Every nation-state has a body of laws woven into the fabric of society. As Peruvian economist Hernando de Soto has commented on extensively, the stronger the rule of law, the stronger the economy.
And by “stronger” laws, I mean laws that are impervious to tampering for personal or political gains. The connection between a sound judiciary and economic health is readily comprehensible, except maybe to a politician… businesses and individuals are far more likely to invest capital in a country with understandable laws that are impartially and universally enforced than if the opposite condition exists.
That’s because the lack of a consistent body of law breeds uncertainty and adds a huge element of risk for entrepreneurs. That is the case here in Argentina, where hardly a week goes by without La Presidenta and her meddlesome comrades cooking up some new hurdle for businesses to overcome.
Which brings me back to the matter at hand – American justice on a slippery slope.
Few recent cases make the contention clearer than the announcement last week by the US Justice Department that it had settled its case against HSBC for acting as the bag men for Colombian and Mexican drug cartels. The fine, $1.9 billion, amounts to about five weeks of revenue for the bank.
And that was pretty much it.
Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone magazine, who can run hot or cold when it comes to reporting, in my opinion, nails his column on the verdict, which you can read here.
The basic setup is that for years, at the highest levels of HSBC, the bank worked hand in glove with the drug cartels to launder their money. So smooth was their relationship that the drug gangs used special cardboard boxes for them to fill with cash – boxes that were designed to fit easily through the teller windows of the HSBC branches in Mexico.
Now, don’t get me wrong – I am 100% against the so-called “War on Drugs.” That there are hundreds of thousands of Americans in prison for the “crime” of voluntarily ingesting recreational drugs, or providing said drugs in a rare free-market transaction (there’s a willing buyer and a willing seller and no regulations – at least none that anyone pays any attention to), is an abomination.
And so it is that the US has the highest prison population in the world, and by a wide margin: on a per-capita basis, it is 33% higher than the closest contender, Russia.
If you take into account everyone under “correctional supervision,” 3.1% of the US population is either in jail or on probation (for blacks, it’s a stunning 9.2%). According to Human Rights Watch, since 1980 the number of people in US jails for drug charges has increased twelvefold.
Yet, the money men for the murderous cartels that supply the stuff – the sort of fat-cat villains that serve as the centerpiece of every James Bond movie – get off with a hand slap.
How is this possible? The answer is that, just like the much-maligned “banana republic,” the judicial system in the Anglo-Saxon world has been bifurcated into two systems – one for the politically favored and the other for the rest of us.
In the case of HSBC, the rationale for management being spared even a criminal trial, let alone years behind bars, is that the bank is too big to fail. And that should anyone within the bank be collared for their colossal crimes, it could provide the trigger for the widespread collapse of the global financial system.
To which an Anglo-Saxon from the UK might retort, “Bollocks!” This is rather a case of the politically connected and their equally politically connected, high-priced law firms twisting the judicial system to their purposes.
Another recent case is that of the LIBOR fixing scandal.
As you know, in this case a group of banks clearly conspired to rig the rates on the interest-rate index used to underpin over $300 trillion in loans. As the scandal was revealed, it was also revealed that top tax dodger and now US Treasury Secretary Tim “Timmy” Geithner was aware of the rigging as far back as at least 2007 when operating the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Yet Geithner’s elevated position in the Obama administration meant that this inconvenient revelation quietly faded into nothingness. As did the clear implication that if Geithner knew about it, so did untold scores of others at the Fed and other institutions at the time.
Meanwhile, back in the present, instead of rounding up the heads of these institutions, it was announced this week that a handful of floor traders – the ever useful minions – have been fingered to take the fall. For the sake of the public show, I suspect the fall will be pretty hard.
Hell, the last time I checked, even Jon Corzine, who as a former senator and governor of New Jersey is the über-insider, is still a free man despite being the lead actor in the bankruptcy of MF Global and the subsequent looting of billions in customer funds. No one, except maybe Corzine himself, thinks that he isn’t criminally complicit, yet, at this writing, there isn’t even a hint he’ll be prosecuted.
As David Webb has so thoroughly documented, a spate of cases over the last decade has set a clear precedent that financial institutions – at least those of a size to count with the political class – are pretty much free to lie, cheat, misrepresent, and even use their clients’ funds to trade for their own book.
And if things go wrong, they can pass the losses on to the clients, or in the case of Corzine simply shrug his Savile Row-clad shoulders, and feign ignorance about where said funds went.
It Goes On… and On…
And the conniving and criminality doesn’t stop at the judiciary but has infested pretty much every corner of the government.
A personal recent favorite was Hillary Clinton‘s oh-so-convenient bout of fainting that kept her from testifying about the truly bizarre attack on the Benghazi consulate, thereby skipping the direct damage to her career that would have resulted from having to answer the unanswerable in front of television cameras.
Then there’s the sweetheart deal embedded in the soon-to-be-updated federal regulations related to mortgages. Given all the abuses leading up to the housing crash, John Q. might posit that there will be strong teeth in these new regulations. Sure, there’s a couple – but lookie what else is in the new regs; this from the New York Times…
As regulators complete new mortgage rules, banks are about to get a significant advantage: protection against homeowner lawsuits.
The rules are meant to help bolster the housing market. By shielding banks from potential litigation, policy makers contend that the industry will have a powerful incentive to make higher-quality home loans.
But some banking and housing specialists worry that borrowers are losing a critical safeguard. Industries rarely get broad protection from consumer lawsuits, and banks would seem unlikely candidates given the range of abuses revealed during the housing bust.
Mind-boggling.
Skipping across the pond, we have the truly incredible case of Julian Assange, who is now a prisoner, surrounded by upwards of 100 police officers, in the Ecuadorian embassy in London where he’s been seeking asylum.
At one point, a senior British official suggested they were seriously considering throwing hundreds of years of diplomatic precedent out of the window by storming the embassy to get their man.
Yet his purported crime, having consensual sex with two different women without a condom (in one case, he had one, but it apparently broke) would, at most, be treated as a minor offense in pretty much any court, in pretty much every country in the world. Unless, of course, he knew he had AIDS and was deliberately trying to transmit it, which he wasn’t.
Do your own research, and maybe you’ll draw a different conclusion – here’s one fairly thorough story on the charges against Assange – but that the UK government is willing to spend untold sums of money it can’t afford keeping him penned up in the Ecuadorian embassy smacks of collusion and corruption.
What’s really going on, of course, is that Assange’s WikiLeaks organization embarrassed the power elite by doing what the media no longer does – getting to the truth, in this case releasing a stash of embarrassing diplomatic cables.
While Assange is fighting the good fight, it’s a fight against entrenched political interests, and so it’s a losing battle. Aided by the corrupt judiciary or, failing that, the malleable military, it’s just a matter of time before he ends up in a cell next to Bradley Manning whose tortured corpus is now on trial for giving up state secrets that were really not all that secret.
In economic policy, too, the evidence of two different systems is glaring. Look no further than the Fed’s recent decision to light the afterburners on over a trillion in new money creation each year.
Whom does such a policy help? The politicians, of course, by allowing them to claim they “fixed” the economy that they broke in the first place… when all they are really doing is replacing the capital formation and spending of a healthy private sector with the polluted effluence of government disbursements.
Whom does such a policy hurt? The population at large, by eroding the value of everything they own and eviscerating their ability to earn money on their money through a free market in interest rates… all the while fostering yet more malinvestment in the Potemkin villages of an uneconomic solar industry, electric cars, high-speed trains, etc.
Make no mistake, the Fed and the government are keenly aware of the damaging consequences of their actions – but, out of self-interest, take those actions nonetheless.
The enviro-socialists that have bought their way into the corridors of power provide another array of examples, using laughably bad science and arbitrary rulings to disadvantage key sectors of the economy such as energy and mining.
What’s It Mean to You and Me?
There is little question that the vast majority of the public is ignorant or apathetic, or both, to the pervasive corruption of the political classes and their financiers.
But even if they were paying attention and outraged, the fact of the matter is that things have degraded to the point where there is next to nothing John Q. can do about it. Sure, you can write your Congressman; just be sure to be extra polite, or your letter will end up in the hands of zee Homeland Security.
Ditto if you write angry emails and send them to all your friends. Just don’t make the mistake of thinking there is still such a thing as privacy or the right of free speech in the Anglosphere.
And heavens forbid you try to organize a physical protest. Next thing you know, you’ll end up wearing a pair of these bad boys coming to your friendly police officer’s belt soon.
(Not only do these next-gen cuffs restrain you, but they allow the arresting officer to remotely deliver electric shocks and, if that doesn’t do the trick, even inject drugs into you.)
Of course, if your company or industry wants to fight it out in the courts, you have to be ready and able to spend millions in legal fees fighting a government with unlimited funds (provided, of course, by your taxes and money borrowed from the Chinese or ginned up by the Fed).
What I’m trying to say is that, regardless of what the popular corruption indexes show – and those are typically based on fairly suspect surveys on matters such as transparency in corporate reporting or whether bribes are required to do business – when you take into account the systematic skewing of the judicial and electoral systems to favor the entrenched politicos and their friends in high places, the level of corruption in the Anglosphere would make an African despot blush.
It’s not an accident that the Republicans and the Democrats, two sides of the same coin despite all the rhetoric, are never remotely at risk of losing their collective grip on power – the system has been carefully and thoroughly rigged to prevent that from happening.
Logically, if there is virtually nothing the public at large can do about the rigged game they are forced to live with, then it comes down to decisions we make as individuals.
Some general approaches for your consideration.
- Suck it up. The Stoic approach is to recognize there are certain things you can’t do anything about, so put the hypocrisy and self-dealing of officialdom and their enablers out of mind and live your life the best you know how.
- Profit from it.While it may seem counterintuitive, the more challenging the environment for business creation, the more money an especially hard-charging entrepreneur can make. This is why Asian shop owners open up in ghettos and why the margins for “war profiteers” are so high – because they literally have to risk life and limb to collect them.A successful acquaintance recently told me that, as the head of the Argentine branch of a major international electronics brand, his division was regularly able to pull down margins in excess of 40% while his counterparts in less volatile political environments were happy with less than 10%.
It just takes an extra measure of patience and fortitude to overcome the challenges that scare less determined individuals away.
- Move West… or South, but probably not North. A combination of #1 and 2 above, the brave minority might want to consider taking the show on the road.
- If you can’t beat them, join them. As Doug Casey has often pointed out, the effect of Pareto’s Law operating over time on the large democracies has resulted in the worst sort of people controlling the levers of government at the federal, state and local level. If you happen to be a sociopath with control issues, then you might want to hop on the gravy train and worm your way into government, or into one of the many parasitic enterprises sucking the life from the body politic.
- Go outlaw. Yesterday, a flash mob gathered in the southern Argentine city of Bariloche for the sole purpose of looting a large storeof electronics, food and booze, and sundry other items that will make the Christmas holidays all the more festive.When I heard of the incident, I mentioned to my wife that this could very well be the proverbial first shot in the breakdown of civil society in cities around the world. And sure enough, as I was writing, the news broke that spontaneous mobs have formed in a number of cities around Argentina for the sole purpose of looting stores.
This is precisely the sort of thing one can expect in an economy laid low by political corruption, malfeasance and self-serving meddling. When people lose hope, and lose faith that the judicial system will protect them from the entrenched interests, then it is well within the range of some of those people to just say screw it and go outlaw.
I could be wrong, but I think what happened in Bariloche yesterday has the potential to be just as seminal as the self-immolation in Tunisia that set off the Arab Spring.
The implications of mobs deciding to come together to just take what they want are potentially huge. In the Anglo-Saxon world, it could provide exactly the excuse needed to bring down the stainless-steel curtain built with hundreds of billions of homeland security expenditures over the past decade.
In fact, while I am probably overstating it, the action of the mob in Bariloche yesterday could be the missing link between Neil Howe’s Third and Fourth Turning, ushering in the next and most troubled era.
It’s ironic that it’s happening in here in my new retreat in Argentina, but it’s of no personal import because our new hometown of Cafayate is rural, small and very successful, and the sort of place where everyone knows everyone else. And, besides, there are no large supermarkets to raid.
In addition, despite the dark era of military rule (or perhaps because of it), Argentina is not a violent culture, and the big cities are few and far between. The same can’t be said of places like Chicago and Detroit, where flash mobs have been increasingly cropping up with the primary intention of committing violence.
How fast and how far things will spread from here is only a matter of conjecture, but the range of possibilities is wide.
Regardless of whether the rule of law continues to be diminished through the acts of corrupt politicians or a mob – or through the militarized arm of the politicos trying to control the mob – I fear the knock-on consequences on the economy and on society at large.
I really don’t want to be a Chicken Little, but taking some basic precautions to protect yourself and your assets is only commonsense at this juncture.
Trend hunters see the writing on the wall and can prepare themselves accordingly for the coming shifts. Those who do so successfully in the investment world can realize life-changing gains… such as David Galland’s highly successful contrarian speculator friend and business partner, Doug Casey. Being able to get inside the mind of someone like this is a rare treat… a window into the thought processes of a self-made millionaire offers insights that can stimulate, entertain, and even educate others.
Right now you have an excellent opportunity to get inside Doug Casey’s mind, to learn his thoughts and feelings on subjects ranging from investing and speculating to American politics, culture, and education. His new book, Totally Incorrect, showcases Doug’s radical libertarian thinking and irreverent personality. Whether you agree with Doug or not, Totally Incorrect will get you thinking – and probably investing – in new and better ways. Get your copy today.
Ron says:
Ive watched this RT channel a few times now,dam interesting! The commies point out all kinds of stuff our media never well. I saw an program about the occupy movement that opened my eyes a bit. They sure showed a different angle to it.
They also talk about our debt trouble and Obama and even NDAA. It was almost freaky! The difference between what we are fed here(our propaganda) and what other countrys see is sad.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
0
9th January 2013 at 9:20 pm
biggtmofo says:
Interesting piece here. The fix is in and your are not in it. I will say to Ron that I have started the other year watching RT news the other year. Their perspective on the occupy movement was very different and more legitimate. They also interviews Chris Hedges several times as he was suing the Obama administration over the NDAA. Nary a peap from the MSM here. I didn’t hear about it in the debates except when Ron Paul supporters booed Romney supporting the NDAA. I like the idea of scamming folks because fuck it, a hustlers credo is to part a fool from his money.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
9th January 2013 at 10:32 pm
BUCKHED says:
I wrote all of my representatives when the discussions got serious about making all of the illegals..legal. I asked if breaking into MY country was a felony and they weren’t going to be prosecuted for it what law could I break and never face prosecution ?
My suggestion was to make up a list of laws that natural born citizen would be exempt from and issue a gooberment card stating the law you were exempt from…I’d choose speeding tickets.
Imagine…. a police officer pulls you over,you hand him your get out of jail card and he says to you…sorry I pulled you over for doing 100 in a 30..Have a nice day.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
9th January 2013 at 10:37 pm
Eddie says:
if you have enough dirty money, there will always be a banker willing to launder it for a share of the profits. This is not new, imho, but the players have never been more blatant about it..but why shouldn’t they be? A slap on the wrist is the worst that can happen to any of our TBTF financial institutions.
What a sweet deal. In the past, when bankers got out of control, countries would nationalize the banks. Now we just nationalize their liabilities, and they get to keep the assets.
Whatever happened to Trust-Busting?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
9th January 2013 at 11:04 pm
crazyivan says:
Ron,
“The commies point out all kinds of stuff our media never well” -ron
RT is no better at truth telling than Fox or Oprah.
This must be the 25th time I have seen you confuse the word will with the word well. Consistently over a period of time, every time. At first I thought it was a typo, and then for quite a while I just thought you were stupid. But then I started to notice that otherwise your spelling was spotty, your punctuation sucks, your sentence structure is below average, and your content is very weighted.
Give it up comrade.
Like or Dislike:
3 
4
9th January 2013 at 11:29 pm
Makati1 says:
Crazyivan, Ron is not a commie, he is more likely a graduate of the Us public school system where things like spelling and grammar are no longer important. I’ll take poor English over poor thinking every time.
The Us is now a banana republic in every area. Soon to be a very distressed banana republic when the haves and the have-nots go to war. Imagine, 300,000,000 guns and ammo to fill them, vs a few million, at best, police and military, many of whom will desert to the civilian side when push comes to shove. Defending your failing country or your family will be the choice. NATO troops on the streets of your city? Probably! If they are not busy back home, or will the Us troops be there?
There are so many laws on the books that every one of America’s ~315 million citizens have violated or broken at least one and they are being recorded to use against you whenever ‘Big Brother’ feels the need. No one saw you go through that red light last year, except the camera on the light pole that read your license number and got your picture as you drove by. Then there was that gun you bought from your neighbor, who will turn you in as soon as there is an inquiry as to why he didn’t register it when he was required to. Yes, he could sell it legally, but you were required to register it with the authorities and pay the fee. So many laws, so few who understand.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
0
9th January 2013 at 12:40 am
Stucky says:
“You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor” ——- Leviticus 19:15,
The above is a good definition of ‘justice. But justice in America? We make a mockery of the word.
Law and order masquerade as justice, and our prisons fill to the brim with young men, mostly black and Hispanic, mostly poor.
Gloria Van Winkle, 30, is serving life without parole in a Kansas prison …. For possessing 1/16 of an oz. of cocaine.
A 6-year-old special education student who kicked a Naples teacher’s aide and spent several hours in juvenile jail is facing felony battery charges.
A man is mercilessly sentenced to 50-years in prison for stealing $153 in video tapes.
The United States is one of the only countries in the world that allows children under 18 to be sentenced to life. Amnesty International report more than 2,000 such inmates; in the rest of the world, there are only 12 juveniles serving a life sentence.
An Arizona man who was sentenced to 200 years in prison for possessing 20 images of child-pornography. Over 5,200 Pentagon employees were caught viewing and download child porn onto their computers, but no charges were ever filed.
I commit fraud by writing a $1000 dollar bad check, I go to prison. Companies commit billion dollar frauds, they pay a fine.
They find $7,000 of laundered money in a Congressman’s freezer … he gets pardoned AND gets a standing ovation.
People get arrested and hit with devastating fines for selling raw milk to their friends … Big Ag poisons us with impunity.
The rule of law has vanished in America’s criminal justice system. Prosecutors now decide whom to punish and how severely. Almost no one accused of a crime will ever face a jury. Inconsistent policing, rampant plea bargaining, overcrowded courtrooms, and ever more draconian sentencing have produced a gigantic prison population, with black citizens the primary defendants and victims of crime. God help your pitiful soul if you ever appear in Criminal Court, where “truth” is the first casualty. Both sides are in it to WIN, truth be damned, truth be twisted, truth be stretched, and truth be manufactured, if necessary. That’s why even when new evidence could prove a guilty man as innocent, they won’t allow a retrial; “We won!! Now fuck off!!”. This is justice in America.
Persons accused of crimes are not imprisoned based on fair proceedings conducted by unbiased judges and based on facts decided by juries of their peers. Persons accused of crimes in most cases go to prison because acts they have committed (or are THOUGHT to have committed) are judged to be threats to the community by police and prosecutors and judges and social workers and the local newspaper reporter …. even in the rare jury trial a jury cannot often interpose its values about who should or should not be punished for particular actions ….. in short, the entire community is against you. “Innocent until proven guilty” is one of the Greatest Myths in the American lexicon.
Is American Justice dead? You’re goddamn fucking right it is. (But not if you quite rich, and preferably, white.)
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
0
9th January 2013 at 12:42 am
marissa says:
Persons accused of crimes are not imprisoned based on fair proceedings conducted by unbiased judges and based on facts decided by juries of their peers. Persons accused of crimes in most cases go to prison because acts they have committed (or are THOUGHT to have committed) are judged to be threats to the community by police and prosecutors and judges and social workers and the local newspaper reporter
Wrong, Stucky.
These persons end up stuck in jail because they don’t have enough money to pay the best kinds of lawyers to get them off the hook.
Always follow the money.
When was the last time you heard of a rich white guy doing time on death row?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9 
0
9th January 2013 at 7:29 am
Outtahere says:
Capitalism, like our political system, only works when it is based on and run with a standard moral code; religious or otherwise. That part of the equation is gone – busted – ignored and evaporated. Only the politically connected are exempt from any wrong doing. Sooner or later it is all going to fall apart and come crashing down around our heads and THEN the problem will have been solved. For me, the sooner the better. The longer this crap drags on the worse the outcome for the average person. More and more people are starting to see that this is nothing but the largest Transfer of Wealth in history with ALL of the risk being passed on to us — the taxpayer. People on TBP seem to get it, but the Sheeple of America it seems are not going to realize how screwed we are until the shaft is broken off in their pretty pink panties which were paid for with a credit card.
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
9th January 2013 at 10:00 am
BUCKHED says:
Muck…I tell people often about jury nullification. I explain it it to them…most are unaware that they have the right to sit in judgement of the law .
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
9th January 2013 at 10:37 am
Stucky says:
You don’t need to know. You can’t know.” That’s what Kathy Norris, a 60-year-old grandmother of eight, was told when she tried to ask court officials why, the day before, federal agents had subjected her home to a furious search.
The agents who spent half a day ransacking Mrs. Norris’ longtime home in Spring, Texas, answered no questions while they emptied file cabinets, pulled books off shelves, rifled through drawers and closets, and threw the contents on the floor. The six agents, wearing SWAT gear and carrying weapons, were with – get this- the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Kathy and George Norris lived under the specter of a covert government investigation for almost six months before the government unsealed a secret indictment and revealed why the Fish and Wildlife Service had treated their family home as if it were a training base for suspected terrorists. Orchids. That’s right. Kathy Norris had a home-based business of cultivating, importing and selling orchids
This elderly woman was sent to federal prison for 2 years for her dastardly sins against humanity.
1) This is Kathy Norris.
2) Gub’ment heros gettin’ ready to take down the old nag.
3) Kathy Norris’ prison reading material for rehabilitation purposes.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
9th January 2013 at 10:58 am
Stucky says:
Everyone is guilty of something. There was a time in America when heresy was a crime. We have been found guilty of perversion for loving the wrong person in the wrong way. And of fighting and refusing to fight. We have been guilty of speaking out and keeping silent, of walking, marching, and running away. We have been guilty of praying in the wrong places, or not praying at all. We have been found guilty for what we drink. We are guilty for taking drugs, and also for not taking them. We have been found culpable for following orders and for refusing to follow them. We have also been guilty of our religion, national origin, sexual preference, whether or not to give birth, and especially skin color.
“In a closed society where everybody’s guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity.”
———–― Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
9th January 2013 at 11:14 am
Dorkus Maximus says:
A large book is needed on this subject.
Three quotes come to mind:
“The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.”
Tacitus (2nd Cent. AD)
“Laws, like the spider’s web, catch the fly and let the Hawk go free”
Spanish proverb
“Where there are too many policemen, there is no liberty. Where there
are too many soldiers, there is no peace. Where there are too many lawyers, there is no
justice.”
Lin Yutang
We’ve been slouching down this road for a long time. The abominable Supreme Court
commerce clause decisions andRoe V. Wade are a huge part of it. Before these decisions, Judges were wary of doing anything that could be seen as encroaching the Constitution. Now it’s exactly the opposite. Now Judges dream up hare-brained, tortured eplanations for why the Constitution doesn’t really say what it clearly says and the powers that be think its cute. The Courts ARE PART OF THE GOVERNMENT and they have taken complete control of “interpreting” the Constitution away from the people. (footnote: the Constitution is written in plain english rather than legalese for a reason: it belongs to the people – not judges and lawyers).
Proof: there has not been a substantive Amendment to the Constitution since Roe v. Wade (27th doesn’t count (not substantive and largely ratified pre-1900′s)) and there are no significant movements afoot for new amendments. Because it’s a waste of time. The government would simply ignore new amendments.
Why?
Because the Judges and congress do whatever the hell they want.
Hide your guns and let me know where I can still find magazines.
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
9th January 2013 at 5:04 pm
Dorkus Maximus says:
We also lost justice when “we” (boomers and silent generation) divorced morality from the law.
In saner times, something was deemed illegal because it was wrong. I.E. the government couldn’t declare green chairs illegal because there is nothing morally wrong with green chairs.
Now the government can declare ANYTHING illegal regardless of whether it’s wrong, such as making it illegal to not purchase health insurance.
And if you resist the government’s declaration you will be shot dead.
If you doubt the shot dead part, try refusing to obey the law AND refuse to capitulate to the government’s attempts to force you to follow the law – eventually you will be the target of a militarized SWAT team. If you refuse to submit you will be shot dead.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
9th January 2013 at 5:31 pm
GJH says:
“Now the government can declare ANYTHING illegal regardless of whether it’s wrong, such as making it illegal to not purchase health insurance…If you refuse to submit you will be shot dead.”
Well put dorkus.
Is this not the definition of a totalitarian state?
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
9th January 2013 at 11:22 pm