It makes me want to vomit, listening to this guy and also NPR, but I want to hear the government propaganda to hear what bullshit they are spewing. I highlighted some particularly nauseating sections. They rebroadcast this just this past weekend, I suppose to hammer it into our heads what a genius he is.
This segment was originally broadcast on July 28, 2012.
Paul Krugman — a professor at Princeton, an op-ed columnist for The New York Times and author of many books — has been called “the Mick Jagger of political/economic punditry.”
Krugman is known for his direct style, so we don’t think he’d do terribly well in the delicate art of diplomatic gift giving. We’ve invited him to play a game called “Well, it’s a nice gift but we’re going to invade your country and take your stuff.” Three questions about diplomatic gifts.
CARL KASELL: From NPR and WBEZ-Chicago, this is WAIT WAIT…DON’T TELL ME!, the NPR News quiz. I’m Carl Kasell, and here again is your host, at the Chase Bank Auditorium in downtown Chicago, Peter Sagal.
PETER SAGAL, HOST:
Thank you, Carl.
(APPLAUSE)
SAGAL: Thanks everybody. So usually, usually you think of science as being dull, filled with numbers and guys sitting around working out complicated equations on blackboards. But there’s also exciting sciences, like economics.
KASELL: One of the most exciting, scintillating economists in the world, Noble Laureate and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman joined us a few months before the recent election, along with panelists Kyrie O’Connor, Mo Rocca and Simon Amstell.
SAGAL: Professor Paul Krugman, welcome to WAIT WAIT…DON’T TELL ME!
PAUL KRUGMAN: Hi there.
(APPLAUSE)
SAGAL: It’s a pleasure to have you. So, you were once called, we found, the Mick Jagger of Political Economic Punditry. Does that sound about right to you?
KRUGMAN: Yeah, except for the, you know, the strutting and the sex and all that. Otherwise, I’ve got it all down.
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: Now, wait a minute. I have seen you on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” and you strut like a rooster, sir.
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: You have a reputation for being very smart and for not – how to put this – shall we say suffering fools gladly.
KRUGMAN: Yeah, yeah, there are so many fools that if you try to suffer them at any great length, there’s no time left.
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: The word I have seen associated with you is shrill. Have you heard that one?
KRUGMAN: Yeah, I kind of like that.
SAGAL: You do?
KRUGMAN: The shrill and all of that, I guess – you know, when people call you shrill that means they don’t actually have any way to answer what you just said. So that’s a good sign.
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: You started with the New York Times around 1999, if not mistaken, writing about economic issues primarily. And you became very well known and very influential. You won the Nobel Prize. By the way, winning the Nobel Prize, does that shut up one’s critics?
KRUGMAN: Well, no, it doesn’t shut them up. I mean, but it does mean that people stop saying that you’re an idiot for about two weeks.
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: Two weeks? Because I mean…
KRUGMAN: Two weeks. Then it’s right back.
MO ROCCA: It’s the honeymoon period.
SAGAL: Because I remember at the time you were engaged in all of these debates, very sometimes intense about the Bush economic program and what it would do. And you had a lot of people criticizing you and dismissing you. And then you won the Nobel Prize. And I, in your shoes, would have such a hard time not saying “Aha” to everybody.
ROCCA: You should wear it when you go on Stephanopoulos’ show.
KRUGMAN: Yeah. When it happens, it’s such a blur. They worked me like a dog. I mean the thing is all for the sake of the Swedes, not for you. And as my wife said, you know, the two great things are first that you won this and second that we’re never going to have to do this again.
SAGAL: Really?
KRUGMAN: Oh yeah.
SAGAL: So you’re saying it’s a pain in the butt to have to win a Nobel?
KRUGMAN: Well, the actual going through the process of collecting it is thrilling but exhausting and…
SAGAL: Do they make you, like, run and chase it? I mean what are you talking about?
(LAUGHTER)
KRUGMAN: I maybe talked to about eight different or ten different groups a day. Oh yeah, I shouldn’t complain.
SAGAL: Right.
KRUGMAN: But it was a very strange out of body experience.
SAGAL: When you’ve been in an argument with somebody who just won’t listen to you, have you ever been tempted to say, “Well, my Nobel says you don’t know what you’re talking about, pal?”
(LAUGHTER)
KRUGMAN: No, it doesn’t work, among other things, because there are some idiots who’ve won Nobels.
(LAUGHTER)
KRUGMAN: So it’s not…
(APPLAUSE)
SAGAL: Wait a minute.
ROCCA: Names.
SAGAL: Name a couple.
(LAUGHTER)
KRUGMAN: Oh no, there I’m not going to go.
SAGAL: Yeah, okay.
SIMON AMSTELL: I have a question.
SAGAL: Yes.
AMSTELL: Paul?
KRUGMAN: Yes.
AMSTELL: Hello?
KRUGMAN: Hi there.
AMSTELL: What about the economy?
(LAUGHTER)
(APPLAUSE)
KRUGMAN: It looks like it might rain.
SAGAL: What about it? Simon, what do you want to know about it?
AMSTELL: Maybe it’s time to stop banging on about the Nobel and sort it out.
(LAUGHTER)
ROCCA: Yeah.
KRUGMAN: Yeah.
Earn that Nobel.
SAGAL: Well, you have…
AMSTELL: Sorry.
SAGAL: You have just written a book. It’s called “End This Depression Now.”
AMSTELL: Good idea.
KRUGMAN: Yeah.
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: I’m not used to books that shout at me what to do. I found it a little intimidating.
KRUGMAN: Well, yeah, I mean it’s not you that it’s supposed to intimidate. It’s supposed to intimidate some people who might actually do something.
SAGAL: Right.
KRUGMAN: It won’t work, of course, but I’m trying.
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: I mean, here’s the thing. I mean your solution is even, at least to my amateur eyes, very simple, is that you think that the solution for the current problem is that the government should spend a lot more money than it’s spending. And that seems very contrary to the current wisdom. Everybody else, including President Obama, says no, no, no, we have to stop our spending.
KRUGMAN: We got a lot of history, got a lot of stuff that says that let’s talk about cutting spending after this depression is over but not now. And now is the time we should actually be spending more.
SAGAL: You’re usually right, but no one listens to you.
KRUGMAN: Yeah, you know, Cassandra, people forget the myth, right?
SAGAL: Right.
KRUGMAN: They call you a Cassandra, and people forget she was always right. Their curse was that nobody would listen.
SAGAL: I remember, for example, in the early 2000′s, you were saying that the Bush tax plan would create huge deficits. You were correct.
KRUGMAN: Yeah.
SAGAL: Later on, you talked about a housing bubble that would eventually explode. And you were right about that. And yet, still no one listens to you.
KRUGMAN: Yeah, well, if you’re not telling people what they want to hear, most of the time you’re going to get people not listening. But sometimes they do. It always helps.
ROCCA: Do people listen to you at home?
(LAUGHTER)
KRUGMAN: Oh, at home? The difference is on the economy I’m always right but at home I’m always wrong.
SAGAL: Really?
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: You had this interesting idea though about how we could save our economy that I thought everybody should listen to, because it’s a great idea. Stage an alien invasion.
KRUGMAN: Yeah, a fake alien invasion. Which we have to solve by – you know, to be prepared for that alien invasion, we have to improve our infrastructure and educate our kids. I mean that’s how the Great Depression ended, right. I mean FDR could never get approval to spend enough money. You know, WPA and all of those programs helped…
SAGAL: So he faked an alien invasion?
(LAUGHTER)
KRUGMAN: No, well, it was the threat of war. And we were actually out of the depression before Pearl Harbor because we’d started our build up to prepare in case we got involved in World War II. So, you know, what you want is the same thing except without the actual war part.
SAGAL: Really? Do you have any sort of clever way of doing that? Can you like…
KRUGMAN: Maybe I gave the game away with the fake aliens. But, you know, National Public Radio can do this by having the fake aliens.
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: That’s true. That’s true.
(APPLAUSE)
SAGAL: Hold on. Carl, you have a newsman’s voice. Can you announce an alien invasion?
KASELL: Oh, absolutely.
SAGAL: Go for it.
KASELL: Ladies and gentleman, turn on your radios and your television sets. Instructions are coming down on how to handle this. Please follow those instructions.
SAGAL: There, economy saved. Bingo.
(APPLAUSE)
SAGAL: Well, Paul Krugman, we are delighted to talk to you, but we have also invited you here to play a game that we’re calling?
KASELL: Well, it’s a nice gift, but we’re still going to invade you and take your stuff.
SAGAL: You are known for your direct, confrontational style, so we think you wouldn’t do well in the delicate art of diplomatic gift giving. We’re going to ask you three questions about diplomatic gifts. Get two right and you’ll win our prize for one of our listeners, Carl’s voice on their home answering machine. Carl, who is Professor Paul Krugman playing for?
KASELL: He is playing for Arne Bathke and Amy Lett of Lexington, Kentucky.
SAGAL: Ready to do this?
KRUGMAN: Sure.
SAGAL: Here is your first question. It is well known that on his historic visit to China, President Nixon received a pair of pandas from Chairman Mao. Panda diplomacy they called it. But what did Nixon give to Mao in return? Was it A: A pair of musk oxen? B: A chainsaw sculpture made by his aide Chuck Colson?
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: Or C: A secret tape of his and Chairman Mao’s private conversations?
(LAUGHTER)
KRUGMAN: I’m going to go with the Musk oxen, although I have to say it doesn’t sound so plausible.
SAGAL: It was in fact the Musk oxen.
(SOUNDBITE OF BELL)
(APPLAUSE)
KRUGMAN: All right.
SAGAL: They were named Matilda and Milton. And after they were transferred to the Chinese, it was discovered they had mange. And this is all true. President Nixon told Kissinger to deal with it. I don’t know why he gave them Musk oxen but he did.
ROCCA: Is that the scent? What is musk?
SAGAL: They’re a breed of oxen.
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: Next question: In 2009, President Obama gave British Prime Minister Gordon Brown a set of DVDs of great American films. There was one problem, though, what? A: 18 of the 25 movies featured a British villain? B: They were American DVDs and would not play in British machines? Or C: Brown complained to Obama that he had already seen all of them?
(LAUGHTER)
KRUGMAN: I’m going to guess B, because I’ve had that problem.
SAGAL: Really?
KRUGMAN: Not being able to play European DVDs on our machine.
SAGAL: Yes, you’re right.
(SOUNDBITE OF BELL)
SAGAL: They were Region 1 DVDs.
(APPLAUSE)
SAGAL: This was discovered when Brown sat down to watch one at 10 Downing Street. All right, you’re doing very well. This befits a Nobel Prize winner. Last question: One of the oddest gifts presented to an American president in recent years was the gift from the billionaire Sultan of Brunei to President George W. Bush in 2004. What was it? Was it A: a concubine?
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: B: A copy of the book, “The Worst Case Scenario Handbook?” Or C: A simple plastic beach bucket and shovel?
KRUGMAN: Oh boy.
SAGAL: Yeah.
KRUGMAN: None of these is possible. So I’m going to go with the beach bucket.
SAGAL: Here, President, we want you to play with this.
(LAUGHTER)
AMSTELL: What voice were you doing there?
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: That was my Sultan of Brunei.
AMSTELL: It’s very good.
SAGAL: Thank you.
(LAUGHTER)
SAGAL: You went for the beach bucket. No, it was actually the book “The Worst Case Scenario Handbook.”
KRUGMAN: Oh good god.
SAGAL: The Sultan of Brunei presented that to the president of the United States, even though it’s an American book. We don’t understand why. It must prove that even the Sultan of Brunei, a billionaire who flies in a private 747, sometimes buys a last minute gift at the airport.
(LAUGHTER)
(APPLAUSE)
KRUGMAN: All right.
SAGAL: Carl, how did Paul Krugman do on our quiz?
KASELL: Well, Paul had two correct answers, Peter, and that was enough to win for Arne Bathke and Amy Lett of Lexington, Kentucky.
SAGAL: Congratulations.
(APPLAUSE)
SAGAL: I’m guessing this is right up there with the Nobel Prize.
KRUGMAN: Oh, it’s great. Yes.
(LAUGHTER)
KRUGMAN: I’ll treasure this memory always.
SAGAL: I’m sure you will. Paul Krugman is a Nobel Prize winning economist and columnist for the New York Times. His latest book is “End This Depression Now.” Professor Paul Krugman, thank you so much for joining us.
KRUGMAN: Thanks so much.
(APPLAUSE)
SAGAL: Thank you.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC) Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright National Public Radio.









ThePessimisticChemist says:
Spend more money that we don’t have.
Where are we to get this money? China? They are broke too. The Fed? They are just sitting there tacking zeroes onto the end of an infinite number in their spreadsheet and claiming they just increased US wealth.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
0
27th November 2012 at 10:19 am
card802 says:
NPR, which I like to listen to, is nothing more than another government mouthpiece.
This mornings NPR segment was on China, and how their media is controlled by the government, and how people who disagree with government policies can be detained without charges, without trial, and sent away, forever.
Gosh, now why does that sound so familiar?
But the average brainwashed listener shakes their head in disgust over an evil government like China while totally oblivious to their own evil government.
And in this NPR segment the average uninformed listener believes that Krugman is genius and we should thank God for his existence. NPR is so pro Obama and progressive, some days they can be very difficult to listen to.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11
1
27th November 2012 at 11:05 am
Stucky says:
That’s quite a love-fest between Krugman and Sagal. Were they sucking each other’s dick during the interview?
The Mick Jagger of Political Economic Punditry?? Ha!! More like, Mick Jagoff.
Sagal said —- “You had this interesting idea though about how we could save our economy that I thought everybody should listen to, because IT’S A GREAT IDEA. Stage an alien invasion.”. Jeebus Fuckin Kristmas!! Retards, one and all.
Krugman’s Nobel Prize is a mockery of all that is holy and good. Stupid fuckin’ Norwegians with their heads up a reindeer’s ass can all go to hell.
How nice would it be to read this headline tomorrow? — “Paul Krugman, Dead. Shot in the head. Two reindeer arrested as suspects.”
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
0
27th November 2012 at 11:18 am
Micro-Be says:
I like NPR…when they shutup and get on with the classical music. For me, and I haven’t really found anyone that agrees, the tone that the people on NPR talk with is very elitist and is as if they are talking down to you, like you are a child. The whole show seems to be a story book hour for giant babies. But the stations usually carry classical music so I listen from time to time though when they are talking I do not even bother.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7
0
27th November 2012 at 12:07 pm
Thinker says:
Krugman is a fucking idiot.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
0
27th November 2012 at 1:05 pm
Wyoming Mike says:
What Thinker said…
Like or Dislike:
4
0
27th November 2012 at 2:04 pm
AWD says:
The guy is insane, no two ways about it. Any wonder liberals love him?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
1
27th November 2012 at 2:18 pm
Jackson says:
Bruce Bartlett, a long time conservative who helped draft the Kemp-Roth tax bill, who was closely associated with supply-side economics, who wrote regularly for NR and the WSJ, and who’s the author of “Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy,” has become a Republican policy apostate. His comments below on Keynesian and Paul Krugman are from “The American Conservative” magazine. I’d quote more but I’m fearful too much might give the Administrator a stroke.
Revenge of the Reality-Based Community
My Life On The Republican Right—And How I saw It All Go Wrong.
by Bruce Bartlett • November 26, 2012
“I came to the annoying conclusion that Keynes had been 100 percent right in the 1930s. Previously, I had thought the opposite. But facts were facts and there was no denying my conclusion….The fact that Keynesian ideas were correct as well as popular simply made my thesis stronger….
“I think I had a very clear understanding of the economic crisis from day one. I even wrote an op-ed for the New York Times in December 2008 advocating a Keynesian cure that holds up very well in light of history. Annoyingly, however, I found myself joined at the hip to Paul Krugman, whose analysis was identical to my own. I had previously viewed Krugman as an intellectual enemy and attacked him rather colorfully in an old column that he still remembers.
“For the record, no one has been more correct in his analysis and prescriptions for the economy’s problems than Paul Krugman.”
Apaprently Bruce Barlett has never read Bertram Folsom’s “New Deal or Raw Deal” which shows how disastrous FDR’s underconsumption theories, high spending policies, and government control programs, all of which Bartlett seems to favor now, were to the nation.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
27th November 2012 at 4:04 pm
OF says:
Tja, that´s what you get from inbreeding…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
27th November 2012 at 5:03 pm
Novista says:
Yojimbo
How about a mashup with the 1938 “War of the Worlds” radio play and the Krugman plan? Several sources on YouTube. Probably just the early part, when the first alien craft opens and … “My God, they look like vampire squids. Call Paul Krugman … “
Like or Dislike:
0
0
27th November 2012 at 8:33 pm
backwardsevolution says:
SAGAL: ” But there’s also exciting sciences, like economics.”
AUTOMATIC EARTH: “I have very little appreciation and/or patience for the field of economics and its practitioners. Labeling it “the dismal science” does it far too much honor in my view, since it’s not a science at all. No more than psychology is, or anthropology, or beer brewing. Nothing that can’t stand the falsifiability test Karl Popper left us is a science. Falsifiability is the dividing line between the real thing and a whole wide range of mere pretenders.”
Klown Krugman!
Like or Dislike:
2
0
27th November 2012 at 8:57 pm
Kill Bill says:
Skrew Krugman with a

Like or Dislike:
2
0
27th November 2012 at 9:15 pm
Kill Bill says:
Spend more money that we don’t have. -TPC
Lest folks forget it was Nixon that took us decided that foreign debts will no longer be paid in gold.
Deficits dont matter -Dick Cheney
So, both parties have agreed that spending is beneficial.
As to whom…..
Like or Dislike:
1
0
27th November 2012 at 9:27 pm
AKAnon says:
I usually hold Thinker’s comments in the highest regard. But in this case, Thinker is off base-far too generous. Krugman makes the choice between a giant douche and a turd sandwich look appealing. What an insufferable piece of shit that jackass is. PKES.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
27th November 2012 at 9:31 pm
sangell says:
The issues were different then. France asking to convert dollars US tourists spent in France at the 35 to 1 ratio was an unfriendly act. Other countries weren’t doing it. I don’t think the French would much appreciate it today if the US government refused to accept Euros for dollars at the market price but demanded a fixed rate.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
27th November 2012 at 9:38 pm
Darwin says:
I vomit a little every time I see anything from Krugman.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
27th November 2012 at 9:46 pm
sangell says:
Oh, I was referencing KIll Bill’s comment about Nixon ending dollar convertibility into gold.
France was behind that as they were trying to strip mine our gold reserves because we had to turn a current account deficit to finance world trade, clean up the mess they left behind in Indochina and import lousy automobiles the French were trying to slip in on the back of Volkswagen and other European auto manufacturers. Paying gold for a Renault Dauphin was adding insult to injury!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
27th November 2012 at 9:47 pm
Kill Bill says:
Oh, I was referencing KIll Bill’s comment about Nixon ending dollar convertibility into gold.
Actually it was a unilateral agreement that Nixon agreed with, My bad.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
27th November 2012 at 10:14 pm