700,000 AMERICANS SIGN PETITIONS TO SECEDE

20 comments

Posted on 10th December 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

What does this mean? The liberal MSM has ridiculed this movement with their usual misinformation and lies. This is just another sign of the Fourth Turning mood change. the mood grows darker by the day. The smell of conflict is in the air. The linear believing punditry actually think that some ridiculous fiscal cliff compromise is going to solve our problems. They proclaim that 2013 will be the year of economic recovery. Sorry linear thinking progressives. Things are going to get a lot worse before they get better. You can laugh off the talk of secession, but it is a reflection of the dire circumstances that confront this country today. This Fourth Turning gives all indications of heating up in the near future.

Embrace the Doom

13 comments

Posted on 8th December 2012 by Novista in Economy |Politics |Social Issues |Technology

, , , , , ,

the print edition

 A little science, history, and speculation to reveal everything you never wanted to know about the dooms and disaster the universe has in store.

From the ordinary worries about the next financial crisis to the possibilities for war, civil unrest, or martial law or even “Mad Max” world, to things that fall out of the sky (ask the dinosaurs) or Extreme Weather, to magnetic pole shift, coronal mass ejections, novae and supernovae complete with massive x-radiation — and beyond the Solar System to the fartherest reaches of the cosmos.

“Embrace the Doom” is a Grand Tour like nothing you’ve ever seen before.

all my projects

 

I’ll say this about indie publishing — CreateSpace (“an Amazon company”) is easy to use. KDP, Kindle Direct Publishing is another kettle of fish, and none of these people seem to talk to each other. KDP has two user guides, the ‘easy’ one is inadequate and the ‘techy’ one is incomprehensible — both assume everyone in the world uses Microsoft Windows.

No idea why the Doom print version does not have the Look Inside feature when all the others do. Oh well.

My only cost — other than time capital — has been ordering print proofs (and shipping that costs more than my cost of said books, grrrr. So it goes.) I’ll welcome any feedback, particularly on Kindle problems. I have three ways of reading that format on Ubuntu linux and two readers on Windows 7 new laptop, and none agree on the display, maybe the format is just flaky!

 

THE GOOD DOCTOR ON SECESSION

42 comments

Posted on 14th November 2012 by Wyoming Mike in Economy

, ,

This was an interview reposted on RonPaul.com from a couple years ago when Rick Perry still had balls and was talking about Texas Seceding. As always, Dr. Paul educates and tells it like it is.

Ron Paul: Secession Is an American Principle
By RonPaul.com on November 13, 2012

This weekend I got a couple of calls from the media asking me questions about Rick Perry, our governor here in Texas and the statements he made about possible secession. Now, he didn’t call for secession, but he was restating a principle that was long held and at least in the original time of our country, and that is that there was a right to secession.

Actually, after the Civil War, nobody believes there is a so-called right to secession, but it is a very legitimate issue to debate because all of the states that came into the Union before the Civil War believed they have a right to secede and New England in the early part of the 19th century actually considered it, and nobody questioned them about whether they had the right to do it or not.

Since the Civil War, it’s been sort of a dead issue, but he brought it up. It stirred the media and believe me, it really stirred some of the liberal media where they started really screaming about what is going on here. “This is un-American”, I heard one individual say, “This is treasonous to even talk about it.”

Well, they don’t know their history very well because if they think about it, it’s an American tradition. It’s very American to talk about secession. That’s how we came into being. Thirteen colonies seceded from the British and established a new country, so secession is very much an American principle.

What about all the strong endorsements we have given over the past decade or two of those republics that seceded from the Soviet system? We were delighted with this. We never said, “Oh no. Secession is treasonous”.

No. Secession is a good principle. Just think of the benefits that would have come over these last 230-some years if the principle of secession had existed. That means the federal government would always have been restrained, not to overburden the states with too much federalism, too many federal rules and regulations.

But since that was all wiped out with the Civil War, the federal government has grown by leaps and bounds and we have suffered the consequences, and we need to reconsider this. It’s not un-American to think about the possibility of secession. This is something that’s voluntary. We came together voluntarily. A free society means you can dissolve it voluntarily. That was the whole issue was about.

Just remember one of the reasons that Wilson drove us in unnecessarily into World War I. He talked about what we have to give, have every country in the world the benefit of self-determination, a good principle. Of course, I don’t think he really believed that. But self-determination is a good principle. It’s a very American principle, so to me it’s a shame that we can’t discuss this.

You know, it’s interesting that so many of us have been taught for so many years, and as long as I can remember from the first grade on up taking the pledge of allegiance that we have a republic that’s “indivisible” and we have been preached that and preached it. So therefore, there is no contest, no question since the Civil War that we have even the thought that this could happen.

But you know what a lot of people don’t talk about and they really don’t even know about is who wrote the pledge to the flag. The pledge to the flag came from, for instance, Bellamy, an avowed Socialist who wanted to put into concrete in the pledge this principle of being indivisible, and he did it, you know, for the celebration ironically 400 years of the celebration of the landing of Christopher Columbus, so it was in 1892.

I mean, the pledge of allegiance has not been here, you know, all our history. So I think it’s worth of discussion. I think people should discuss this because right now, the American people are sick and tired of it all and I think the time will come when people will consider it much more seriously is when the federal government can no longer deliver. That time will come when the dollar collapses.

No matter what they do and how many promises they have and how many bailouts they have, they can’t do it if the money doesn’t work. So then, the independence of the states will come back and it doesn’t mean that you’ll be un-American to even contemplate what might have to be done once the dollar crashes.

IS SECESSION POSSIBLE?

89 comments

Posted on 12th November 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

This certainly came out of the blue. The liberal media is in full ridicule mode today about the secession petitions being circulated in 20 states. Liberal pundits never see change coming. They are “progressives” who think the world moves forward in a straight line. Fourth Turnings are a complete surprise to these nitwits. Even though the recent examples of the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia have happened within the last 20 years, they are blind to the possibility. Thomas Jefferson saw it clearly in 1816. When the ruling elite abscond with all the riches and leave the people to fight wars and die a slow death caused by man made inflation and debt, the end of the grand experiment is near.

Former President of the United States Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to William H. Crawford, Secretary of War under President James Madison, on June 20, 1816: “In your letter to Fisk, you have fairly stated the alternatives between which we are to choose : 1, licentious commerce and gambling speculations for a few, with eternal war for the many ; or, 2, restricted commerce, peace, and steady occupations for all. If any State in the Union will declare that it prefers separation with the first alternative, to a continuance in union without it, I have no hesitation in saying, ‘let us separate’. I would rather the States should withdraw, which are for unlimited commerce and war, and confederate with those alone which are for peace and agriculture.”

 

Secession petitions flood White House website

President Obama’s reelection last week has prompted a slew of requests to secede from the United States.

Using the Obama administration’s own We the People website, nearly two dozen petitions have sprung up asking the Obama administration for permission to withdraw from the Union.

The two most popular petitions, Texas and Louisiana, have both drawn more than 10,000 signatures each as of Monday morning. The Texas petition needs only 7,000 more signatures to trigger an official White House response.

None of the petitions explicitly cite Obama’s reelection as a reason for independence, but all were created after last week’s elections.

“The citizens of the US suffer from blatant abuses of their rights such as the [National Defense Authorization Act], the [Transportation Security Administration], etc,” the Texas petition charges. “Given that the state of Texas maintains a balanced budget and is the 15th largest economy in the world, it is practically feasible for Texas to withdraw from the union, and to do so would protect it’s citizens’ standard of living and re-secure their rights and liberties in accordance with the original ideas and beliefs of our founding fathers which are no longer being reflected by the federal government.”

Others are more vague for in their reasons for wanting to leave the country.

“just like in 1860 the south secede from the union. 2012 the state of georgia would like to withdraw from the USA,” one of the Georgia petitions states.

Most of the petitions simply quote the Declaration of Independence in their request to depart the country.

As of Monday, residents of Kentucky, Oregon, Montana, North Dakota, Mississippi, North Carolina, Florida, Georgia, New York, New Jersey, Colorado, Arkansas, South Carolina, and Missouri have all expressed interest in dissolving their relationship with the United States.

Celebrating the 150 Year Anniversary of Secession

30 comments

Posted on 19th February 2011 by Reverse Engineer in Politics

, , , ,

And yes, it is once again Coming Soon to a Theatre Near You.

 

RE

 

Confederate Descendants Mark 150th Anniversary

by The Associated Press

4_APTOPIX_Civil_War_Sesquicentennial.sff.jpg
Enlarge Associated PressMembers of Sons of Confederate Veterans fire their rifles in celebration in Montgomery, Ala. on Saturday, Feb. 19, 2011 following the re-enactment of the 1861 swearing-in ceremony of Confederate States of America provisional President Jefferson Davis on the steps of the Alabama State Capitol.

4_APTOPIX_Civil_War_Sesquicentennial.sff.jpg

Associated PressMembers of Sons of Confederate Veterans fire their rifles in celebration in Montgomery, Ala. on Saturday, Feb. 19, 2011 following the re-enactment of the 1861 swearing-in ceremony of Confederate States of America provisional President Jefferson Davis on the steps of the Alabama State Capitol.

3_Civil_War_Sesquicentennial.sff.jpg
Associated PressMembers of Sons of Confederate Veterans and others watch, Saturday, Feb. 19, 2011 in Montgomery, Ala., as they witness the re-enacting of the swearing in ceremony of CSA President Jefferson Davis on the steps of the Alabama State Capitol.

2_Civil_War_Sesquicentennial.sff.jpg
Associated PressMembers of Sons of Confederate Veterans march up Dexter Ave. in Montgomery, Ala. on Saturday, Feb. 19, 2011 to celebrate the re-enactment of the 1861 swearing-in ceremony of Confederate States of America provisional President Jefferson Davis on the steps of the Alabama State Capitol.

1_Civil_War_Sesquicentennial.sff.jpg
Associated PressTyron Crowley, playing the part of Confederate Civil War President Jefferson Davis watches from the porch, on Saturday, Feb. 19, 2011 in Montgomery, Ala., following the re-enacting of the swearing in ceremony of CSA President on the steps of the historic Alabama State Capitol.

text size A A A

MONTGOMERY, Ala. February 19, 2011, 05:26 pm ET

Confederate descendants and re-enactors dressed in soldiers’ uniforms and hoop skirts marched down the main avenue in Montgomery on Saturday to mark the 150th anniversary of the inauguration of Confederate President Jefferson Davis.

They started at a fountain where slaves were once sold, past the church that Martin Luther King Jr. led during the Montgomery Bus Boycott, and ended at the Capitol steps, where Alabama’s old and modern history often collide.

It’s the spot where former Gov. George C. Wallace proclaimed “segregation forever” in 1963 and where King concluded the historic Selma-to-Montgomery voting rights march in 1965.

The city no longer rolls out the red carpet for the Sons of Confederate Veterans like it did 50 years ago, when the centennial of Davis’ inauguration was a state-coordinated celebration with past and present governors and officials from all ranks of government.

On Saturday, state and city officials gave permission for the SCV to march, but had no role in the events. Elected officials from the governor to the mayor chose to stay home or go to other events.

The reception was even colder from African-American leaders in the state.

“The whole celebration is akin to celebrating the Holocaust,” state NAACP President Benard Simelton said.

Simelton said elected officials stayed away because they knew attendance would be viewed as a slap in the face to African-Americans, who make up one-fourth of Alabama’s population.

Black leaders had discussed holding a protest like the one held in December at a Secession Ball in Charleston, S.C., but decided against it.

“We didn’t want to give them more publicity,” said Rep. Alvin Holmes, the longest serving black member of the Alabama Legislature.

A downtown shopper, Shirley Williams of Montgomery, who is black, shook her head as she walked by the parade. She said she was offended the parade occurred during Black History Month.

“It represents things in the past that were not positive. Some things ought to be remembered, but this brings up too many painful things people went through,” she said.

Sons of Confederate Veterans members, who trace their history to ancestors who fought in the war, call it the “War Between the States” or the “War of Secession” rather than the Civil War. They say its origins have been distorted by modern historians.

SCV member Randy Beeler said he drove from Paducah, Ky., to “send a message the war was fought over states’ rights. Slavery was an issue, but it was not the main issue.”

“Yes, it was about states’ rights. It was about states’ rights to have slavery,” retorted Rep. Holmes, a retired college history teacher.

One of the organizers, Chuck McMichael, a past national commander of the SCV, called the comparison of the march to celebrating the Holocaust ludicrous.

“In many ways the Union Army acted more like the German army of the 1940s with its scorched earth policy,” said McMichael, a high school history teacher from Shreveport, La.

The Montgomery event is the biggest event planned by the SCV this year to mark the sesquicentennial. In 2012, McMichael said the action will switch to Richmond, Va., which replaced Montgomery as the capital of the Confederacy.

Holding up a Confederate flag near the end of the ceremony, he told the crowd, “As long as there blows a southern breeze, this flag will fly in it.”

———

Online:

Sons of Confederate Veterans: http://www.scv.org/