GOVERNMENT – A BLOOD SUCKING BED BUG

4 comments

Posted on 27th September 2010 by avalon in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

,

Government has crept into so many aspects of our lives that they are essentially a bed bug, sucking the life out of our nation. Every new rule, regualtion, law and declaration is another bite. The do gooders in Congress think they know what is best for your life. They don’t. You know what is best. It is time to fumagate and kill all of these bloodsuckers, before it is too late.

BedBug.jpg BED BUG image by DragonEmpire46  bedbugs.gif bed bugs image by posionedsnow

What is the meaning of a bed bug bite?

Published: Monday, September 27, 2010

By: Jay Ambrose

Look at an enlarged photo of one of them, and yikes! Bedbugs are ugly.

The bigger deal will be when they dine on your flesh, thereby memorializing a spectacular comeback and providing some spectacular signals, to boot.

And what are they signals of, these saliva-injecting, blood-sucking, itch-inducing, eyes-protruding, millimeter-measured mini-monsters staging a national invasion of hotels and homes after a half-century’s virtual absence?

Just this — that government interventionism has gone maniacal, that human advancement is being undone as human freedoms are rolled back and that our self-supposed superiors are forever making our lives worse in the name of making them better.

All of this and more was put in elucidating perspective recently in a Colorado Springs talk by Jeffrey Tucker, an economist with the Ludwig von Mises Institute who noted that once upon a time the purpose of so-called progressives was to enhance humanity’s material well being.

They seldom if ever enhanced anything, but at least the cause was more justifiable than the one that began emerging with John Kenneth Galbraith’s book “The Affluent Society,” in 1958.

Galbraith was well past the indefensible notion that capitalism made anyone poorer. It didn’t. It did the opposite, and we therefore had a new problem.

Wealth. Or as he put it, materialism and consumerism, dread afflictions visited upon us by productivity and rising living standards and all those other moral encumbrances of free exchange.

Americans were soon to learn of even more discomfort with all that’s comforting. After Galbraith came environmentalism.

“Now poverty was the goal” of progressives, said Tucker as he observed that civilization is defined by such achievements as clean homes, the pickup of garbage that would otherwise spread disease and the money to fund concerts and churches.

Because people around the world pursued objectives of this kind, their numbers increased from 500 million five centuries ago to 7 billion today. Sadly, however, governments especially inspired by environmentalist trepidation keep devising restrictions and mandates to scoot us in the direction of hunter-gatherer days.

All of which brings us back to bedbugs. They were practically eliminated in this country 50 years ago by the pesticide DDT.

But DDT itself was practically eliminated with a U.S. ban after Rachel Carson’s book, “Silent Spring,” mistakenly made it out be many times as dangerous to wildlife and people as careful study has shown it was.

DDT was not only effective in killing bedbugs, but also mosquitoes that carry the malaria virus sickening people worldwide, Tucker said.

As someone who has studied the issue, I can vouch that the disappearance of DDT significantly reduced the means for protecting the lives of Third World inhabitants and condemned many to painful deaths.

One estimate puts the toll for children at 20 million, and the only excuse has been the remote possibility of risks some scientists dismiss as all but nonexistent.

Though indoor spraying of DDT is still badly needed in Africa, it is not the central issue.

Bedbugs may even be resistant to it at this point, Tucker said. What matters more in ways large and small is that governmental “interventions subvert the capacity to civilize our world.”

Government, said Tucker, is the only thing in the world that kills more people than insects.

Private property is the only rescue from poverty, he told the audience, and freedom is what gave us civilization. Government too often just gets in the way, as it is now doing with rules about kinds of light bulbs you may soon no longer buy, about pointless recycling that complicates the crucial task of garbage removal or even about showerheads that reduce water pressure.

He says we take our civilization so much for granted now that government thinks it can trample on precious accomplishments without consequence when, in fact, its interfering deeds are “the enemies of all that makes life grand.”

Something to think about when the bedbugs bite.

Jay Ambrose is former Washington director of editorial policy for Scripps Howard newspapers He can be reached at SpeaktoJay@aol.com.

4 Comments
  1. Dave says:

    Careful Jim: Using words like fumigate or exterminate can be looked upon as threats to our wonderful elected officials. Knock Knock!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    27th September 2010 at 4:30 pm

  2. ragman says:

    How ’bout ropes and lampposts?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    27th September 2010 at 7:38 am

  3. Ed Darrell says:

    Ambrose said:

    All of which brings us back to bedbugs. They were practically eliminated in this country 50 years ago by the pesticide DDT.</blockquote

    Actually, bedbugs started showing resistance to DDT in the late 1940s. Exterminators had to switch from DDT in the 1950s because DDT stopped working against bedbugs. Pesticides probably helped, but DDT wasn't the hero of that action.

    But DDT itself was practically eliminated with a U.S. ban . . .

    Balderdash. EPA’s “ban” on DDT applied only to agricultural use, and only in the U.S. Specifically, the ban language left open the manufacture of DDT in the U.S. for export to Africa to fight malaria. DDT has been manufactured in gross quantities since 1946, today in North Korea, China and India. There has never been a shortage of DDT, and DDT has been available to anyone who wants to use it.

    . . . after Rachel Carson’s book, “Silent Spring,” mistakenly made it out be many times as dangerous to wildlife and people as careful study has shown it was.

    Did all the fact checkers at Scripps News die? Get laid off?

    President Kennedy had a group of Nobel-laureate scientists who advised him on science policy, the President’s Science Advisory Council. In late 1962 Kennedy asked them to go over Carson’s book with a fine tooth comb and find any errors in it. On May 15, 1963, they reported back. They said Carson’s book was loaded with sound science but for one thing — she wasn’t hard enough on DDT, which needed to be phased out quickly.

    Ambrose’s claim is pure buncombe, unadulterated by fact.

    DDT was not only effective in killing bedbugs, but also mosquitoes that carry the malaria virus sickening people worldwide, Tucker said.

    Well, yeah, DDT was effective in killing mosquitoes, until overuse of DDT by big agricultural companies bred mosquitoes that are immune to it. The World Health Organization sadly had to abandon its campaign to eradicate malaria from the Earth in 1965, because overuse of DDT had made mosquitoes that were immune to it, and there was no alternative chemical to use.

    It wasn’t environmentalists who caused the trouble — it was the anti-environmentalists who urged “more DDT.” Strangely, that is exactly the position Ambrose assumes today.

    As someone who has studied the issue, I can vouch that the disappearance of DDT significantly reduced the means for protecting the lives of Third World inhabitants and condemned many to painful deaths.

    One estimate puts the toll for children at 20 million, and the only excuse has been the remote possibility of risks some scientists dismiss as all but nonexistent.

    Though indoor spraying of DDT is still badly needed in Africa, it is not the central issue.

    Ambrose is selling bull. Worse, he knows better — he’s been caught at it before, and though he promised to make a defense for his false claims, he’s never done it.

    Shame on him. We know better, fortunately.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    27th September 2010 at 5:44 pm

  4. Novista says:

    What you mean ‘we’, white man?

    I read “Silent Spring’ a long time ago, maybe you weren’t even born then? And I looked then at other evidence,. I wouldn’t know Ambrowse from a bar of soap. Nor you. Sp JFK had a ‘consensus’ and I read as many experts on the other side of the question. Put it to a vote, eh? Or — you give me a peer review and I’ll give you an opposite. Science is as to a god for people who don’t know better.

    Science in reality is fads and favoritism. Raise an unpopular view and one risks a career. Even when it is later proved to be right. Ulcers caused by bacteria? Off with his head. Prehistory of Peru — ‘no old skeletons here, not possible’. Washing your hands before examining patients? Balderdash.

    Et bloody cetera.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    27th September 2010 at 8:40 am

Leave a comment

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.