Human nature is not something politicians can’t alter, no matter how they may try. It’s taken thousands of years for humans to evolve, to build, to work, to reproduce and better society.
Yet, somehow 100 million people are on welfare, with many more on disability and unemployment benefits, and don’t have to work, build or better society. They are the dependent class, and support the collectivist redistributing government. The pathology induced by couch sitting and voting for a living are beyond comprehension, yet millions accept this bastardization of their human nature to get free everything from their government masters.
The final insult of socialists and communists is an attempt to remove human nature, demonize it, and destroy it. Only then can the great leaders mold and control the public. I’d say they’ve succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. Having 100 million people dependent on the government (and therefore powerless) is a truly amazing accomplishment.

The Collectivist Mind Game, Part 3: Demonizing Human Nature
By Oleg Atbashian January 23, 2013
If Robert Heinlein were to write The Moon today (see Part 1), there’s no doubt his notion of the future oppressive global government on Earth would be very different. With such forces at play, the free-market revolution in Lunar colonies would likewise be fought by different means, struggling to overcome the tidal wave of government indoctrination and demonization, in addition to an army of statist looters hiding behind the army of statist moochers, who will be hiding behind an army of statist Blue Helmets of the statist United Nations.
That would be an asymmetrical warfare if ever there was one. The individualist free-market rebels wouldn’t be able to respond in kind by playing the collectivist mind games with the statists because it would turn them into their own enemies. Their only hope would be to learn to recognize the game when it is being played, not to fall for any of its seductive illusions, methodically expose the players at every turn, call every little manipulative trick in their arsenal for what it is, and help to immunize the rest against its corruptive influence.
The tidal wave of propaganda notwithstanding, the rebels would still have the most important ally on their side — human nature. No matter into what society they are born and what mind conditioning they receive, people will never stop being competitive individuals. They will always long for individual freedom, rationality, objectivity, personal achievement, and the pursuit of a better life for themselves and their families.
Without these traits humanity would never have risen from the ignorant tribal collectivism of hunters and gatherers, with its brutal mores, dark superstitions, and average life expectancy of 30 years, when few lived long enough to develop complete self-awareness, formulate a coherent individual thought, and pass it onto others. There would be no division of labor, no markets, and no capitalist wealth to sustain the advances in science, arts, and technology — let alone to feed the multitudes of Marxist intellectuals and statist plutocrats. There would be nothing to lose and nothing to fight for.
Admittedly, the Marxist notion of human progress is a spiral that would return humanity to that stateless, moneyless, classless, and selfless collectivism — except on a higher level. For that purpose they must, so to speak, put the genie of individualism back into the bottle, and the only way they can do it is by demonizing human nature itself.
However, the 74 years of the morbid Soviet experiment failed to breed the New Collectivist Man. The communist “engineers of human souls” isolated millions of people from the rest of humanity by sealing off the nation’s borders and creating a pressurized Marxist bubble. They rearranged the society, rewrote history, and reorganized the culture. They subjected several generations of children to intense mind programming. They blocked all undesirable news sources, books, films, and music. They rewarded “correct” thoughts and impulses, and punished the “incorrect” ones. They demonized greed, selfishness, individualism, and self-interest. They taught altruism, collectivism, and self-sacrifice. They ran relentless campaigns that dehumanized non-compliant individuals.
Ultimately, not a single trait of human nature had changed. In the months before the collapse, the indisputable failure of collective farming forced the Soviet communists to resurrect the idea of individual farms — and, in order to survive, Chinese communists reverted to private entrepreneurship, while maintaining the pretense of Marxist orthodoxy.
This alone should be enough to discredit the fundamental Marxist doctrine that the human mind is a “social construct” shaped entirely by manipulation and social conditioning. As an unintended consequence, the Soviet experiment proved the existence of something that Marxist science has always denied: that our individual thoughts, motives, and actions are governed, on the most part, by absolute moral standards, which are objectively derived from the unchangeable nature of human beings and the nature of the world.
Obviously, it is more beneficial to accept human nature in its entirety as an absolute standard and to build the society on that foundation, rather than to erect an artificial construct first and rearrange the foundation later, trying to discard parts that don’t fit into the design.
And yet that failed philosophy is now flourishing in America’s academia and leftist think tanks, which currently formulate U.S. government policies.
From the economy to crime prevention to education to foreign relations, America’s policies today are based on the Marxist premise that crime results from poverty, economic crisis results from greed, injustice results from capitalist exploitation, corruption results from the free markets, and militant Islamism results from Western colonialism. Therefore, peace and harmony can only be achieved through equal redistribution of wealth, appeasement, and a global effort to reshape human nature through politically correct, collectivist indoctrination.
Predictably, a faulty premise leads to a faulty outcome: the economy is stumbling, education is failing, corruption is spreading, crime is rising, and militant Islamism is gaining more ground. Instead of creating the New Man, the suppression and demonization of natural human traits breeds moral and intellectual freaks. Where normalcy is outlawed, abnormalities flourish.
The most damaging outcome of this fallacy, however, is also the least visible — and thus rarely mentioned: the government effort to demonize our individual thoughts, impulses, and human nature itself can only result in the eventual dehumanization of our society, turning independent American citizens into mindless statistical units, spiritless cogs in the machine, and powerless subjects of the state, ripe for abuse by any sociopathic government official with dictatorial tendencies.
The Game can only exist in symbiosis with big government. They equally need each other for survival, nourishment, and expansion. Downsizing the government would not only deprive the Game of its nourishment, but would remove the very reason for its existence. Of course, the Game’s state sponsor can also be a foreign government — as it was with the network of KGB influence agents — but that is a matter for another discussion.
A free-market revolution’s primary function, therefore, would be to discard any policies or government structures that are based on the collectivist philosophy of demonization and dehumanization of the individual, starting with the Department of Education.
Human nature has taken us this far; there is every reason to believe it will continue to help us in the future.
* * *
In the meantime, a domestic influence operation known as OFA (Obama for America), is reorganizing, renaming itself Organizing for Action, and assuming a tax-exempt legal structure. It would be a mistake to think that since Obama is no longer running for office, his campaign outfit has outlived its purpose. Without its thundering acoustics, Obama would be as helpless as a lip-synching artist whose soundtrack went silent in the middle of an act. The introduction and perpetuation of a collectivist, statist frame of reference among American voters was not only a prerequisite for Obama’s victory; it remains a vital ingredient of his governing style as the nation’s most powerful community organizer.
As such, even though OFA is not directly bankrolled by the U.S. Treasury, it has become an indispensable part of today’s big-government operation — the American version of the Department of Agitation and Propaganda, if you will — and, as every bureaucracy, it has no intention of downsizing. Having taken the Game to an unprecedented level and reaching its peak performance during the “fiscal cliff’s” hate week — rivaling in effectiveness the erstwhile Propaganda Department of the Soviet Communist Party Central Committee — OFA is planning to solidify its structure and influence with a so-called Obama Campaign Legacy Conference.
Regrettably, the legacy of Obama campaign is not that of achievements in bettering the country, but rather that of perfecting shameless crowd manipulation aimed at grabbing more power and transforming America into something it was never meant to be.
In an email to supporters, Obama campaign manager Jim Messina writes, “Issues like immigration, climate change, and gun violence will be debated over these next four years, and President Obama is ready to take them on — but he needs us by his side. Our goal is to help him get things done, but also to help change how things get done in Washington in the first place.”
Thus, in addition to being a tradition in presidential elections, emotional manipulation is now also being geared to become an official replacement for a traditional legislative process. Marx would have described this as a great qualitative leap forward.
Messina further describes OFA as “an advantage that no previous president has enjoyed and one that has the potential to reshape our politics for years to come.”
Judging by past performance, the vague “reshaping of our politics” here translates into a very concrete subjugation of the legislative and judicial branches to the executive dictate and the elimination of the constitutional principle of checks and balances.
If this plan works, Obama and his Czars will be simply telling Congress and the courts what to do, as his Department of Agitation and Propaganda will discredit and demonize all non-compliant legislators and judges with coordinated “hate weeks” in the media and staged street protests, all the while feeding illusions of a major historic battle between good and evil to the misinformed public, who will eagerly play the part of a crowd with pitchforks and torches, especially if motivated with promises of more government handouts.
Any surviving opposition will thus be pressured and intimidated into submission, one by one, until the last resisting judge, congressman, or any other troublemaker is either removed from office or gives up the fight and succumbs to the Orwellian alternative reality, letting Obama fundamentally transform America as advertised. Thereafter, we may as well live in a Lunar colony — so small will be our chance to uproot the new ruling Party who will be setting the terms, framing the debate, writing the narrative, and otherwise stage-managing the bamboozled, easily manipulated subjects of the new “people’s republic.”
We may well be witnessing a pivotal moment in creating a system, against which a future free-market revolution will be fought. Let’s hope it won’t be merely a plot device in a libertarian sci-fi novel, because if this revolution doesn’t happen in real life, manuscripts of such nature may soon become inadmissible for publication.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/the_collectivist_mind_game_part_3_demonizing_human_nature.html#ixzz2JNnzFJv1
Great piece about the government controlled media:









napari says:
AWD,
I like your posts they go along with the way I see things. Is there a solution? I mean a mountain is moved one shovel at a time and I’m ready! I just dont know where to begin….
Like or Dislike:
0
0
29th January 2013 at 1:06 pm
Nonanonymous says:
napari, the bottom line is there is no hope without God. If it were within man to save himself, Jesus Christ, or Jeebus, whichever you prefer, would need not have died on the Christ. The salvation of man rests in the Lord, God Almighty.
Some people don’t like the answer, but you asked
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
3
29th January 2013 at 1:29 pm
AWD says:
napari
I don’t feel optimistic. The collectivist nightmare has progressed so far it’s beyond belief. There is nothing to stop it now. The Republicans are useless, gutless phonies. The liberals own the media propaganda machine. We are seeing the true nature of Obama and what he’s trying to turn this country into. He’d prefer totalitarianism, and there’s nobody to stop him. He’s purging the military now of any descent, purging conservative judges. Once the military is restaffed with liberal progressives willing to fire on Americans on American soil, the real purges can begin (and will start with gun confiscation). Obama controls the justice system. Who is left to stop it?
Print this out, it may help when they come to take you away…
Like or Dislike:
4
0
29th January 2013 at 2:38 pm
AWD says:
We had a chance (and maybe still do), his name is Ron Paul
Like or Dislike:
3
0
29th January 2013 at 2:44 pm
JJ3 says:
I just read The Law by Frederick Bastiat last night, I got it for becoming a member of the Laissez Faire book club. The basic premise is that the law is supposed to be for one thing the protection of individual rights and property, however it has become perverted and is now a struggle for hundreds of different groups each with their own version of what a fantasy utopia should be struggling against each other to use the law to implement their version of fantasy. None of the fantasies in question take human action and human nature into consideration I might add.
The conclusion is, no government at all, it is not needed. Ask yourself, honestly, what has government ever done for you? Even if it has done something important for you, ask yourself if the same thing could have been accomplished better by a private entity.
Read or listen to Ludwig Von Mises, Murray Rothbard, or Bastiat, the true fathers of Libertarianism, sign up for newsletters from libertarian writers and know that the true libertarian stance is the complete elimination of government, not compromise, not smaller government, no government at all.
Take a tour of my youtube channel if you want to view some cool videos on this subject.
http://www.youtube.com/jenklefritz
Like or Dislike:
2
0
29th January 2013 at 2:54 pm
JJ3 says:
And if your answer is what about schools and roads, please understand that schools came into existence as a private entity. They were hijacked by government once governmet realized that they needed to control the populace through education.
Also private roads were built throughout England during the industrial revolution which led to them becoming a global leader in trade.
Read or listen to For a New Liberty by Murray Rothbard, it’s explains clearly how private enterprise could do a better job in every instance.
What about police you say? Well, what we have now is a government monopoly on protection, if we had competing private police forces, if an officer was rude or abused us, guess what we could cancel our subscription to their police force and go with another one, therefore there would be an incentive for police to serve us instead of abuse us.
Look into the private police forces used by the railroads when building this great country for an example of how a private police force would operate efficiently and effectively.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
29th January 2013 at 3:01 pm
AWD says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
0
29th January 2013 at 3:15 pm
napari says:
Nonanonymous : I like your answer…short and sweet
AWD: Thats the real problem AWD. Progressives keep solidifying power without regard for anything. The ones I’ve talked to actually would rather have anything even islam in control before any Christian or right winger! It probably will be a collapse and genocide. Which my greatest fear of blood spilling on our homeland I had hoped to avoid but the war drums keep getting louder.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
29th January 2013 at 3:40 pm
OF says:
“Without these traits humanity would never have risen from the ignorant tribal collectivism of hunters and gatherers, with its brutal mores, dark superstitions, and average life expectancy of 30 years, when few lived long enough to develop complete self-awareness, formulate a coherent individual thought, and pass it onto others.”
We know shit about these hunters and gatherers. Turns out, if you study the times seriously, that nothing was dark about the “dark” ages, the middle-ages, for instance. At least not really any darker than today.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
29th January 2013 at 10:47 pm
phack says:
Oh c’mon.
stop trying to make Obama out to be some sort of communist. He’s a corporatist, just like the presidents before him, including Saint Ronnie. You’re spending all your time on the 1% difference between the Dems and GOP when you should be doing something about how the country is run for the rich, by the rich and you have lost all your civil rights since 9-11
Like or Dislike:
0
4
29th January 2013 at 11:58 am
AWD says:
phack
Obama is controlled by corporations, yes, but he’s much more dangerous. He is trying to bypass Congress and representative government. He is trying to do away with the Constitution and bill of rights. He is purging the military of patriots, and replacing them with people he and the progressives can control, so they will fire on American citizens when he decides to seize power and become a dictators. He is already behaving like one, so wake the fuck up. It’s not “politics as usual”, which seems to be your point.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
29th January 2013 at 12:11 pm