OBAMACARE – THE FUN HAS JUST BEGUN

14 comments

Posted on 2nd May 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

,

Bend over the doctor is in.

The Massive Obamacare Taxes Just Ahead

 
In 2013 (via American’s for Tax Reform):

Obamacare Surtax on Investment Income:  A  new, 3.8 percent surtax on investment income earned in households making at least $250,000 ($200,000 single). (Bill: PPACA, Reconciliation Act; Page: 2,000-2,003; 87-93)

Obamacare Medical Device Tax:  . Obamacare imposes a new 2.3 percent excise tax on gross sales. This will make everything from pacemakers to artificial hips more expensive. (Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,980-1,986)
 
Obamacare High Medical Bills Tax: Before Obamacare, Americans facing high medical expenses were allowed a deduction to the extent that those expenses exceeded 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI).  Obamacare now imposes a threshold of 10 percent of AGI.  Therefore, Obamacare not only makes it more difficult to claim this deduction, it widens the net of taxable income. According to the IRS, 10 million families took advantage of this tax deduction in 2009, the latest year of available data. Almost all are middle class. The average taxpayer claiming this deduction earned just over $53,000 annually. ATR estimates that the average income tax increase for the average family claiming this tax benefit will be $200 – $400 per year.  (Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,994-1,995)
 
Obamacare Flexible Spending Account Tax:  The 30 – 35 million Americans who use a pre-tax Flexible Spending Account (FSA) at work to pay for their family’s basic medical needs face a new Obamacare cap of $2,500. This will squeeze $13 billion of tax money from Americans over the next ten years. (Before Obamacare, the accounts were unlimited under federal law, though employers were allowed to set a cap.) Now, a parent looking to sock away extra money to pay for braces will find themselves quickly hitting this new cap, meaning they would have to pony up some or all of the cost with after-tax dollars.
 
There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. Nationwide there are several million families with special needs children and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education. This Obamacare tax provision will limit the options available to these families. (Bill: PPACA; Page: 2,388-2,389)
 
Starting in Tax Year 2014:
 
Obamacare Individual Mandate Non-Compliance Tax:  Starting in 2014, anyone not buying “qualifying” health insurance – as defined by President Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services — must pay an income surtax to the IRS. The Congressional Budget Office recently estimated that six million American families will be liable for the tax, and as pointed out by the Associated Press:  “Most would be in the middle class.”
 
In addition, 100 percent of Americans filing a tax return (140 million filers) will be forced to submit paperwork to the IRS showing they either had “qualifying” health insurance for every month of the tax year or they obtained an exemption to the mandate.
 
Americans liable for the surtax will pay according to the following schedule
 
  1 Adult 2 Adults 3+ Adults
2014 1%AGI/$95 1%AGI/$190 1%AGI/$285
2015 2%AGI/$325 2%AGI/$650 2%AGI/$975
2016 2.5%AGI/$695 2.5%AGI/$1390 2.5%AGI/$2085
(Bill: PPACA; Page: 317-337)
 
Obamacare Employer Mandate Tax:  If an employer does not offer health coverage, and at least one employee qualifies for a health tax credit, the employer must pay an additional non-deductible tax of $2,000 for all full-time employees.  This provision applies to all employers with 50 or more employees. If any employee actually receives coverage through the exchange, the penalty on the employer for that employee rises to $3,000. If the employer requires a waiting period to enroll in coverage of 30-60 days, there is a $400 tax per employee ($600 if the period is 60 days or longer). (Bill: PPACA; Page: 345-346)
 
 
Obamacare Tax on Health Insurers:  Annual tax on the industry imposed relative to health insurance premiums collected that year.  The tax phases in gradually until 2018.  Fully imposed on firms with $50 million in profits. (Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,986-1,993)
 
Starting in tax year 2018
 
 
Obamacare Tax on Union Member and Early Retiree Health Insurance Plans:  Obamacare imposes a new 40 percent excise tax on high cost or “Cadillac” health insurance plans, effective in 2018. This tax increase will most directly affect union families and early retirees, who are likely to be covered by such plans. This Obamacare tax will be levied on insurance policies whose premiums exceed $10,200 for an individual and $27,500 for a family.  Middle class union members tend to be covered by such plans in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan.  Higher threshold ($11,500 single/$29,450 family) for early retirees and high-risk professions. CPI +1 percentage point indexed. (Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,941-1,956)

1913

7 comments

Posted on 21st April 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

RETAIL SALES ALWAYS FALL DURING AN ECONOMIC RECOVERY – RIGHT?

6 comments

Posted on 12th April 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , ,

It was the Sequester!!! It was Easter!!! It was too cold!!! It was too much fiscal austerity!!!!

What we’ve got here is TOO MUCH BULLSHIT!!!

Wall Street, the MSM and your political hack representatives will try to spin our deteriorating economic calamity into gold, but report after report confirms that we are in recession and headed south. But, buy stocks anyway. Just because consumer spending accounts for 71% of GDP, why would a collapse in consumer spending have an impact on our economy? It takes a village of idiots to run this country.

Here is the link to the atrociously bad retail report:

http://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/marts_current.pdf

Here are my observations, which will be SLIGHTLY different than the bullshit you will hear on CNBC or read on Marketwatch:

  • Retail sales fell in March versus February by $2 billion, and shockingly January sales which had been reported as being higher, were revised lower. Your government drones doing their usual coverup.
  • The increase over last year of 2.8% is less than the real inflation rate of 5%.
  • Even auto sales dropped, despite 48% of sales from subprime loans and as long as 7 years.
  • If there is a housing recovery how could furniture and electronics sales be flat with last year? I guess Blackrock isn’t buying furniture for their millions of rental units.
  • How could Building Materials stores (Home Depot, Lowes) have flat sales if there is a housing recovery?
  • General merchandise store (Wal-Mart, Target) sales fell month over month and year over year. This is with 5% inflation. The profits of department stores are going to plummet in the 1st quarter.
  • Even internet sales were flat. They had been advancing at a 10% to 15% clip.
  • Even with food inflation of 5% to 10%, grocery store sales declined.
  • The fractional increase in restaurant and bar sales was due to inflation and people drowning their sorrows in alcohol.

This was a horrific retail report. The Obama tax increases, Obamacare premium increases, declining real wages for workers, and the continued QEing of the American middle class by Bernanke is why this is happening. It ain’t the fucking weather!!! 

 

Retail sales post biggest drop in 9 months

Spending falls by 0.4% in March as most stores take a hit

By Jeffry Bartash, MarketWatch

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Americans spent less at gasoline stations and most other stores in March, as retail sales posted the biggest decline in nine months.

The decline in sales — the biggest since last June — might be a sign that higher taxes and slower job creation are taking a bite out of the economy. A cold snap in March might also have limited sales for some retail items such as clothing. 

Retail sales in the U.S. fell 0.4% last month after a revised 1.0% gain in February, the Commerce Department said Friday. That was below the MarketWatch forecast of a 0.1% decline.

Sales for January were also revised to show a 0.1% drop instead of a 0.2% increase, suggesting that first-quarter growth might not be as strong as forecast. The U.S. is estimated to have grown 3.0% in the first quarter, according to the latest MarketWatch estimate.

The drop in retail sales is the latest in a string of reports, including last week’s disappointing employment number for March, signaling the U.S. economy has cooled off again.

The “recent data suggest that the economy took a step backward in March after coming out of the gates reasonably strongly to start the year,” said Jim Baird, chief investment officer at Plante Moran Financial Advisors.

Sales fell the sharpest at gasoline stations, down 2.2% in the month, as the price at the pump declined. The average cost of regular gas fell from $3.72 a gallon to around $3.57 in March, according to government figures.

Falling sales at gas stations are a good thing for consumers because it gives them more to spend on other items aside from basic necessities. Yet Americans also reduced purchases at many other stores.

Sales fell a seasonally adjusted 0.6% at auto dealers, 1.6% at electronic and appliance stores, 1.2% at general-merchandise outlets and 1.1% at department stores.

Retailers that sell books, music, hobby items, personal-care goods also posted lower sales. Even spending at groceries tapered off.

Many economists had predicted sales might soften in the spring as consumers began to feel the pinch of higher taxes or move to rebuild a savings rate that plunged at the end of 2012. Reductions in federal spending via a law known as the sequester and a slower pace of hiring may have also weighed on consumer spending.

Retail sales account for about one-third of consumer spending, the main engine of the economy. They are a good proxy for how fast the U.S. is growing, though the data is prone to sharp revisions like what occurred in January.

Sales have fallen in two of the first three months of 2013, though, and the pace of spending has decelerated. In the past 12 months, the increase in retail sales slowed to 2.8% in March from 4.4% in February.

A few retailers stood out in March. Spending jumped 0.9% at stores that sell home furnishings, a carryover from improving home sales. The housing market is finally rebounding from a long slump, and sales are expected to continue to rise.

Sales also rose at bars and restaurants, in somewhat of a surprise, as well as at Internet retailers, a category that has outperformed most others over the past decade.

Sales were essentially flat at apparel stores, perhaps because of a cold spell in March. That may have spurred shoppers to delay the purchase of new clothes for the spring, meaning there could be a snapback in April.

In February, the government revised the retail-sales increase to 1.0% from 1.1%

MAIN STREET VERSUS WALL STREET

34 comments

Posted on 9th April 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , , , ,

Do small businesses, which account for 65% of all the new hiring in the country, become less optimistic during an economic recovery?

After another false start, small business confidence has sputtered and stalled again. For the sector that produces half the private GDP and employs half the private sector workforce -— the fact that they are not growing, not hiring, not borrowing and not expanding like they should be, is evidence enough that uncertainty is slowing the economy. Virtually no owners think the current period is a good time to expand, because they simply don’t know what the future holds. So why invest? And with the lack of any sustainable fiscal policy or a federal budget, no one’s banking that Washington will be at forefront of any meaningful change. Overall, it appears that there will be little growth coming from the small business half of the economy; as the world economy slows, even big business may suffer. NFIB chief economist Bill Dunkelberg

Small Business Optimism Down in March

The March NFIB Index of Small Business Optimism ended its slow climb, declining 1.3 points and landing at 89.5. In the 44 months of economic expansion since the beginning of the recovery in July 2009, the Index has averaged 90.7, putting the March reading below the mean for this period. Of the ten Index components, two increased, two were unchanged and six declined. Among the greatest declines were labor market indicators, inventory investment plans and sales expectations. 

Small business optimism report for April 2013

Small business owners are on the ground near the real people. They aren’t sitting in ivory towers at Princeton playing with regression models. They aren’t programming their high frequency trading computers to buy the dip. They aren’t calculating their bonuses and stock option compensation. They are trying to make payroll. They are trying to sell products. They are trying to understand how badly Obamacare will screw them. They are trying to navigate through the hundreds of thousands of rules, regulations and laws that are passed by politicians. They are paying experts thousands of dollars to decipher and comply with the IRS tax code. Well guess what? They have no plans to hire anyone and they expect sales to go lower.

Small business optimism components

Ben Bernanke’s money printing is not benefitting them in any way. His policies are not generating jobs. His policies are impoverishing savers, who now have less money to spend at small businesses. Ben Bernanke’s policies are designed to benefit Wall Street banks and mega-corporations. His policies are designed to drive stock prices higher and enrich the connected crony capitalists that control the country. Meanwhile, small businesses and small people are dying on the vine. The real economy is withering away under the weight of massive debt, crushing taxation, and ponderous government regulations and red tape.  

Top problems of small business owners

There has never been a greater disconnect between Main Street America and Wall Street in our history. It will not end well. Bill Dunkelberg seems to be an economist with common sense, as opposed to the Keynesian morons like Krugman and the other Wall Street shills paraded on CNBC.

 

COMMENTARY BY CHIEF ECONOMIST BILL DUNKELBERG

Bill "Dunk" Dunkelberg
NFIB Chief Economist
William Dunkelberg

Small business produces half the private GDP and employs half the private sector workforce. But it is not growing, not hiring, not borrowing and not expanding enough. Small business owners have been depressed since 2007 and that has not changed. In the March survey of NFIB’s 350,000 member firms, 77% expect the economy to be no better or even worse 6 months from now that it is currently. Only 4% think the current period is a good time to expand substantially, compared to an average of 17% for the period 1973 to 2007. More owners plan to reduce employment in the coming months than plan to create new jobs. More owners plan to reduce their inventories than plan to order new stocks. The bulk of growth comes from the increase in our population of about 3 million people and the growing need to simply replace stuff that is wearing out, not enough to get the economy back to trend growth much less the strong growth needed to restore employment to 2007 levels.

The Federal Reserve continues to assert its intention to purchase a trillion dollars of Treasury securities and mortgages, adding a trillion dollars to its portfolio and stuffing a trillion dollars of new liquidity into the banking system, until the unemployment rate falls below 6.5% or inflation breaks out. Then it will “consider” changing policy. Unless something really bad happens, this is a winning strategy for the Fed because eventually the private sector will improve, the labor force will shrink (as boomers leave), the unemployment rate will fall and the Fed can claim its policies “worked”, even if their policies made no contribution to the improvement or even slowed it down by creating uncertainty and fear among investors and business owners.

This is a risky strategy. The evidence that “uncertainty” is slowing the economy is pretty clear now (research at the San Francisco Federal Reserve for example) and uncertainty probably increases with the size of the Fed’s portfolio (as has the price of gold). The real economy is hardly growing yet the stock market and corporate profits are at record high levels. How do we make a record amount of money without producing more output and employing more workers? Such contradictions breed uncertainty.

In the meantime, a record low percentage of small business owners claim that credit is their top business problem (3%) while taxes get the most votes (23%). Record numbers of owners have no interest in a loan (over 60%), because they have no use for the funds that have a high probability of successfully generating a return so the loan can be repaid. The Fed has made sure that there is plenty of money to lend, but in the process may have reduced the confidence that borrows need to take risks, borrow, spend and expand. And then there’s the impact of fiscal policy (or the lack of a policy). The President is flying around the country doing fund-raisers and stumping for gun control, but he still has presented no budget proposal. Enough said.

HAUSER’S LAW

12 comments

Posted on 8th April 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

Tax rates in the U.S. were much higher in the 1940s and 1950s, but it didn’t result in the government collecting more tax revenue as a % of GDP. The tax code isn’t 60,000 pages because the corrupt politicians want to collect more taxes. It is 60,000 pages because our politicians have been bought off by special interests to give them tax breaks. The tax code will never be simplified because politicians would lose power. No matter what happens, the government will never collect tax receipts much more than 20% of GDP. 

“No matter what the tax rates have been, in postwar America tax revenues have remained at about 19.5% of GDP.” – William Kurt Hauser

Federal government spending, on the other hand, has surged to well above 20% of GDP and is on automatic pilot to explode to 30% of GDP as the entitlement promises of corrupt politicians come due over the next 30 years. The lying MSM perpetuate the falsehood that we don’t have a spending problem, counting on the fact that the average government public school educated dullard can’t do basic math computations.

When you add Federal, State, and Local government spending as % of GDP together, it exceeds 42%. This number was less than 30% in the 1950s and early 1960s. Has bigger government benefitted you? Is healthcare cheaper and more efficient? Do you have more freedom or less freedom? Are you more safe or less safe? Has your standard of living increased or decreased?

Raising tax rates on the rich sounds like a great idea, but they will figure out a way to not pay more taxes. The only solution is to cut our spending and reduce our debt. But it won’t happen. So it goes.