QUOTE OF THE DAY

3 comments

Posted on 13th March 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

Ron Paul: “I had a Federal Reserve Board Chairman testify before the committee that the gold standard had some merits but it was unnecessary because central bankers have now learned how to manage a Fiat currency in a manner in which it would mimic the gold standard. Would anybody care to comment about where the flaw is in that thinking?”

Mr. Lehrman: “I am anxious to comment on that, Dr. Paul. Under–and I must say Mr. Greenspan made the same insipid remark. Mr. Greenspan and Mr. Bernanke will have to then explain why it was that two of the greatest booms in American history, and two of the greatest panics and busts in American financial history, occurred under their 25-year watch…”

Mr. Grant: “The failure of AIG is so instructive in this respect. AIG, this immense insurance company with this ever so brilliant financial products group, didn’t do one thing. It didn’t mark its positions to market. Finally came the day of judgment and it argued with Goldman Sachs about what these things were worth, AIG said 100 cents on the dollar, Goldman Sachs said not close, Goldman Sachs won that debate and AIG failed.

As with AIG and Goldman Sachs, so it is today with the United States and its Asian trading partners. We never clear our trades. Our dollars go there, and they come right back here. We run twenty five consecutive years of debts on a current account and there will be for us, as there was for AIG, a moment in truth in which we must settle.”

U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services, Testimony of March 17, 2011

IT’S GOOD TO WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT

3 comments

Posted on 28th January 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , ,

Geithner was really good to work for. You have three of the worst run companies on the entire planet and the government is paying their executives million dollar salaries and handing out raises like candy. It’s good to be playing with taxpayer money. The US Treasury has exited their AIG position and has announced their plans to exit their GM position. Why aren’t they trying to exit their Ally Financial position? Could it be that they want to keep doling out subprime auto loans to deadbeats in an effort to prop up GM and the rest of the dying American auto industry? The losses at Ally Financial just get paid by the American taxpayer. Obama has no intention of exiting Ally Financial and letting it operate like a profit seeking entity. That does not support his agenda.

Treasury watchdog takes aim at AIG, GM pay

Watchdog’s Romero: ‘It’s not business as usual’ at AIG, GM and Ally

By Ronald D. Orol, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Top executives and employees at three big companies that reaped among the largest taxpayer bailouts were paid “excessive” compensation in 2012 even though Treasury officials monitoring their pay had the authority to limit their packages, a key government oversight unit said Monday in a critical report.

At issue are the 2012 pay packages of top executives and employees at American International Group Inc. (NYSE:AIG)  , General Motors (NYSE:GM)  and Ally Financial (formerly GMAC), three companies that received “exceptional assistance” as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program implemented to stem the financial crisis of 2008.

Christy Romero, the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

“These companies want to be paid as business as usual,” Christy Romero, who runs the special inspector general office for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, told MarketWatch. “In 2012 they seem to have met no resistance from Treasury. It’s not business as usual because taxpayers had to shoulder their bailouts for many years.”

Because of the size of their taxpayer-funded infusions, the Treasury allowed Special Master Kenneth Feinberg, who was often called the “pay czar” and later his successor, Patricia Geoghegan, to set compensation for the top 25 executives at each of these companies.

According to the report, 68 of 69 executives received pay of $1 million or more, with 16 individuals receiving pay packages of $5 million or more.

It notes that 48 of 69 executives, 70%, received cash salaries of $500,000 or more and 94% received cash salaries of $450,000 or more.

Romero said these payments were generally excessive and many conflicted with a principle set forth by Feinberg, who was in charge of the Treasury’s pay supervision office until September 2010. The principle, Romero noted, was that cash salaries should not exceed $500,000 except for good cause and should “in most cases be well under that amount.”

The report also notes that Feinberg suggested that total compensation at these institutions should target the 50th percentile of comparable positions at similar companies. However, it adds that Treasury approved pay packages exceeding the 50th percentile by about $1.7 million, $1.2 million and $850,000 for three employees of Ally’s mortgage subsidiary.

Treasury also approved all 18 pay raise requests sought by AIG, GM, and Ally in 2012, according to the report. The raises ranged from $30,000 to $1 million.

“The Treasury set the pay in a way that was very deferential for what the companies proposed,” Romero said.

According to the report, the Office of the Special Master said that pay raises were permitted in some instances because certain employees were at risk of leaving, were crucial to the company or they were strong performers.

‘Unique circumstances’

In a Jan. 25 response, Treasury’s Geoghegan said that the office continues to fulfill its requirements, seeking to limit pay while keeping compensation at levels that enable the firms to remain competitive and repay TARP.

Geoghegan noted that AIG’s average total compensation for the top 25 employees was at the 48th percentile of similar positions at comparable companies while GM’s was at the 50th percentile.

She noted however that Ally’s average total pay for the top 25 employes was mid-way between the 50th and 75th percentiles of similar positions “due to its unique circumstances.” She added that the 50th percentile is “merely a benchmark” and not a specific limitation.

The Treasury oversight office approved a $1 million raise for Peter Hancock, the CEO of AIG’s Chartis unit, according to the report. It noted that the oversight office said that he is one of the most important people at AIG.

The special master office also signed off on an increase in salary from $500,000 to $550,000 for an employee of Ally’s ResCap “knowing that ResCap was planning for bankruptcy.” The oversight office noted that the executive was “critical to successful restructuring,” according to the report.

Treasury exiting its positions

The report comes as the Treasury department seeks to exit its positions.

AIG finished repaying its $182 billion bailout in December, which means it is not longer subject to the pay restrictions. The Treasury said its overall positive return on the bailout was $22.7 billion. Earlier this month, the Treasury also set out a “pre-arranged written trading plan” to sell its remaining 300 million shares of GM stock and fully exit its position in the next 12 to 15 months “subject to market conditions.” The government owns a 74% stake in Ally Financial, according to the report.

 

WALL STREET GOODWILL

1 comment

Posted on 11th January 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

,

AIG Nearly Blows All The Goodwill Built Up By Wall Street In Recent Years

NewsNewsbusinessISSUE 49•02 • Jan 9, 2013

NEW YORK—Wall Street narrowly dodged a devastating blow to its reputation Wednesday as insurance giant American International Group seriously considered suing the federal government over the terms of its 2008 bailout, a move that experts agreed would have destroyed the tremendous amount of trust and affection the U.S. populace currently feels toward big banks.

Sources said if AIG had decided to join a $25 billion lawsuit over the assistance it received from from taxpayers following a devastating economic crisis for which no one has been held accountable, then citizens who now feel a deep fondness for the nation’s financial institutions may have become outright angry with them instead.

“Wall Street really won me over in 2008 when it veered toward total collapse after years of predatory lending practices,” said Jessica Woodward, 37, a Cincinnati-based software engineer. “And the banks definitely had a special place in my heart after they continued foreclosing on homeowners they shouldn’t have loaned money to in the first place.”

“But if AIG had gone ahead with this lawsuit—well, I’m not sure that’s something I could have turned a blind eye to,” she added.

Many Americans echoed Woodward’s disapproval, saying it would have been “terribly unfortunate” if the company had gone ahead with its plan to sue the government just a few years after receiving a $182 billion bailout package, considering all the work Wall Street had done to rebuild its good name by granting top-ranking officials obscene bonuses, systematically lying to investors, and failing to reform its practices.

“Thankfully, AIG has avoided any action that might have sullied the public’s view of the financial industry as a whole,” said Sam Kerr, a father of three in Boise, ID. “Their decision today showed a tremendous amount of respect for the American taxpayer.”

“Honestly, they deserve a round of applause for this,” he added.

DA BEARS EXPLAIN THE SCREWING OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

10 comments

Posted on 29th January 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , , ,

How you have been screwed and continue to be screwed in a 6 minute cartoon. More truth in 6 minutes than you’ll get in an entire year from Obama and his minions.

 

AIG & GM BOARD MEETINGS

2 comments

Posted on 6th October 2010 by avalon in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,