OBAMACARE – THE SCREW THAT KEEPS SCREWING

37 comments

Posted on 11th December 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

Remember when Pelosi said we had to pass the 2,700 page healthcare abortion of a bill in order to find out what was in it? Remember when Obama told us that families would save $2,500 per year if Obamacare was passed? Remember when Obama and Reid declared that Obamacare would add nothing to the National Debt?

Well now we know what is in it. It seems when you add 30 million people to the healthcare system and guarantee to cover all pre-existing conditions, it actually costs money. Obama and his minions snuck a little clause into page 1,869 that requires every employer in the country to pay a $63 fee per person covered under their plans to pay for the pre-existing conditions. That’s a mere $25 billion extracted from employers. If you think employers are going to eat that fee, you’re smoking some good Colorado shit. A middle class family of four will see their employer pass that $250 annual cost onto them. I urge every employer to put this fee on the paycheck of every employee with the description of Obamacare Fee.

Remember when Obama declared that all employers had to cover dependents up until the age of 26? Do you think employers ate that added cost? Not a chance. My co-pays went from $15 per visit to $25 per visit over two years. Obamacare has only just begun to screw you, your employer, and the country. It will add trillions to the National Debt. You will be waiting weeks for basic services. Employers will drop millions from health coverage. Millions will not be hired by businesses because of Obamacare.

I hope you enjoy being screwed. 

Surprise ‘Obamacare’ fee to be passed on to workers

By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Your medical plan is facing an unexpected expense, so you probably are, too. It’s a new, $63-per-head fee to cushion the cost of covering people with pre-existing conditions under President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul.

The charge, buried in a recent regulation, works out to tens of millions of dollars for the largest companies, employers say. Most of that is likely to be passed on to workers.

Employee benefits lawyer Chantel Sheaks calls it a “sleeper issue” with significant financial consequences, particularly for large employers.

“Especially at a time when we are facing economic uncertainty, (companies will) be hit with a multi-million dollar assessment without getting anything back for it,” said Sheaks, a principal at Buck Consultants, a Xerox subsidiary.

Based on figures provided in the regulation, employer and individual health plans covering an estimated 190 million Americans could owe the per-person fee.

The Obama administration says it is a temporary assessment levied for three years starting in 2014, designed to raise $25 billion. It starts at $63 and then declines.

Most of the money will go into a fund administered by the Health and Human Services Department. It will be used to cushion health insurance companies from the initial hard-to-predict costs of covering uninsured people with medical problems. Under the law, insurers will be forbidden from turning away the sick as of Jan. 1, 2014.

The program “is intended to help millions of Americans purchase affordable health insurance, reduce unreimbursed usage of hospital and other medical facilities by the uninsured and thereby lower medical expenses and premiums for all,” the Obama administration says in the regulation. An accompanying media fact sheet issued Nov. 30 referred to “contributions” without detailing the total cost and scope of the program.

Of the total pot, $5 billion will go directly to the U.S. Treasury, apparently to offset the cost of shoring up employer-sponsored coverage for early retirees.

The $25 billion fee is part of a bigger package of taxes and fees to finance Obama’s expansion of coverage to the uninsured. It all comes to about $700 billion over 10 years, and includes higher Medicare taxes effective this Jan. 1 on individuals making more than $200,000 per year or couples making more than $250,000. People above those threshold amounts also face an additional 3.8 percent tax on their investment income.

But the insurance fee had been overlooked as employers focused on other costs in the law, including fines for medium and large firms that don’t provide coverage.

“This kind of came out of the blue and was a surprisingly large amount,” said Gretchen Young, senior vice president for health policy at the ERISA Industry Committee, a group that represents large employers on benefits issues.

Word started getting out in the spring, said Young, but hard cost estimates surfaced only recently with the new regulation. It set the per capita rate at $5.25 per month, which works out to $63 a year.

America’s Health Insurance Plans, the major industry trade group for health insurers, says the fund is an important program that will help stabilize the market and mitigate cost increases for consumers as the changes in Obama’s law take effect.

But employers already offering coverage to their workers don’t see why they have to pony up for the stabilization fund, which mainly helps the individual insurance market. The redistribution puts the biggest companies on the hook for tens of millions of dollars.

“It just adds on to everything else that is expected to increase health care costs,” said economist Paul Fronstin of the nonprofit Employee Benefit Research Institute.

The fee will be assessed on all “major medical” insurance plans, including those provided by employers and those purchased individually by consumers. Large employers will owe the fee directly. That’s because major companies usually pay upfront for most of the health care costs of their employees. It may not be apparent to workers, but the insurance company they deal with is basically an agent administering the plan for their employer.

The fee will total $12 billion in 2014, $8 billion in 2015 and $5 billion in 2016. That means the per-head assessment would be smaller each year, around $40 in 2015 instead of $63.

It will phase out completely in 2017 — unless Congress, with lawmakers searching everywhere for revenue to reduce federal deficits — decides to extend it.

GOOD SAMARITANS RECEIVE BILL FROM LOS ANGELES AFTER BEING ELECTROCUTED TO DEATH

6 comments

Posted on 28th August 2012 by avalon in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

Fire Officials to Review Paramedic Bills for Good Samaritans in Electrocution Accident

Top officials at the city fire department may cancel the bills for paramedic services for the families of two good Samaritans who were electrocuted at a traffic crash in Valley Village, and will make an announcement on the issue Monday.

“The city fire department administration is going to address that issue publicly tomorrow,” Los Angeles City Fire Department spokesman Brian Humphrey told City News Service.

Humphrey, however, declined to discuss the details of the announcement or whether the fee adjustment would include the other five civilians who suffered electrical burns.

“The administration will speak for themselves,” Humphrey said. “They will discuss the issue tomorrow.”     

Publicly hailed as heroes, Stacey Lee Schreiber, 39, and Irma Zamora, 40, raced to help a stricken motorist following a crash Wednesday evening, and were electrocuted by an estimated 4,800 volts of power that flowed from a snapped streetlight fixture into water from a sheared fire hydrant that had flooded a crash scene.

Another six people, including a Los Angeles police officer, were also treated at the scene and five of them were later transported to hospitals.

However, it was expected that the families of the two dead women and the five civilian would-be rescuers would soon receive legally mandated bills from the city for the emergency services they received, such as hospital transport and on-scene medical paramedic treatment, a fire department official told City News Service.

The city’s municipal code does not allow billing exemptions for good Samaritans, or the victims of violent crime, fire department spokesman Humphrey said Friday.

For example, people who get shot in a drive-by attack and get treated, then taken to a hospital by city fire paramedics get charged for the services they received, he said.

“We can’t decide who’s innocent, who gets a bill and who doesn’t,” Humphrey said Friday. “We have no control over this. We are mandated by the city council and the mayor to bill citizens for the services rendered by paramedics and that’s what we do.”

Humphrey said the money recouped from the billing is returned to the city and eventually is figured back into the city budget.

The city began charging people for paramedic services sometime in the 1970s, he said.

“There was a time when the fire department did it for free, but that was a long time ago,” Humphrey said.

Humphrey pointed out that citizens do have some “recourses for redress.” If a person is indigent or has low income they can appeal the bill and ask for a fee waiver.

In the Valley Village case, Arman Samsonian, 19, of Glendale, is being investigated for excessive speed and reckless driving in connection with the fatal chain of events on Magnolia Boulevard.

No charges have been filed.

The people injured in this case can attempt to be reimbursed by the driver’s insurance carrier or they could sue the driver, Humphrey said.

However, sometimes people just don’t pay. In those cases, a past due account would be turned over to an collection agency hired by the city, Humphrey said.

In this case, the city-hired collection agency is NCO Financial, according to city records filed with the City Clerk’s office.

Under the current system, paramedics are mandated to document any and all services, including hospital transport.

Those records are passed to the fire department’s Emergency Medical Services Unit, which is responsible for billing people or their insurance companies to recover service costs.

Fees for emergency services are published, and in August 2010 those fees were raised by a City Council motion introduced by Councilman Bernard Parks and seconded by Councilman Greig Smith. The city code change was approved by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

Fees for “Advanced Life Support Services Fee” were raised from $1,004 to $1,373 per patient and “Basic Life Support Fee” from $712 to $974 per patient. But the cost of transport by city ambulance was kept the same: $15.75 per mile, one way service.

In 2011, the fire department reported it had billed a total of about $73.7 million for emergency services for the seven fiscal years ending in 2011.

Of that total, the department adjusted the total billings downward by about $9.4 million and collected $27 million, leaving an outstanding uncollected balance of $37.3 million, according to city documents reviewed by CNS.

Los Angeles Fire Chief Brian Cummings reported to the council that the $37.3 million figure represented 92,403 individual accounts of less than $5,000 each.

The council agreed to write off those accounts.