
Who Runs The World? Solid Proof That A Core Group Of Wealthy Elitists Is Pulling The Strings
By Michael, on January 29th, 2013
Who Runs The World? Solid Proof That A Core Group Of Wealthy Elitists Are Pulling The Strings. Does a shadowy group of obscenely wealthy elitists control the world? Do men and women with enormous amounts of money really run the world from behind the scenes? The answer might surprise you.
Most of us tend to think of money as a convenient way to conduct transactions, but the truth is that it also represents power and control. And today we live in a neo-fuedalist system in which the super rich pull all the strings. When I am talking about the ultra-wealthy, I am not just talking about people that have a few million dollars. As you will see later in this article, the ultra-wealthy have enough money sitting in offshore banks to buy all of the goods and services produced in the United States during the course of an entire year and still be able to pay off the entire U.S. national debt. That is an amount of money so large that it is almost incomprehensible.
Under this neo-feudalist system, all the rest of us are debt slaves, including our own governments. Just look around – everyone is drowning in debt, and all of that debt is making the ultra-wealthy even wealthier. But the ultra-wealthy don’t just sit on all of that wealth. They use some of it to dominate the affairs of the nations. The ultra-wealthy own virtually every major bank and every major corporation on the planet. They use a vast network of secret societies, think tanks and charitable organizations to advance their agendas and to keep their members in line.
They control how we view the world through their ownership of the media and their dominance over our education system. They fund the campaigns of most of our politicians and they exert a tremendous amount of influence over international organizations such as the United Nations, the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO. When you step back and take a look at the big picture, there is little doubt about who runs the world. It is just that most people don’t want to admit the truth.
The ultra-wealthy don’t run down and put their money in the local bank like you and I do. Instead, they tend to stash their assets in places where they won’t be taxed such as the Cayman Islands. According to a report that was released last summer, the global elite have up to $32 TRILLION dollars stashed in offshore banks around the globe.
U.S. GDP for 2011 was about 15 trillion dollars, and the U.S. national debt is sitting at about 16 trillion dollars, so you could add them both together and you still wouldn’t hit 32 trillion dollars.
And of course that does not even count the money that is stashed in other locations that the study did not account for, and it does not count all of the wealth that the global elite have in hard assets such as real estate, precious metals, art, yachts, etc.
The global elite have really hoarded an incredible amount of wealth in these troubled times. The following is from an article on the Huffington Post website…
Rich individuals and their families have as much as $32 trillion of hidden financial assets in offshore tax havens, representing up to $280 billion in lost income tax revenues, according to research published on Sunday.
The study estimating the extent of global private financial wealth held in offshore accounts – excluding non-financial assets such as real estate, gold, yachts and racehorses – puts the sum at between $21 and $32 trillion.
The research was carried out for pressure group Tax Justice Network, which campaigns against tax havens, by James Henry, former chief economist at consultants McKinsey & Co.
He used data from the World Bank, International Monetary Fund, United Nations and central banks.
But as I mentioned previously, the global elite just don’t have a lot of money. They also basically own just about every major bank and every major corporation on the entire planet.
According to an outstanding NewScientist article, a study of more than 40,000 transnational corporations conducted by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich discovered that a very small core group of huge banks and giant predator corporations dominate the entire global economic system…
An analysis of the relationships between 43,000 transnational corporations has identified a relatively small group of companies, mainly banks, with disproportionate power over the global economy.
The researchers found that this core group consists of just 147 very tightly knit companies…
When the team further untangled the web of ownership, it found much of it tracked back to a “super-entity” of 147 even more tightly knit companies – all of their ownership was held by other members of the super-entity – that controlled 40 per cent of the total wealth in the network. “In effect, less than 1 per cent of the companies were able to control 40 per cent of the entire network,” says Glattfelder. Most were financial institutions. The top 20 included Barclays Bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and The Goldman Sachs Group.
The following are the top 25 banks and corporations at the heart of this “super-entity”. You will recognize many of the names on the list…
1. Barclays plc
2. Capital Group Companies Inc
3. FMR Corporation
4. AXA
5. State Street Corporation
6. JP Morgan Chase & Co
7. Legal & General Group plc
8. Vanguard Group Inc
9. UBS AG
10. Merrill Lynch & Co Inc
11. Wellington Management Co LLP
12. Deutsche Bank AG
13. Franklin Resources Inc
14. Credit Suisse Group
15. Walton Enterprises LLC
16. Bank of New York Mellon Corp
17. Natixis
18. Goldman Sachs Group Inc
19. T Rowe Price Group Inc
20. Legg Mason Inc
21. Morgan Stanley
22. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc
23. Northern Trust Corporation
24. Société Générale
25. Bank of America Corporation
The ultra-wealthy elite often hide behind layers and layers of ownership, but the truth is that thanks to interlocking corporate relationships, the elites basically control almost every Fortune 500 corporation.
The amount of power and control that this gives them is hard to describe.
Unfortunately, this same group of people have been running things for a very long time. For example, New York City Mayor John F. Hylan said the following during a speech all the way back in 1922…
The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation. To depart from mere generalizations, let me say that at the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes.
They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business.
These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.
These international bankers created the central banks of the world (including the Federal Reserve), and they use those central banks to get the governments of the world ensnared in endless cycles of debt from which there is no escape. Government debt is a way to “legitimately” take money from all of us, transfer it to the government, and then transfer it into the pockets of the ultra-wealthy.
Today, Barack Obama and almost all members of Congress absolutely refuse to criticize the Fed, but in the past there have been some brave members of Congress that have been willing to take a stand. For example, the following quote is from a speech that Congressman Louis T. McFadden delivered to the U.S. House of Representatives on June 10, 1932…
Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government board, has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board has cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.
Sadly, most Americans still believe that the Federal Reserve is a “federal agency”, but that is simply not correct. The following comes from factcheck.org…
The stockholders in the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are the privately owned banks that fall under the Federal Reserve System. These include all national banks (chartered by the federal government) and those state-chartered banks that wish to join and meet certain requirements. About 38 percent of the nation’s more than 8,000 banks are members of the system, and thus own the Fed banks.
According to researchers that have looked into the ownership of the big Wall Street banks that dominate the Fed, the same names keep coming up over and over: the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, the Lazards, the Schiffs and the royal families of Europe.
But ultra-wealthy international bankers have not just done this kind of thing in the United States. Their goal was to create a global financial system that they would dominate and control. Just check out what Georgetown University history professor Carroll Quigley once wrote…
[T]he powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.
Sadly, most Americans have never even heard of the Bank for International Settlements, but it is at the very heart of the global financial system. The following is from Wikipedia…
As an organization of central banks, the BIS seeks to make monetary policy more predictable and transparent among its 58 member central banks. While monetary policy is determined by each sovereign nation, it is subject to central and private banking scrutiny and potentially to speculation that affects foreign exchange rates and especially the fate of export economies. Failures to keep monetary policy in line with reality and make monetary reforms in time, preferably as a simultaneous policy among all 58 member banks and also involving the International Monetary Fund, have historically led to losses in the billions as banks try to maintain a policy using open market methods that have proven to be based on unrealistic assumptions.
The ultra-wealthy have also played a major role in establishing other important international institutions such as the United Nations, the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO. In fact, the land for the United Nations headquarters in New York City was purchased and donated by John D. Rockefeller.
The international bankers are “internationalists” and they are very proud of that fact.
The elite also dominate the education system in the United States. Over the years, the Rockefeller Foundation and other elitist organizations have poured massive amounts of money into Ivy League schools. Today, Ivy League schools are considered to be the standard against which all other colleges and universities in America are measured, and the last four U.S. presidents were educated at Ivy League schools.
The elite also exert a tremendous amount of influence through various secret societies (Skull and Bones, the Freemasons, etc.), through some very powerful think tanks and social clubs (the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the Bohemian Grove, Chatham House, etc.), and through a vast network of charities and non-governmental organizations (the Rockefeller Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the World Wildlife Fund, etc.).
But for a moment, I want to focus on the power the elite have over the media. In a previous article, I detailed how just six monolithic corporate giants control most of what we watch, hear and read every single day. These giant corporations own television networks, cable channels, movie studios, newspapers, magazines, publishing houses, music labels and even many of our favorite websites.
Considering the fact that the average American watches 153 hours of television a month, the influence of these six giant corporations should not be underestimated. The following are just some of the media companies that these corporate giants own…
Time Warner
Home Box Office (HBO)
Time Inc.
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
CW Network (partial ownership)
TMZ
New Line Cinema
Time Warner Cable
Cinemax
Cartoon Network
TBS
TNT
America Online
MapQuest
Moviefone
Castle Rock
Sports Illustrated
Fortune
Marie Claire
People Magazine
Walt Disney
ABC Television Network
Disney Publishing
ESPN Inc.
Disney Channel
SOAPnet
A&E
Lifetime
Buena Vista Home Entertainment
Buena Vista Theatrical Productions
Buena Vista Records
Disney Records
Hollywood Records
Miramax Films
Touchstone Pictures
Walt Disney Pictures
Pixar Animation Studios
Buena Vista Games
Hyperion Books
Viacom
Paramount Pictures
Paramount Home Entertainment
Black Entertainment Television (BET)
Comedy Central
Country Music Television (CMT)
Logo
MTV
MTV Canada
MTV2
Nick Magazine
Nick at Nite
Nick Jr.
Nickelodeon
Noggin
Spike TV
The Movie Channel
TV Land
VH1
News Corporation
Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Fox Television Stations
The New York Post
Fox Searchlight Pictures
Beliefnet
Fox Business Network
Fox Kids Europe
Fox News Channel
Fox Sports Net
Fox Television Network
FX
My Network TV
MySpace
News Limited News
Phoenix InfoNews Channel
Phoenix Movies Channel
Sky PerfecTV
Speed Channel
STAR TV India
STAR TV Taiwan
STAR World
Times Higher Education Supplement Magazine
Times Literary Supplement Magazine
Times of London
20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
20th Century Fox International
20th Century Fox Studios
20th Century Fox Television
BSkyB
DIRECTV
The Wall Street Journal
Fox Broadcasting Company
Fox Interactive Media
FOXTEL
HarperCollins Publishers
The National Geographic Channel
National Rugby League
News Interactive
News Outdoor
Radio Veronica
ReganBooks
Sky Italia
Sky Radio Denmark
Sky Radio Germany
Sky Radio Netherlands
STAR
Zondervan
CBS Corporation
CBS News
CBS Sports
CBS Television Network
CNET
Showtime
TV.com
CBS Radio Inc. (130 stations)
CBS Consumer Products
CBS Outdoor
CW Network (50% ownership)
Infinity Broadcasting
Simon & Schuster (Pocket Books, Scribner)
Westwood One Radio Network
NBC Universal
Bravo
CNBC
NBC News
MSNBC
NBC Sports
NBC Television Network
Oxygen
SciFi Magazine
Syfy (Sci Fi Channel)
Telemundo
USA Network
Weather Channel
Focus Features
NBC Universal Television Distribution
NBC Universal Television Studio
Paxson Communications (partial ownership)
Trio
Universal Parks & Resorts
Universal Pictures
Universal Studio Home Video
And of course the elite own most of our politicians as well. The following is a quote from journalist Lewis Lapham…
“The shaping of the will of Congress and the choosing of the American president has become a privilege reserved to the country’s equestrian classes, a.k.a. the 20% of the population that holds 93% of the wealth, the happy few who run the corporations and the banks, own and operate the news and entertainment media, compose the laws and govern the universities, control the philanthropic foundations, the policy institutes, the casinos, and the sports arenas.”
Have you ever wondered why things never seem to change in Washington D.C. no matter who we vote for?
Well, it is because both parties are owned by the establishment.
It would be nice to think that the American people are in control of who runs things in the U.S., but that is not how it works in the real world.
In the real world, the politician that raises more money wins more than 80 percent of the time in national races.
Our politicians are not stupid – they are going to be very good to the people that can give them the giant piles of money that they need for their campaigns. And the people that can do that are the ultra-wealthy and the giant corporations that the ultra-wealthy control.
Are you starting to get the picture?
There is a reason why the ultra-wealthy are referred to as “the establishment”. They have set up a system that greatly benefits them and that allows them to pull the strings.
So who runs the world?
They do. In fact, they even admit as much.
David Rockefeller wrote the following in his 2003 book entitled “Memoirs”…
“For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
There is so much more that could be said about all of this. In fact, an entire library of books could be written about the power and the influence of the ultra-wealthy international bankers that run the world.
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/who-runs-the-world-solid-proof-that-a-core-group-of-wealthy-elitists-is-pulling-the-strings










Super Elite says:
Dear Serf,
What are you going to do about it?
I thought so.
McScrew You
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
14
1
30th January 2013 at 5:16 pm
SSS says:
“According to a report that was released last summer, the global elite have up to $32 TRILLION dollars stashed in offshore banks around the globe.”
—-from the article
WTF does “up to” mean? Could be $100 billion, $20 trillion, whatever. Why does the article just admit that it’s a fucking wild-ass guess.
Too much fuzzy, unsubstantiated and uncorroborated math in the article, much less the fact that the article doesn’t seem to be short on naming the banks and companies, but doesn’t come up with one single name in the list of “global elite.” Not one.
My reaction to the article? Piffle.
Hot debate. What do you think?
7
8
30th January 2013 at 5:36 pm
llpoh says:
I must second SSS’s piffle. Who the fuck is “Michael”? I always want to check the source of stuff like this, and Michael just doesn’t cut it.
Sorry, AWD. I do appreciate all of your efforts. Just think this one was a swing and a miss.
Hot debate. What do you think?
4
6
30th January 2013 at 6:10 pm
AWD says:
the article doesn’t seem to be short on naming the banks and companies, but doesn’t come up with one single name in the list of “global elite.” Not one. My reaction to the article? Piffle.
Piffle indeed. Here’s a little starter list for the uniformed:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
0
30th January 2013 at 6:38 pm
AWD says:
Billions In Blood Money Enjoyed by War Criminals’ Families
Submitted by George Washington
While you might not see them on Forbes’ list of wealthy people, criminals and their beneficiaries are some of the richest people on the planet.
For example, Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels’ heirs are billionaires who own half of BMW. They are also closely connected with Daimler. Four of Goebbels’ step-grandchildren are worth $1.2 billion each, according to an investigation by Bloomberg. Much of their wealth came from slave labor at German concentration camps.
The Goebbels family weren’t the only ones to get rich from Nazi efforts. Barclays, Chase, and the Bush family made money hand over fist financing the Adolph and the gang.
The Vatican has built a secret property empire worth close to a billion U.S. dollars using money Italian dictator Mussolini gave the church for blessing fascism.
Modern tyrants have gotten wealthy from oppressing people as well. For example, the family of U.S.-backed Egyptian dictator Mubarak holds $40-70 billion. Russian leader Putin also has a current net worth of $40 billion. (They pale in comparison to Libya’s Gaddafi, worth $200 billion.)
Indeed, given up to $32 trillion dollars are being hidden in offshore tax shelters, the amount of wealth accumulated through crime is nearly impossible to track.
What should have happened, of course, is that ill-gotten gains should have been clawed back from the criminals as soon as they were discovered, just as they should be clawed back from Wall Street fraudsters.
But that is not likely to happen, since many political and business leaders are unrepentant and unwilling to root out crime.
Indeed, when the elite profit from things such as laundering drug and terror money, funding both sides of wars and other unsavory acts, no one wants to stop the music.
Balzac may have been exaggerating when he said, “Behind every great fortune lies a great crime.” There are some wealthy people who earned their money by honestly delivering a better or cheaper product or service.
But not many …
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9
1
30th January 2013 at 6:45 pm
llpoh says:
I didn’t make the list? Damn.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
0
30th January 2013 at 6:50 pm
AWD says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9
0
30th January 2013 at 7:02 pm
AWD says:
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
0
30th January 2013 at 7:04 pm
sangell says:
There’s a deputy assistant undersecretary at HHS that decides how to spend more money than Lloyd Blankfein. An Administrative law judge who can require the citizens of this country fork over $10 or $20 billion per year on their electricity bills because he believes Antarctica might melt. The very rich, I mean Alice Walton, Bill Gates or Larry Ellison rich, don’t particularly bother me. Most of their money is in shares of their companies so they have an incentive to want the economy to do well.
If my neighbor can make twice as much money as he did last year should I be jealous or should I be happy? I think a little of both is the normal human reaction but economically I should be overjoyed. Maybe he will remodel his house and by doing so make mine more valuable too. In an instance like this I am stealing value from him not the other way around. If he buys a boat or a second home he might offer the use of them to me ( if I hold my tongue and do not accuse him of being a greedy SOB). When BBQ’s out back I might get a steak instead of a hot dog. What’s not to like.
OTOH if my neighbor decides working is a drag and goes on disability instead then I’m in trouble. He won’t be able to afford to fix up his house or yard and may just let it go to hell. Instead of a nice new car in the driveway there will be a junker or two. If I BBQ in the back yard he will manage to find a way to invite himself over.
All in all give me the neighbor who’s making money. I’ll get over my jealousy and lot easier than I will get over my anger at the parasite on SSI.
Like or Dislike:
3
3
30th January 2013 at 7:23 pm
Olga says:
False dichotomy: i.e., “Making money” versus “parasite”.
How about invested in the playing field being level to see what happens?
This means people come to the field as they are – skills and shortcomings “In Toto” – and the game continues with the rules applied equally and consistently, regardless of influence.
The parasitic end of the human spectrum may not move much but perhaps the risk behind the obscene capital accumulation within a finite world, [which has like a washing machine – upset the earth’s equilibrium to the point of massive instability] and the certainty that we are destined to send the entire planet off balance, is enough to reign in the parasites that run in the “better circles”.
Like or Dislike:
3
2
30th January 2013 at 8:29 pm
ecliptix543 says:
So we nuke Basel and the Caymans. Problem solved. All these alleged offshore trillions of dollars are almost entirely digital, so vaporise the servers and all the backups.
Another way to deal with these fuckers would be to contaminate a few of the larger remaining in-ground oil reserves with Cesium. Leak the story that all the crude oil from Russia, Saudi Arabia, Alaska, Iraq/Iran, etc is potentially radioactive. That’ll stop EVERYTHING in less than ten minutes.
Like or Dislike:
5
1
30th January 2013 at 8:56 pm
T4C says:
AWD, I just finished reading GW’s post on ZH. Looking through the comments one really made me kinda stop in my tracks.
“Stuntgirl
Actually, in an actuarial sense, Balzac was correct, no exceptions.
Radical Marijuana

Yeah, Stuntgirl, I agree all the way through …
Human realities are ALWAYS organized lies, operating organized robberies. We have rationalized our ability to act as robbers in our environment. We have rationalized enslaving other animals, and plants, as well as, first and foremost, other human beings.
Private property does not exist outside of some system of public violence. By definition, human beings are entropic pumps that have to get energy to continue living, and to feed their children. That energy has primarily been from killing and eating other living organisms. Therefore, the great fortunes of herds of domesticated animals, or fields of domesticated plants, are achieved through similar sorts of means that we used to domesticate other human beings. We take for granted the ways that we enslave other living beings, because those appear to be relatively nothing compared to how we enslave ourselves.
Great fortunes are necessarily built on top of the established previous systems of organized lies and robberies, which enabled there to be systems where natural resources could be appropriated, and processed, and distributed to other human beings. Human beings basically live as robbers in their environment. Groups of human beings operate as gangs of robbers. Civilization is simply the development of that to astronomically amplified scales, involving billions of human beings, all acting as robbers together. The richest people necessarily operate within the basic systems which are ALL organized lies, operating organized robberies.
The BASIC organized lies are subtracting parts from the whole environment, and then using language to give those parts names, and organizing those into systems of understanding. Those systems of understanding are then correlated with using tools, in order to continue to take material and energy from the environment, which mostly means killing other living things, and eating them, which then was developed to mean controlling the lives of other living things, through the domestication of animals and plants, and first and foremost of those were the domestication of human beings themselves.
What nature does is evolve ecologies, which tend to balance out the rates of robberies. After all, the subtraction is never absolute. We ARE our environment. We are toroidal vortices, which are infinite loops through the environment, of endless cycles of matter and/or energy. Therefore, the processes of robbery are never finished. If one sees that energy is spirit, then, since we are our environment, and energy is spirit, we then can say we are god. Basically, all of ancient mysticism gets recycled through post-modernizing science, and all of the various old-fashioned religions and ideologies were simply different ways of doing the same things. Every religion, with its morality, and every political economy, with its ideology, are different ways of operating organized systems of lies and robbery, which are different ways of cutting up the flow of infinite energy, or spirit without beginning or end, into pieces which we say have a beginning, middle and end, such as with our birth, life and death, or with the rise and fall of civilizations.
Great fortunes are relative concentrations of the organized systems of lies and robbery, through those who are identified with those great fortunes. There was no production that can explain that great fortune, outside of the infinitely greater natural abundance that was the source for that. Great fortunes are all based on the long history of the organized lies and robberies, which made civilizations. Anyone who operates within the established economic systems automatically is taking for granted the history of militarism which resolved conflicts.
For example, everyone in North America appropriates resources through the current systems, which came with the European invasions, that transplanted Neolithic civilization styles here. Those European invasions genocidally wiped out the people who had been living here for thousands of years previously. The survivors of those genocidal invasions were assimilated into the current Neolithic systems. The earlier inhabitants of North America never voluntarily agreed to have all of North America robbed from them! Therefore, almost everyone who lives in North America today benefits from the great crimes of the past.
That is pretty well universally true of everywhere else, throughout time. TO REPEAT: The fundamental processes are subtraction and robbery. Those were organized into systems of lies, operating systems of robbery. Any and all great fortunes are claims staked over wealth, backed up by violence. There is nothing outside of that. All of the domain of possible human production, and voluntary contracts, and free exchanges necessarily ALWAYS takes place within the larger context of natural production, and involuntary contracts, which were based on robbery, with killing the ultimate form of robbery. Those are the basic facts, the foundations to everything else. We should be building up on those foundations in ways that acknowledge and admit them. Instead, almost everything that established political economies stated presupposed the idealized roof, and then pretends to build down from that roof, without ever admitting the real foundations.
To make human ideas and activities consistent with sciences such as physics and biology is possible, but when one approaches human reality as energy systems, one then ALWAYS discovers that there are organized systems of lies, operating organized systems of robberies. The great fortunes were built by those who were best at being dishonest, and backing that up with violence. Assuming that there were some productive or creative people who made their own fortune ignores that always those people were born into an established system, which they took advantage of. Moreover, it usually is the case that the most creative breakthroughs in basic science, i.e., the breakthroughs to better systems of organized lies, were made by groups of people who were not the same as those who finally profited from those better lies enabling better systems of organized robberies.
This article by George Washington tends to presuppose false fundamental dichotomies between relatively good and evil people, and then continues to presuppose the impossible ideals based on those false fundamental dichotomies ought to be the ways that we resolve the conflicts between those different degrees of good and evil people.
That is increasingly nonsense, as progress in science, and the related technologies, in every other domain, transcends the previous false fundamental dichotomies, and establishes unitary mechanisms which better understand the universe. All our moralities, and ideologies, are grossly old-fashioned, and adamantly persistent in being attached to those obsolete ways of thinking!
I suggest that the ways we should approach understanding our situation should be as outlined above. Those who amassed great fortunes were always taking advantage of systems of lies and robbery. The problems are the trends towards those becoming runaway imbalances, where those who were better at deceits were better at staking claims, and backing those up with violence. Therefore, those now appear to possess great fortunes. For every one extremely wealthy individual in the world today, there are one million extremely poor people. That deviancy amplification has been due to the runaway triumph of systems of lies and robbery, ineffectively resisted, and therefore, not brought back into better balance.
To face the facts, money is backed by murder. The debt controls are based on the death controls. The organized systems of fraud and robbery that dominate the world today are runways because those are misunderstood through perceiving them in terms of false fundamental dichotomies, which then leads to proposing bullshit solutions based on impossible ideals, which always backfire in the real world.
Balzac was not wrong. He is always right. All good analysis always reveals systems of lies, operating systems of robbery. The only good solutions are evolving the human ecology to better balance those factors. The most intense problem is tangled up with the paradox of enforcement with respect to the rule of law. The only people who could enforce the rule of law are those who are the best at being dishonest, and backing that up with violence, in order to defeat any other group who has a different idea regarding what the rule of law should be. Therefore, the idea of forming states in which there is a rule of law, limited by the consent of the governed, regularly breaks down as the best organized gangs of criminals over and over take control of the government.
The real world system today is a runaway fascist plutocracy juggernaut, building a fascist police state, in order that the powers of government can be used to defraud and rob more and more people, in order to transfer their wealth to a smaller and smaller minority. That is not effectively resisted because the opposition is almost all controlled to promote the same old-fashioned false fundamemtal dichotomies, and impossible ideals, which always tend to backfire and make the opposite things happen in the real world.
Billions In Blood Money Enjoyed by War Criminals’ Families IS the real situation, because ALL MONEY is BLOOD MONEY. The descendants of known war criminals running around free with billion dollar fortunes is merely the tiniest tip of the iceberg!
What theoretically needs to happen is that we evolve a better human ecology, with a better murder system, so that can sustain a better money system. Nothing less than that is enough. In order to do that, we must perceive that human realities are ALWAYS organized lies, operating organized robberies. Those who did that in excessive ways are those who we may call “war criminals.” However, there is nobody alive today who is not living inside of systems which were made and maintained by countless generations of “war criminals.” Furthermore, there are chronic political problems inherent in the nature of life which will constantly make more of those problems manifest in the future.
More importantly, that deeper understanding of human ecology is the central core to any breakthroughs towards deeper understanding of industrial ecologies, and natural ecologies. The grand paradox of our current times is that there have been a series of breakthroughs in the paradigms with respect to physics, and biology, and other sciences, however, political science continues to be totally hidebound within the biggest bullies’ bullshit social stories.
On the one hand, we have weapons that are trillions of times more powerful, while, on the other hand, those powers are still being channelled through old-fashioned social pyramid systems, based on triumphant deceits. The contradictions between progress in every other science, while human sciences are deliberately suppressed with well-established bullshit, are being amplified to ASTRONOMICAL SIZES!
Warfare is the oldest and best developed human science. Success in warfare was based on deceits. That is the paradox that is at the root of the problem that those who are the descendents of those who were robbers in the past tend to still enjoy what was gained through that robbery. What made War King then made Fraud King. The whole world is now being dominated and controlled by the Fraud Kings who have made a fundamentally fraudulent financial accounting system, enforced by governments, which enables the Fraud Kings and their court to systematically defraud everyone else. However, there are no genuine solutions to be found in continuing to approach these problems through false fundamental dichotomies.
Everyone alive today is living inside systems made during a long history of warfare. Everyone alive today has adapted to being some kind of war criminal, or the descendents of war criminals. Those who were the best at doing that, or whose ancestors were the best at doing that, are those who now are able to stake great claims to wealth, while those who were robbed, or whose ancestors were robbed, are those who now live in poverty.
However, keeping that system of force backed frauds going with weapons that are trillions of times more powerful has become extremely problematic and improbable! Instead, it is imperative that we go through paradigm shifts in our basic ideas about militarism, which can sustain monetary revolutions. That IS going to happen, anyway, one way or another, sooner or later, and MIGHT be better if we understood it better?”
Thoughts on this…..anyone? I don’t have any yet as I’m still mulling it over. All I know is it resonated with me.
Like or Dislike:
2
3
30th January 2013 at 8:57 pm
sangell says:
@Olga
Yeah a level playing field would be nice and I’m not enamored of people making money by rigging the system or by adding useless financial complexity but that requires government. Government is the big enemy in every case because free and open markets are inherently fair if the government is.
To paraphrase Lincoln, no ones smarter than everyone all of the time! It probably would be well nigh impossible to amass 1000 times your money trading in any free market. That is if you have a million in capital you will never reach a billion because you will fuck up and be long when you should have been short or bet the wrong way on an interest rate or currency move somewhere along the way and get kicked back towards your initial stake. The fact that people do manage to make such outsized gains is, to me, prima facie evidence that governments or players with the ability to manipulate government are rigging the system.
Like or Dislike:
4
1
30th January 2013 at 9:25 pm
sangell says:
Let me add the caveat to the above by noting there is ‘blind luck’. People do win the lottery but were we to find someone who managed to bet right 25 times in a row we might find a guy who says he used a monkey to pick his positions as often as some smooth talking octogenarian attributing his success to some easily followed investment principles.
Like or Dislike:
2
1
30th January 2013 at 9:30 pm
SSS says:
AWD
You, and several other commenters thus far, hypothesize that the accumulation of wealth is a dirty business fueled by war and other means of ill-gotten gains. You cite the Goebbels family and include the billionaire Koch Brothers among the so-called Global Elite. I’m throwing the bullshit flag on your inclusion of the Koch Brothers, who have consistently defended economic freedom through a variety of ways. If push comes to shove, I firmly believe the Koch Brothers will take the side of frredom and not the side of national or global statists. And they will bring a bundle of cash to the table on the side of freedom.
So let’s take a look at another multi-billion dollar empire that will most definitely NOT be on the side of fascist corporatism and the Global Elite. And I’m talking about the secretive Mars family. Go grab a Snickers candy bar and read the following from Forrest Mars Jr, one of three heirs to this multi-billion enterprise.
“The fifth principle (in managing the Mars Corporation), and probably the one closest to the brothers’ hearts, is Freedom: ‘We need freedom to shape our future; we need profit to remain free.’ What this really means, however, is privacy – in every facet of the business. The brothers believe that the best way to determine the company’s future is to remain private, and privately held. Being out of the Wall Street spotlight means Mars doesn’t need to be concerned with achieving consistent financial returns. ‘There are no stockholders that have to be answered to, and if John and Forrest want to make investments at the expense of short-term profit, they can and they do,’ says Al Aragona, the recently retired president of Uncle Ben’s. But the privacy issue extends beyond business decisions to the company’s public relations – or lack of them. If Mars doesn’t have to communicate with the world, it won’t.
‘THE ABILITY to be secretive,’ according to Forrest Jr, ‘is one of the finest benefits of having a private company.’ Lecturing to business students at Duke University, North Carolina, he said: ‘Privacy at times today seems a relic of the non-media past, but it is a legal right – morally and ethically proper and even desirable – and a key to healthy, normal living.’
Hot debate. What do you think?
4
8
30th January 2013 at 9:48 pm
Novista says:
Damn, AWD
I see no uniformed people here. And your mug shots prove what? I stopped reading the post when I saw HuffPost … poster children for the politics of envy.
Like or Dislike:
1
1
30th January 2013 at 12:45 am
majormocambo says:
What, you guys finally figured out AWD doesn’t stand for All Wheel Drive.
Like or Dislike:
3
1
30th January 2013 at 2:07 am
Reverse Engineer says:
If you want some names, here is a good chart to start with
Larger size for readability of all the NAMES found here:
http://www.reformy.cz/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/bilderbergx.jpg
RE
http://doomsteaddiner.org
Like or Dislike:
1
0
30th January 2013 at 2:14 am
Reverse Engineer says:
Try another one.

RE
Like or Dislike:
1
0
30th January 2013 at 2:17 am
X2SDT says:
@T4C – radical marijuana gets a thumbs up from me. some of the language/concepts are a little extreme (“enslaving plants”) but they serve to emphasise the basic idea that all communities, countries and their institutions are generally, ultimately, based on violence – domination of the weakest by the strongest; survival of the fittest if you will but where the “fittest” are what we would now identify as the psycopaths/ sociopaths amongst us, those who want more and feel entitled to it and don’t mind how they get it.
today, they use the established institutions (the banks, the churches, the political system, the markets) to accumulate wealth and power and manipulate other institutions (police, legal, military) to protect and expand their wealth and power.
unfortunately, I think this is what history teaches us: that no matter what system or ideology you try to put in place (communism, capitalism, laissez-faire, etc.), there will always be sociopaths who will manipulate and corrupt that system for their own ends until they have enslaved the masses in one way or another.
this is my first substantive comment on this site and I await my newbie ass-kicking.
all the best.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
30th January 2013 at 7:29 am
Bostonbob says:
Interesting character Senator Nelson Aldrich one of the political olicharchists who helped mould the legislation that gave us our income tax and the Federal Reserve. I have been to his house in Rhode Island, our company did some land development on an adjacent property. It is a magnificent mansion on Narragensett Bay in Warwick, RI. The story I was told was he built there because “they” would not let him build in Newport since he was a Catholic. Ironically his heirs who inherited the estate and refusing to pay the inheritance tax he gave it to the Catholic Church. Aldrich sold his soul to J. P. Morgan when he sold an interest in a railway company to a company owned by said Mr. Morgan. His repayment back to Morgan and his cronies came back in the useful leverage of being head of the Senate Finance Committee, and using this power to carve out the legislaton that ultimately became the Federal Reserve. Morgan and Aldrich were both members of the Jekyll Island Club of Georgia, yes that club. His daughter married John D. Rockefeller Jr. spawning Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, and his son would later be the CEO of Chase National Bank. Nice cozy little club if you can get membership. Unfortunately it is only for the rich, politcally connected olicharchs.
Thank you,
Bob.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
30th January 2013 at 9:22 am
Eddie says:
Up until about ten thousand years ago, our Euuropean ancestors were hunter-gatherers, we had small tribes of less than 150 people. This number is key, because that’s about how many people on person can actually know and keep track of. There were leaders and followers, but the culture of “every man for himself” was unkown. We lived in cohesive units and responsibilities and food were shared. The use of money and the need for money was very limited.
Agriculture changed everything in very radical ways, especially socially. Suddenly there could be treasure in the form of surplus food that could be stored. Suddenly it became advantageous to own things, like land ..and even people. Women and children suffered a drop in status that has never truly been recovered.
To that was added the multiplier of cheap fossil fuels in the form of coal, and more lately, oil.
Too much treasure lead to accumulation of money that became intergenerational. Kings and priests were at the top of the food chain, and they accumulated and spent vast fortunes that were created on the backs of the work of ‘common” people.
Banks were invented to take care of the wealth of kings. Kings typically wasted money until it was all gone, and then borrowed money ( this is where the bond market started) to make war on other kings. Where we are now is not that different than that. Our system was designed to prevent some of the problems kings created, but it hasn’t really worked, because the principles our country adopted in the 1780′s have been eroded and circumvented, and we now just have royalty by a different name.
It can be argued that those two things, agriculture and fossil fuels, have allowed the human population to turn into an extractive, unsustainable culture that must now inevitably fail as resources decline. We now have far more people alive than the planet could ever support, and our overgrowth has stripped most of the non-renewable resources from the world.
To me, it is important to acknowledge that it doesn’t have to be the way it is. And that if we are to continue to exist as a species, that we have to (a) learn to carefully regulate population and (b) return to a locally governed culture that would allow people to actually be emotionally invested in the people (other than themselves) that they support.
How we get there, if we do at all, probably involves catastrophic failure f the existing system, and massive die-offs. That’s the saddest thing. But we could, still, at this point, make some kind of stand if the existing structure would fail under the weight of its own crumling castle walls. Embrace the doom, as Hope says.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
30th January 2013 at 9:31 am
AWD says:
I don’t condemn the Koch brothers, or all billionaires for that matter. I admire Bill Gates and what he’s done with healthcare in Africa.
As always, it’s not having money that’s the problem, it’s what you do with it.
Goldman Sachs manipulates the commodity market for profit, driving up food prices and millions starve. George Soros supports liberal progressives that are undermining the constitution and bill of rights. Jamie Dimon and JPM are raping Afghanistan of gold and minerals (with the help of the pentagon) and prolonging the war. The big banks launder drug money.
Rupert Murdoch and the other billionaires that control the media have taken journalism, once a respected profession, and turned it into agenda propaganda. The people with money have turned the population into debt serfs. The sheeple love their slavery, they can’t get enough. It’s brilliant, but it’s also evil.
Like or Dislike:
1
0
30th January 2013 at 11:53 am
AWD says:
The Linchpin Lie: How Global Collapse Will Be Sold To The Masses
In our modern world there exist certain institutions of power. Not government committees, alphabet agencies, corporate lobbies, or even standard military organizations; no, these are the mere “middle-men” of power. The errand boys. The well paid hitmen of the global mafia. They are not the strategists or the decision makers.
Instead, I speak of institutions which introduce the newest paradigms. Who write the propaganda. Who issue the orders from on high. I speak of the hubs of elitism which have initiated nearly every policy mechanism of our government for the past several decades. I am talking about the Council On Foreign Relations, the Tavistock Institute, the Heritage Foundation (a socialist organization posing as conservative), the Bilderberg Group, as well as the corporate foils that they use to enact globalization, such as Monsanto, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, the Carlyle Group, etc.
Many of these organizations and corporations operate a revolving door within the U.S. government. Monsanto has champions, like Donald Rumsfeld who was on the board of directors of its Searle Pharmaceuticals branch, who later went on to help the company force numerous dangerous products including Aspartame through the FDA. Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan have a veritable merry-go-round of corrupt banking agents which are appointed to important White House and Treasury positions on a regular basis REGARDLESS of which party happens to be in office. Most prominent politicians are all members of the Council on Foreign Relations, an organization which has openly admitted on multiple occasions that their goal is the destruction of U.S. sovereignty and the formation of a “one world government” or “supranational union” (their words, not mine).
However, one organization seems to rear its ugly head at the forefront of the most sweeping mass propaganda operations of our time, and has been linked to the creation of the most atrocious military methodologies, including the use of false flag events. I am of course referring to the Rand Corporation, a California based “think tank” whose influence reaches into nearly every sphere of our society, from politics, to war, to entertainment.
The Rand Corporation deals in what I would call “absolute gray”. The goal of the group from its very inception was to promote a social atmosphere of moral ambiguity in the name of personal and national priority. They did this first through the creation of “Rational Choice Theory”; a theory which prescribes that when making any choice, an individual (or government) must act as if balancing costs against benefits to arrive at an action that maximizes personal advantage. Basically, the ends justify the means, and moral conscience is not a factor to be taken seriously if one wishes to be successful.
Hilariously, rational choice theory has been attacked in the past by pro-socialist (collectivist) critics as “extreme individualism”; a philosophy which gives us license to be as “self serving” as possible while feeling patriotic at the same time. In reality, the socialists should have been applauding Rand Corporation all along.
What Rand had done through its propaganda war against the American people was to infuse the exact culture of selfishness needed to push the U.S. towards the socialist ideal. At the onset of any communist or national socialist society (sorry socialists, but they do indeed come from the same collectivist mindset), the masses are first convinced to hand over ultimate power to the establishment in order to safeguard THEMSELVES, not others. That is to say, the common collectivist man chooses to hand over his freedoms and participate in totalitarianism not because he wants what is best for the world, but because he wants what is best for himself, and he believes servitude to the system will get him what he wants with as little private sacrifice as possible (you know, except for his soul…).
Like or Dislike:
1
0
30th January 2013 at 7:00 pm
IraK, who knows that the Chosen People should rule the ignorant masses, says:
People are better off if they’re led by their superiors. Those with more money, education, and experience should lead while those with less interest in the society, and those who have less training and fewer resources, should follow their superiors.
Policy should be set by the elites. In the United States the elites are those who come from the groups destined to lead by religion, education, and their contacts. Other Americans should ape and blindly support those Americans who are their betters.
Wealth should accrue to the elites. They’re better able to bear the burden and responsibility that wealth brings. Lesser groups, able to manage with less wealth, power, and responsibility, should be satisfied with their share.
America was founded as a nation of equality of opportunity and outcome. That means that we all need to recognize our role and position in the State. The best need to be given the equal opportunity to rule; the most need to be given the equal opportunity to serve; and the vast need to be given the least opportunity to live.
Hopefully all Americans will recognize the American Dream and how it can be fufilled.
Like or Dislike:
2
2
30th January 2013 at 1:04 am