SANDY RELIEF BILL FILLED WITH $9 BILLION OF PORK

25 comments

Posted on 29th December 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , ,

This is what the slimeballs in Congress do when they think we aren’t watching. First of all there should be $0 spent by the Federal government to bailout New Jersey and New York. The Federal government does not have $60 billion to give. We run a $3.5 billion deficit per day. Every dime of this money is being borrowed, with the bill being passed on to future unborn generations. If the country wants to give $60 billion to people in New Jersey and New York so they can rebuild their houses 100 yards from the Atlantic Ocean, then we need to cut the $60 billion from someplace else. How about food stamps? How about the military industrial complex? How about green energy subsidies? How about the Department of Orwellian Security?

Noooo. We can’t cut anything. Not only can’t we cut one fucking cent from Federal spending, the maggots in DC actually added $9 freaking billion to this bloated waste of a bill for shit that has nothing to do with Sandy. I can’t wait until this corrupt, fetid, disgusting excuse for a country collapses under the weight of debt and lies.

Congress Accused of Sneaking Unrelated ‘Pork’ Spending into Sandy Emergency Aid Bill: ‘It’s Typical of Washington’

Posted on December 28, 2012 at 11:00pm by Jason Howerton

American Majority Action Spokesman Ron Meyer Says Sandy Aid Bill Packed With Pork Spending

New York Senators Charles Schumer (L) and Kirsten Gillibrand brief the media on a bipartisan Hurricane Sandy relief bill voted on December 28, 2012 on Capitol Hill. Credit: AFP/Getty Images

The Senate approved a $60.4 billion recovery package on Friday intended to help the states affected by Hurricane Sandy in November. Appearing on “Cavuto” on Friday night, American Majority Action spokesman Ron Meyer said the bill was also packed with tons of “pork” spending, some of which won’t even occur until after 2013.

Some of the pork spending reportedly goes towards projects that have nothing to do with Hurricane Sandy or the victims, including millions of dollars for tree planting in areas untouched by Sandy and a new roof for the Smithsonian Museum. When an elected representative appropriates government spending for local projects to help his or her district, it is know as “pork barrel” spending.

“Why was this in the emergency bill for Sandy? It doesn’t make any sense.” Only $1 out of every $6 — $9 billion of the $60 billion will be spent in 2013. That means 85 percent doesn’t come until 2014 and beyond. That’s not immediate relief. What this bill is fundamentally is a pork bill.”

Instead, Meyer suggested the Senate should’ve passed a $9 billion “loan” to the states affected by Sandy instead of sneaking in all the wasteful spending before the end of the year.

“It’s disgraceful to load a bill like this that has good motives, that has good intentions that is going to help people, with pork,” he added. “Why are you putting your own projects in it. It’s disgraceful. It’s typical of Washington.”

In an email to TheBlaze, Meyer explained that $1 out of every $20 spent in the Sandy bill will go to “non-relief-related pork.”

Watch the segment via Fox Business:

Featured image via Paul J. Richards/AFP/Getty Images

PRODUCERS TAKE NOTE

1 comment

Posted on 20th May 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

If you have an idea for a new business, plan on starting a company, or have dreams of employing thousands of Americans, think twice. The Federal Government considers you an enemy. You are stepping on their toes. They want complete control of our economy. Entreprenuers and small business owners are the enemy. They will regulate and tax you to the point where it doesn’t make sense to even try. Chuckie Schumer and Bobbie Casey know how to run an economy. Stay out of their way. If you want to create something, move to Singapore.

Expatriation in the Wake of the Facebook  IPO

By Bill Bonner

05/19/12 Baltimore, Maryland –  The Maryland House of Delegates just voted to raise taxes. Should we move  to Florida…or Delaware?

If we move to Palm Beach, will we ever be able to visit our beloved Maryland  homeland again?

The Financial Times reports that thousands of wealthy French people  are now moving to London. Their motive? They want to escape the taxes proposed  by France’s new president, Francois Hollande.

Should the French impose an exit tax on these “ex-patriots”? Should it then  bar them from visiting France?

Of course not.

In England in 1215, the right to travel was enshrined in Article 42 of the Magna  Carta:

It shall be lawful to any person, for the future,  to go out of our kingdom, and to return, safely and securely, by land or by  water, saving his allegiance to us, unless it be in time of war, for some short  space, for the common good of the kingdom: excepting prisoners and outlaws,  according to the laws of the land, and of the people of the nation at war  against us, and Merchants who shall be treated as it is said above.

Here’s the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article  13:

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement  and residence within the borders of each State. (2) Everyone has the right to  leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 12 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights  incorporates this right into treaty law:

(1) Everyone lawfully within the territory of a  State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and  freedom to choose his residence. (2) Everyone shall be free to leave any  country, including his own. (3) The above-mentioned rights shall not be  subject to any restrictions except those provided by law, are necessary to  protect national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals  or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights  recognized in the present Covenant.

People should be able to move where they want, no? They should be able to  look for lower tax places to live, shouldn’t they? After all, we’re Americans,  aren’t we? Aren’t we all descendants of people who tried to improve their lives  by moving to a new place?

Apparently, a lot of Americans don’t think so. Facebook is going public. And  one of Facebook’s founders has moved to Singapore. He will save, by one  estimate, $67 million in taxes by giving up his US citizenship. He says that’s  not the reason he gave it up. But you can believe what you want.

And now the politicos are up in arms. Mr. Saverin has helped to give them an  asset worth about $100 billion. Are they grateful? Do they bend down and kiss  his derriere?

No! They want to tax him even more heavily…and prevent him from ever setting  foot in the US again.

Yes, dear reader, there is no thought so dumb…so short-sighted…so low…that it  won’t become the law of the land. Bloomberg reports:

Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has a status update for  Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin: Stop attempting to dodge your taxes by  renouncing your US citizenship or never come to back to the US again.

In September 2011, Saverin relinquished his US  citizenship before the company announced its planned initial public offering of  stock, which will debut this week. The move was likely a financial one, as he  owns an estimated 4 percent of Facebook and stands to make $4 billion when the  company goes public. Saverin would reap the benefit of tax savings by becoming a  permanent resident of Singapore, which levies no capital gains taxes.

At a news conference this morning, Sens. Schumer  and Bob Casey, D-Pa., will unveil the “Ex-PATRIOT” — “Expatriation Prevention by  Abolishing Tax-Related Incentives for Offshore Tenancy” — Act to respond  directly to Saverin’s move, which they dub a “scheme” that would “help him duck  up to $67 million in taxes.”

The senators will call Saverin’s move an “outrage” and will outline their plan to re-impose taxes on expatriates like  Saverin even after they flee the United States and take up residence in a  foreign country. Their proposal would also impose a mandatory 30 percent tax on  the capital gains of anybody who renounces their US citizenship.

The plan would bar individuals like Saverin from  ever reentering the United States again.

If Chuck Schumer has his way, entrepreneurs like Eduardo Saverin will think  twice before setting up shop in America!

[Editor’s Note: After yesterday’s column, Run,  Saverin! Run!r, we were delighted to discover that a brave Fellow  Reckoner had actually linked to The Daily Reckoning...on Chuck  Schumer’s Facebook page. Ha! Feel free to “like” our bitty missive here and  to “share” it on Facebook. Call it non-violent protest. And of course, you can  always “be our friend” here.]

Down, down, down…day after day… Stocks down. Yields down.

But what’s this? Gold rose nearly $40 yesterday.

Our “Alert Flag” went up yesterday morning. The Dow fell 156 points during  the day. Not that there’s any connection. Most likely, after so many down days,  stocks will bounce today. But watch out…

We have a hunch.

Facebook is the biggest deal in the stock market…perhaps ever. It’s a company  that didn’t even exist 10 years ago. We know all about the company’s founding;  we saw the movie. Twice. Because our daughter has a role in the movie. She’s the  waitress in the scene where Zuckerberg means Sean Parker.

Not a bad flick. But from an investment standpoint, Facebook is probably one  of the worst moves you can make. Most likely, it will be gone 10 years from now.  $100 billion of market capitalization will disappear. Poof! It’s just a website,  after all. We looked at a Facebook page, once… We couldn’t figure out why anyone  would waste his time.

The trouble with new technology is that in a few years it’s old  technology.

Here’s our hunch: The Facebook IPO may mark a major peak…and the beginning of  a major bear market on Wall Street.

It happens every time. There’s a big, big deal. And then, it’s over. We’d  give you some examples, if we could think of them. But we can’t. You’ll just  have to trust us on this.

We don’t really have any evidence or logic to back this up. It’s just a  hunch.

But our intuition tells us that when investors finally get the full Facebook  treatment, they are going to be turned off by the stock market and Wall Street.  Not only will the company turn out to be not worth a fraction of the IPO  price…investors will also get a clearer picture of how Wall Street really  works.

About that IPO… The idea is to generate a lot of excitement…a frenzy…so that  people are eager to get the shares. And with all these Facebook users, who  like…like…Facebook…and think they can tell a good investment when they see  one…it ought to be easy to create a buying frenzy. Besides, everyone knows  shares are intentionally priced below what their backers believe they can get  for them. This causes the share-price to “pop” right after the IPO.

Of course, the distribution is tightly controlled. You have to be an insider  to get IPO shares. Say…you’ll get them at about $40…and then, you expect them to  go to $50 on the “pop.” If it works out as planned, you make $10 per share. This  is a lot of money. Easy money. So, the insiders all want a piece of the  action.

How do you get to be an “insider”? You have to be a friend of Morgan Stanley.  Which is to say, you help Morgan Stanley make money. How? For example, if you  are a pension fund or hedge fund you put through a lot of trades. Morgan Stanley  makes money on the churn. You make money on the churn, too. Customers don’t make  any money on the churn. They pay for every transaction. But who cares about  them?

Everyone is convinced that buying…selling…and trading investments makes  money. As long as the illusion lasts, Wall Street is happy. The customers are  happy too…more or less. They’re participating in the Great Illusion — all trying  to make money without actually doing anything.

So everyone churns. And the more you churn with Morgan Stanley the more  likely you are to get an allocation of IPO stock. There could be about 50  million shares handed to insiders in this manner. Let’s say they go up $10 in  the “pop.” That’s half a billion in gains …in only a few hours.

Dan Ariely explains:

Morgan Stanley and the rest of the investment  banks involved will … make sure that their favorite fund manager client “friends” are given lots of free money. Assuming that these “friends” are given  75% of the total number of IPO shares, or a total of 291 million shares, and  assuming that the stock does rise from $40 to $50, then these fund managers will  collectively, in one day, make $2.9 billion dollars in realized or unrealized  profits. That’s right, 2.9 BILLION DOLLARS.

…where and out of whose pocket does this money  come from?

Well, just think of it this way… Let’s assume you  own a very expensive piece of waterfront real estate, and you hire a broker to  sell it for you. After exploring the market and after getting indications of  interest, your broker advises you that $10 million would be a great price for  your home. You meet with the potential buyers and decide to sell it for $10  million. After the $1 million commission you have to pay your broker, your net  proceeds are $9 million. An hour later, you drive by the house and see your  broker in the driveway shaking hands with some different people. You pull over  to see what’s going on, and you find that the people you just sold the house to  for $10 million are very close friends of your broker. To your dismay, you also  find out that those friends just sold your (former) house to somebody else for  $15 million.

The same exact game is going on here… By the time  you drive around the block, these folks will have sold their shares at $50 per  share.

I am not sure about you, but I find all of this  very depressing.

Regards,

Bill Bonner, for The Daily Reckoning

Read more: Expatriation in the Wake of the Facebook IPO http://dailyreckoning.com/expatriation-in-the-wake-of-the-facebook-ipo/#ixzz1vPeXajq0

MORE RIDICULOUS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS

21 comments

Posted on 6th December 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

,

Politicians trying to “FIX” the housing market. Schumer was a huge fan of the homebuyer tax credit. He was a huge fan of the loan modification programs. He was a huge fan of the Cash for Clunkers debacle. Every one of these worthless programs cost American taxpayers billions and fixed nothing.

Here’s an idea for Chuckie Shumer. How about the government get out of the way, let home prices fall to whatever the market says is a fair price, and buyers will emerge at those prices. I know this is radical and could get me thrown in to Guantanamo, but I’m going to rely on supply and demand to solve the housing “problem”.

Buy a US House, Get a 3-Year Visa: Sen. Schumer

CHARLES SCHUMER, SEN. SCHUMER, HOUSING BILL, THREE-YEAR VISA, HOMEOWNERS VISA, FOREIGN INVESTMENT, MIAMI, HOUSING MARKET, MARGO D. BELLER, WILBUR ROSS, MIKE LEE, CONGRESS, RICHARD LEFRAK
Posted By: Margo D. Beller | Special to CNBC.com
| 05 Dec 2011 | 12:14 PM ET

A new Senate bill would help spur demand in U.S. housing by offering foreign investors a three-year “homeowners visa” if they invest half a million dollars cash and stay in the house for 180 days, co-sponsor Sen. Charles Schumer told CNBC Monday. 

“We all know housing is dragging down our economy and the problem is basic supply and demand,” said the New York Democrat. 

The bill, co-sponsored with Mike Lee, a Utah Republican, “simply increases the demand. There are literally millions of people around the world, many of them retirees, some not, who would like to live here in America.” 

The residency requirement will force these investors to pay federal and property taxes, Schumer pointed out, and is intended to allay immigration concerns. 

“We have to straighten out our immigration policy,” Schumer said. “Immigrants are good for America. We should not just have people who cross the border illegally.” 

His visa bill is “not a path to citizenship,” he stressed. But those who come using the visa can renew it every three years “as long as they stay in the U.S.” 

In the same interview real estate mogul Richard Lefrak, head of the Lefrak Organization, who said he first suggested the “homeowners visa” idea three years ago, said the bill’s provision to make it easier for Chinese citizens to visit the U.S. will draw more monied entrepreneurs, which will prompt more U.S. investment. 

He said that “40 percent of the wealthy people in China would like to leave. I mean they’re going to want to come here and they’re going to want to spend money and start businesses and buy the homes.” 

Same for the Brazilians, said investor Wilbur Ross, CEO of WL Ross & Co. “You’re already seeing it in Florida,” he said, noting that 20 percent of all the residential real estate sales in Miami last year was by Brazilians. 

He and Lefrak said the residency requirement may scare some investors away but acknowledged having that provision makes the bill politically palatable. 

“If we tap some of the wealth in Asia, think how it would help housing” in California, Las Vegas, Florida and other troubled real estate markets, Lefrak said. “Any bill that has the support of Sen. Schumer and Sen. Lee, on opposite sides of the political spectrum, means there’s some merit to the idea.”

BYE BYE BAMA

38 comments

Posted on 14th September 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , ,

Anyone who thinks Barack Obama will win in 2012 better wake up and smell the pastrami. Anthony “the penis” Weiner’s congressional seat was up for election yesterday. It has been a Democratic seat for 91 years. There are 3 registered Democrats to every one registered Republican. The population of the district is 40% Jewish. The Democratic candidate was a Jew. The Republican candidate was a Catholic.

The seat was previously held by Chuck “the ultra lib” Schumer. There is no way in hell this seat could go Republican. But it did. In a landslide. If the Democrats can’t hold this seat, they are toast. Obama is toast.

This was the canary in the coal mine. Obama is Jimmy Carter. His term will go down in history as the most pathetic in U.S. history.

HUH? Weiner’s Seat “Difficult” For Dems, Chairwoman Says — Even Though They’ve Held It Since 1920

Zeke Miller | Sep. 14, 2011, 9:40 AM

debbie wasserman schultz

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz declared last night that the seat vacated by disgraced Rep. Anthony Weiner — and held by the party since 1920 — is a “very difficult district for Democrats.”

Republican Bob Turner defeated Democrat David Weprin 54-47 in the heavily Jewish district last night. The race is being viewed by many as a referendum on President Barack Obama’s policies, prompting the defensive remarks from the DNC chairwoman.

Speaker of the House John Boehner dismissed Wasserman-Schultz’s remarks, citing historical precedent and calling it a “very seriously Democrat district,” according to The Wall Street Journal.

“This is not a district that Republicans have any right to believe we could win,” he said.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/huh-weiners-seat-difficult-for-dems-chairwoman-says–even-though-theyve-held-it-since-1920-2011-9#ixzz1XweQiwqq

THE EXTREME 1.6% CUT

29 comments

Posted on 6th April 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

This is what you get from Washington DC. You have PR maggots instructing Senators which words work best in scaring the ignorant masses. The Republicans used these methods to railroad us into attacking Iraq. Pictures of mushroom clouds and dirty bombs and terrorists behind every bush worked wonders. Now it is the Democrats turn. Chuck Schumer is a despicable piece of shit, human being. Not only is he a stupid motherfucker, but he is a lying fucker who will say anything to win. He couldn’t care less about the long term viability of this country. He takes his marching orders from his puppet masters and dutifully lies to the American public. This time he was caught on tape. When the SHTF, he should be on the top of the list for the guilotine line. The DNC must be working overtime coming up with the talking points reagrding Paul Ryan’s budget plan to kill old people.

“Extremist” Charles Schumer Caught Giving Marching Orders to Fellow Big Spending Libs

Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, March 29, 2011, 6:10 PM

Senator Charles Schumer spilled the beans today when he told fellow democrats to call the meager GOP spending cuts “extreme.” Schumer didn’t know reporters were already listening in on the call.

That’s the dem game plan. To call any cuts to their historic and irresponsible budget “extreme.”

Obama, Pelosi, Reid and Senate Democrats like Schumer added over One Trillion Dollars to the Federal Budget in the last 4 years.

That’s at least a 30% increase in federal spending in just 3 years.
Democrats LOVE to spend your money. It’s what they live for.
And, now we know that if you suggest that they cut back on their record deficit spending they will call you “extreme.”

The Washington Examiner reported:

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., a member of the Democratic Senate leadership, got on a conference call with reporters Tuesday morning without realizing the reporters were already listening in. Schumer thought he was on a private line with four Democratic senators who were to talk with reporters about the current budget stalemate.

Schumer instructed the group, made up of Sens. Barbara Boxer of California, Tom Carper of Delaware, Ben Cardin of Maryland and Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, to tell reporters that the GOP is refusing to negotiate.

He told the group to make sure they label the GOP spending cuts as “extreme.”

“I always use extreme,” Schumer said. “That is what the caucus instructed me to use.”

Someone must have finally told Schumer that the media were listening and he stopped talking midsentence.

Here’s a bit more of what he said about House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, according to my notes.

“The main thrust is basically that we want to negotiate and we want to come up with a compromise but the Tea Party is pulling Boehner too far over to the right and so far over that there is no more fruitful negotiations,” Schumer said on the call. “The only way we can avoid a shutdown is for Boehner to come up with a reasonable compromise and not just listen to what the Tea Party wants. “