By Paul B. Farrell, MarketWatch
SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif. (MarketWatch) — Near zero economic growth by 2050? Yes, America’s economy is collapsing. Fast. Yes, the “most depressing forecast ever,” says InvestmentNews, trusted source for 90,000 professional financial advisers across America.

Jeremy Grantham
Actually it’s worse than depressing if you read the details in “On Road to Zero Growth,” the latest Quarterly Letter from Jeremy Grantham, founder and chief investment strategist for the $100 billion GMO money managers.
Yes, today’s fiscal-cliff drama is just a warm-up for what’s coming. America’s economic future is a disaster. We are going over a bigger game-changing economic cliff, into a long-term chasm. And it’s unavoidable.
Why? Because our myopic Congressional leaders and Fed chairman are focused on short-term fixes, piling on more monetary-stimulus debt, while avoiding America’s systemic long-term problems. Yes, we are our own worst enemy and nothing will keep us from driving down the road to zero growth and into painful austerity, just like the 1930s.
Listen closely: here’s Grantham’s overview of America’s economy from the late 1900s through 2050: “The trend for U.S. GDP growth up until about 1980 was remarkable: 3.4% a year for a full hundred years.” That powered the great American Dream. “But after 1980 the trend began to slip.” And unfortunately the economy is “not going back to the glory days of the U.S. GDP growth.”
Get it? A century of high-growth prosperity, then our GDP growth dropped “by over 1.5% from its peak in the 1960s and nearly 1% from the average of the last 30 years.”
America’s high growth and prosperity is gone forever
What’s ahead? InvestmentNews’s Dan Jamieson sums up Grantham’s “most depressing forecast ever:” America’s long-term 3.4% annual GDP growth is ancient history. Grantham is blunt: “The U.S. GDP growth rate that we have become accustomed to for over a hundred years … is not just hiding behind temporary setbacks. It is gone forever.”
Unfortunately, we’re in denial, accelerating the decline. Just the opposite: “Most business people (and the Fed) assume that economic growth will recover to its old rates.” Wrong: “Going forward, GDP growth (conventionally measured) for the U.S. is likely to be about only 1.4% a year, and adjusted growth about 0.9%.”
Listen closely: The American economy is on a long decline. By 2050 our GDP will be under 1% growth. We are in a downhill road race headed to zero growth while Washington, Wall Street, CEO’s and billionaires play myopic games, feigning optimism, while making matters worse.
So investors, voters, taxpayers are left alone, forced to adjust their long-term retirement plan accordingly, because this trend is certain to raise havoc in the financial markets, in consumer spending and in the job market, as we descend into zero growth hell.
20 leading financial minds warned of 2008 bank crash for 8 long years
Back in mid-2008, months before the Wall Street disastrous pre-election meltdown, we wrote a column reporting on eight years of warnings made by financial leaders, beginning in 2000 till the 2008 meltdown. The list was impressive: two Fed governors, an SEC chairman, five respected economists, four billionaires, five big money managers, two financial historians, etc. Warnings kept coming for eight years.
But not only were their warnings ignored, Treasury Secretary Paulson was out there telling Fortune, “this is far and away the strongest global economy I’ve seen in my business lifetime.” Fed Chairman Bernanke was telling us the subprime crisis was “contained.”
Later, after 18 years running America’s monetary system, former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan finally admitted to Congress, “I really didn’t get it until very late.”
But Jeremy Grantham and many others did “get it.” Got it early. He’s one of the world’s most respected money managers, “a capitalist who co-founded two firms that today employ about 600 people in total.” Investors should listen to his new warnings.
Trust Grantham’s forecast: great track record, lots of great company
Back then Grantham was building on a mid-2005 special report in the Economist magazine, “The Biggest Bubble in History,” warning that in the five short years after the 2000 dot-com crash, property prices had risen worldwide by an unprecedented 75%. Yes, real estate mania had replaced the dot-com mania.
In his April 2007 quarterly newsletter, Grantham described a trip around the world. His finding were headlined: “The First Truly Global Bubble, impacting all countries, all assets worldwide. From Indian antiquities to modern Chinese art; from land in Panama to Mayfair; from forestry, infrastructure, and the junkiest bonds to mundane blue chips; it’s bubble time. … Everyone, everywhere is reinforcing one another. … Bursting of the bubble will be across all countries and all assets … no similar global event has occurred before.””
Then in his midyear 2007 letter, a deeply concerned Grantham warned that watching the global economy was like “watching a very slow-motion train wreck.” In his October letter, Grantham said the “train hits end of track at full speed.”
A year later, on schedule, Wall Street’s slow-motion credit train did in fact hit a solid wall, leaving Wall Street banks, America’s monetary system and the world’s credit markets essentially bankrupt, a catastrophe that was predicted years in advanced, and ignored.
No lessons learned from 2008 crash, blowing bigger bubble, disaster
Today we still haven’t learned any lessons: In his early 2012 newsletter Grantham saw a bigger global train accelerating. Focusing on the “common good, it became quickly apparent that capitalism in general has no sense of ethics or conscience.” In fact, capitalism’s “greatest weakness is its absolute inability to process the finiteness of resources and the mathematical impossibility of maintaining rapid growth in physical output.”
The biggest culprit: Wall Street bankers. Their collective myopic brain is incapable of seeing beyond their millisecond trades, beyond today’s closing prices, beyond quarterly earnings, and never beyond their annual bonuses.
All public costs, especially long-term environmental losses, are discounted to zero, someone else’s problems.
America’s delusional leaders on the road to zero growth
Flash froward to Grantham’s latest quarterly newsletter: “On the Road to Zero Growth.” Will his warnings be listened to this time? Any more than those 20 other warnings in the years prior to the 2008 Wall Street crash? Unlikely, certainly not by Wall Street, not by Congress nor by the White House — at least not in time to avoid another, and this time bigger, meltdown than in 2008. They’ll keep misreading history with their faux optimism.
Grantham even has a special warning about the disastrous job Greenspan’s successor Bernanke is doing, favoring Wall Street’s too-greedy-to-fail banks while piling trillions of new debt on the backs of future taxpayers with endless bond buybacks.
Grantham warns “investors should be wary of a Fed whose policy is premised on the idea that 3% growth for the U.S. is normal. Remember, the Fed is led by a guy who couldn’t see a 1-in-1,200-year housing bubble! Keeping rates down until productivity surges above its last 30-year average or until American fertility rates leap upwards could be a very long wait.”
So if Washington and Wall Street don’t get it, Main Street investors have no choice: Take control of your money and adjust your retirement portfolios for the coming decline.
Black Swan: next crash, bigger, longer than 2000 and 2008 combined
Grantham is a realist, understands human nature, personally, nationally, globally. It will probably take a global catastrophe — pandemic, famine, WWIII or a monetary system crash bigger than 2000 and 2008 combined — to awaken America: “Attitudes are sticky. We cling to the idea of the good old days with enthusiasm. When offered unpleasant ideas (or even unpleasant facts) we jump around looking for more palatable alternatives.”
Why? Americans are dreaming, in denial, trapped in a delusion: The return to 3%+ GDP growth. Politicians are even biggest dreamers: “The tech boom and bust and the following housing boom and housing and financial busts helped camouflage the recent unpleasant economic development lying below the surface: the steady and important drop in long-term U.S. growth,” warns Grantham.
Global GDP will drop, too, but far outperform America. The “bottom line for U.S. real growth,” says Grantham, “is 0.9% a year through 2030, decreasing to 0.4% from 2030 to 2050.”
The recent century-long 3.4% GDP growth is dead, never to return. Never. Accept it, bite the bullet, plan ahead, downshift retirement plans, do it now.









TeresaE says:
“…But not only were their warnings ignored, Treasury Secretary Paulson was out there telling Fortune, “this is far and away the strongest global economy I’ve seen in my business lifetime.” Fed Chairman Bernanke was telling us the subprime crisis was “contained.”
Later, after 18 years running America’s monetary system, former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan finally admitted to Congress, “I really didn’t get it until very late.”…”
These two jackwipes were trained by the banks to do exactly what has happened. Greenspan sat above a bankster led grab of GDP, thinking that, somehow, fewer Americans sharing the pie would be the same in the end.
Back when I first caught wind (IT in the late 90s/early 00s was a rumor mill – and delusion pit, future-to-be-canned, but clueless, I got out on my terms) of the coming mass layoffs (of people making over $100k) AND Clinton increasing the number of allowed H1-B immigration increases EVER (seriously, how few know that in 1998/1999, knowing full well that Y2K-fixing employment would cease to be needed on Jan 1, 2000, THEN you fling open the gates to foreign grads whom have no idea how expensive our colleges and debt load is? pricks).
Security, war and housing filled the gap created by the passage of a second, plus mania in dotcom (which was a lot less employment than people think, at least on a nationwide, relative basis).
We have been lied to, stolen from, then had our IQs poisoned by everything from mercury in vaccinations, to fluoride in the water, to god knows what horror in our hygiene products, or to the imported, processed, “foods” that come in with little USDA oversight, from Asia.
From the article end, “…The recent century-long 3.4% GDP growth is dead, never to return. Never. Accept it, bite the bullet, plan ahead, downshift retirement plans, do it now.”
bwaahahahaha, if “we” didn’t notice all the above happening – which it did – then there is next to NO chance that many will see it this time.
Human nature, a warning too early, is a warning never heeded. We keep proving it with dams, levees, rivers, tunnels and who knows what else. Why would our very means of survival be any different?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7
0
4th December 2012 at 1:52 pm
AWD says:
“The “bottom line for U.S. real growth,” says Grantham, “is 0.9% a year through 2030, decreasing to 0.4% from 2030 to 2050.”
That looks like a “lost 1/2 century”. I also don’t understand how you can project out that far considering the deficit/debt. The debt will kill us faster than anything. By 2030, the U.S. will have a deficit of more than $33 trillion. I don’t think that’s gonna happen.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
1
4th December 2012 at 2:31 pm
Stucky says:
I’ll be dead by 2050. Thank God.
Spoken like a true self centered don’t-give-shit fat assed Boomer.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
13
0
4th December 2012 at 3:00 pm
Pirate Jo says:
And this guy wonders why the birthrate is declining. Oh well, at least the comments from readers are good.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/02/opinion/sunday/douthat-the-birthrate-and-americas-future.html?ref=opinion
Like or Dislike:
2
0
4th December 2012 at 3:18 pm
youcanthavemyglock says:
my firearms and ammo purchases are on a road to infinity by 2050
Like or Dislike:
2
2
4th December 2012 at 3:19 pm
sangell says:
Not trying to sound like a 60′s hippie denouncing the ‘plastic people’ and their materialistic culture but seriously, how much shit do people really need? It is quality of life that is important for most folks
not quantity of goods in their house. How big a TV set do you need to watch TV and if all you can watch on TV is rednecks killing alligators or towing cars why in the hell watch TV at all!
Growing 3% per year is worthless if all it does is create more debt, more stress and a 4000 square foot house full of plastic electronic junk.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
1
4th December 2012 at 3:33 pm
Llpoh says:
Sangell – depends on what the population is doing. If it goes up 2% per year and gdp goes up 1, ru-oh. After twenty years you got big doodoo.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
4th December 2012 at 3:51 pm
Stucky says:
sangell
How much do we really need, indeed!! +100
I don’t have the skills to be a DIYer. I can’t build a house, or install solar panels, or do electrical and plumbing, etc. It is what it is. So, I’ve been researching ‘small, under 1000 sqft, off the grid prefab houses”
Something like this little gem would suit me PERFECTLY …. but Ms Freud is reluctant to change;
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
0
4th December 2012 at 4:10 pm
sangell says:
NO!!! This is already to go ‘off grid’
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
0
4th December 2012 at 5:16 pm
sangell says:
If you’ve got $700,000 you can get this. Steel hull, 3000 mile range under power, can operate under sail for ‘get home’ or fuel economy purposes and is 51 feet of intercontinental travel capability.
Like or Dislike:
4
0
4th December 2012 at 5:27 pm
Stucky says:
Not so sure about that boat thingee, sangell.
I’ve been told that the two happiest days in a boat owners life are, 1) they day he buys the boat and, 2) the day he sells it.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
0
4th December 2012 at 5:37 pm
Eddie says:
I wouldn’t try to sail that vessel very far. And getting home better not involve sailing to weather. However, it’d be a fine home as long as the diesel held out. I’ll give you that.
I did once read a book (I probably still have it somewhere) about an interesting young man who lived aboard a home-built sailboat, mostly eating sprouts that he sprouted himself, along with fish. Of all the live-aboards I’ve ever read about, he came the closest to what I’d consider a sustainable lifestyle.
That’s the hitch about living on a boat. It’s difficult to carry enough food to survive on for long. My sailing buddy has a bunch of MRE’s stockpiled aboard…but the truth is that they wouldn’t get him that far in a SHTF scenario.
It’s nice to know you can leave if you need to though. A boat is a ticket out of town, at least.
Like or Dislike:
4
0
4th December 2012 at 5:38 pm
Stucky says:
Also, we won’t be needing too much time wondering if I have $700,000.
What can I get for five bucks?

Like or Dislike:
4
0
4th December 2012 at 5:43 pm
Pirate Jo says:
Imagine a large corral full of cattle in a stockyard, all standing in the mud, and at one end of the corral a gate has been opened and the cattle are being slowly herded to slaughter.
Does it do you any good to be that one cow that knows what’s going to happen? You’re going to be just as screwed as all the other cows, but the knowledge would frighten you and bum you out.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
0
4th December 2012 at 5:46 pm
sangell says:
Hole in the water too, but… if the SHTF do you really want to be in your spider hole, hunkered down peering through your night vision goggles afraid to go to sleep less they sneak up on you and take all you have? Maybe it would be better to fire up the diesels and go where the weather is mild and relax 20 or 30 miles offshore and let the radar warn you if someone is approaching so you can put your pants on, pull out the Barret .50 cal and go up see what they are all about. If they don’t answer on the radio well, once they are within a mile of you you fire a tracer over them and if they don’t stop you put a few rounds into their hull.
Meanwhile you’ve got freshwater desalinization, a biodiesel kit on board and the sea will provide protein long after land supplies give out.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
4th December 2012 at 5:54 pm
Stucky says:
How high’s the water, mama?
Two feet high and risin’
How high’s the water, papa?
Two feet high and risin’
We can make it to the road in a homemade boat
That’s the only thing we got left that’ll float
It’s already over all the wheat and the oats,
Two feet high and risin’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fpbCLNyPUA
If you remember that song, you are a Boomer. (take note, Admin!)
Like or Dislike:
2
0
4th December 2012 at 5:56 pm
Stucky says:
Did ya’ll notice that five buck note is from “Stuckey’s Banking Company”?
Eddie
This isn’t about that young man in a home-built sailboat ….. but, if you like that kind of thing, you just might throughly enjoy the true story of Poppa Neutrino, “Random Lunacy”
5min intro vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Qh5J8gGm3Q
Poppa’s website
http://www.poppaneutrino.com/
Like or Dislike:
2
0
4th December 2012 at 6:00 pm
Eddie says:
Sangell
I can’t afford a Barrett .50 caliber…I do admire the way they look, especially the semi-auto model.
My substitute is the .45-70. I have a couple of Marlin guide guns in .45-70…and I’m thinking about getting a long buffalo gun in the same caliber, maybe a Pedersoli. I do like having a rifle available with a heavy bullet.
Pirate Jo
So far the analogy is more like sheep than cattle. We are getting sheared a little closer every shearing.
But when the shearing turns into slaughtering, I’m getting the flock out if I can.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
4th December 2012 at 6:14 pm
Eddie says:
Stuck
Amazing guy. It must take great courage to live like that. It seems to me that it would anyway.That’s really living free and out on the edge. I have to watch more. Thanks!
Like or Dislike:
3
0
4th December 2012 at 6:23 pm
sangell says:
Well I COULD afford a Barret but unless I had the $700,000 Seahorse Marine Diesel Duck, which I can’t afford unless Taylor Swift want’s to go halve’s on it with me, I don’t need to maintain a cordon sanitaire of a 1000 yards.
Seriously, for you survivalists types, you are looking in the wrong direction. A boat offers more protection at lower cost than trying to build an entire self sufficient complex on land. For $40 or 50K you can get a boat that has everything you need to survive for 2-4 weeks and you are out of range of the FSA. Spend twice that and you can last months offshore. How long do you thing the FSA can last?
Like or Dislike:
2
0
4th December 2012 at 6:38 pm
Eddie says:
Lots of good boats out there, but I’d have to give up a practice I’ve spent 25 years building to make that transition. If we have a deflationary collapse I might buy a boat when prices bottom. They are falling now. Boats have never been more affordable in my adult life. I window shop. I like the Hardin 45.
Neil Young’s Baltic Trader was recently on the market for 600K.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
4th December 2012 at 6:50 pm
Davel says:
Admin: “Paul Farrell doesn’t realize that there will be a resolution of our unsustainable paradigm by 2028. ”
Damn, I’m going to miss that.
Like or Dislike:
4
0
4th December 2012 at 8:27 pm
Ron says:
With a little luck and more debt we can go like this for years.How many is the question. Oh well everyone keeps saying there are to many people.For the food and jobs.
Without a big black swan event how long do we keep going?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
4th December 2012 at 2:05 am