British, its not far off the mark.
I think I’ll wait to withhold judgement until I see the actual story for myself. This could just be a mole-hill.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
26th November 2012 at 3:26 pm
flash says:
If Lindsey butt-fucker Graham is an example of an angry white man, then count this honky out.
BTW, the Republican Party eats shit…
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
13 
1
26th November 2012 at 3:36 pm
flash says:
…wonder how the angry white bitch Lispy Lindsey feels about Secession?
http://www.thelonestarwatchdog.com/2012/11/21/secession-of-the-states-is-about-survival/
Secession of the States is about Survival.
Posted on November 21, 2012 by The Watchdog
Secession is not just an American Movement. It is a Global Phenomena.
I have a real problem with people saying secession will tear the country apart. They say secession is the globalist plan to tear this country apart. In the Bible the 10 tribes of Israel seceded from Judah and the tribe of Benjamin because of High taxes. The Hebrews threw off the government and became their own country. Secession in the Bible was about escaping unjust taxation. The right of secession is a Biblical principle too. Secession is a Christian principle.
When we were 13 Colonies. The Declaration of Independence was a document telling the king the colonies have seceded from British rule because of a tyrannical King. It is a proclamation of secession from the Monarch. There were arguments to try to reason with the king that it will tear apart the British empire.
When Texas was part of Mexico, When General Santa Anna became the dictator of Mexico and trashed the Mexican Constitution started to oppress the people with high taxes. The people of Texas trying to plead with the Mexican government in a redress of grievance was met with a long train of abuses. The people of Texas seceded from Mexico because of the oppressive Mexican government.
The United States acquired the territories of the Philippines, Cuba and the Marshall Islands. in the spoils of war. All three islands gained their independence from the United States. Did the US government or the country fall apart? No, it did not. A large percentage of Puerto Rico still wants to secede from the United States than become a state or a territory.
When the old Soviet Union broke up. The former Soviet republics broke away from the Russia. It did not tear apart Russia. Russia is doing fine without the former Soviet Republics. The Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Belarus and Georgia are all sovereign independent republics. It did not divide the people or cause a civil war. Secession is a healthy movement. It did not destroy Russia. Secession did not lead to mass instability after the communist system collapsed.
The Scottish people are seeking secession from the United Kingdom. Greece, Spain and other European countries are seeking to secede from the European Union. Secession is a global movement. Countries or a people seeking this remedy to preserve their economic and cultural integrity. Secession is not an evil word. It is necessary.
With the recent election of Obama for four more years. People know this man is bad news. What he has planned for American is not good. States are seeking secession as a remedy to preserve their economic industries and the standard of living of what is left and sovereignty. Texas might be the first state to secede first. After that happens, we can see a chain reaction of other states following Texas.
For the people saying this is not good or it is a trap. Well not seceding is like a woman staying with her abusive husband. Being an abused spouse being beaten daily to near death. If she does not leave, she will die. To say she needs to stay in the marriage because the husband will change is a pipe dream. To say she must stay with an abusive husband who is trying to break her will for the sake of preserving the institution of marriage. To believe that is a death sentence to her when she knows leaving him is the only choice when all has be tried to turn around the marriage has failed because the husband refuses to change. Secession is a political divorce from the party that has broken the compact.
States that stay in the union will suffer to the point of no return with no recovery. If states secede they can preserve their economies and stay free. Some states may turn tyrannical who secede. Some will flourish being free from the Federal government.
Secession is a global movement. It is necessary, it moral and it is right. Secession is a remedy when the other party becomes destructive to the states. I do not think secession will bring us a civil war. There maybe short term unrest.It will bring stability in the long run. The founders believed in secession. Early Texans believed in secession. Secession is good solution then. It is still a good solution today.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
3
26th November 2012 at 3:41 pm
harry p. says:
the boston tea party absolutely was an act of terrorism (as well as a false flag to boot)… with the caveat that you view it strictly from the perspective of the British. The Brits treated the colonies better than the various guv-thugs in the US currently treat the citizenry.
Perspective is everything, this is why there is no winning the “hearts and minds” of Iraqis and Afghans, our military is an occupying force and those that fight against it are patriots, not terrorists.
The idea of a “war on terror” is one of the stupidest saying I hear on a fairly regular basis. “Terrorism” is not an enemy, it is a tactic.
The colonies would have been slaughtered by the redcoats if they fought a gentlemen’s war, lined up and fired musketballs and cannonballs at each other. The colonists used guerilla warfare, snipers and all sorts of tactics that were frowned upon. It is so tragic that history is so easily forgotten
good find AWD.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
14 
0
26th November 2012 at 4:43 pm
The Boston Terrorist Party says:
[...] original here. [...]
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
26th November 2012 at 4:50 pm
Eddie says:
Don’t worry. Texas kids can’t read anyway. The smart ones will get the real story in college, right? RIGHT?
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
26th November 2012 at 5:09 pm
Kill Bill says:
The Boston Tea party dumped the tea because of tax cuts….for the British Kings cronies.
~~
And the pwogs dont run the Texas Curriculum Collaboration. Hell, this is a red state and even the democrats here lean conservative. The Democrats pretty much controlled state government for 100 years during the time we had “Blue Laws” which said you could not buy things related to work on sundays and most stores were closed. You could only buy liquor at certain times and certain llocations, even beer.
Today every corner store, gas stattion and big box grocery sells beer and wine.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
26th November 2012 at 6:16 pm
Hollow man says:
Not in gaines county, yoakum county and I was in an east texas county last weekend it was dry. Canton was the name pf the town.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
26th November 2012 at 7:23 pm
Moto says:
So what. The bigger story is how a small group of men and women dedicated to freedom and willing to risk everything they had can make history.
Like or Dislike:
3 
1
26th November 2012 at 7:56 pm
Kill Bill says:
So what. The bigger story is how a small group of men and women dedicated to freedom and willing to risk everything they had can make history. -Moto
They were interested in profits and when King George, empire, decide to screw them, then yeah, they were about freedom, from unfair trade.
It wasnt about your personal freedom.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
26th November 2012 at 1:15 am
Ron says:
The site seems buggy and not right.
Maybe TBP is ruffling some feathers.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
26th November 2012 at 1:24 am
flash says:
How many angry white men are still stupid enough to believe that the GOP is the party of limited government ? …damn dumb-asses.You just can’t fix stupid.
Obama Campaign Video Shows Socialist Origins of Romneycare and ObamaCare
Written by Michael Tennant
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/13150-obama-campaign-video-shows-socialist-origins-of-romneycare-and-obamacare
A video posted by President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign provides further evidence that the 2006 Massachusetts healthcare reform law signed by then-Governor Mitt Romney was the prototype for the 2010 federal law signed by President Obama. But the video does more than just reaffirm that Romney is an unprincipled flip-flopper: It also offers a glimpse into the socialist origins of both Romneycare and ObamaCare.
The Obama campaign posted the video (see below), fittingly titled “The Anniversary of Romneycare,” on YouTube on April 12, 2012, six years to the day after Romney signed the Massachusetts bill into law with a huge ceremony attended by dignitaries including the late Sen. Edward Kennedy and a large contingent of local and national media.
“Romney’s people built a stage on top of the stage so that the event would project better for the assembled national media,” Harvard School of Public Health professor John McDonough says in the video.
McDonough should know. As he explains in the video, “I helped craft and pass Massachusetts’ health reform in 2006 and the Affordable Care Act in 2010.” He assisted with Romneycare as the executive director of Health Care for All, a Massachusetts consumer health advocacy organization. By the time ObamaCare was being drafted, McDonough was serving as a health policy adviser to Kennedy.
“Mitt Romney,” McDonough asserts in the video, “had this belief that this was going to be his ticket to national fame and glory.”
In the years following the big signing ceremony Romney repeatedly urged the federal government to take Romneycare nationwide. At least twice in 2007 he stated that the Massachusetts law would serve as a “model for the nation.” In 2008, asked by ABC’s Charles Gibson if he hadn’t “backed away from mandates on a national basis,” Romney replied, “No, no, I like mandates. The mandates work.” In 2009, he said Obama should be looking to the Massachusetts plan as “a model for getting everyone insured.”
Heeding the governor’s advice, Obama consulted former Romney advisors when putting together the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare). One of them, MIT economist Jonathan Gruber, states in the video that he worked on both Romneycare and ObamaCare and that “the core” of the two laws is “identical.” Now he’s stunned that Romney is backing away from what Gruber considers a “brilliant achievement” simply “because it was from the other party.”
As Madelyn Rhenisch — who, as the first enrollee in a core health plan under Romneycare, was invited to the health plan initiation ceremony with Romney — put it in the video: “When I hear Governor Romney talking about repealing ObamaCare, I just think he’s jumping to a political position where the issue isn’t healthcare, it’s getting elected.”
While the video paints a devastating portrait of a politician who will say whatever he thinks his audience wants to hear, it also “puts Obamacare into the context of socialist plans to remake the U.S. economy and reduce the influence of the private sector,” in the words of Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media.
Like or Dislike:
2 
1
26th November 2012 at 7:37 am
Johncoster says:
Can we give Texas back to Mexico??
Like or Dislike:
1 
2
26th November 2012 at 9:34 am
llpoh says:
If you win it is righteous revolution. If you lose, it is terrorism.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
26th November 2012 at 5:59 pm