MAJOR RETAILERS LOSING SALES

15 comments

Posted on 16th May 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

The biggest retailer in the world and another major retailer that caters to the middle class reported 1st quarter results today. Wal-Mart is the retail industry. They are worldwide. Their results tell the truth about the global economy. And the truth is it sucks. Same store sales FELL. Traffic FELL. They missed their own February forecast. This is versus an extremely weak first quarter last year. They are lowering their earnings guidance. They admit that things are getting worse. Wal-Mart is the canary in the global coal mine. It is looking woozy.

Kohl’s is my favorite store. Their sales also FELL. Their earnings FELL. Again, this is versus an extremely weak 1st quarter of 2012. They are totally U.S. based and their main customer is the middle class. I always know when they are struggling, because they send 30% off coupons when they are struggling and 15% coupons when times are good. We received a 30% coupon in the mail yesterday.

Their sales are falling without taking inflation into account. Their real sales are falling by 4% to 6%.

These results are a reflection of what is happening in the real world to real people. The stock market can reach new highs day after day, but it is doing nothing for the average person. This dichotomy will continue until it can’t go any further. Retail sales will continue to fall. There is no recovery just around the corner. Kohls and Wal-Mart and all of the big box retailers will be shuttering stores over the next decade. The unsustainable debt financed boom is over. 

Wal-Mart EPS guidance below analyst consensus

By Saabira Chaudhuri

Wal-Mart Stores Inc.’s (NYSE:WMT) fiscal first-quarter earnings rose 1.1% as the world’s largest retailer reported slightly stronger revenue, though same-store sales missed expectations amid a delay in income tax refund checks, challenging weather conditions, less grocery inflation than expected and the payroll tax increase.

The company’s namesake stores in the U.S. showed a 1.4% decline in same-store sales in the latest period, excluding fuel. Its February forecast was for flat sales.

Same-store sales excluding fuel at its Sam’s Club warehouse shops, meanwhile, edged up 0.2%. Wal-Mart had predicted same-store club sales excluding fuel between flat and up 2%.

Core customers of Wal-Mart generally have been grappling with higher payroll taxes, rising gasoline prices and delayed income-tax refunds. In response, Wal-Mart has made modifications like going with smaller packaging and less expensive products. The retailer also recently announced plans to expand its ecommerce services this summer by placing lockers in stores for customers to pick up items they ordered from the company online.

Despite recent challenges to its core lower-income customers, strong expense-control efforts have helped the company’s margins while increased austerity measures in Europe have benefited international sales.

Ahead of Wal-Mart’s report, analysts at Barclays said they are “impressed with the company’s disciplined expense management” and pointed to Wal-Mart’s “defensive positioning, especially with the macro uncertainty,” and its existing strategies being deployed the U.S. segment to improve same-store sales and traffic as being positives.

On Thursday, Chief Executive Mike Duke pointed to “considerable headwinds to top line sales” and also highlighted ecommerce sales growth of 30% year-over year.

For the quarter, Wal-Mart reported a profit of $3.78 billion, or $1.14 a share, versus $3.74 billion, or $1.09 a share, a year earlier. The company’s February forecast called for earnings of $1.11 to $1.16 a share.

Revenue rose 1% to $114.19 billion, missing the $116.29 billion expected by analysts polled by Thomson Reuters.

International sales rose 2.9% to $33 billion, or 5.4% on a constant currency basis.

Input costs rose 1%.

Looking ahead, the company forecast earnings of $1.22 to $1.27 a share for its current quarter, below the $1.29 per-share profit currently expected by analysts.

Chief Financial Officer Charles Holley said while the company will leverage expenses for the year, the second quarter will be “challenging,” given expense pressures in the international and corporate segments. “Expense leverage may not be delivered evenly across the quarters, but we believe that by executing our plans, we will continue to reduce expenses and improve productivity,” he said.

Earlier this week, Wal-Mart declined to sign on to a legally-binding pact meant to prevent disasters like the Bangladesh building collapse that killed more than 1,100 garment workers last month. Instead the retailer unveiled its own plan for improving safety at Bangladesh garment factories, saying it would hire an outside auditor and require factory owners to renovate when needed or risk being removed from its list of authorized factories.

Shares fell 2% to $78.28 in recent premarket trading. The stock has risen 35% in the past 12 months.

 

Kohl’s profit falls, but beats estimates

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Kohl’s Corp. (NYSE:KSS) said Thursday its first-quarter profit fell to $147 million, or 66 cents per share, compared to $154 million, or 63 cents per share a year earlier. The retailer’s revenue fell to $4.19 billion from $4.24 billion from a year-ago quarter. Wall Street analysts expected the company to earn 57 cents a share on net sales of $4.27 billion, according to a survey by FactSet. Same-store sales fell 1.9% for the quarter, compared to rising 0.2% for the same quarter a year ago. Kohl’s ended the quarter with 1,155 stores in 49 states, compared with 1,134 stores at the same time last year. Kohl’s provided initial guidance for the fiscal quarter ending Aug. 3 of $1.00 to $1.08 per share. The guidance is based on total sales growth of 1% to 3% and comparable store sales growth of 0% to 2%. Kohl’s shares were up nearly 6% in premarket trading.

 

LAYOFFS ALWAYS SURGE BY 30% DURING AN ECONOMIC RECOVERY – RIGHT?

3 comments

Posted on 4th April 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , ,

It’s funny how this story hasn’t made it onto the front page of Marketwatch or the other MSM propaganda agencies. Layoffs in the 1st quarter of this year were the highest since 2011. Layoffs in March were 30% higher than last March. That is a sure sign of an economic recovery. Right? 

The Obamanistas will immediately claim the surge is due to the dreaded sequester. FALSE!!!!

There were only 1,448 government drones laid off in March. For the math challenged, that equals 2.9% of the total layoffs. The devastating sequester cuts are an Obama and MSM storyline that is FALSE!!!

Retail layoffs are up 52% in the 1st three months of this year versus last year. I thought the consumer was recovering. I thought jobs were being created. Why would retailers be laying off 52% more employees than last year if the economy is improving? Inquiring minds want to know.

http://www.challengergray.com/press/PressRelease.aspx?PressUid=266

First quarter layoffs highest in a year

Published: April 4, 2013 at 7:31 AM

CHICAGO, April 4 (UPI) — The monthly number of layoffs at U.S. firms has exceeded the same month a year earlier for four of the past six months, a private employment firm said.

Outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas said there were 49,255 announced job layoffs in March, which was a drop of 11 percent from February, but an increase of 30 percent from March 2012 when 37,880 job cuts were announced.

March is the second consecutive month and the fourth of the past six in which announced cuts exceeded the same month of the previous year.

Add it all up and job cut announcements January through March were the highest of any quarter since 2011, the firm said.

In the first quarter of the year, employers announced 145,041 layoffs, a 5.6 percent increase from the fourth quarter of 2012, which included 137,361 job cut announcements, and a 1.4 percent climb from January through March in 2012.

Chief Executive Officer John Challenger said the retail environment looked especially precarious.

“While consumer spending is up in 2013, many retailers have been fighting for their lives since the end of the recession,” Challenger said, pointing out that Best Buy, JC Penney, Sears and Kmart have all announced job cuts recently and movie rental chain Blockbuster has shuttered its business.

WHEN THE MALLS COME TUMBLING DOWN

27 comments

Posted on 8th January 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , ,

Excellent article from Jeff Jordan http://jeff.a16z.com/2012/12/21/why-malls-are-getting-mauled/ about the coming day of reckoning for our mall based retail paradigm. These malls will come tumbling down. There are 1,000 large malls in the country and over 200 of them have vacancy rates over 35%. They constitute the ghost malls of America. The thousands of strip malls are in even worse shape, as mom and pop retailers don’t have the staying power of dying behemoths like Sears and JC Penney. The author points to on-line retailing as the reason for the coming demolition of malls across America. He is partly right. The numbers speak for themselves.

In 2007 the total retail sales, excluding auto sales,  in America were $3.09 trillion. In 2012 they will be approximately $3.45 trillion. That is a 12% increase in five years. This is not very good considering government reported inflation was 11% and real inflation for real people was closer to 20%. If you back out gasoline sales, then retail sales only grew by 8.7%. Now we get to the internet retail revolution. Internet retail sales totaled $309 billion in 2007 and will total $435 billion in 2012, a phenomenal 41% increase in five years. If you back that out, then retail sales from bricks and mortar mall based stores only grew by 6% in the last five years. This is an epic fail. We know for a fact that Sears and JC Penney are in death spirals. One or both are the anchors in most of the largest malls in the country. Their eventual bankruptcy will be the final nail in the coffin of mall based retailing. As the price of gasoline continues to rise, internet sales will continue to eat away at bricks and mortar. We are watching a slow motion train wreck in progress.

Jeff Jordan’s charts showing vacancy rates in malls reveals another truth. With vacancy rates this high, real estate developers should be going bankrupt, as their rental income can’t possibly be covering the interest expense on their loans to the Wall Street banks. The Wall Street banks have pretended the loans are being paid and the developers are pretending to pay them. Ben Bernanke and the Fed have instructed the Wall Street banks to not foreclose on these developers for non-payment, waiting for the economy to recover. It hasn’t happened and will not happen. There are hundreds of billions of bad debt sitting on JP Morgan, Cititcorp and the rest of the criminal cabal banks that should be written off today. The imminent demise of Sears and JC Penney will be the reality check as developers go under en masse.

The delusional retail CEOs will never admit the truth until it is too late. These brilliant strategists all use the same game plan. As sales continue to decline, they cut staff and reduce benefits. Have you been in a big box retailer lately? Try finding a worker who knows anything. As the experience of physically visiting a retail store becomes so repugnant that it makes you physically ill, you do more of your purchasing on-line. It’s a slow steady spiral downward for bricks and mortar retailing – except for JC Penny were it is a rapid spiral. Most of the major retail chains have either stopped expansion or slowed it dramatically since 2007. Even with no new stores, sales continue to deteriorate. Middle class America has run out of money. The lack of expansion is about to transition to the closing of thousands of stores in the next few years.

Maybe the government can make lemonaide out of lemons. The 200 or 300 ghost malls can be converted to FEMA holding facilities or massive soup kitchens and homeless shelters after the USD collapses. I always try to find the bright side to a bad situation. :)  

 

Why Malls Are Getting Mauled

Online is clearly taking share from brick and mortar…this is likely to continue
—International Council of Shopping Centers, last week

America has too many malls.

I’ve recently blogged that many traditional brick-and-mortar retailers are being threatened with “economic destruction” by their advantaged online competition.  In an interview with Bloomberg TV, anchorwoman Nicole Lapin asked about the implications of this dynamic on retail real estate.  I said I hadn’t studied it, but I thought the ramifications would be very big and very negative (I believe the phrase “apocalyptic” was used).

I’ve since had the opportunity to spend some time looking at this issue, and I believe we’re seeing clear signs that the e-commerce revolution is seriously impacting commercial real estate.  Online retailers are relentlessly gaining share in many retail categories, and offline players are fighting for progressively smaller pieces of the retail pie.  A number of physical retailers have already succumbed to online competition including Circuit City, Borders, CompUSA, Tower Records and Blockbuster, and many others are showing signs of serious economic distress.  These mall and shopping center stalwarts are closing stores by the thousands, and there are few large physical chains opening stores to take their place.  Yet the quantity of commercial real estate targeting retail continues to grow, albeit slowly.  Rapidly declining demand for real estate amid growing supply is a recipe for financial disaster.

There are very few thriving physical retailers these days outside of the daily consumables markets.  I did a quick analysis on the high-level health of the National Retail Federation’s list of the Top 100 retailers in 2012, focusing on merchandise retailers that would likely be located in malls (removing grocery, drug, restaurant and online retailers).  I looked at three measures of retailer health: total sales growth, comp store sales growth and number of stores.

Stores.org Top 100 Retailers

The analysis doesn’t paint a very pretty picture regarding the health of the leading physical retailers in the United States.  Total sales growth is mixed and is negative for 20% of the sample.  Comp store sales growth—arguably the key measure of retailer health—is also mixed and a quarter of the sample is negative.  And note that many of these sales results include the retailers’ online segments, so the picture for their physical stores is even worse.  Lastly, store counts are simply stagnant—about as many top retailers shrank their store count as expanded it, and precious few are expanding aggressively.  The largest retailers in the U.S. do not look very healthy.  And if they’re struggling, it’s likely that their more marginal physical competitors are struggling even more.

I went back to the Top 100 retailers in 2007 to see how that crop had fared five years later and found that four of these top retailers had already gone away through Chapter 11.  Interestingly, the picture of these four doesn’t look that different than the 2012 list.

2007 chart

Source: Stores.org Top 100 Retailers

This declining retailer health is directly impacting malls and shopping centers in the form of very high vacancy rates and sluggish rents—exactly what you’d expect to see where supply exceeds demand.  Both factors deteriorated quickly during the economic crisis of 2008-09, but they’ve shown virtually no improvement since in spite of improved economic conditions.  The recession was the catalyst, but competition from online retailers can only be the continued driver.  The mall business isn’t very healthy either.

Regional Mall Trends

Neighborhood and Community Center Trends

These trends are hitting the market capitalizations of most of the largest owners of retail real estate.  Simon, General Growth, DDR and Kimco between them own over 600 MILLION square feet of U.S. retail real estate, according to nreionline.  Simon’s stock has performed strongly, but the other three stocks have created virtually no value over the past decade.

Stock Performance

Source: Yahoo! Finance

Most real estate professionals understand that profound changes are afoot.  Don Wood, CEO of Federal Realty Investment Trust, says  “there is too much retail supply in this country.”  The Wall Street Journal reports “Green Street Advisor, an analysis firm that tracks REITs, has forecast that 10% of the roughly 1,000 large malls in the U.S. will fail within the next 10 years and be converted into something with far less retail.  That’s a conservative estimate; many mall CEOs predict the attrition rate will be higher”.  And Daniel Hurwitz, president and CEO of DDR, observes, “I don’t think we’re overbuilt, I think we’re under-demolished.”

I agree with the above perspectives, although I believe they likely understate the eventual impact on malls.  A report from Co-Star observes that there are more than 200 malls with over 250,000 square feet that have vacancy rates of 35% or higher, a “clear marker for shopping center distress.”  These malls are becoming ghost towns.  They are not viable now and will only get less so as online continues to steal retail sales from brick-and-mortar stores.  Continued bankruptcies among historic mall anchors will increase the pressure on these marginal malls, as will store closures from retailers working to optimize their business.  Hundreds of malls will soon need to be repurposed or demolished.  Strong malls will stay strong for a while, as retailers are willing to pay for traffic and customers from failed malls seek offline alternatives, but even they stand in the path of the shift of retail spending from offline to online.

This in turn creates further opportunity for online commerce.  If I were thinking of starting a new retail brand right now, I would unquestionably start it online.  And many very talented entrepreneurs are doing just this! I personally shop at Bonobos for pants, J.Hilburn for sweaters, Ledbury for shirts and Warby Parker for eyeglasses.  All of these brands design and source their own goods.  They historically would have started in the mall but they now are starting online, a trend that will undoubtedly continue.  There clearly will be fewer new offline retailers to take the space vacated by the disappearing brick-and-mortar chains, further pressuring malls.

And in an ironic turn, many of these online brands are experimenting with offline stores—but typically with some important twists.  Bonobos and Warby Parker have built showrooms in their New York offices where consumers can come in and try on samples.  But if the consumer wants to purchase items, then the companies fulfill the product from their warehouses—they don’t stock inventory in their “stores”.  Bonobos has expanded this concept into a few additional locations, but not mall locations.  Instead, they are selecting lower cost, non-mall locations and using emails to their online customers to drive folks to these locations.  They do this because a consumer’s purchasing typically expands after a visit to their physical store, and the costs are not high given the lack of inventory and lower rents and staffing costs.  If this trend expands, it will provide further challenges to malls.

In researching this post, I came across a fascinating (and slightly morbid) website called deadmalls.com, a site that chronicles the tales of hundreds of already or soon-to-be dead malls.  Co-founder Brian Florence writes, “I started deadmalls.com with my friend Peter Blackbird in 2000 when we both realized that Pete had mountains of data about dead and dying malls stuck up in his head.  Why keep this information to yourself?  And, realizing the burgeoning power of the Internet and its ability to draw in more information, the site was created to harness stories of woe and merriment from others.  It’s been a great success.”

Unfortunately for mall owners, the content on deadmalls.com is about to expand substantially.  There just are too many malls in America, and this will only get worse.

RETAILERS – REALITY CHECK TIME

21 comments

Posted on 8th September 2010 by avalon in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , , ,

Having worked for a big box retailer for 14 years, I understand the dynamics of a high growth rollout of stores as a key to increasing market share and profits. Some of the best retail names in the US have practiced the identical strategy of concentrating many stores in each market to drive the small competitors out of business. This strategy worked wonders for Lowes, Wal-Mart, Target and Kohl’s during the early part of this decade. The combination of solid same store sales and opening new stores is a fantastic combination during good times. The results actually make the CEOs of these companies think they are brilliant. Their store expansion models based on rosy assumptions are followed like they can’t go wrong.

What these CEOs didn’t realize was that their expansion plans were based on lies and frauds. If they had advisors who could give them a reality check, they could have avoided the massive downsizing that awaits them. Their hubris didn’t leave room for a reality check. The population of the US has grown from 281 million in 2000 to approximately 308 million today. We’ve had a 10% population increase in 10 years. Consumer expenditures have grown from $6.7 trillion in 2000 to $10.3 trillion today. This is a 54% increase over the course of the decade. Amazingly, real average weekly earnings have only gone up by 6% in the last decade.

The chart below tells the story that retail CEOs have been ignoring for a decade. Consumer credit has advanced from $1.5 trillion in 2000 to $2.4 trillion today. This 60% increase in consumer debt has allowed workers who have barely increased their earnings to spend like they made a lot more money. This debt fueled consumption binge led major retailers to expand in order to keep up with the delusional consumers.   

Graph: Total Consumer Credit Outstanding

Retail America has run directly into a brick wall. Below are charts detailing the expansion history of four of the most admired retailers in America. Lowes grew their store count from 600 to 1,700 over the course of the decade, a 183% increase. Wal-Mart grew their store count from 4,000 to 8,500, a 113% increase. Target grew their store count from 1,000 to 1,750, a 75% increase. Kohl’s grew their store count from 300 to 1,050, a 250% increase. Same store sales are the true measure of a retailer’s health. When comp store sales are +5% or better, retailers make substantial profits and confidently build new stores. As the charts below clearly show, comp store sales have been in a substantial downtrend since 2006. The new stores that have been built in existing markets are over cannibalizing their existing stores.

Lowes has 500 more stores today than it had in 2005, $4 billion more sales, and $1 billion less profits. Target has 340 more stores today than it had in 2005, $12 billion more sales, and the same profit. Kohl’s has 240 more stores than it had in 2006, $1.6 billion more sales, and $100 million less profit. Only Wal-Mart has kept the profits flowing, mostly due to its international expansion. The tough times have only just begun for these retailers.

Lowe's - Annual Sales Growth

Walmart - Annual Sales Growth

Target - Annual Store Count Growth

Target - Annual Sales Growth

Kohl's - Annual Store Count Growth

Kohl's - Annual Sales Growth

The American consumer is still heavily indebted. Much of the retail spending in the last decade came from mortgage equity withdrawals. Using your home as an ATM is history. Home equity is at an all-time low and 25% of homeowners are underwater. Home prices are destined to fall another 20%. There are 15 million people unemployed. Consumer expenditures still account for 70% of GDP. In order for the US economy to achieve equilibrium, consumer spending will need to regress back to 65% of GDP. This will require an annual reduction in consumer spending of $800 billion. The CEOs of these retailers have not grasped the implications of this coming adjustment in our consumer society.

There are three major errors that have been committed by every retailer in America. They failed to recognize that the spending per household was 30% over inflated due to debt financed demand. They then extrapolated the spending per household using a 5% to 10% growth rate. Lastly, they ignored the fact that their competitors had the same strategy. There are 1.5 million retail establishments in the US. Thousands of these stores are going out of business every year.

Lowes, Wal-Mart, Target, and Kohl’s have yet to recognize their predicament. They are still blinded by their hubris. The point of recognition will occur within the next year. Each of these retailers will be closing hundreds of underperforming stores in the next two years. Time for a reality check.