PROMISES ARE EASY – MATH IS HARD

11 comments

Posted on 12th June 2012 by Administrator in Economy

,

It isn’t a problem that people in the modern world are living longer. The average working stiff should have paid attention in math class. People should have saved at least 10% of their income per year in order to ensure a retirement not based on eating Alpo three days per week. Sadly, few people understand math. They were lured into debt by the Wall Street/corporate Media machine and forgot to save. Now they’re panicked and want BIG GOVERNMENT to save their sorry asses. Well guess what? The corrupt politicians didn’t pay attention in math class either. They are REALLY REALLY good at making promises in order to get elected, they just aren’t very good at figuring out how to fullfill those promises.

The chart below paints about as bleak a picture of our future as you can get. You have hundreds of millions of Boomer era people who are retiring at ages between 59 and 65 who will live another 20 years, expecting BIG GOVERNMENT to fund their old age. This is supposed to be paid for by a dwindling number of younger workers. One itsy bitsy tiny problem. MATH!!!!

It is mathematically impossible to fund 23 year retirements for hundreds of millions of old folks with money that does not exist and cannot be generated by the existing number of younger workers. Your options are few. You can dramatically increase the retirement age. You can reduce the promised benefits. You can dramatically increase taxes on the younger workers. Or you can print the money out of thin air and destroy the purchasing power of the younger generations through inflation.

I wonder which “solution” our fearless leaders will choose? 

 

Fun with pensions

Jun 11th 2012, 15:48 by The Economist online

The burden of increased longevity in the rich world

ON JUNE 6th François Hollande, France’s new president, unveiled plans to reverse a planned rise in the official retirement age to 62. In most other countries the trend is in the other direction. According to a new report from the OECD, increases in the official retirement age are planned or underway in 28 out of its 34 member countries. As can be seen from the chart below, pensionable ages have failed to keep pace with longevity. This comes at an increasing cost to the state. The OECD expects governments’ expenditure on pensions to rise from 8.4% to 11.4% of GDP between 2010 and 2050. And in most countries people retire earlier than the official retirement age. In 1970 the average Frenchman entering retirement could expect to live for just over ten years. Now he could expect to live for 23.

 

 

 

NOT THE BOOMERS FAULT!

10 comments

Posted on 9th June 2012 by Wyoming Mike in Economy

, ,

From Messn: It’s not the fiscally responsible boomers fault, it’s their lazy ass kids who won’t move out that are screwing them over. Happy Friday. Enjoy!

Boomers giving away too much? As they feel more pressure to support their children and aging parents, their own financial stress grows. In a poignant scene in HBO’s “Girls,” the parents of a young 20-something living in New York inform her that they will no longer be giving her money every month. She will need to get a job and learn how to support herself. Hannah, the 20-something, protests. She later returns to her parents’ hotel room to beg them to reconsider. Her mother refuses. She’s worked hard, she tells her daughter, and as a college professor close to retirement, she deserves a comfortable retirement, along with the lake house she’s always wanted.

As young adults struggle to find their footing in this economy, often turning to their parents for help, many baby boomer parents find themselves trapped between their own financial security and that of their children. A new survey from Ameriprise Financial found that more than half of boomers have allowed their grown children to move back home with them rent-free, despite the fact that their own financial stability has deteriorated over the past five years.

The survey reveals that many baby boomer parents are feeling simultaneous pressure to help their aging parents and struggling children, and to shore up their own savings and investments as retirement approaches. Many of them are also unable to work as long as they planned, which further hurts them financially, says Suzanna de Baca, vice president of wealth strategies at Ameriprise Financial. “Boomers are feeling significantly less confident that they can maintain their lifestyle and retire on time,” she says.

These six emerging trends explain why baby boomers feel so financially squeezed:

1. Baby boomers feel financial pressure from all sides. In addition to their own investments being knocked down during the recession, many boomers were forced to retire earlier than planned due to job loss or health issues, which hurt their earnings. At the same time, they want to help their adult children, many of whom are struggling in today’s job market, as well as their own parents.

“We’re seeing boomers under a great deal of pressure to help other family members,” de Baca says. In the survey, four in 10 boomers said it was important for them to help their children or grandchildren pay for college. Just over two in 10 said it was important for them to help provide financial security for their parents.

2. Boomers feel more pressure to support their adult children than they did five years ago. “Parents have always helped their kids with college and education, but now it seems to be increasing pretty significantly,” de Baca says. “It’s not just college, but prolonged support.” More than half of boomers said they worry their children won’t have enough financial resources to fund a financially secure retirement.

3. Boomers don’t realize that the help they give to family members is hurting their own financial situation. Just 10% of boomers say the help they provide their parents is slowing down their own retirement savings, and one in 3 said the same about the support they give their grown children. But de Baca says the impact is probably far more widespread than that — people often just don’t realize it. “They’re not necessarily taking money out of a qualified retirement account, but that’s just one element of the complete retirement picture,” she says. In fact, even inviting a child to live at home can have a negative effect on savings, she adds.

Five years ago, 44% of boomers said they were working on increasing their savings, while today, just one in 4 say they are doing so. Prioritizing their own retirement savings over other demands isn’t easy; more than half of boomers say they would help a parent afford long-term care insurance before putting more money into their own retirement accounts.

4. Boomers are less ready for retirement than they were five years ago. Only one in three boomers reports being very confident in personal financial security. In 2007, 39% of boomers said they were very optimistic about their own financial futures. This year, just 17% of respondents said the same.

5. Families avoid awkward money conversations, which can compound financial strain. While boomers and their adult children alike say they are talking about money issues more than they were five years ago, many are still shying away from what they fear could be uncomfortable discussions. Half of boomers said they were taught growing up that money is something one doesn’t talk about. “They also feel like it’s none of their business — ‘I haven’t talked to my aging parents, they’re very private, I shouldn’t bother them’ . . . but the truth is, money is a family affair, and if you don’t address it now, you’ll have to address it later,” de Baca says.

6. Parents think it’s their own fault that their children don’t know how to manage money. De Baca says that even though many parents think they missed their opportunity to impart money lessons when their children were younger, it’s not too late to start. She urges parents to talk to their adult children about budgeting, planning and even retirement planning. For parents of younger children, she says, it’s never too early to begin those conversations. More than half of adult children in the survey said they wished money had been discussed more openly when they were growing up.

The guilt baby boomer parents feel over not having imparted financial lessons earlier might motivate them to give their children more money — which could further prevent those children from learning how to live on a budget.

THE FRAUD & THEFT WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES

72 comments

Posted on 7th May 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The BEA reported the latest figures for personal income, personal consumption expenditures and the savings rate last week. The government mouthpieces in the mainstream media obediently reported that personal income and expenditures reached an all-time high in March. The chart below shows the ever increasing level of expenditures by consumers since this supposed economic recovery began in the 4th quarter of 2009. All good Keynesian economists know that consumer spending is always good for America, no matter how it is achieved. We must be in a recovery if income and spending are reaching new highs, right? That is the fraudulent storyline being propagandized to the non-questioning lapdog public. A false storyline and data that has been massaged harder than a Secret Service agent by a Columbian hooker will not lead to a happy ending. Some critical thinking, a calculator, and some common sense reveal the depth of the fraud and expose the theft being committed by the avaricious governing elite at the expense of the prudent working middle class.

 

Digging into the data on the BEA website to arrive at my own conclusions, not those spoon fed to a willfully ignorant public by CNBC and the rest of the fawning Wall Street worshipping corporate media, is quite revealing. It divulges the extent to which Ben Bernanke and the politicians in Washington DC have gone to paint the U.S. economy with the appearance of recovery while wrecking the lives of senior citizens and judicious savers. Only a banker would bask in the glory of absconding with hundreds of billions from senior citizen savers and handing it over to criminal bankers. Only a government bureaucrat would classify trillions in entitlement transfers siphoned from the paychecks of the 58.4% of working age Americans with a job or borrowed from foreigner countries as personal income to the non-producing recipients. How can taking money from one person or borrowing it from future generations and dispensing it to another person be considered personal income? Only in the Delusional States of America.

If you really want to understand what has happened in this country over the last forty years, you need to analyze the data across the decades. This uncovers the trends over time that has led us to this sorry state of affairs. The chart below details the major components of personal income over time as a percentage of total personal income. It tells the story of a nation in decline and on an unsustainable path that will ultimately result in a monetary collapse.  

               
 

1970

1980

1990

2000

Apr-08

2010

Mar-12

Total Personal Income

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Wages & Salaries

66.1%

60.2%

56.7%

56.2%

52.7%

51.9%

51.8%

Interest Income

8.3%

12.1%

15.5%

11.6%

11.2%

8.2%

7.4%

Dividend Income

2.9%

2.9%

3.5%

4.5%

6.5%

5.8%

6.2%

Government transfers

8.5%

11.3%

11.7%

12.2%

14.3%

17.9%

17.3%

It is always fascinating to compare data from 1970, prior to Nixon closing the gold window and allowing bankers and politicians to print and spend to their hearts delight, to present day. The chart above paints a picture of a nation of workers and savers descending into a nation of parasites and spenders. Any rational person knows that income comes from one of two methods: working or investing. A country can only grow by working, saving, investing and living within its means.  Money taken from workers and investors and transferred to the non-working and spenders is NOT INCOME. It is just redistribution from producers to non-producers. The key takeaways from the chart are:

  • Working at a job generated two-thirds of personal income in 1970 and barely half today. This explains why only half of Americans pay Federal taxes.
  • One might wonder how we could be in the third year of a supposed economic recovery and wages and salaries as a percentage of total personal income is lower than pre-crisis and still falling.  
  • Government transfers have doubled as a proportion of “income” in the last forty years. The increase since 2000 has been accelerating, up 122% in 12 years versus the 55% increase in GDP.  The slight drop since 2010 is the result of millions falling off the 99 week unemployment rolls.
  • Luckily it is increasingly easy to leave unemployment and go on the dole for life. The number of people being added to the SSDI program has surged by 2.2 million since mid-2010, an 8.5% increase to 28.2 million people. Applications are swelling with disabilities like muscle pain, obesity, migraine headaches, mental illness (43% of all claims) and depression. Our leaders have set such a good example of how to commit fraud on such a grand scale that everyone wants to get a piece of the action. It’s like hitting the jackpot, as 99% of those accepted into the SSDI program (costing $132 billion per year) never go back to work. I’ve got a nasty hangnail. I wonder if I qualify. I’d love to get one of those convenient handicapped parking spaces. Once I get into the SSDI program I would automatically qualify for food stamps, a “free” government iPhone, “free” government cable and a 7 year 0% Ally Financial (85% owned by Timmy Geithner) auto loan for a new Cadillac Escalade. The SSDI program is now projected to go broke in 2016. I wonder why?    

 

  • A nation that rewarded and encouraged savings in 1970 degenerated into a country that penalizes savers and encourages consumption. The government, mainstream media, and NYT liberal award winning Ivy League economists encourage borrowing and spending as the way to build a strong nation. Americans have been convinced that borrowing to appear successful is the same as saving and investing to actually achieve economic success.
  • Americans saved 7% to 12% of their income from 1960 through 1980. As Wall Street convinced delusional Boomers that stock and house appreciation would fund their luxurious retirements, savings plunged to below 0% in 2005. Why save when your house doubled in price every three years? Americans rationally began to save again in 2009 but Bernanke’s zero interest rate policy put an end to that silliness. Why save when you are being paid .15%? Buying Apple stock at $560 (can’t miss) and getting in on the Facebook IPO (PE ratio of 99) is a much better bet. The national savings rate of 3.8% is back to early 2008 levels. I wonder what happens next?

 

  • The proportional distribution between interest and dividends which had been in the 3 to 4 range for decades is now virtually 1 to 1, as Ben Bernanke has devastated the lives of millions of poor senior citizen savers while continuing to subsidize his wealthy stock investors buddies on Wall Street.

Now for the bad news. The Baby Boom generation has just begun to retire en masse. Government transfers will automatically accelerate over the next decade as Social Security and Medicare transfer payments balloon. Government transfer payments have already increased by 3,250% since 1970, while wages and salaries have increased by 1,250%. The non-existent inflation touted by Ben Bernanke accounts for 590% of this increase. We have passed a point of no return. As the number of Americans receiving a government EBT into their bank account grows by the day and the number of working Americans remains stagnant, the chances of a politician showing the courage to address our un-payable entitlement liabilities is near zero. Americans choose to deal with problems in a reactive manner rather than a proactive manner. Until the next inescapable crisis, the fraud and looting will continue until morale improves. 

 Billions of $

1970

1980

1990

2000

Apr-08

2010

Mar-12

Total Personal Income

$835

$2,257

$4,852

$8,548

$12,457

$12,361

$13,328

Wages & Salaries

$552

$1,358

$2,750

$4,800

$6,565

$6,413

$6,905

Interest Income

$69

$272

$753

$989

$1,397

$1,012

$984

Dividend Income

$24

$65

$169

$381

$810

$723

$821

Government transfers

$71

$256

$570

$1,041

$1,786

$2,217

$2,312

 

A Few Evil Men

“Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its powers, but the truth is the FED has usurped the government. It controls everything here (in Congress) and controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will… When the FED was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here… A super-state controlled by international bankers, and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure!” – Rep. Louis T. McFadden

  

The largest fraud and theft being committed in this country is being perpetrated by the Central Bank of the United States; its Wall Street owners; and the politicians beholden to these evil men. The fraud and theft is being committed through the insidious use of inflation and manipulation of interest rates. The biggest shame of our government run public education system is their inability or unwillingness to teach even the most basic of financial concepts to our children. It’s almost as if they don’t want the average person to understand the truth about inflation and how it has slowly and silently destroyed their livelihood while enriching the few who create it. Converting the chart above into inflation adjusted figures reveals a different picture than the one sold to the general public on a daily basis. Even using the government manipulated CPI figures from the BLS, the ravages of inflation are easy to recognize.

Billions of Real $

1970

1980

1990

2000

Apr-08

2010

Mar-12

Total Personal Income

$4,937

$6,261

$8,569

$11,374

$13,304

$13,007

$13,328

Wages & Salaries

$3,264

$3,767

$4,856

$6,387

$7,011

$6,748

$6,905

Interest Income

$408

$754

$1,330

$1,316

$1,492

$1,065

$984

Dividend Income

$142

$180

$298

$507

$865

$761

$821

Government transfers

$420

$710

$1,007

$1,385

$1,907

$2,333

$2,312

CPI

38.8

82.7

129.9

172.4

214.8

218

229.4

Total wages and salaries have risen by only 112% on an inflation adjusted basis over the last 42 years. This is with U.S. population growth from 203 million in 1970 to 313 million people today, a 54% increase. On a real per capita basis, wages and salaries rose from $16,079 in 1970 to $22,060 today, a mere 37% increase in 42 years. That is horrific and some perspective will reveal how bad it really is:

  • The average new home price in 1970 was $26,600. The average new home price today is $291,200. On an inflation adjusted basis, home prices have risen 85%.  
  • The average cost of a new car in 1970 was $3,900. The average price of a new car today is $30,748. On an inflation adjusted basis, car prices have risen 33%.
  • A gallon of gasoline cost 36 cents in 1970. A gallon of gas today costs $3.85. On an inflation adjusted basis, gas prices have risen 81%.
  • The average price of a loaf of bread in 1970 was 25 cents. The average price of a loaf of bread today is $2.60. On an inflation adjusted basis, a loaf of bread has risen 76%.

In most cases, the cost of things we need to live have risen at twice the rate of our income. This data is bad enough on its own, but it is actually far worse. The governing elite, led by Alan Greenspan, realized that accurately reporting inflation would reveal their scheme, so they have been committing fraud since the early 1980s by systematically under-reporting CPI as revealed by John Williams at www.shadowstats.com:

       

The truth is that real inflation has been running 5% higher than government reported propaganda over the last twenty years. This explains why families were forced to have both parents enter the workforce just to make ends meet, with the expected negative societal consequences clear to anyone with two eyes. The Federal Reserve created inflation also explains why Americans have increased their debt from $124 billion in 1970 to $2.522 trillion today, a 2000% increase. Wages and salaries only rose 1,250% over this same time frame. Living above your means for decades has implications.   

 

The country, its leaders, its banks and the American people should have come to their senses after the 2008-2009 melt-down. Politicians should have used the crisis to address our oncoming long-term fiscal train wreck, the recklessly guilty Wall Street banks should have been liquidated and their shareholders and bondholders wiped out, the bad debt rampant throughout the financial system should have been purged, and American consumers should have reduced their debt induced consumption while saving for an uncertain cloudy future. These actions would have been painful and would have induced a violent agonizing recession. It would be over now. We would be in the midst of a solid economic recovery built upon reality. Iceland told bankers to screw themselves in 2008. They accepted the consequences of their actions and experienced a brutal two year recession.

    

The debt was purged, banks forced to accept their losses, and the citizens learned a hard lesson. Amazingly, their economy is now growing strongly. This is the lesson. Wall Street is not Main Street. Saving Wall Street banks and wealthy investors did not save the economy. Stealing savings from little old ladies and funneling it to psychopathic bankers is not the way to save our economic system. It’s the way to save bankers who made world destroying bets while committing fraud on an epic scale, and lost.

Despite the assertion by the good doctor Krugman that there are very few Americans living on a fixed income being impacted by Bernanke’s zero interest rate policy, there are actually 40 million people over the age of 65 in this country that might disagree. There are another 60 million people between the ages of 50 and 64 years old rapidly approaching retirement age. We know 36 million people are receiving SS retirement benefits today. We know that 49 million people are already living below the poverty line, with 16% of those over 65 years old living in poverty. Do 0% interest rates benefit these people? Those over 50 years old are most risk averse, and they should be. Despite the propaganda touted by Wall Street shills and their CNBC mouthpieces, the fact is that the S&P 500 on an inflation adjusted basis is at the same level it was in 1996. Stock investors have gotten a 0% return for the last 16 years. The market is currently priced to deliver inflation adjusted returns of 2% over the next ten years, with the high likelihood of a large drop within the next year.

Ben Bernanke’s plan, fully supported by Tim Geithner, Barack Obama and virtually all corrupt politicians in Washington DC, is to force senior citizens and prudent savers into the stock market by manipulating interest rates and offering them no return on their savings. A fixed income senior citizen living off their meager $15,000 per year of Social Security and the $100,000 they’ve saved over their lifetimes was able to earn a risk free 5% in a money market fund in 2007, generating $5,000 or 25% of their annual living income. Today Ben is allowing them to earn $150 per year. From the BEA info in the chart above you can see that Ben’s ZIRP has stolen $400 billion of interest income from senior citizens and prudent savers and dropped it from helicopters on Wall Street. This might explain why old geezers are pouring back into the workforce at a record pace. Maybe Dr. Krugman has an alternative theory.

          

Another doctor, with a penchant for telling the truth, described in no uncertain terms the depth of the fraud and theft being perpetrated on the American people (aka Muppets) by Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve, their masters on Wall Street, and the puppets in Washington DC:

“We are not doing very well. The economy is just coming along at a snail’s pace. The first quarter numbers that we just got last week were not very good at all. The GDP number was 2.2%. That was a disappointment, but you know, it was all automobiles. 1.6 out of the 2.2 was motor vehicle production. So, people were catching up after not being able to buy them the year before. So, this is a very weak economy… I think the real danger is that this is a bubble in the stock market created by low long-term interest rates that the Fed has engineered. The danger is, like all bubbles, it bursts at some point. Remember, Ben Bernanke told us in the summer of 2010 that he was going to do QE2 and then ultimately they did Operation Twist. The purpose of that was to make long-term bonds less attractive so that investors would buy into the stock market. That would raise wealth and higher wealth would lead to more consumption. It helped in the fourth quarter of 2010 and maybe that is what is helping to drive consumption during the first quarter of this year. But the danger is you get a market that is not with the reality of what is happening in the economy, which is, as I said a moment ago, is really not very good at all.” – Martin Feldstein

The entire bogus recovery is again being driven by subprime auto loans being doled out by Ally Financial (85% owned by the U.S. government) and the other criminal Wall Street banks. The Federal Reserve and our government leaders will continue to steer the country on the same course of encouraging rampant speculation, deterring savings and investment, rewarding outrageous criminal behavior, purposefully generating inflation, and lying to the average American. It will work until we reach a tipping point. Dr. Krugman thinks another $4 trillion of debt and a debt to GDP ratio of 130% should get our economy back on track. When this charade is revealed to be the greatest fraud and theft in the history of mankind, Ben and Paul better have a backup plan, because there are going to be a few angry men looking for them.

Henry Ford knew what would happen if the people ever became educated about the true nature of the Federal Reserve:

“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”  



 

INCOMPREHENSIBLE

104 comments

Posted on 28th April 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , ,

When I read stories like the one below and the information about how much people have saved for their retirement, I’m flabbergasted by the delusional, utterly ridiculous behavior of American consumers. We know for a FACT that 60% of all workers in the country have less than $25,000 of total savings. Many have absolutely nothing saved. Even better, over 25% of all 401k participants have borrowed against their 401k plan as of the end of 2010. This data is for people with jobs. How about the 88 million people who aren’t in the labor market? I wonder how much savings they have. In order to retire at 65 and live above the poverty line, people need to have saved at least a couple hundred thousand dollars. Those who retired in the 1980s and 1990s had equity in their homes, many had defined benefit pensions, and could rely on Social Security and their savings.

Today you have 55 year old people with $25,000 of liquid assets earning .15%, underwater homes, no pension plans, and $15,000 of credit card debt. They cannot afford to retire. They will stay in the labor market until the day they die. This is not good news for the Millenials.

What I find incomprehensible is that Americans ramped up their spending in the 1st quarter of 2012 and their savings rate in back at a four year low of 3.9%. With the data about retirement savings being so pitiful consumers SHOULD BE saving 10% of their disposable income like they did in the early 1980s. Going further into debt in order to enjoy going out to dinner two times per week is about the stupidest thing anyone could do. And our leaders, media and Ivy League trained economists actually encourage this delusional foolish behavior. Can this many Americans be this stupid? What are they thinking? Are they counting on the government to come to their rescue when they are 75 years old, broke, homeless, and begging?

I find myself shaking my head and talking to myself when I see this data and watch the behavior of the majority. We’re surely doomed.   

Delaying retirement: 80 is the new 65

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — A quarter of middle-class Americans are now so pessimistic about their savings that they are planning to delay retirement until they are at least 80 years old — two years longer than the average person is even expected to live.

It sounds depressing, but for many it’s a necessity. On average, Americans have only saved a mere 7% of the retirement nest egg they were hoping to build, according to Wells Fargo’s latest retirement survey that polled 1,500 middle-class Americans.

While respondents (whose ages ranged from 20 to 80) had median savings of only $25,000, their median retirement savings goal was $350,000. And 30% of people in their 60s — right around the traditional retirement age of 65 — that were surveyed had saved less than $25,000 for retirement.

As a result, many people aren’t in a hurry to quit their day jobs.

Three-fourths of middle-class Americans expect to work throughout retirement. And this includes the 25% of Americans who say they will “need to work until at least age 80″ before being able to retire comfortably.

The 2012 Retirement Confidence Survey: Job Insecurity, Debt Weigh on Retirement Confidence, Savings

March 2012 EBRI Issue Brief #369 Paperback, 36 pp. PDF, 1,585 kb Employee Benefit Research Institute,  2012

Download Issue Brief PDF

Executive Summary

  • Americans’ confidence in their ability to retire comfortably is stagnant at historically low levels. Just 14 percent are very confident they will have enough money to live comfortably in retirement (statistically equivalent to the low of 13 percent measured in 2011 and 2009).
  • Employment insecurity looms large: Forty-two percent identify job uncertainty as the most pressing financial issue facing most Americans today.
  • Worker confidence about having enough money to pay for medical expenses and long-term care expenses in retirement remains well below their confidence levels for paying basic expenses.
  • Many workers report they have virtually no savings and investments. In total, 60 percent of workers report that the total value of their household’s savings and investments, excluding the value of their primary home and any defined benefit plans, is less than $25,000.
  • Twenty-five percent of workers in the 2012 Retirement Confidence Survey say the age at which they expect to retire has changed in the past year. In 1991, 11 percent of workers said they expected to retire after age 65, and by 2012 that has grown to 37 percent.
  • Regardless of those retirement age expectations, and consistent with prior RCS findings, half of current retirees surveyed say they left the work force unexpectedly due to health problems, disability, or changes at their employer, such as downsizing or closure.
  • Those already in retirement tend to express higher levels of confidence than current workers about several key financial aspects of retirement.
  • Retirees report they are significantly more reliant on Social Security as a major source of their retirement income than current workers expect to be.
  • Although 56 percent of workers expect to receive benefits from a defined benefit plan in retirement, only 33 percent report that they and/or their spouse currently have such a benefit with a current or previous employer.
  • More than half of workers (56 percent) report they and/or their spouse have not tried to calculate how much money they will need to have saved by the time they retire so that they can live comfortably in retirement.
  • Only a minority of workers and retirees feel very comfortable using online technologies to perform various tasks related to financial management. Relatively few use mobile devices such as a smart phone or tablet to manage their finances, and just 10 percent say they are comfortable obtaining advice from financial professionals online.

BOOMERS – THE GIANT TURD CLOGGING THE DRAIN

193 comments

Posted on 21st February 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , ,

These Boomer stories always have the same theme. The poor Boomers caught a bad break  because companies stopped defined benefit pension plans, and they got laid off and the stock market crashed at the wrong time. They are going to work until they are 70 because they like to work. This is a bullshit storyline. Guess what? Life is tough. Everyone has bad things happen over the course of their lives, and then you die. The Boomers didn’t catch a bad break. They had a 20 year bull market in their peak earnings years. The economy boomed during most of their lifetime in the workforce. There is one simple reason they need to work until they are 70 – they lived above their means and did not save money for a rainy day or enough for their retirement. They used debt to finance a lifestyle much higher than they could have lived using cash and savings.

Now they are in their 50s and 60s without a pot to piss in. These are the people piling into the SSDI program. These are the people declaring that the Federal government needs to do more to help them. They will never vote for a politician that threatens their entitlements. And now they are clinging to jobs that should be going to the Millenials entering the workforce. If they had lived frugal lives, saved for their retirement, and cared more about future generations, we wouldn’t be in the current predicament. Instead, they are functioning as a giant turd clogging up the drain of the American economy.

For boomers, it’s a new era of ‘work til you drop’

JOHN ROGERS
Associated Press

LOS ANGELES — When Paula Symons joined the U.S. workforce in 1972, typewriters in her office clacked nonstop, people answered the telephones and the hot new technology revolutionizing communication was the fax machine.

Symons, fresh out of college, entered this brave new world thinking she’d do pretty much what her parents’ generation did: Work for just one or two companies over about 45 years before bidding farewell to co-workers at a retirement party and heading off into her sunset years with a pension.

Forty years into that run, the 60-year-old communications specialist for a Wisconsin-based insurance company has worked more than a half-dozen jobs. She’s been laid off, downsized and seen the pension disappear with only a few thousand dollars accrued when it was frozen.

So, five years from the age when people once retired, she laughs when she describes her future plans.

“I’ll probably just work until I drop,” she says, a sentiment expressed, with varying degrees of humor, by numerous members of her age group.

Like 78 million other U.S. Baby Boomers, Symons and her husband had the misfortune of approaching retirement age at a time when stock market crashes diminished their 401(k) nest eggs, companies began eliminating defined benefit pensions in record numbers and previously unimagined technical advances all but eliminated entire job descriptions from travel agent to telephone operator.



At the same time, companies began moving other jobs overseas, to be filled by people willing to work for far less and still able to connect to the U.S. market in real time.

“The paradigm has truly shifted. Now when you’re looking for a job you’re competing in a world where the competition isn’t just the guy down the street, but the guy sitting in a cafe in Hong Kong or Mumbai,” says Bill Vick, a Dallas-based executive recruiter who started BoomersNextStep.com in an effort to help Baby Boomers who want to stay in the workforce.

Not only has the paradigm shifted, but as it has the generation whose mantra used to be, “Don’t trust anyone over 30,” finds itself now being looked on with distrust by younger Generation X managers who question whether boomers have the high-tech skills or even the stamina to do what needs to be done.

“I always have the feeling that I have to prove my value all the time. That I’m not some old relic who doesn’t understand social media or can’t learn some new technique,” says Symons, who is active on Twitter and Facebook, loves every new time-saving software app that comes down the pike, and laughs at the idea of ever sending another fax.

“Ahh, that’s just so archaic,” she says.

Meanwhile, as companies have downsized, boomers have been hurt to some degree by their own sheer numbers, says Ed Lawler of the University of Southern California’s Marshall School of Business.

The oldest ones, Lawler says, aren’t retiring, and more and more the youngest members of the generation ahead of them aren’t either. It’s no longer uncommon, he says, for people to work until 70.

“People who would have normally been out of the workforce are still there, taking jobs that would have gone to what we now call the unemployed,” he said.

John Stewart of Springfield, Mo., sees himself becoming part of that new generation that never stops working.

“No, I don’t see myself retiring,” says Stewart, who is media director for a large church. “I think I would be bored if I just all of a sudden quit everything and did whatever it is retired people do.”

Then there are the financial considerations. Like many boomers, the 60-year-old acknowledges he didn’t put enough aside when he was younger.

For more than 30 years, Stewart ran his own photography business, doing everything from studio portraits to illustrating annual reports for hospitals and other large corporations to freelancing for national magazines and newspapers.

As the news media began to struggle, the magazine and newspaper work dried up. As the economy tanked, his large corporate clients began to use cheaper stock photos purchased online rather than hire him to take new ones. Eventually he took his current job, producing videos of pastors’ sermons and photos for church publications. He says he is glad to be one boomer to make a late career change and keep working.

“There were times when the money was really rolling in,” he says of his old business. “But somehow retirement wasn’t really in the forefront of my thinking then, so saving for it wasn’t an automatic thing.”

Steve Wyard, of Los Angeles, says he and his wife have planned carefully for retirement.

He’s worked for 30 years for a company that sells and services commercial washers and dryers, and she’s been with a health maintenance organization for even longer. They’ve invested cautiously, lived in the same house for decades and meticulously paid down the mortgage.

Plus he’s one of the few boomers who figures that, no matter what technology comes along, his job won’t go away.

“Everyone has to do the laundry,” he says.

Still, he and his wife have two sons, 19 and 21, to put through college, and Wyard, 61, sees that pushing back retirement for several years.

Until then he plans to keep working, which is what every physically able boomer should consider doing, says USC’s Lawler.

Union membership, which has been declining for years, now includes only about 10 percent of all eligible U.S. employees, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Meanwhile, the number of defined benefit retirement funds offered by private enterprise have fallen from about one in three employers in 1990 to about one in five in 2005.

With unions no longer in a strong position to fight for benefits like pensions, with jobs disappearing or going overseas, and with Gen Xers and even younger Millennial Generation members coveting their jobs, Lawler warns this is no time for boomers to quit and allow the skills they’ve spent a lifetime building to atrophy.

“My advice is above all don’t retire,” he says. “If you like your job at all, hold onto it. Because getting back in in this era is essentially impossible.”