11 PIECES OF AFGHAN COLLATERAL DAMAGE

13 comments

Posted on 8th April 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , ,

Hat tip to Stuck. We’ve had some pretty good dust-ups over pictures just like these.

Now this is really pre-emptive war. We all know these Muslim curs were just going to grow up into American hating jihadists. So why not kill them when they are 4 years old? The savings down the line will be incalculable. I’m sure we won lots of hearts and minds this weekend in Afghanistan. Things are going swimmingly well. I wonder where the liberal MSM is on this one. Wasn’t it their savior Obama who ramped up the war in Afghanistan? How did that work out? Eleven years in this god forsaken hell hole and we’re still blowing up children and instilling American democracy. When will we ever learn? Meanwhile, the brain dead, facebook worshipping, igadget addicted, unemployed, dumbasses that walk through life like zombies yawn at stories like this. We deserve everything we are going to get.

I love how the American corporate MSM says NATO air strikes when it was AMERICAN air strikes.

 

Afghanistan: NATO Air Strike Kills 11 Children

By KIM GAMEL 04/07/13 04:27 PM ET EDT AP

Afghanistan Air Strike Kills Children
The lifeless bodies of Afghan children lay on the ground before their funeral ceremony, after a NATO airstrike killed several Afghan civilians, including ten children during a fierce gun battle with Taliban militants in Shultan, Shigal district, Kunar, eastern Afghanistan, Sunday, April 7, 2013. (AP Photo/Naimatullah Karyab) 
 

KABUL, Afghanistan — A fierce battle between U.S.-backed Afghan forces and Taliban militants in a remote corner of eastern Afghanistan left nearly 20 people dead, including 11 Afghan children killed in an airstrike and an American civilian adviser, officials said Sunday.

The fighting along a main infiltration route from Pakistan on Saturday was indicative of a surge in hostilities as Afghanistan’s spring fighting season gets underway. This year’s will be closely watched because Afghan forces are having to contend with less support from the international military coalition, making it a test case of their ability to take on the country’s resilient insurgency.

The U.S.-led coalition confirmed that it launched airstrikes in Kunar province where the deaths occurred, stressing that they were requested by international forces. The coalition said it was assessing the incident, but could not confirm that civilians were killed.

The battle unfolded on Saturday, the same day that a total of six Americans, including three U.S. soldiers, died in violent attacks. In addition to the U.S. adviser killed during the operation in the east, two others – a female foreign service officer with the U.S. State Department and an employee with the U.S. Defense Department – died in a suicide bombing in southern Zabul province during a trip to donate books to Afghan students.

The deaths capped one of the bloodiest weeks of the nearly 12-year-old war. On Wednesday, insurgents ambushed a courthouse in the relatively safe west, killing more than 46 people.

The death of Afghan civilians caught in the crossfire has been a major point of contention between international forces and the Afghan government. Earlier this year, Afghan President Hamid Karzai banned his troops from requesting coalition airstrikes.

In the latest incident, Associated Press photos showed villagers gathered for the funerals of the children whose bodies were swaddled in blankets. A garland of flowers adorned the head of a dead baby.

Afghan officials said the airstrike occurred after a joint U.S.-Afghan force faced hours of heavy gunfire from militants. The joint force was conducting an operation targeting a senior Taliban leader that began around midnight Friday in the Shultan area of Kunar’s Shigal district, according to tribal elder Gul Pasha, who also is the chief of the local council.

The remote area is one of the main points of entry for Taliban and other insurgents trying to move across the mountainous border from neighboring Pakistan, where they enjoy refuge in the lawless northwestern area.

“In the morning after sunrise, planes appeared in the sky and airstrikes started,” Pasha said in a telephone interview, adding that the fighting didn’t end until the evening.

“I don’t think that they knew that all these children and women were in the house because they were under attack from the house and they were shooting at the house,” he said.

There were slightly differing accounts of the death toll.

Pasha said the main Taliban suspect was in the house that was hit and was killed along with a woman and the children, ages 1 to 12, who were members of the suspect’s family.

Provincial government spokesman Wasifullah Wasify said 10 children and one woman were killed and five women, who also were in the house, were wounded.

Karzai’s office later said 11 people were killed – all of them children – and six women were wounded.

“While the president strongly condemns the Taliban act of using people and their houses as shields, he also strongly condemns any operation on populated areas that results in civilian casualties,” his office said in a statement.

An airstrike in the same district in Kunar that killed 10 civilians in mid-February prompted Karzai to ban his forces from requesting airstrikes.

Afghanistan’s Interior Ministry said six Taliban militants were killed in the operation in Sano Dara Sheltan village, including two senior commanders identified as Ali Khan and Gul Raof, the main planner and organizer of attacks in the area.

The U.S.-led coalition said it provided fire support from the air, killing several insurgents.

“The air support was called in by coalition forces, not Afghan security forces, and was used to engage insurgent forces in areas away from structures, according to our reporting,” coalition spokesman Maj. Adam Wojack said in a statement.

He said the coalition takes all reports of civilian casualties seriously, and was currently assessing the incident.

Afghan forces have been increasingly taking the lead in combat operations as international forces move to complete their withdrawal by the end of 2014. But U.S. and other foreign troops still face dangers as they try to clear areas of insurgents and prepare the Afghans to take control.

Gen. Martin Dempsey, the top U.S. military officer, told the AP in an interview on Sunday in Afghanistan that he was cautiously optimistic about the final stage of handing off security responsibility to Afghan forces.

Asked if he thought that some parts of Afghanistan will be contested by the Taliban in 2015, Dempsey replied, “Yes, of course there will be. And if we were having this conversation 10 years from now, I suspect there would (still) be contested areas because the history of Afghanistan suggests that there will always be contested areas.”

There are about 100,000 international troops currently in Afghanistan, including 66,000 from the United States. The U.S. troop total is scheduled to drop to about 32,000 by early next year. The bulk of the decline is to occur after fighting winds down this winter.

___

AP writers Rahim Faiez in Kabul, Rahmat Gul in Jalalabad and Robert Burns at Bagram Air Field contributed.

WINNING HEARTS & MINDS

28 comments

Posted on 17th August 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

Things are going exactly as planned in Afghanistan. I think we’ve trained their security forces real good. I think if we just stay there for another 10 or 20 years, the Afghans will learn to love us. I think it’s time to declare victory and hit the fucking road. Another feather in the cap of spreading our democracy around the world. We can’t afford too many more of these victories.

Another Afghan police attack kills  2 US troops

Members of the Afghan  security forces — or someone wearing their uniform — have opened fire on  international forces seven times in the past two weeks

By  

Friday,  August 17, 2012, 8:42 AM
<br />
	An Afghan policeman stands guard as election officials put up election participation posters at Baba Qushquar village, 25 kilometers (15 miles) northeast of Kabul, Afghanistan, Monday, July 5, 2004.<br />

Manish Swarup/AP

An Afghan policeman stands guard as election officials put up election  participation posters at Baba Qushquar village, 25 kilometers (15 miles)  northeast of Kabul, Afghanistan, Monday, July 5, 2004. A newly recruited  Afghan village policeman (not pictured) opened fire on his American allies on  Friday, killing two U.S. service members minutes after they handed him his  official weapon

KABUL, Afghanistan — A newly recruited Afghan village policeman opened fire  on his American allies on Friday, killing two U.S. service members minutes after  they handed him his official weapon in an inauguration ceremony. It was the  latest in a disturbing string of attacks by Afghan security forces on the  international troops training them.

Later Friday, an Afghan soldier turned his gun on foreign troops in another  part of the country and wounded two of them, a spokesman for the NATO coalition  said.

The attacks in the country’s far west and south brought to seven the number  of times that a member of the Afghan security forces — or someone wearing their  uniform — has opened fire on international forces in the past two weeks.

Such assaults by allies, virtually unheard of just a few years ago, have  recently escalated, killing at least 36 foreign troops so far this year. They  also raise questions about the strategy to train Afghan national police and  soldiers to take over security and fight insurgents after most foreign troops  leave the country by the end of 2014.

The NATO-led coalition has said such attacks are anomalies stemming from  personal disputes, but the supreme leader of the Taliban boasted on Thursday  night that the insurgents are infiltrating the quickly expanding Afghan  forces.

Friday’s deadly attacker in the far western province of Farah was identified  as Mohammad Ismail, a man in his 30s who had joined the Afghan Local Police just  five days ago.

He opened fire during an inauguration ceremony attended by American and  Afghan forces in the Kinisk village, the Farah provincial police chief Agha Noor  Kemtoz said.

“As soon as they gave the weapon to Ismail to begin training, suddenly he  took the gun and opened fire toward the U.S. soldiers,” Kemtoz said.

Ismail was shot and killed as the coalition and Afghan forces returned fire,  the police chief said.

A spokesman for the international coalition force, Jamie Graybeal, confirmed  that two American service members were killed Friday by a member of the Afghan  Local Police.

The ALP is different from the national police and represents a village  defense force under the Ministry of Interior that is being trained by  international forces, including U.S. special forces.

Graybeal gave no other details on the Farah attack other than confirming the  shooter had been killed.

Kemtoz, the police chief, said the attack took place about 8 a.m., after the  U.S. forces arrived in the village to train the local police. He said one Afghan  National Police officer was also seriously wounded in the shooting.

Later Friday, an Afghan army soldier fired on coalition troops in the  southern province of Kandahar. Two of the international troops were wounded but  none was killed in that shooting, Graybeal said. He added that the soldier was  shot and died later Friday of his wounds.

So far in 2012, there have been 29 attacks reported on foreign troops by  Afghans they are training, compared to 11 attacks in 2011, according to an  Associated Press count, and five attacks in each of the previous two years.

Seven such attacks have come in the past two weeks alone, with six American  troops killed last Friday in two separate shootings in Helmand province in the  south and another American killed a few days previously on a U.S. base in Paktia  province in the east.

The trend raises questions about potential resentment by Afghans after more  than a decade of international presence since the American-led intervention to  oust the Taliban regime from power for harboring the al-Qaida terrorist  leadership after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in the U.S. The insider attacks also  renew concern that insurgents may be infiltrating the Afghan army and police,  despite intensified screening.

Insurgent infiltration or recruitment was behind only about 10 percent of  this year’s reported attacks on coalition forces by Afghan allies, Graybeal said  earlier this week, citing investigations into attacks before those of the past  week.

Graybeal insisted the deadly violence is relatively small scale compared to  the nearly 340,000 Afghan security forces now being trained.

The international coalition has said that Afghan forces are increasingly  able to lead operations and already have started to assume responsibility for  security in areas of the country that are home to 75 percent of the Afghan  population.

However, the Taliban have been quick to seize on the increasing number of  attacks as a sign of Afghan rejection of foreign forces and the insurgents’ own  successful recruitment.

The group’s supreme leader Mullah Mohammad Omar said Thursday night that the  insurgents “have cleverly infiltrated in the ranks of the enemy” and were  successfully killing a rising number of U.S.-led coalition forces.

In an email to media organizations, Omar said the plan to transfer  responsibility to Afghan forces by the end of 2014 is a “deceiving drama” that  the international community has orchestrated to hide its defeat.

The Taliban leader’s message came on the same day that a U.S. military  helicopter crashed during a firefight with insurgents in a remote area of  southern Afghanistan, killing seven Americans and four Afghans in one of the  deadliest air disasters of a war now into its second decade.

The Taliban claimed they gunned down the Black Hawk.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/afghan-police-attack-kills-2-troops-article-1.1138394#ixzz23pQbtAOD

AFGHAN KEYNESIANISM

9 comments

Posted on 5th August 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , ,

Sixty billion here, sixty billion there – before long we might be talking real money. Thank God for Ben’s printing press, the Chinese, and our future unborn generations willing to pick up the bill for rebuilding Iraq and Afghanistan so the natives can blow it all up again. It’s not as if we can use those billions here in the U.S. on our crumbling infrastructure. Paul Krugman thinks if we had just spent another trillion or two in the Middle East, all would be well.

Report: US Spending Projects in Afghanistan Wasteful, Counterproductive

Posted By John Glaser

The foolish US strategy in Afghanistan of throwing exorbitant sums of money at reconstruction and wasteful infrastructure projects is making that war-torn country’s problems worse, according to a new report by the special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction.

“Implementing projects that the Afghan government is unable to sustain may be counterproductive” to the U.S. counterinsurgency mission, the inspector general wrote. “If goals are set and not achieved, both the U.S. and Afghan governments can lose the populace’s support.”

“Until now, most critiques have asserted only that the massive U.S. foreign assistance program has led to waste and fueled corruption,” reports the Washington Post. “The new report goes further by suggesting that some projects may ultimately prove detrimental.”

And that’s when they actually work. Most projects have lost their allocated funding through corruption and criminality. The Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan found that up to $60 billion in US war funds were lost due to waste, fraud, and abuse. One report found that one in every six contracting and grant dollars spent in Iraq and Afghanistan has been wasted.

The assumption behind US spending in Afghanistan, writes Joshua Foust, a fellow at the American Security Project, “was that more is better, and if the government spent a lot of money, then it was clearly accomplishing something.”

“For the last ten years,” Foust continues, “policymakers have promised that if only enough money were spent, then many of the war’s objectives (a strong central government chief among them) would appear and make victory possible.”

Meanwhile, Afghanistan is still suffering from an intensely violent status quo, one of the most corrupt governments in the world, and an insurgency on the verge of civil war ahead of a partial US withdrawal in 2014. The US debt continues to grow to unsustainable levels, while excessive spending on the war is wasted, lost, and detrimental to the security of the region.

AFGHAN WAR PROGRESS

5 comments

Posted on 20th July 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

Commanding General In Afghanistan Has No Idea How War Is Going, Just Trying To Ignore It At This Point

July 16, 2012 | ISSUE 48•29

Gen. Allen acknowledges that he’s “definitely put the war in Afghanistan on the back burner.”

KABUL, AFGHANISTAN—Admitting he hasn’t been following combat operations all that closely lately, Gen. John R. Allen, the top commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, told reporters Monday he has “no idea” how the war is going and, at this point, is trying to ignore the whole situation as best he can.

“As far as I know, we’re still slowly making progress with our counterinsurgency efforts against the Taliban, but to be honest, I haven’t been keeping up with all that stuff and couldn’t really say for sure,” a shrugging Allen told reporters at NATO headquarters in Kabul. “It’s not really part of my day-to-day anymore, so I can’t help you out with any specifics on current missions or casualty figures or anything like that. It’s really not where my focus is at right now.”

“Sure, I hear things about ongoing operations here and there,” the four-star Marine Corps general continued. “But for the most part I’m pretty much checked out of this one.”

Allen, who commands more than 130,000 coalition troops and possesses full oversight of the combat mission in Afghanistan, confirmed he attends multiple briefings on the status of insurgent movements each week, but stated “they all kind of blur together after a while” and nowadays he simply prefers to tune them out.

Questioned about last week’s deadly attack by the Taliban in Bamian Province, Allen responded by asking whether that was the bombing at the American military checkpoint or “one of those police station ones,” and then acknowledged he was “probably not the best guy to ask about that sort of thing.” Pressed about tactics, Allen conceded he wasn’t certain exactly where his forces were currently deployed, but suggested all inquiries be directed toward one of his lieutenants, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or “the British commander, maybe,” as one of them was probably handling such matters now.

Additionally, the general said that if reporters really needed a high-level source on an important war-related matter, they should “just go ask the president.”

“These days, unless there’s something going on that’s monumentally important, my staff knows not to come to me,” said the man in charge of the 50-nation International Security Assistance Force. “I do check with my advisers every month or so to see if there’s anything new going on here in Afghanistan, but honestly, there never is. It’s usually the same old, same old—market bombings, militants infiltrating the Afghan security forces, helicopter crashes. By now the guys here can handle all that without my help.”

Admitting he no longer arrives for work at NATO’s Kabul headquarters before noon, Allen said he typically leaves most of the routine decisions on military offensives and drone strikes up to others, because many of the newer individuals on his staff seem to take a greater interest in the conflict and are still eager to do “all the typical war stuff” that Allen flatly stated he’s tired of dealing with.

The general claimed he now skips over any news article that mentions the word “Afghanistan” and barely skims the many combat reports and e-mails he receives from the Pentagon, saying they seldom have any new or helpful information to add regarding the 11-year-old conflict.

“You know, after so many high-profile Taliban prison escapes and accidental civilian deaths, you kind of just throw up your hands and say, ‘All right, you got me,’ and then move on to something else,” Allen said. “So I’ve taken a step back, and now I see myself as more of a consultant who just gives general advice on the war now and then.”

“Frankly, there’s not much more I can do out here, anyway,” he added.

At press time, after being notified of a massive, coordinated attack on the American embassy in Kabul, Allen stared blankly at his staffers for several moments, eventually telling them to do whatever it was they did last time that happened.

POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER

9 comments

Posted on 23rd March 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

Military Now Considering Limiting Soldiers With Severe PTSD To 3 Combat Tours

March 21, 2012 | ISSUE 48•12

WASHINGTON—Following the alleged murder of 16 Afghan civilians by Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales, the U.S. military announced Wednesday it would consider limiting troops with crippling post-traumatic stress disorder to just three combat tours. “If it’s only their second or third tour, we have no problem sending soldiers with shattered psyches and profound emotional problems back into a war zone, but the case of Staff Sgt. Bales suggests four may be too many,” said Gen. John R. Allen, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, adding that troops in their third deployment can still basically function with PTSD and, instead of snapping and killing civilians, ”might still have it together enough to kill actual enemies when they go berserk.” ”We are beginning to think that if a soldier in his fourth tour suffers from constant night terrors or is haunted by memories of the friends he’s lost in combat, he could actually become a liability on the battlefield.” Gen. Allen acknowledged that while it is possible the redeployment of the mentally ill is a bad policy altogether, any such notion is mere speculation at this point.