MSM MORONS CACKLING ABOUT SURGE IN CONSUMER SPENDING

11 comments

Posted on 29th March 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , , , ,

You can count on the MSM to spin bad news into great news. It’s their job. The MSM story below leads off with bullshit about surging consumer spending in January and February proving that consumers are happy and confident again. They quote a Wall Street shill who exuberently declares the 1st quarter of 2013 will be great. One little problem. It’s a completely false storyline, which the story glosses over later in the story. Here are the facts:

  • Personal spending increased $78 billion in February.
  • Energy expenditures (aka filling up your gas tank) accounted for $57 billion of the increase.
  • Food expenditures (aka grocery shopping to not starve) accounted for $10 billion of the increase.
  • Purchases of durable goods DROPPED.

So 86% of the SURGE in consumer expenditures was for gasoline and food. This is supposed to lead to a surge in 1st quarter GDP?????

Personal income jumped by 1.1% in February. This must be from all the new jobs. Right? Wrong!!!

Here are the facts on income:

  • Personal income jumped by $143 billion.
  • But wages from things called jobs only went up $43 billion, or 0.6%. Where did the other $100 billion come from?
  • The majority of the increase was from dividends on stock. They increased $82 billion. Guess who got those? Not the average American family. The top .01% reaped these gains.
  • Interest income that sustains senior citizens fell by $12 billion. Thanks Bennie. Granny is now eating Nine Lives cat food.
  • Government transfer payments, also known as welfare, went up $9 billion. Hysterically, this is called income and now makes up 18% of all personal income. Taking money out of one pocket and putting it in another pocket is considered income in our Orwellian America.

The personal savings rate of 2.6% is near an all-time low. This surely bodes well for future spending.

Real disposable personal income per person is now lower than it was in December 2006, but the stock market is at new highs. And this is while using the fake BLS inflation rate.

The MSM outlets portray todays report as positive for the economy and bullish for the stock market. When I look at the real numbers, I see pitiful job growth, decling real wages for the average worker, soaring costs for food and energy, negative real returns for savers, middle class Americans living on the edge, and the financial ruling class reaping billions in profits from Ben Bernanke’s QE to infinity policies designed to benefit only the top .01%. Mission accomplished Bennie. Buy stocks everyone. 

 

Consumer spending climbs in February

Higher gasoline costs a factor, but incomes also rise

By Jeffry Bartash, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Consumers lifted spending in February at the fastest rate in five months, though a good chunk of their money went to pay for higher gasoline prices.

Personal spending climbed a seasonally adjusted 0.7% last month, the Commerce Department said Friday. That was a notch higher than the estimate of economists polled by MarketWatch.

The increase in spending in January, what’s more, was revised up to 0.4% from 0.2% in another sign that consumers

The speedy pace of spending in the first two months of the year indicates that first-quarter growth could snap back sharply to the 2.5% to 3% range after a lackluster 0.4% increase in the final three months of 2012.

“Despite the expiry of the payroll tax cut and higher gasoline prices, we’re now likely to see the fastest quarterly gain in real consumption in two years,” said Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics. 

Yet the composition of spending also suggests some caution is in order. Virtually all of the increase in spending in February, for example, was devoted to perishable items such as gasoline and food.

Purchases of so-called nondurable goods jumped 1.9%, likely reflecting the sharp spike in prices at the pump. The average national cost of a gallon of regular gas surged 13% in February, according to the Energy Information Administration.

Spending on durable goods was basically flat in February, marking the worst performance since last October. That’s a category that bears watching: consumers usually cut back on the purchase of big-ticket items if they feel any economic stress or the need to rebuild their savings.

While the savings rate edged up to 2.6% from 2.2% in February, it’s still at a five-year low. A 2% increase in payroll taxes at the start of 2013 is one of the reasons Americans are saving less.

Yet spending was still fairly strong last month if perishables such as gasoline are excluded. What helped consumers in February was a 1.1% jump in personal income, the third strong gain in four months. That was largely in line with Wall Street forecasts.

What’s more, after-tax income adjusted for inflation rose a healthy 0.7% last month, partly shielding consumers from the effects of higher fuel prices.

What’s unclear is whether that trend can continue. The increase in disposable income over the past year has barely kept ahead of inflation, leaving Americans little cushion given their low savings rate.

Many economists think consumers could take a break and rebuild their savings, but others point out that households have sharply reduced their debt since the end of the Great Recession. By one measure, household debt is the lowest in more than 30 years.

Consumer spending is critical to the nation’s growth because it represents as much as 70% of the economy. When Americans buy more goods and services, businesses generate higher sales and profits and can afford to hire extra workers. Less spending results in slower economic growth.

Inflation, meanwhile, remains low. The PCE price index climbed 0.4% in February, largely because of higher gasoline prices, but it’s only up 1.3% over the past 12 months and below the Federal Reserve’s target of 2%.

The core rate, which excludes food and energy, edged up a smaller 0.1% and is also up just 1.3% in the past year.

 

WHO’S LYING THIS TIME?

5 comments

Posted on 27th March 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , ,

So the Department of Agriculture, which is part of the U.S. government, reports that food prices have risen 9.8% in the last year.

The BLS, also a U.S. government agency, reports that food prices have risen 1.6% in the last year. I kid you not. Here is the link:

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.t01.htm

Does this discrepancy seem a bit wide? Have you been in a grocery store in the last year? Do you believe that food prices have risen by 9.8% or by 1.6% versus one year ago?

How can the BLS get away with reporting these lies when the agency responsible for food reports a number 6 times as high?

And those meat prices that have been dropping due to farmers culling their herds to save on feed costs due to the drought – once the supply of livestock has been reduced it takes awhile to replace them. Meat prices will be rising as the year goes on.

Consumers Paying Less for Meat, More for Vegetables

March 27, 2013 by Paul Ausick

 

78494592

Source: Thinkstock

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today released its preliminary report on March farm prices. The index uses prices from 1990-1992 as its base value (100). The March price index rose 3 points (1.5%) to 202 month-over-month, with the crop index up 2.1% and the livestock index up 1.95. The all-products index rose 9.8% year-over-year in March, to 240. 

Farm costs, measured by the prices paid index were unchanged month-over-month at 221, but that’s 3.8% higher than March of 2012. Higher prices for nitrogen fertilizer, feed grains, and other fertilizers and supplements led the prices-paid hike.

Food processors and consumers paid more for feed grains and hay and commercial vegetables in March. The rising cost of feed is at least partially attributable to last summer’s drought and the impact it had on corn and hay crops. Lettuce and tomatoes led the rise in vegetable prices.

Meat prices fell in March, down 1.2% month-over-month and down 4.2% compared with March 2012. Livestock producers have been culling herds in an effort to force prices back up, but the immediate impact of slaughtering more animals is to lower the price.

 

DROUGHT & NOW COLD

4 comments

Posted on 27th March 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , ,

The drought seems to be letting up in some upper midwest states, but it persists and is growing in other areas of the U.S. Now the unseasonably cold March is endangering crops. When is that global warming going to kick in. I’m still freezing my ass off here in PA. Don’t expect food prices to decline based on the facts as of today.

United States Seasonal Drought Outlook Graphic - click on image to enlarge

Latest Seasonal Assessment - The drought outlook for March 21 – June 30, 2013 is based primarily on short-, medium-, and long-range forecasts, initial conditions, and climatology. Since the release of the previous drought outlook issued on March 7, 2013, the largest drought improvement occurred across the middle to upper Mississippi Valley and the Ozark region. Improvement is forecast to continue across these areas and extend northwest to include much of the Dakotas and Minnesota. Some improvement is forecast for the most intense drought areas of the central and southern Great Plains. Prospects for drought improvement decrease further south across the southern high Plains and Texas. Drought is forecast to persist for much of the West and expand across northern California and southern Oregon. During the past two months, major improvement occurred across Georgia and South Carolina where additional improvement is expected. Drought is forecast to persist or develop across the Florida peninsula but it will likely be short-lived as the rainy season typically begins during June. Some improvement is expected for the smaller areas of drought across northern Alaska and the Hawaiian Islands.

Forecaster: B. Pugh

 

As winter hangs on, freeze adds to worries for U.S. wheat crop

Reuters  |   March 26, 2013

A late blast of cold and snowy conditions could harm parts of the U.S. winter wheat growing area, with widespread freeze damage feared in some of the more mature fields, experts said.

“I think we’ll certainly have some (freeze damage),” said Travis Miller, an agronomist at Texas A&M University. “We did not dodge a bullet. It is a mess out there, both from freeze and drought.”

It will take several days after the freeze passes to determine the extent of plant-tissue damage, wheat experts said, with areas where wheat fields were maturing quickly seen
suffering the most harm.

Wheat fields in key growing areas of Texas have been two to three weeks ahead of normal maturity due to recent beneficial moisture and warm conditions before the freeze that descended on the Plains over the weekend.

Temperatures fell into the low 20s and upper teens (Fahrenheit) in Texas and were much colder in top producer Kansas, where they dropped to single digits – 2 to 4 degrees – in some areas over the weekend, said Mary Knapp, Kansas state climatologist.

MDA Weather Services (Cropcast) meteorologist Anthony Chipriano said overnight Sunday and overnight Monday would be the coldest readings for the week in Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas.

“There could be some potential harm but it’s going to turn a little warmer after tonight so I don’t see much impact for wheat,” Chipriano said.

There is a freeze warning from north central Texas extending to Dallas and as far south as Waco, temperatures will drop to 32 degrees Fahrenheit early Tuesday morning, he said. “The freeze could extend into Oklahoma and Kansas as well,” he added.

Chipriano said low readings by Wednesday morning would be back up to the mid-30s in most of the wheat belt.

Much of the new winter wheat crop in the U.S. Plains has been struggling due to extended drought, making the young plants vulnerable to wild weather fluctuations. Recent snow and rain
have improved conditions, but the crop generally is still seen as likely to have much-shortened production potential.

 ”Wheat is a wreck looking for a place to happen,” Miller said.

IS THE DROUGHT OVER?

26 comments

Posted on 10th February 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , ,

I find it fascinating that we are hearing nothing from the MSM about the drought. Absolutely nothing. If you google Midwest drought, you find no articles in the last month from any MSM outlet. Considering it’s an issue that will have a tremendous impact on worldwide food supplies and prices, the silence is deafening. Is the MSM incompetent or are they purposely keeping the ignorant masses in the dark? The two maps below show the drought has not let up. Any improvement has been matched by new drought development in other areas.

The article that I found below shoots a big hole in the storyline that this drought is due to global warming. It seems severe droughts have tracked every Fourth Turning, arriving like clockwork every 80 years.

If this drought continues and/or worsens during 2013 it could be a black swan that pushes food prices past a breaking point. The combination of Bernanke money printing, central banks debasing currencies across the globe, and food shortages could create a perfect storm. We are already seeing cracks in the foundation, as Venezuela and Argentina are experiencing the start of hyperinflation. Iran already has hyperinflation. Middle Eastern and Far East countires cannot withstand rapidly rising food prices. Revolution will follow.

The MSM is keeping the lid on this story because the implications are dire and the oligarchs have no control over it. They only control the message or lack of message.

Year-to-date precipitation (to February 5) has been subnormal in the Far West, central and northern Plains, New England, and along the eastern Gulf and southern Atlantic States. The greatest deficits (3 to 6 inches, locally more than a foot) have accumulated along the Washington, Oregon, and California coasts, in the Cascade and Sierra Nevada Mountains, and from the Florida Panhandle northeastward into the coastal Carolinas. In contrast, surplus precipitation has fallen on the Four Corners Region, southern Plains, most of the Mississippi, Tennessee, and Ohio Valleys, southern half of the Appalachians, and the mid-Atlantic. January 1-February 5 temperatures have averaged below normal in the West, close to normal in the Plains, upper Midwest, and mid-Atlantic, and above normal in the Southeast and New England.

Accordingly, some drought expansion has occurred over the past 3 weeks in Florida, southern Alabama and Georgia, the coastal Carolinas, and parts of Texas. In contrast, improvement was recorded along the northwestern Southeast drought edge and in the mid-Atlantic. Some improvement was also made in parts of the middle and lower Mississippi Valley (from Wisconsin to Arkansas), in the Four Corners region, southern coastal California, and Hawaii. The worst conditions (D3 to D4) have stubbornly persisted in the middle third of the Plains, and in central Georgia.

 

Midwest droughts on an 80-year cycle

By Cliff Harris/Weather Gems

The Coeur d’ Alene Press                  

Major solar-induced drought patterns, often lasting nearly a full decade, have recurred across the midsection of the U.S. approximately every 80 years since at least the early 1600s.

We are still in the latest version of this particular long-term drought cycle. We’ve seen some moisture relief in parts of Texas and the eastern Corn Belt in recent weeks, but the western Midwest and much of the Great Plains remain, of this Feb. 1, 2013 writing, in the firm grip of choking drought with no significant precipitation yet in sight west of the Mississippi River.

The latest Palmer Drought Index, released by the National Weather Service on Jan. 26, showed that much of eastern Montana, all of Wyoming, most of Nebraska and large parts of the Dakotas, Minnesota, Iowa, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri and New Mexico were still under “extreme drought conditions.”

Randy Mann and I do not see a major break in the prolonged drought in the nation’s heartland for at least another 60 days, maybe longer. It will take months of above normal moisture in order for these parched regions to even begin to recover from years of extreme dryness.

The last 80-year drought occurred in the Dust Bowl Era of the so-called ‘Dirty 1930s.’ This was one of the worst environmental disasters of the entire 20th Century anywhere in the world.

More than three million people were forced to abandon their farms when their wells and fields went dry in the Great Plains and the western Midwest. Nearly a million farmers went west to California and other Pacific coastal states to seek jobs of any kind, especially in the agriculturally rich valleys of California.

But, the main reason for the drought disaster in the central U.S. was poor land use and inept general farming techniques that saw these regions plowed up for decades before the 1930s as the planting of wheat expanded westward to the eastern slopes of the Rockies.

The natural grasses of the Great Plains could survive, in most cases, these horrible, long-lasting droughts. But, during the 1930s, and again in recent years, the wheat fields shriveled, exposing the bare earth and dust to the high winds. The resulting erosion and dust storms clogged the lungs of thousands of Plains residents. As many as 5,000 people died in Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas alone between 1930 and 1937.

I should likewise mention that a preview of the 1930s Dust Bowl occurred during the 1856-65 major 80-year drought that peaked during the Civil War. The war ended and so did the drought in 1865. The ‘weather slaves’ were freed.

More soldiers died of the effects of malnutrition, exposure and disease toward the end of the Civil War than were killed by bullets. Parched croplands and homes in the Southeast were torched by Union soldiers that often resulted in their own demise as food supplies ran out.

Yes, Man can be his WORST ENEMY.

GUESS WHAT?

10 comments

Posted on 30th January 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , ,

As the captured MSM and the Wall Street Shysters proclaim happy days are here again because the 1% are getting ever richer from the $85 billion per month Bernanke stock market ramp, the average American is getting fucked again. The MSM is not talking too much about the fact that oil prices have surged from $84 in November to $98 today during the lowest consumption portion of the year. This is a 16% increase in under three months. The price of oil is now higher than it was last January. Oil prices tend to have an impact on gas prices. Gas prices are up 4% in the last month and they are going higher. And this  has happened when Middle East tensions are relatively low. So when is that North Dakota shale oil effect going to kick in?

The fact is that the Wall Street crowd are celebrating, while the masses continue to get screwed with higher gas prices, higher food prices, and lower wages. Sounds like a recovery to me. Party on Garth!!!