THIS IS WHY YOU OWN GOLD

25 comments

Posted on 7th March 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

,

You gots to ask yourself one question. Maybe a few questions. Will Ben Bernanke keep printing more USD and expanding his balance sheet to $4 trillion and beyond? Will the ECB keep printing? Will Japan keep printing? Will China keep printing? Will there be more paper currency in the world system in five years? Will someone go too far and set off a derivative weapon of mass destruction? Will there be much more gold in circulation in five years? Do you trust your political and banking leaders?

Physical gold in your own possession is an insurance policy against the criminal actions of central bankers and their puppet politician cronies.

The secret bull market in gold

Commentary: Why the precious metal’s run isn’t finished just yet

By Brett Arends

Have you heard about the new boom in gold?

You won’t hear about it in the usual places. Everywhere you turn these days, all you hear is that gold is down, it’s finished, it’s heading for something called a “death cross,” which sounds terrifying. But away from the headlines, gold just rocketed to a new, all-time high.

Where? In Japan — the world’s fourth largest economy.

The arrival of a new government in December, and the launch of Japan’s own brand of “quantitative easing,” or money printing, has sent the yen tumbling dramatically on the international exchanges. Lots more yen means each yen is worth less.

An ounce of gold, which sold for 125,000 yen as recently as last July, now sells for 145,000. It touched 155,000, an all-time record, early in February.

Those Japanese who dumped their yen in the past couple of years and stocked up on gold are probably feeling pretty good at this point.

Gold has rocketed up 36% in yen in two years. So much for the collapse in gold.

And this isn’t an isolated case. In recent months, gold also hit new highs in other countries, including Brazil, Iceland and India.

Look at Argentina. I’ll leave it to others to comment on the presidency of Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner. As I’m in the news business, allow me to be candid and say that at least she is entertaining and ensures that those of us who scribble for a living won’t run short of things to write about.

Any Argentines who dumped their pesos when she first became president, in 2007, and loaded up on bullion instead are probably very, very relieved. Gold has more than tripled since then, when measured in pesos. It is up 45% just in the past two years, recently hitting record highs.

It is looking pretty healthy to a lot of people in London about now, too. The British pound has been slumping after economic data came in worse than expected. The traditional response is, “Oh, that’s just because their currencies are down.” Er, yes. That’s like saying demand for umbrellas has only gone up because it’s raining.

Japan is deliberately driving down its currency to boost its economy.

This is a zero-sum game: It can only work by boosting your economy versus other countries, whose currencies thereby become more expensive. At some point, they are apt to respond.

I’m gold-agnostic. I think it’s a ridiculous currency. I just accept that the others may well be worse. Gold is the only currency no country can just print incessantly in order to boost its economy.

(Incidentally, there are two other arguments in favor of gold. The first is that the Chinese Central Bank is surely going to increase its holdings. It makes no sense for the Chinese to hold their reserves in dollars and euros, two assets that their chief rivals can devalue at will. The second is that gold is now the only financial asset that still accords privacy. Everything else is being monitored.)

I have to say I am somewhat baffled by the latest outpouring of bullishness and unfettered optimism. Things were never as bad as they seemed at the bottom, but they are hardy A-OK now. The entire economic recovery has been built on the back of record federal budget deficits and record money printing by the Federal Reserve.

This is financial engineering.

The latest sequestration fiasco shows that the only institution left which can actually govern is the Fed. It’s all down to Fed chief Ben Bernanke. And if deficits come down, there is every reason to suspect he may have to keep printing.

We do not have much inflation at the moment, except in financial assets. But it would be a brave person who could say confidently that we won’t get any down the road.

Gold, famously, is a hedge against inflation. This is why some very sensible people suggest you should always have a few percent of your portfolio in gold, as insurance.

As the Japanese — and Argentines — could tell you.

 

TIME TO BUY & TIME TO SELL

21 comments

Posted on 28th February 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

,

Two articles from Marketwatch (owned by the Wall Street Journal, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who owns Fox News) on the same day telling you to do the exact opposite. If you believe in the Dow Theory you should be buying with both hands. If you believe the Greed Alert you should be selling like mad. It’s all a game designed to make you poorer and the Wall Street shysters richer. Wall Street will fuck you coming and going.

I’m not buying or selling. I’m out. Homey don’t play dat game anymore.

Dow transports, industrials point to Dow Theory buy signal

February 27, 2013, 6:30 PM
If you’re a student of Dow Theory, then it’s your time to buy. The Dow’s transportation index is outperforming the already bullish industrials index.

According to the theory, equities still have more room to rise if both indexes clear recent highs with transports taking the lead. That’s certainly been the case  for the past 12 months as the transport index has kept on logging new highs. It was cast into a particularly stark relief Wednesday as transports rose more than twice as much as the already bullish industrials.

The Dow Jones Transportation Average/quotes/zigman/627450 DJT +0.03%rose 169.22 points, or 2.9%, to close at 5,989.37 Wednesday, with Kansas City Southern/quotes/zigman/262427 /quotes/nls/ksu KSU -0.36%, J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc./quotes/zigman/73439 /quotes/nls/jbht JBHT -0.69%, and United Continental Holdings Inc./quotes/zigman/617037 /quotes/nls/ual UAL -0.19%leading the surge. That’s the best closing level for the index since Feb. 19, when it topped out at 6,020.67, a record high close. The index is up 3.2% for February and nearly 13% for 2013. An exchange-traded fund that tracks the index, the iShares Dow Jones Transportation Average iyt/quotes/zigman/333256 /quotes/nls/iyt IYT -0.02%, also gained 3% Wednesday.

Compare that to the Dow Jones Industrial Average/quotes/zigman/627449 DJIA -0.02%, which closed up 175.24 points, or 1.3%, at 14,075.37, for its fifth highest close ever. Wednesday’s close is less than 100 points shy of its all-time closing high of 14,164.53 reached on Oct. 9, 2007. The Dow industrials is up 1.6% for February and 7.4% year to date. Below is an indexed chart of the Dow transports versus the industrials. (Source: FactSet.)

 

Danger as stock-market ‘Greedometer’ flashes red

Commentary: Key indicators look ominous for the market

By Brett Arends

“Danger, the emergency destruct sequence has now been activated. The ship will self-destruct in t-minus, ten minutes. The option to override automatic detonation will expire in t-minus, five minutes…” — Mother, “Alien” (1979)

Have you ever felt like Ripley — Sigourney Weaver — at the end of Alien? After the monster has wiped out all of her fellow crew members, she decides to kill it by blowing up her spaceship, the Nostromo. She sets the ship’s self-destruct mechanism and races for the escape shuttle — only to find the alien now blocking her way.


Shutterstock.com

The next few minutes are a hair-raising race against time. As Ripley barrels back through the long corridors of the space ship, “Mother,” the voice of the ship’s computer, ominously counts down the time left until everything will go kaboom in a blinding, space-bending explosion.

The stock market feels a little like this. The higher it goes, the more euphoric the cheerleading, the more the airheaded Gamma-class humans put on the happy face and hum their way to work, the more terrifying it becomes for anyone who actually bothers thinking. (Luckily, this excludes most of Wall Street). At best we feel like Jones, the ship’s cat, getting banged around in a portable cage.

I hate to state the obvious, but stocks are just a claim on companies’ future dividends. That’s it. By definition, the higher they rise in price, the worse a deal they are. (I am amazed this is ever a subject of debate, as it is a tautology). Mom and Pop, with an instinct for self-preservation which suggests human beings are descended from the lemmings, usually pile on board at the peak.

Is it happening again?

Last week I got an email from Jeff Seymour, a former engineer turned money manager.

For the last seven years he’s been studying the math behind a stock market crash. (There’s more to it than that, but that’s the elevator summary). He figured that if you looked at the right indicators, you ought to have a good chance of knowing what was coming. You should, at least, get an edge.

What were the indicators which were flashing red in 1999-2000, just before the collapse, he wondered? What were they showing in 2006-7?

Seymour’s conclusion: There are nine indicators you need to watch. Just nine.

They range from the Volatility Index or “VIX,” a measure in the options market, to the Weekly Leading Index (WLI) of the Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI), to the amount of stock that insiders are dumping on the market.

He put them all together in a doomsday machine he calls “the Greedometer.” It tells you just how dangerously complacent and carefree the market has become at any moment. See the Greedometer.

These Greedometer indicators flashed red in early September 2000. If you read the signs — as some of my wiser sources did — you got out before the crash and saved half your money.

They flashed red again in May of 2007. And, again, if your read the signs you got out before the big collapse.

They flashed red again in April 2011, just before the market fell another 20%.

Let’s cut to the case. The Greedometer is flashing red again.

Bright red. Last week it was up to 7900. The maximum possible reading is 8000.

What’s that, Mother?

“Danger. The ship will self-destruct in…”

The VIX is down. Insider selling is up. Advisers are bullish. Margin debt — the amount investors are borrowing to buy stocks — is nearing the all-time, 2007 peak. And the economy is weakening.

In total, says Seymour, people are now even more greedy, complacent and euphoric and over the top for stocks than they were in 2007. “Stock markets die of euphoria,” he says. “These are the signals you look for.”

Any individual measure can give a false reading. Throw nine of them together, he argues, and it’s a different story. Since 1999 these nine indicators have given no false alarms, and missed no warnings.

(It’s worth adding that the Greedometer isn’t a one-way indicator either. It flashed bright green in 2002-3 and 2008-9, telling you it was a great time to buy stocks. And so it proved.)

OK, so data from 1999 to 2013 is just a brief period of time. I’m not an engineer by education, but a historian. I take the long view.

But the Greedometer’s latest warning isn’t in isolation. I notice that all sorts of alarming bull market signals are flashing ominous warnings. Small-caps hit record highs recently. Mom and Pop are jumping into the market. And every time I run a stock screen of the market, I can’t find any good value stocks. It’s tough. Everything is up.

Meanwhile, everyone I know who predicted the last two crashes is really bearish, and all the bulls are ignoring them (again). This includes the good folks at GMO, a fund shop in Boston, Rob Arnott at Research Affiliates, and John Hussman of the Hussman Funds, who calls the current environment one of the worst in history in which to invest.

Yes, they’ve been gloomy for a while. But so what? The only reason this market’s been booming has been because Fed chairman Ben Bernanke and European Central Bank President Mario Draghi have been pumping the world economy with as much free money as it will hold.

Earlier this week, Federal Reserve minutes were published showing growing concern on the Open Market Committee about the free money policy. Some members of the committee wondered aloud if all this free money might be causing a bubble in financial assets and too much risk taking.

Gee, you think?

Unlike Alien, we don’t get a countdown and we don’t know when this will end, or even how. But it’s enough to be alarmed.

 

SO GOD MADE A BANKER

16 comments

Posted on 6th February 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

So God made a banker

Commentary: A commercial for the next Super Bowl?

By Brett Arends

To be read in the voice of Paul Harvey.

And on the eighth day God looked down on his planned paradise and said, “I need someone who can flip this for a quick buck.”

So God made a banker.

God said, “I need someone who doesn’t grow anything or make anything but who will borrow money from the public at 0% interest and then lend it back to the public at 2% or 5% or 10% and pay himself a bonus for doing so.”

So God made a banker.

God said, “I need someone who will take money from the people who work and save, and use that money to create a dotcom bubble and a housing bubble and a stock bubble and an oil bubble and a commodities bubble and a bond bubble and another stock bubble, and then sell it to people in Poughkeepsie and Spokane and Bakersfield, and pay himself another bonus.”

So God made a banker.

God said, “I need someone to build homes in the swamps and deserts using shoddy materials and other people’s money, and then use these homes as collateral for a Ponzi scheme he can sell to pensioners in California and Michigan and Sweden. I need someone who will then foreclose on those homes, kick out the occupants, and switch off the air conditioning and the plumbing, and watch the houses turn back into dirt. And then pay himself another bonus.”

God said, “I need someone to lend money to people with bad credit at 30% interest in order to get his stock price up, and then, just before the loans turn bad, cash out his stock and walk away. And who, when asked later, will, with a tearful eye, say the government made him do it.”

God said, “And I need somebody who will tell everyone else to stand on their own two feet, but who will then run to the government for a bailout as soon as he gets into trouble — and who will then use that bailout money to help elect a Congress that will look the other way. And then pay himself another bonus.”

So God made a banker.

YOU MIGHT BE A DEADBEAT IF…..

74 comments

Posted on 15th January 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

It’s interesting to see the MSM finally writing about stuff I was pointing out two years ago. The American people have not taken austerity to heart and paid off their debts.  Household debt has declined because deadbeats have defaulted on $585 billion of debt. When a bank and a borrower enter into an agreement that is their problem. If the borrower doesn’t pay, they need to accept the consequences of their actions – bankruptcy, poor credit rating, inability to borrow again. If a lender makes enough high risk loans to deadbeats, the losses should put them into bankruptcy. Their bank should be liquidated and their good assets sold off to prudent banks that did not make high risk loans.

This is not what is happening in this country. Hard working Americans who did not default on their obligations have been forced at gunpoint to subsidize the deadbeat borrowers and lenders in this country. The $6 trillion of debt incurred in the last four years was done to prop up Wall Street banks and bailout deadbeat borrowers. Bernanke’s zero interest rate policy is designed so that insolvent Wall Street banks can make more loans to deadbeats to boost the economy. Zero interest rates allow zombie banks, real estate developers, and retailers to not accept the consequences of their actions. It encourages foolish lending and is guaranteed to lead to more losses for the American taxpayer. We truly are a deadbeat nation run by brain dead politicians.

Why U.S. might be ‘a nation of deadbeats’

Consumers have been paying down debt, but walking away from more

By Brett Arends


Tony Mathews / Shutterstock.com

President Obama said on Monday that “we are not a nation of deadbeats,” but instead a people who “pay our bills.”

Really?

A close look at the data reveals a very different story — and one that gets far too little airing in public discourse.

Far from paying our bills, the current generation of Americans — or some of them — have set records for default which probably have no parallel in the history of the human race. During the last five years, U.S. individuals have walked away from a staggering $585 billion in mortgages, credit card debts and other personal loans. That works out at about $6,000 per household.

And if the numbers are to be believed, there is probably a lot more to come.

Turn on any news program devoted to the economy and you will doubtless hear some Wall Street blowhard telling you that American households have been “repairing their balance sheets” and paying down their debts. They make it sound so virtuous, and they often then segue into sneering remarks about those degenerate Greeks and other Europeans who don’t behave in the same responsible way.

The truth is very different. According to the Federal Reserve, U.S. household debts peaked five years ago at a gigantic $13.8 trillion. Since then it has declined to $12.9 trillion – a decline of about 7%. To put that in context, household debts today still exceed those seen at the end of 2006, near the peak of the bubble. They are three times what they were in 1998.

Furthermore, as our chart shows, the majority of that reduction hasn’t come from people paying off their loans, but from banks writing them off.

The total debt reduction from the peak, says the Fed, is $954 billion. Loan write-offs, at $585 billion, account for 60% of that. In other words, for all the chest-thumping about how Americans are repairing their balance sheets and how we aren’t a nation of deadbeats, in the last five years Americans have walked away from $3 in debt for every $2 they’ve paid off.

In the first quarter of 2010 alone about 13% of all credit card debt was just written off.

Households weren’t alone. Corporations have defaulted on $35 billion to $40 billion in debt per year in recent years, according to Moody’s.

Naturally this has occurred even while the federal government has bailed out bankrupt financial institutions, and flooded the economy with massive deficits, low interest rates and free money to make it all easier.

Heaven knows what the situation would have looked like under a system of honest money.

It’s easy to get too sanctimonious. Once a country gets itself into a disastrous debt hole, write-offs may be the only sensible way out. After all, for every reckless borrower there was also a reckless lender. If a debt is not going to be repaid, a policy of “extend and pretend,” let alone, say, debtors’ prison, is not going to help. So maybe deadbeat economics is the way to go.

But let’s go easy on the chest-thumping.

 

THE ANSWER IS YES

9 comments

Posted on 31st December 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

,

Economists are either captured by their failed theories or captured by the Wall Street shysters who pay them to lie to the public on CNBC and the rest of the corporate MSM. We are in recession. We’ve been in recession. We’re going deeper into recession. Don’t expect an economist to tell you the truth.

Are we already in a recession?

Commentary: Economists are almost always slow to spot key trouble signs

By Brett Arends

Many people are warning that if the government goes over the “fiscal cliff” next week, as seems increasingly likely, the U.S. economy could tumble back into recession.

But what if we already have?

Despite some misleading headlines, and some cheerleading in certain quarters, there are plenty of reasons to be worried that the economy could already be shrinking again, even before the wave of tax hikes and spending cuts scheduled for January.

Money manager John Hussman, chairman of Hussman Funds, is among those who think it is. “We continue to believe that the U.S. economy joined a global economic downturn during the third quarter of the year,” he wrote to investors recently.

He notes that most of the forward-looking indicators, including “industrial production, capacity utilization, real disposable income, real personal consumption, real sales, retail and food service sales, and real manufacturing and trades sales” are all pointing down.

The Economic Cycle Research Institute agrees, and recently announced that a recession may have begun as long ago as July. The combined economic signal coming from industrial production and personal income, noted ECRI in a recent report, “has never occurred outside a recessionary context in over half a century – but it’s occurred in every recession.”

Walk around the mall this week: You’ll see a lot of terrific sales, and probably not that many customers. Retailers have been forced to slash prices to unload their inventory after what looks like a weak Christmas.

MasterCard reports that holiday spending was up just 0.7% this year, a fraction of the 4.1% predicted by the National Retail Federation. MasterCard’s report, based on spending on its cards, is only the first on the topic and it is not the final word, but it is ominous.

No wonder retail stocks on Wall Street are rolling over. Stocks like Target and Macy’s have fallen about 10% since the week before Thanksgiving. Tiffany & Co. has lost 15% since the start of November.

The holiday season is vital to the economy: 70% of the U.S. economy is based around personal consumption.

Many businesses came into the final two months of the year loaded up with inventory. According to the U.S. government, retail inventories in October were 8.2% higher than a year earlier, lead by a stunning 21% rise in the inventories of new cars and parts. (This may be a terrific moment to shop around for a new car). Retail inventories are the highest on record, and the ratio of inventories to sales has spiked to the highest levels since 2009.

The economic recovery of the past few years has been based on three things: Loan defaults by households, massive deficit spending by the government and enormous money printing by the Federal Reserve. It is hard to see how any of these, let alone all three, can continue indefinitely.

Missed in most recent jobless reports was the news that the number of employed people in the United States, age 25 to 54, actually fell by half a million – before seasonal adjustments – from October to November.

Charles Biderman, chief executive of economic research group TrimTabs, says December payroll figures may be flattered by a rush to recognize income ahead of January 1 tax hikes, but even if this happens it may inevitably lead to a dismal January as the true picture becomes clearer.

The most positive news recently has been the continued improvement in the housing market. I happen to think this is real, and sustainable. I think Sunbelt real estate has bottomed out (I’m writing this in a Miami condo whose value is up about 50% over the past year). But we can’t just assume that a housing recovery will filter through dollar-for-dollar into the economy. A lot of that real estate was underwater on its mortgage. The rise in price may reduce the shortfall, but it does not increase personal wealth or income.

Naturally, we will have to wait and see what happens next. I am not surprised that we are likely to head over the fiscal cliff. Our unhappy binational state, in which Red and Blue America are forced to try to get along, has produced complete dysfunction in Washington. I am only surprised that so many people are surprised.

As for the economy: Don’t think that if we were already back in recession “someone would have told us.” It doesn’t work like that. Because of the lag-time involved in collecting the data they track, economists don’t tend to know we’re going into a recession until we are halfway back out again.

Remember the Great Recession that began in December, 2007? The economists at the National Bureau of Economic Research, who are basically the official scorekeepers of recessions, didn’t discover the recession until December, 2008 – a year late, and only a few months before the episode (officially) ended.

Indeed I distinctly remember any number of economists, financial gurus and money managers during the first half of 2008 telling me (and every other reporter) that we were already “past the worst” and that the economy was going to pick up in the second half of the year.

The previous recession began in March, 2001 – but the NBER didn’t call it a recession until November 26 of that year. By amazing coincidence, that was actually the month it ended (as they told us many months later).

The recession that began in July, 1990 wasn’t called until April the following year. The recession that began in July, 1981 wasn’t recognized until January of 1982. And so it goes.

Economists, it seems, are like the old joke about husbands. They’re always the last to know.

(My late friend Stephen Rousseas, an economics professor at Vassar and elsewhere, used to tell me that economists “are very good at predicting the past.” How right he was).

No one will tell us we’re in a recession until we’ve been in it for months. Are we there now?