BANKERS & POLITICIANS WILL STEAL EVERYTHING YOU’VE GOT WITHOUT BLINKING AN EYE

15 comments

Posted on 29th March 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , ,

It will happen here. Do not keep more money than you need to pay your monthly bills in any bank. It will happen over a weekend when you won’t have the ability to get your cash. They will disallow electronic transactions for the good of the country. The time is approaching. Why keep money in a bank or money market. The bank fees total more than the interest they pay. Your money isn’t safe in a bank. It is inaccessible in a bank.

“I Went To Sleep Friday A Rich Man, I Woke Up Poor”

 
Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 03/29/2013 16:02 -0400

Another non-Russian, non-oligarch, non-billionaire, non-tax-evader speaks up…

So much has been written of the Cypriot bail-ins and massive haircuts for the uninsured depositors – assumed to be nasty oligarchic Russian money-launderers – that, it appears, the reality for people living in Cyprus has been forgotten. We noted earlier the small business issues, but as the Sydney Morning Herald reports, real lives have been destroyed. 65-year-old John Demitriou retired (back) to the picturesque fishing village of Liopetri, Cyprus, with his life-savings of around $1 million living off the interest it paid from Laiki ‘Popular’ Bank and spending it on his grandchildren. He was in no hurry to invest it; to spend it on big purchases.

Then, after being told just last week by his bank manager, “there’s no problem, nothing to worry about,” he so painfully notes, “I went to bed Friday as a rich man. I woke up a poor man,” as Laiki’s depositors over EUR100,000 were devastated thanks to the bail-in. The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs notes, “there is no need for special measures,” to help John (or the other 5000 Cypriot-Australians on the island) as he exclaims, “it’s not Russian money; it’s not black money; it’s my money.”

 

Via Sydney Morning Herald,

 
 

”Very bad, very, very bad,’‘ says 65-year-old John Demetriou, rubbing tears from his lined face with thick fingers. ”I lost all my money.”

 

John now lives in the picturesque fishing village of Liopetri on Cyprus’ south coast. But for 35 years he lived at Bondi Junction and worked days, nights and weekends in Sydney markets selling jewellery and imitation jewellery.

 

He had left Cyprus in the early 1970s at the height of its war with Turkey, taking his wife and young children to safety in Australia. He built a life from nothing and, gradually, a substantial nest egg. He retired to Cyprus in 2007 with about $1 million, his life savings.

 

He planned to spend it on his grandchildren – some of whom live in Cyprus – putting them through university and setting them up. There would be medical bills; he has a heart condition. The interest was paying for a comfortable retirement, and trips back to Australia. He also toyed with the idea of buying a boat.

 

He wanted to leave any big purchases a few years, to be sure this was where he would spend his retirement. There was no hurry. But now it is all gone.

 

”If I made the decision to stay, I was going to build a house,” John says. ”Unfortunately I didn’t make the decision yet.

 

”I went to sleep Friday as a rich man. I woke up a poor man.”

 

His money was all in the Laiki ”Popular” Bank which was the main casualty of Cyprus’ bailout package set by the European Union. Laiki is to be dismantled. Savings of less than €100,000 are to move to the Bank of Cyprus. Anything more than that will almost certainly be wiped out as the bank is wound down, its remaining assets taken by the bank’s creditors.

 

Last week he heard a rumour that the bank was in trouble and went into Aiya Napa to ask his bank manager – a friend – if he should move his life savings.

 

‘There’s no problem, nothing to worry about,’‘ he was told.

 

Not so. ”I go to bed and I can’t sleep. I walk around, I have a coffee. I am thinking about my family.”

 

John’s tears flow. As he chokes up, his son George, who moved to Cyprus in 1990, explains.

 

”The whole family, we used to work at the markets. I would work at the markets on the weekend to help my parents while my mates were off having fun. Honest work in honest jobs. Now all that hard work is paying the debts of other people and the government. It’s disgusting, to be honest.”

 

George says he can start again – if things get worse he and his family might move back to Australia.

 

”But not my dad. He can’t go back to Australia. He is not allowed to fly because of his heart, and anyway where would he live? He has no house. He will have €100,000 left to live off. Soon he’s not going to have a cent to his name.”

 

John has a thin hope. His money was sitting in the bank in Australian dollars instead of euros, so he wonders if it would be exempt from the bank’s collapse. But the bank’s doors are closed, so he doesn’t even know to whom he should put that argument.

 

”For the moment I am ‘sitting on charcoal’, as they say,” waiting to see if he gets burnt.

 

”It’s not Russian money, it’s not black money. It’s my money.”

 

There are almost 5000 Cypriot-Australians on the island. Most are – or were – self-sufficient veterans of the 1950s engineering boom or the 1974 war who came back to retire or to be with family (John is looking after his 90-year-old mother).

 

This week Britain stopped paying pensions into Cypriot accounts, advising expatriates to open a British bank account instead.

 

Australia’s high commission in Nicosia has already fielded inquiries from dual nationals seeking advice on their pensions. They were told to set up different payment arrangements, a spokeswoman for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said.

 

”We expect the main impact will be for Australians who have invested large sums in Laiki Bank or the Bank of Cyprus,” she said. ”There is no need for special measures at this stage.”

YOU ARE ALREADY BEING CYPRUSED, BECAUSE MATH IS HARD

43 comments

Posted on 20th March 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , , , ,

The internet has been abuzz all week about the plan to steal money directly from bank depositors in Cyprus. The Eurocrats want to abscond with 3% to 15% of bank depositor cash as a bribe to keep from letting the Cyprus banks collapse under the weight of bad debt created by the policies of the Eurocrats. There is outrage among the critical thinking alternate media and yawns from the Larry Fink’s and Barry Ritholtz’ of the world who depend on muppets to keep investing with them. The MSM does their usual propaganda spiel about the FDIC backing up trillions in deposits with their $25 billion fund.

This could never happen in America. Right?

It has already happened and continues this very second. The ruling financial class are so supremely confident in your lack of math skills that they openly and blatantly steal money from your savings account every second of the day. They have been doing it since December 2008.

I take you back to the days of yesteryear – 2006 and 2007. In those pre-crisis days you could put your money in a Vanguard Money Market fund and earn a 5% return. Over this two year period, inflation averaged 3.2% according to our friends at the BLS. That means you were getting a REAL RETURN of 1.8%. Even if you don’t believe the BLS numbers, you weren’t losing by keeping money in a savings account.

Then the Wall Street/Federal Reserve created financial collapse occured in late 2008. In order to protect his owners on Wall Street, Helicopter Ben swooped in with free money for his boys in December 2008. He lowered the Federal Funds Rate to between 0% and .25% and has left the rate at this level to this day. You can see from the chart below that the last time the Fed dropped rates below 2% for a significant time period, they created the housing bubble. I wonder what 0% interest rates over 4.3 years will create?   

Now we get to the math. By lowering the Fed Fund Rate to near zero, Ben has thrown savers and senior citizens under the bus. For the last 4.3 years savers have been able to get a .15% return on their money. Over this same time frame the CPI has risen 10.4%.  Let’s put this into a real life example.

Suppose grandma has life savings of $100,000 that she needs to live off of to supplement her meager $13,000 of Social Security income. Back in 2007 she could earn $5,000 per year in interest to help her make ends meet. Since December 2008 she has been able to earn a total of $650 in interest at .15% rates. That means she would have $100,650 today.

But one problem. The 10.4% inflation has resulted in the $100,650 only having $90,200 of purchasing power today. This means that Ben Bernanke has already stolen 10% of your savings and handed it to his banker buddies. He is much more devious than the Eurocrats. They are being too transparent. Ben understands that our government run public school system matriculates functionally illiterate dullards into society and they will never figure out the beauty of inflationary stealing.

Of course it is much greater than the 10% calculated above. We know that true inflation is at least 2% greater than the BLS manipulated data. Therefore, the ruling class has actually stolen closer to 20% of your savings since December 2008.  

And the good news is that Bennie has absolutely no intention of raising the Federal Funds Rate for a few more years. By 2016 he will have stolen another 20% of your savings and no one will be protesting or rioting in the streets, because math is hard.

You’ve been CYPRUSED and didn’t even know it.

COMING TO A BANK NEAR YOU

92 comments

Posted on 18th March 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , , , ,

Make no mistake about it, this will happen in the United States at some point in the not too distant future. This is theft pure and simple. If you think the money you have in banks is yours, read this story and realize they will abscond with it whenever they choose to change the rules. Do you think your 401k is safe from the grubby hands of the government? You are naive. The ruling class don’t care about rules, laws or good faith. They have already pillaged most of the wealth in this country and they will not hesitate to steal the money out of your bank account. Bankers and politicians in Europe will do whatever it takes to protect the interests of the rich and powerful oligarchs. The bankers and politicians in this country are no different.

It will happen on a weekend. They will shutdown the ATMs. They will shut down the ability to electronically transfer money. Banks will close their doors. They will not announce their intentions in advance. They will proclaim that their actions are being done for the good of the country. In reality, they will be stealing your money in order to maintain their control, power and wealth. This blatant act of criminality being committed against the citizens of Cyprus by the Eurocrats is a warning shot to all citizens of the debt saturated, banker controlled developed world.

If you are one of those who believe it can’t happen here, then you haven’t studied history. It was exactly 80 years ago this month when FDR announced a banking holiday and declared that possession of gold was immediately illegal. The government set the price at which American citizens would receive when they handed over their gold to the government. Federal agents broke into safe deposit boxes and took the gold. It is much easier to steal our wealth today. In an instant they can electronically vaporize your wealth. 

As the oligarchs grow more desperate they will grow more extreme in their efforts to retain power. This is why they are trying to take our guns. They do not want an armed populace resisting when they try to abscond with our money. The only way to avoid this fate is to have cash in your possession, along with gold and silver. Be armed and be prepared to fight them. They are evil men and we will need to defeat them.

Cyprus Bank Deposits to Be Taxed in $13 Billion Bailout

By Rebecca Christie & Corina Ruhe -                  Mar 16, 2013 12:34 PM ET

Euro-area finance ministers agreed to an unprecedented tax on Cypriot bank deposits as officials unveiled a 10 billion-euro ($13 billion) rescue plan for the country, the fifth since Europe’s debt crisis broke out in 2009.

Cyprus will impose a levy of 6.75 percent on deposits of less than 100,000 euros — the ceiling for European Union account insurance — and 9.9 percent above that. The measures will raise 5.8 billion euros, in addition to the emergency loans,  Dutch Finance Minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem, who leads the group  of euro-area ministers, told reporters early today after 10 hours  of talks in Brussels. The International Monetary Fund may  contribute to the package and junior bondholders may also be tapped in a so-called bail-in, the ministers’ statement said.

Officials have struggled to find an agreement that would rescue Cyprus, which accounts for just half of a percent of the euro region’s economy, without unsettling investors in larger countries and sparking a new round of market contagion. Finance Minister Michael Sarris said the plan was the “least onerous”of the options Cyprus faced to stay afloat.

“This decision should not be compared to the ideal, but to the very real possibility that much more money could have been lost in a bankruptcy of the banking system or indeed of the country,” Sarris said in Brussels.

Late Meeting

Policy makers began meeting at 5 p.m. yesterday in a hastily convened gathering, seeking to overcome differences on bondholder losses while financial markets were closed.

“Further measures concern the increase of the withholding tax on capital income, a restructuring and recapitalisation of banks, an increase of the statutory corporate income tax rate and a bail-in of junior bondholders,” according to a statement released by ministers after the talks. It didn’t specify whether bank or sovereign bond holders could be affected.

The European Central Bank will use its existing facilities to make funds available to Cypriot banks as needed to counter potential bank runs. Depositors will receive bank equity as compensation.

President Nicos Anastasiades called leaders of the political parties to a meeting at 8:30 p.m. local time today. The Cypriot parliament will convene tomorrow to vote on legislation needed for the bailout.

‘Uncharted Territory’

While the tax on deposits carries some risks of setting a precedent for other countries in the euro area, the ECB has shown it’s prepared to do what it takes to preserve the currency union, said Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg Bank in London.

“We are optimistic that it will not spark massive contagion,” Schmieding said in a note. “Still, with the unprecedented haircut on Cypriot bank deposits we are in uncharted territory again.”

The tax on deposits, as well as hurting wealthy Russians with money in Cypriot banks, will also sting ordinary citizens. Some ATMs in the country ran out of cash, Erotokritos Chlorakiotis, general manager of the Cooperative Central Bank, told state-run CYBC.

Funds to pay the levy were frozen in accounts immediately, ECB Executive Board Member Joerg Asmussen said. The levy will be assessed before Cypriot banks reopen on March 19 after a March 18 national holiday. Sarris said electronic transfers will also be limited until then.

‘Unique Measures’

“As it is a contribution to the financial stability of Cyprus, it seems just to ask a contribution of all deposit holders,” Dijsselbloem said, noting the country’s financial industry was five times the size of its economy. The plan includes “unique measures” that address the “exceptional nature” of Cyprus and show “inflexible commitment to financial stability and the integrity of the euro area.”

The IMF will consider contributing money to the rescue, said IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde, who travelled to Brussels for the talks. “We believe that the proposal as outlined by Jeroen is actually sustainable,” she said.

Euro ministers expect the region’s bailout fund, the European Stability Mechanism, will approve a bailout proposal“by the second half of April 2013 and subject to completion of national procedures.”

Skeptics

Cyprus pledged to step up asset sales and enact budget cuts amounting to 4.5 percent of gross domestic product. The aid program, which should be completed by the second half of April, calls for its debt to be 100 percent of GDP by 2020. The EU forecasts it at 93 percent this year. The deal calls for the banking sector to shrink substantially by 2018.

Skeptics including Luxembourg’s Jean-Claude Juncker had said that imposing investor losses in Cyprus risked reigniting the financial crisis that has so far pushed five of the euro zone’s 17 members to seek aid. Last year, the euro area took what officials called a unique step to ask Greek bondholders to absorb losses.

Asmussen said tapping deposit holders was needed to expand Cyprus’s tax base. European Union Economic and Monetary Affairs Commissioner Olli Rehn called the assessment a strictly fiscal measure. Rehn had warned against so-called haircuts on depositors to avoid setting a destabilizing precedent.

When asked if a deposit assessment could be ruled out for future rescues, Rehn said in an interview: “It can and there is no concrete case where it should be considered.”

ECB Role

“This kind of stability fee is clearly a much better choice from the point of view of financial stability and Cypriot citizens than a full-scale bail-in, which would have led to very chaotic consequences in the Cypriot economy,” he said.

Cypriot banks are on track to regain access to ECB emergency lending facilities once they have been successfully recapitalized, Asmussen said. Cyprus is “systemically relevant” and needs assistance to ensure stability of the euro, Asmussen told reporters.

The ECB also will be available to euro-area banks that may need extra liquidity, Asmussen said. Authorities plan to ringfence Cypriot bank branches in Greece, through transactions with Greek banks that won’t require money from Greece’s rescue funds, he said.

Corporate tax rates in Cyprus will rise to 12.5 percent to 10 percent as part of the deal, Dijsselbloem said. Rehn told reporters that Russia, whose banks have loaned as much as $40 billion to Cypriot companies of Russian origin, would ease terms on its existing loans to Cyprus as the rescue unfolds. Cyprus’s finance minister is scheduled to fly to Moscow on March 20.

At the talks, the ministers also agreed to give extra time to Ireland and Portugal to repay loans to the European Financial Stability Facility. The euro group, IMF and ECB will approve the details of the extensions and the Cyprus deal once technical details have been ironed out and national parliaments have acted as needed, the finance ministers said in a statement.

WALL STREET TITANS SCREW YOU EVERY DAY

9 comments

Posted on 21st February 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

,

Yes American taxpayer – you have been fucked by Wall Street and your political “leaders”. Without directly stealing your money, the 5 biggest banks in the U.S. would make no money. They steal $83 billion per year from your pocket and then pay off politicians to keep the game going. They count on the fact that 99.5% of Americans think math is too hard. OK. That is your reality break of the day. Now back to the American Idol elimination round.

Too Big to Make Money?

 

Via Bloomberg,

… the biggest U.S. banks … make the case that size is a competitive advantage. It helps them lower costs and vie for customers on an international scale. Limiting it, they warn, would impair profitability and weaken the country’s position in global finance.

 

 

What if the billions of dollars they allegedly earn for their shareholders were almost entirely a gift from U.S. taxpayers?

 

 

Let’s start with a bit of background. Banks have a powerful incentive to get big and unwieldy. The larger they are, the more disastrous their failure would be and the more certain they can be of a government bailout in an emergency. The result is an implicit subsidy: The banks that are potentially the most dangerous can borrow at lower rates, because creditors perceive them as too big to fail.

 

Lately, economists have tried to pin down exactly how much the subsidy lowers big banks’ borrowing costs. In one relatively thorough effort, two researchers — Kenichi Ueda of the International Monetary Fund and Beatrice Weder di Mauro of the University of Mainz — put the number at about 0.8 percentage point. The discount applies to all their liabilities, including bonds and customer deposits.

 

Big Difference

 

Small as it might sound, 0.8 percentage point makes a big difference. Multiplied by the total liabilities of the 10 largest U.S. banks by assets, it amounts to a taxpayer subsidy of $83 billion a year. To put the figure in perspective, it’s tantamount to the government giving the banks about 3 cents of every tax dollar collected.

 

The top five banks — JPMorgan, Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. – - account for $64 billion of the total subsidy, an amount roughly equal to their typical annual profits (see tables for data on individual banks). In other words, the banks occupying the commanding heights of the U.S. financial industry — with almost $9 trillion in assets, more than half the size of the U.S. economy — would just about break even in the absence of corporate welfare. In large part, the profits they report are essentially transfers from taxpayers to their shareholders.

 

Neither bank executives nor shareholders have much incentive to change the situation. On the contrary, the financial industry spends hundreds of millions of dollars every election cycle on campaign donations and lobbying, much of which is aimed at maintaining the subsidy. The result is a bloated financial sector and recurring credit gluts. Left unchecked, the superbanks could ultimately require bailouts that exceed the government’s resources. Picture a meltdown in which the Treasury is helpless to step in as it did in 2008 and 2009.

 

Regulators can change the game by paring down the subsidy.

 

 

Once shareholders fully recognized how poorly the biggest banks perform without government support, they would be motivated to demand better. This could entail anything from cutting pay packages to breaking down financial juggernauts into more manageable units. The market discipline might not please executives, but it would certainly be an improvement over paying banks to put us in danger.

THE VERDICT IS IN – WALL STREET HAS WON

9 comments

Posted on 21st August 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , , , ,

Read this article from Chris Whalen carefully. The Wall Street banks are free to steal your money. The legislative, judicial and executive branches of the United States government agree that this is OK. Goldman Sachs, Jon Corzine and a myriad of other sociopathic predators have already gotten away with it. Not one banker has gone to jail for the greatest control fraud in the history of mankind. On some future weekend your owners are going to pull the plug and steal all your money, and do it legally because they write and interpret the laws as they deem fit. Get your money out of the Wall Street banks ASAP.

How Congress Helps the TBTF Banks Steal Your Money with Impunity

rcwhalen's picture

Submitted by rcwhalenon 08/20/2012 22:08 -0400

 

Well I won’t back down, no I won’t back down

You could stand me up at the gates of hell

But I won’t back down

 

Gonna stand my ground, won’t be turned around

And I’ll keep this world from draggin’ me down

Gonna stand my ground and I won’t back down

Tom Petty

 

There is a very important article on Jesse’s Cafe Americain blogspot, “Warren Pollock and Ann Barnhardt On the Increased Risk to Customers In the US Financial System,” that illustrates how the US bankruptcy laws now enable theft brazen theft of customer funds by the largest banks.  I have written about this issue in the past on ZH, but Pollock and Barnhart really do a nice job of presenting the issue.

 

http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2012/08/this-is-interesting-dis…

 

My friend and mentor Walker Todd of AIER, who worked as a legal counsel at the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and Cleveland, states the situation succinctly:

 

“Basically, there is a new 7th Circuit opinion saying that there is no reason to impose a constructive trust on a lender’s takings of customers’ funds from client commodity firms that were used (inappropriately) to secure the firms’ borrowings, as long as the lender can say that it did not know WITH  CERTAINTY that customers’ funds were being repledged.  Negligence and misappropriation (vs. knowing criminal intent) are now a sufficient excuse for letting the lender keep the money and go to the head of the line for distributions in bankruptcies of the client commodity firms.  Spread the word.”

 

Walker goes on to say that this decision does rise to the level of “what were they thinking’ when the Powers That Be think that somehow this is saving or strengthening the financial system.  He refers to the now infamous 2005 bankruptcy reform legislation, where the banks made themselves senior to the very customers and savers they are supposed to protect.  Pollock summarizes the situation nicely in the article:

 

“The way I read it was that basically you no longer have property rights. If you have your money in any (US) financial institution, you now have no property rights because in a crisis situation a bankruptcy judge now has the right to say that all of this speculation (by the banks and brokers) takes precedence over your savings.”

 

Another veteran attorney that I have quoted often in past articles about creditor rights comments thusly:

 

“This decision is just further incentive to steal.  And if you do it in Fl., state attorneys say they will not prosecute theft when conducted without the use of violence.  So, unless the broker threatens to injure customers that do not turnover money, in Fl., it’s freedom to steal.”

 

I won’t go over all of the fine post from Jesse’s Cafe Americain, but here are a couple of basic recommendation to readers of ZH and investors generally about the custody of customer funds:

 

First, no customer should EVER use a broker-dealer as custodian, either for securities or cash.  The 2005 bankruptcy reform legislation and the Seventh Circuit decision make clear that customers of a broker dealer have no legal protection from the predatory behavior of the large banks that clear for these firms.

Second, no customer should maintain funds in a depository about the FDIC insured limit if that bank has a broker dealer subsidiary.  Based on my reading of the Seventh Circuit decision, it is entirely possible for a bank to place a broker dealer affiliate into bankruptcy and then raid the customer accounts to protect the bank.  Keep in mind that the Seventh Circuit is simply interpreting the law as changed by the lobbyists for the TBTF banks.

 

Third, everyone in the financial markets needs to start pressing members of Congress to repeal the 2005 bankruptcy reform laws in its entirety.  The bankruptcy reform legislation passed during Bush II is one of the most hideous laws ever passed by the national congress.  And this travesty was supported and encouraged by the Fed and other regulators, proof again that the zombie banks are calling all of the shots in Washington.

 

The liberal notion of “regulation” begun in the 1930s has become a bad joke. This legal decision shows that the only way we can regain control of the US politically is to see the largest banks broken up.  Unfortunately, neither of the political candidates for the presidency is likely to do anything of the kind.  At the end of the day, the only alternative for people who will not live as slaves to the big banks may be to seek the peaceful overthrow of the government of the United States, at least as it currently exists today.  Shall we start the revolution now?  Or wait for the big banks to take everything that we have and more?