Isn’t it funny that Obama is going after Standard & Poors, five years after the financial crisis. Moodys and Fitch also provided AAA ratings to worthless mortgage debt in collusion with the Wall Street banks and blessing of the Federal Reserve. They were smart enough to not downgrade the debt of the United States of America. S&P and Eagan Jones made the mistake of telling the truth about our debt situation and are paying the price. This is how a fascist government operates.
Why S&P is in the Crosshairs of the Department of Justice
By Scott S. PowellThursday, February 07, 2013
What has been distinct about Barack Obama’s presidency is his inclination to operate in continuous campaign mode, to deflect attention away from his policy failures and to undermine opposition by politicizing the issues and policy responses he chooses to take up. So now with the president’s attorney general Eric Holder having just announced the filing of a $5 billion Department of Justice suit against Standard & Poor’s—charging that fraudulent ratings were made on risky mortgage bonds that went into default during the financial crisis of 2008—one has to wonder what the political motivation might be.
First, why now? Why has it taken four years for the Obama Administration to bring this case? Second, why is it that S&P is singled out for alleged wrongdoing, when Moody’s and Fitch did the very same things in assigning top ratings to similar classes of dodgy mortgage securities? The plausible answer is that it’s all about political calculation on manipulating perception and outcome on the central issue of our time.
President Obama has been reminded from multiple quarters that the deficit spending and debt accumulation during his administration has the potential to undermine his legacy and precipitate a major financial crisis. Surely someone in the White House has paid attention to the various reports on the state of the U.S. Government debt rating, issued from all three credit rating agencies during the last few years.
A January 2011 Moody’s report noted that the ratio of national debt to national tax revenue in the United States is the worst of all the AAA-rated countries in the world. While the European debt crisis got more news coverage than the one brewing at home in the last three years, the U.S. fiscal condition has deteriorated to the point where its debt to revenue ratio is nearly three times higher than the AAA median, and more than twice that of Germany, the U.K., the Netherlands, Switzerland and Canada.
Later in 2011 Moody’s and Fitch hedged their AAA-ratings of U.S. Government debt—issuing negative outlooks. But it was S&P that took the heat in August of that year, being first to actually cut the nation’s rating to AA+. At the time the Obama administration lashed out at S&P, launching an unprecedented attack, specifically accusing the agency of “misleading calculations.”
Some now speculate that the Obama administration is merely getting revenge on S&P’s downgrade by taking legal action against the rating agency. But it is also plausible that the Obama administration made a shrewd political calculation in taking this action. First, it wants to deflect attention away from its failed leadership on budgetary matters resulting in record deficits and alarming debt accumulation as the debate over the sequester and debt ceiling heats up. Second, and perhaps more important, the Obama Justice Department’s suit puts Moody’s and Fitch on notice that they had better behave and save Barack Obama from the historical ignominy of the one who lost America’s AAA-rating.
Washington is increasingly defined by hubris, but in the end financial markets will overrule politics. Politically contrived AAA ratings on U.S. Government debt will no more hold up the markets for U.S. Treasury bonds and the dollar than did the falsely rated mortgage securities hold up the banking, housing and mortgage markets in 2008. Unfortunately the magnitude of this next crisis would make the previous look like a cakewalk.
_________________________________
Scott Powell is senior fellow at the Discovery Institute in Seattle. Reach him at scottp@discovery.org.
DaveL says:
Jim. OT. In another thread someone posted under my name a half dozen times. I can’t register under a new name because I only have one e-mail address. What to do?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
9th February 2013 at 11:42 am
Kill Bill says:
You didnt rate that!
~~~~
admin knows, by IP address, DaveL, that it wasnt you.
Here is how you get a gravatar, which makes it hard to dopplegang your moniker.
https://en.gravatar.com/
When you enter your emal address it links to an image of your choice.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
9th February 2013 at 11:49 am
Administrator says:
DaveL
That post was from a few months ago. I brought it forward to today.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
9th February 2013 at 11:53 am
Mary Malone says:
Well, of course they punished S&P and Egan Jones. Moody’s and Fitch see this as a shot across the bow.
What’s next boys? Time to put up or shut up. Obama and his minions are bullies. Are there any real men left in America who will stand up to them?
Other than Admin…
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8 
0
9th February 2013 at 1:01 pm
Kill Bill says:
What’s next boys? Time to put up or shut up. Obama and his minions are bullies. Are there any real men left in America who will stand up to them? -MM
Stand? Why? I have such a good seat here.
And I did not work towards their demise, they did it all by themselves. So here I sit and wait for the fat laady to sing and when she is finished, I will stand and clap.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
9th February 2013 at 5:32 pm
printmemoney says:
Are they doing this on purpose or are they really that fucking stupid?
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
9th February 2013 at 7:10 pm
DaveL says:
Jim: Stop fucking with my 72 year old brain. I thought I was losing my mind.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
9th February 2013 at 8:05 pm
Bob says:
This is an example of a continuing turn in social mood. There is an increased desire to engage in witch hunts. Officially expressed hatred is a dangerous thing.
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
9th February 2013 at 8:18 pm
Makati1 says:
Rating should be about F-. Anyone who still believes ANY rating agency deserves what is coming to them.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
9th February 2013 at 11:57 pm