U.S. ON VERGE OF BEING A PETROLEUM EXPORTER?

7 comments

Posted on 10th May 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , ,

Have you seen the stories in the MSM about the tremendous oil reserves we have right here in the good ole US of A? The propagandists proclaim we are only a few short years from being a net exporter of petroleum products. Peak oil is a myth. The U.S. doesn’t need that stinking Arab oil. We’ll be self sufficient because we’re smart, not dumb like everyone says.

Just one problem with this storyline. It is complete and utter bullshit. Romney’s drilling mantra and Obama’s green energy mantra are lies. If you see or hear anyone say that the U.S. will be able to produce the 19 million barrels of oil per day that we consume, immediately run for the door. They are filthy stinking liars.

Take a gander at this little chart. Please observe the little black line. It seems we are running a slight trade deficit in petroleum of about $360 billion per year. This means we import $360 billion more petroleum products than we export. Please observe the direction of that black line since Obama took office in 2009. Please observe the trend over the last 14 years.

Do we appear to be on the verge of becoming a net petroleum exporter?

YOU AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET – PART THREE

163 comments

Posted on 5th April 2012 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 This is Part Three of a three part series trying to make sense of the Crisis period we entered in 2008. Click here to read: PART ONE or PART TWO

Seeking Regeneracy

“Soon after the catalyst, a national election will produce a sweeping political realignment, as one faction or coalition capitalizes on a new public demand for decisive action. Republicans, Democrats, or perhaps a new party will decisively win the long partisan tug of war. This new regime will enthrone itself for the duration of the Crisis. Regardless of its ideology, that new leadership will assert public authority and demand private sacrifice. Regardless of its ideology, that new leadership will assert public authority and demand private sacrifice. Where leaders had once been inclined to alleviate societal pressures, they will now aggravate them to command the nation’s attention. The regeneracy will be solidly under way.” – Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

   

  

 

  

 The 2008 election happened in the midst of the catalyst events. A sweeping political realignment did not occur. In fact, the 2010 mid-term elections produced a result which has essentially gridlocked the political process in Washington D.C. The reunification and reenergizing of society has yet to occur. Neil Howe in his recent article pondered the question of regeneracy:

“We may like to imagine that there is a definable day and hour when America, faced by growing danger and adversity, explicitly decides to patch over its differences, band together, and build something new. But maybe what really happens is that everyone feels so numb that they let somebody in charge just go ahead and do whatever he’s got to do. I’m thinking of how America felt during the bleak years of FDR’s first term, or during Lincoln’s assumption of vast war powers after his repeated initial defeats on the battlefield.

The regeneracy cannot always be identified with a single news event. But it does have to mark the beginning of a growth in centralized authority and decisive leadership at a time of great peril and urgency. Typically, the catalyst itself doesn’t lead directly to a regeneracy. There has to be a second or third blow, something that seems a lot more perilous than just the election of third-party candidate (Civil War catalyst) or a very bad month in the stock market (Great Power catalyst). We are still due for such a moment. We have not yet reached our regeneracy. When it happens, I strongly suspect it will be in response to an adverse financial event. It may also happen in response to a geopolitical event. It may well happen over the next year or two.” Neil Howe – Dating the Fourth Turning

Regeneracy occurred within five years of the outset of the three previous Crisis periods in U.S. history. The historic year of 1776 saw the colonies come together and declare independence from Great Britain. Group solidarity and willingness to die for their cause launched an eight year war and ultimately the formation of a new republic. The Civil War regeneracy occurred after the Union debacle at Bull Run in 1861. The Washington aristocrats had treated the battle like a show, where they could bring a picnic lunch and be entertained by an entertaining skirmish between two armies. After the resounding bloody defeat Abraham Lincoln assumed dictatorial like powers over the North and ordered the immediate enlistment of a half a million soldiers. He assumed unprecedented powers of taxation, forced conscription, suspension of due process and showed a willingness to administer maximum destruction to his foes. This would be no picnic in the park, as 700,000 men died in the next three years. The regeneracy during the Great Depression/WWII Crisis occurred in 1933 with the election of Franklin Roosevelt. He immediately declared a bank holiday and confiscated all the gold in the country. In a flurry of executive orders and bills sent to Congress he rammed through his New Deal, assuming new and broader powers for the Federal government and Executive branch.

Based on these examples in American history it is clear we have not entered the regeneracy stage of this Crisis. Also based on history, it is likely to occur by the end of 2013. A second blow to our nation and our psyches is the only thing that could possibly bring together a deeply divided nation. The country was struck by a category 3 hurricane in 2008. We have been in the eye of the hurricane for the last two years and have grown complacent. The eye will pass over us in the next year and we will again be buffeted by hurricane force winds – except the hurricane has strengthened to a category 5 as the “solutions” to the storm will make part two far worse.  Those with a libertarian mindset are not likely to be happy with the Federal government and President taking on even greater powers in the coming years. The usurpation of more control over the citizens of this country in the last decade has been one of the major reasons for the ratcheting down of trust in our leaders. The upcoming presidential election will likely create the dynamic that propels the country into its regeneracy. If the next downward blow can be averted before the election, the country will end up with four more years of Obama. If the Crisis suddenly worsens before November, Romney assumes the mantle of Prophet Leader in January 2013.   

I agree with Neil Howe that the country’s reaction to an adverse financial event will be the likely regeneracy moment. The explosive mixture of the five D’s will provide the spark for the next phase: Debt; Derivatives; Default; Devaluation; and ultimately Depression. There is no way to deny the $15.6 trillion of debt this country has accumulated, with $10 trillion of it added since 2000. The debt ceiling of $16.4 trillion will be breached in October 2012 at the current rate of extreme spending. This should set up an interesting dynamic just prior to the November elections. A replay of the August 2011 showdown could be disastrous for Obama if the stock market were to crater again.

      

 

We are accumulating debt at a rate of $3.7 billion per day, or $154 million per hour. No politician of either party, other than Ron Paul, has any plan to even moderate the spending, let alone make actual cuts. The CBO projections rolled out by these congressional weasels aren’t worth the paper they are printed on. The National Debt is on track to surpass $20 trillion in 2015 and $25 trillion by 2018. And this is before the Medicare and Social Security costs blast into orbit in 2020. Kicking the can down the road works until math catches up with you. It is insane to believe we can dig ourselves out of this debt induced mess with more debt, but empires tend to act insanely in their death throes.

“In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.”Friedrich Nietzsche

Strauss & Howe made preparation recommendations back in 1997 that would have lessened the impact of this Crisis, but they fell on deaf ears. Their common sense suggestions included:

  •  Work to elevate moral and cultural standards. Toddlers with Tiaras and The Kardashians were not an elevation.
  • Shed and simplify the federal government by cutting back sharply on its size and scope.
  • All levels of government should prune legal, regulatory and professional thickets.
  • Politicians should define our challenges bluntly and stress duties over rights.
  • Require community teamwork to solve local problems without federal government intervention.
  • Treat children as the nation’s highest priority.
  • Tell future elders they will need to be more self-sufficient, save more, and expect fewer entitlements.
  • Shift government pension plans from defined benefit plans to defined contribution plans.
  • Begin to trim Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security benefits.
  • Raise the national savings rate, reduce consumption and work towards federal budget surpluses.
  • Expect the worst, conserve our forces, and be prepared for an epic struggle down the road.

I would reckon we went 0 for 11 on the preparation front. We took the exact opposite course in most cases. Each generation has their own crosses to bear. No one will escape the bitter gale force winds of this Crisis. Strauss and Howe must have had a crystal ball looking fifteen years into the future when they made this supposition:    

 “The Boomers’ old age will loom, exposing the thinness in private savings and the unsustainability of public promises. The 13ers will reach their make or break peak earning years, realizing at last that they can’t all be lucky exceptions to their stagnating average income. Millenials will come of age facing debts, tax burdens, and two tier wage structures that older generations will now declare intolerable.”

Thus far the older generations have refused to yield. They demand promises made be promises kept. The Boomers did not save enough to sustain themselves during their retirement. Many are entirely reliant upon Social Security and Medicare as their only savings and health insurance. Generation X is caught between aging parents and indebted jobless children. The Millenials are saddled with $1 trillion of student loan debt and few decent job opportunities. In prior Fourth Turnings the Prophet generation led and the Hero generation followed, doing the heavy lifting. This dynamic is yet to be realized during this Crisis. Maybe the regeneracy event will create this dynamic.

That event will likely be triggered by another debt crisis. Rogoff and Reinhart studied 44 countries over 200 years and concluded that once government debt exceeded 90% of GDP economic growth slowed and the likelihood of disaster rose dramatically.   

“Those who remain unconvinced that rising debt levels pose a risk to growth should ask themselves why, historically, levels of debt of more than 90% of GDP are relatively rare and those exceeding 120% are extremely rare. Is it because generations of politicians failed to realize that they could have kept spending without risk? Or, more likely, is it because at some point, even advanced economies hit a ceiling where the pressure of rising borrowing costs forces policy makers to increase tax rates and cut government spending, sometimes precipitously, and sometimes in conjunction with inflation and financial repression (which is also a tax)? Historical experience and early examination of new data suggest the need to be cautious about surrendering to “this-time-is-different” syndrome and decreeing that surging government debt isn’t as significant a problem in the present as it was in the past.”

 

On this date the U.S. debt to GDP ratio is 102%. Our debt accumulation is on automatic pilot and the national GDP is incapable of growing above 3%. Anyone with the most basic math skills (this excludes Wall Street economists, CNBC bimbo anchors, and Bernanke) can determine the ratio will pass 120% in 2015. This doesn’t even include the Fannie, Freddie, and Student Loan debt that are guaranteed by the Federal government, along with trillions of unfunded social program liabilities and state and local debts. In reality the true debt obligations of this country exceed 500% of GDP, as no politician plans to willingly renege on Medicare and Social Security promises made to voters who would boot them if they voted to cut these entitlements.

The linear thinking deniers of reality (Krugman) will use Japan as their example of a country whose debt ratio is above 200%, without disastrous consequences. I guess a 22 year recession is not considered disastrous. Japan has been able to fund themselves internally because their citizens had a 15% savings rate in and they have run gigantic trade surpluses for decades. That game is over and they will hit the wall in the near future. The savings rate in the U.S. is 3.7% and we run $550 billion trade deficits, or 3.7% of GDP. The United States has no advantages other than the U.S. dollar currently being regarded as the worldwide reserve currency. We are hanging our hat on being the best looking horse in the glue factory.

 trade deficit as gdp

The cracks in the façade are already painfully visible. The U.S. ran a $1.4 trillion deficit in 2009; $1.3 trillion in 2010; and $1.3 trillion in 2011. In the chart below you can see foreigners’ appetite for U.S. debt since 2007 has plunged. Maybe it has something to do with getting a negative real return by investing in U.S. Treasuries paying 2%. Maybe it has something to do with Ben Bernanke attempting to inflate away our debt burden. Maybe it has something to do with Congress and the President accelerating spending and creating massive deficits for as far as the eye can see. Maybe they are losing trust and confidence in the American Empire.   

 

In the last three years we have run $4 trillion in deficits and foreigners have only funded $1.4 trillion of that debt. That means someone else had to buy $2.6 trillion of our long term Treasuries. Some of it was funded by little old ladies and pension funds that are setting themselves up for enormous losses. The vast swath was purchased by Ben Bernanke with his QE for eternity programs. As foreigners rationally reduce their Treasury holdings and we continue to run $1.3 trillion deficits, Bernanke must keep buying the debt. This cycle will continue until we reach our Minsky Moment, then Strauss & Howe’s forecast will be realized:

“This might result in a Great Devaluation, a severe drop in the market price of most financial and real assets. This devaluation could be a short but horrific panic, a free-falling price in a market with no buyers. Or it could be a series of downward ratchets linked to political events that sequentially knock the supports out from under the residual popular trust in the system. As assets devalue, trust will further disintegrate, which will cause assets to devalue further, and so on.” - Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

Who will buy our debt in the coming months and years? Europe is saturated with debt and doesn’t have the means to purchase our debt. Japan is a train wreck waiting to happen. China’s customers aren’t buying their crap, so their economic miracle is about to go in reverse. The Federal Reserve cannot buy $1 trillion of Treasury bonds per year forever without creating more speculative bubbles and raging inflation in the things people need to live. The Minsky Moment will be the point when the U.S. Treasury begins having funding problems due to the spiraling debt incurred in financing perpetual government deficits. At this point no buyer will be found to bid at 2% to 3% yields for U.S. Treasuries; consequently, a major sell-off will ensue leading to a sudden and precipitous collapse in market clearing asset prices and a sharp drop in market liquidity. In layman terms that means – the shit will hit the fan. The Federal Reserve and Treasury will be caught in their own web of lies. The only way to attract buyers will be to dramatically increase interest rates. Doing this in a country up to its eyeballs in debt will be suicide. We will abruptly know how it feels to be Greek.

Linear thinkers like Krugman and most of the mainstream media opinion leaders can’t fathom the possibility of a complete collapse of our economic system. Most of their little models and economic data points don’t even go back to the last Fourth Turning period. They make projections about a housing recovery based on historical data that starts in 1962. Housing sales linger at historical lows with mortgage rates at 4%. The entire housing market would cave in if mortgage rates reached 6%, where they were in 2008. The forty year average mortgage rate has been 9%. Everything about our economic system is abnormal. Even reversion to the mean would be disastrous. The Minsky Moment headed our way will not be a single uncorrelated event. The entire financial world is hopelessly entangled by the $700 trillion of derivatives that ensure mass destruction if one of the dominoes falls. This is the reason an otherwise inconsequential country like Greece had to be “saved”.

Everyone knows Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy are broke. One or more will eventually default on their debt. It is highly likely that a butterfly will flap its wings in Europe and cause a hurricane in the U.S. The default will spark a worldwide contagion as trust in a system of false promises disintegrates. China’s already crumbling real estate market will implode. As interest rates soar and stock markets plunge, global tensions will intensify. Continued oil supply constraints will be the cherry on top. Based on historical precedent, this is likely to strike before 2014 arrives. The wealth destruction and pain will be so intense a regeneracy will be at hand. Our very survival will feel at stake.   

“Eventually, all of America’s lesser problems will combine into one giant problem. The very survival of the society will feel at stake, as leaders lead and people follow. The emergent society may be something better, a nation that sustains its Framers’ visions with a robust new pride. Or it may be something unspeakably worse. The Fourth Turning will be a time of glory or ruin.” - Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

And here is the rub for those who argue for less government intervention in our lives. Which leaders will lead and who will follow? The actual events do not matter as much as how the people react to the events. Fourth Turnings are always chaotic and tumultuous. In the frenzied period during the next leg down, people will demand order. They will call for the government to do something. Obama or Romney will use the fear and uncertainty to assume more power over our lives. Executive orders, new legislation, and another stripping of our liberties will be attempted. How the generational cohorts react to these deeds will determine what happens next. There are 97 million Millenials, 83 million Generation X and 73 million Boomers. The Boomers hold most of the positions of power, but their credibility as leaders has been damaged by their actions over the last two decades.

How the Millenials react to Boomer commands will determine the course of this Fourth Turning. The great devaluation will provide our leaders the opportunity to address the structural imbalances that haunt our nation. They could force Wall Street bankers, shareholders and bondholders assume their losses. They could rewrite the social contract with all generations, balancing the needs of elders with the futures of our youth. They could dramatically scale back the military industrial complex. They could completely scrap the ridiculous tax code and shift from taxing income to taxing consumption. They could revamp our political system and remove money from the political process. They could choose to balance budgets and reduce the size of government. They could ask for proportional sacrifice from everyone in order to keep this ship from sinking. If you believe this will happen, I have nice home near an Iranian nuclear power plant I’d like to sell you.

The regeneracy does not mean the actions taken by our leaders will be wise, well thought out, rational or beneficial to all people. Many believe the actions taken by Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt during the previous Fourth Turning Crisis periods were detrimental, foolish, and enhanced the power of the state at the expense of liberty for the people. The leader when the regeneracy events strike is more likely to respond with more government control as the solution. He will invoke executive orders giving government control over important industries and crucial institutions. The government politician leaders will pick the winners and losers, with their cronies and contributors winning again. Dissent will not be acceptable. The NDAA will be invoked to imprison those who disagree with the mandates handed down by those in power. Congress would pass SOPA and lock down the internet and shutdown any websites they consider dangerous to their central authority. Lastly, with the biggest and baddest military machine on earth, the leader will attempt to rally the masses and distract them from our dire economic situation by seeking an external threat to confront. It just so happens that China is also in the midst of their own Fourth Turning. History has shown that armed confrontation is likely around the climax of the Crisis:    

“History offers even more sobering warnings: Armed confrontation usually occurs around the climax of Crisis. If there is confrontation, it is likely to lead to war. This could be any kind of war – class war, sectional war, war against global anarchists or terrorists, or superpower war. If there is war, it is likely to culminate in total war, fought until the losing side has been rendered nil – its will broken, territory taken, and leaders captured.” - Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

No one knows the exact events that will mark this Crisis period in our history. But there is no turning back. We’ve entered the Winter season and the beautiful calm days of autumn are long past. Nothing but turmoil, bitterness and sacrifice lie ahead. We entered this Winter of our discontent unprepared like the grasshopper in the fable. This has insured this Crisis will be far worse than it needed to be. The grasshoppers want solutions and easy answers to problems created over decades of ignorance, sloth, greed and stupidity. It’s too late. There are no easy answers and the solutions are all painful and bitter. This is not some theoretical exercise. This is the reality of our situation. I have three teenage sons and their futures depend on the outcome of this Crisis. I will do whatever it takes to support them. I will not allow them to be cannon fodder in some war for oil in the Middle East. If their future requires me to oppose a tyrannical government, so be it. If their future requires me to give up my Social Security and Medicare security blanket, so be it. If I have to die so they may live, so be it. There are no guarantees in this life. We get about 80 years on this planet to make a difference. The choices we make in the next few years will matter. Are you ready? I am.

   

“The seasons of time offer no guarantees. For modern societies, no less than for all forms of life, transformative change is discontinuous. For what seems an eternity, history goes nowhere – and then it suddenly flings us forward across some vast chaos that defies any mortal effort to plan our way there. The Fourth Turning will try our souls – and the saecular rhythm tells us much will depend on how we face up to that trial. The saeculum does not reveal whether the story will have a happy ending, but it does tell us how and when our choices will make a difference.” - Strauss & Howe – The Fourth Turning

Click here to read: PART ONE or PART TWO

 


 

BACK TO NORMAL

3 comments

Posted on 11th May 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

Well all is well. Bennie and Timmy’s plan is working perfectly. The plan was to print money until the cows came home. By printing money they wanted to push the value of the dollar lower and generate artificial profits for the international conglomorates that outsourced your jobs to Asia. They’ve succeeded as exports hit an all-time high this month. Part two of the plan was to hand the newly printed money to Wall Street banks so they could artificially generate a stock market rally. This would enrich the bankers and make Americans feel wealthier. Whenyou feel wealthier, you spend money you don’t really have. They’ve succeeded on this front too. The clueless American consumer is again buying shitloads of  crap from Asia using their credit cards. So there you have it. We’ve got a finely tuned recovery.

The annual trade deficit is now running at $575 billion per year. Consumer debt is back up to $2.425 trillion and rising. Our annual cost of importing foreign oil is only $400 billion. Inflation for food and energy is only running a little above 10%. See, we’re backed to a well balanced economy.

Thanks Bennie and Timmy!!!!

March Trade Deficit Jumps To $48.2 Billion As Imports Surge

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 05/11/2011 08:40 -0400

And just as Citigroup predicted, US imports surge even as US exports jump to a record $172.7 billion. But the story is once again in the GDP reducing imports which jump by a whopping $220.8 billion, a $10.4 billion jump M/M. The total deficit of $48.2 billion is the highest since the June 2010 spike which hit $49.9 billion. From the release: “Exports increased to $172.7 billion in March from $165.0 billion in February. Goods were $124.9 billion in March, up from $117.8 billion in February, and services were $47.7 billion in March, up from $47.2 billion in February. Imports increased to $220.8 billion in March from $210.4 billion in February. Goods were $187.0 billion in March, up from $176.9 billion in February, and services were $33.8 billion in March, up from $33.5 billion in February. For goods, the deficit was $62.1 billion in March, up from $59.1 billion in February. For services, the surplus was $13.9 billion, up from $13.7 billion in February.” Ah, financial innovation being exported as per usual. Look for another round of Q1 GDP downgrades as this number takes out a few basis points in growth. As we know from China that April exports to the US jumped even more, this import surge will likely carry over into Q2 and result in more GDP cuts.

Graph of International Trade Balances

More details:

  • The February to March increase in exports of goods reflected increases in industrial supplies and materials ($2.5 billion); automotive vehicles, parts and engines ($1.6 billion); capital goods ($1.0 billion); other goods ($0.8 billion); consumer goods ($0.7 billion); and foods, feeds, and beverages ($0.6 billion).
  • The February to March increase in imports of goods reflected increases in industrial supplies and materials ($7.7 billion); automotive vehicles, parts and engines ($2.1 billion); capital goods ($1.6 billion); and other goods ($0.6 billion). A decrease occurred in consumer goods ($2.0 billion). Foods, feeds, and beverages were virtually unchanged.
  • The February to March increase in exports of services was more than accounted for by increases in other private services ($0.3 billion), which includes items such as business, professional, and technical services, insurance services, and financial services, other transportation ($0.1 billion), which includes freight and port services, passenger fares ($0.1 billion), and transfers under U.S. military agency sales contracts ($0.1 billion). A decrease in royalties and license fees ($0.1 billion) was partly offsetting. Changes in the other categories of services exports were small.
  • The February to March increase in imports of services was mostly accounted for by increases in other transportation ($0.2 billion) and other private services ($0.1 billion). Changes in the other categories of services imports were small.

And on the key relationship with China:

  • The goods deficit with China decreased from $18.8 billion in February to $18.1 billion in March. Exports increased $1.1 billion (primarily industrial machines; civilian aircraft, engines, equipment, and parts; and passenger cars) to $9.5 billion, while imports increased $0.3 billion (primarily computers and accessories and telecommunications equipment) to $27.6 billion.

Which, as usual is quite funny, considering that from a Chinese perspective, exports to the US in March were $13 billion, and in April $15.1 billion. In other words, in March there was just a 30% discrepancy between the two most prevaricating economies.

WHERE ARE THE BENEFITS OF A WEAK DOLLAR?

16 comments

Posted on 12th April 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

,

The US reported its trade deficit this morning. The annualized trade deficit is now running at $550 billion. You may remember that one of the reasons for a low interest rates and a declining currency was to spur exports. It seems exports are actually declining. WTF!!! How low does the USD need to go to spur exports? It looks like we are about to find out. The dollar declined after the report. It is now trading at its lowest level versus a basket of currencies since August 2008 during the worst financial crisis in history. It declined to 1.45 versus the Euro this morning. It has fallen 18% versus the Euro since June of 2010. Inch by inch, foot by foot, we get closer to the day of reckoning. It will happen without warning. A panic will ensue as everyone tries to exit the USD simultaneously. The picture won’t be pretty.

USD versus basket of currencies DXY

One-Year Chart for DOLLAR INDEX SPOT (DXY:IND)

USD versus Euro

One-Year Chart for EUR-USD X-RATE (EURUSD:IND)

US Trade Deficit Deteriorates As US Import Price Index Surges By Most Since June 2009

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/12/2011 08:43 -0400

Another month, and another confirmation that the US export segment is non-existent. In February the US posted a $45.8 billion trade deficit compared to $47 billion in January, but worse than expectations of $44 billion. Importing our way to prosperity and #Winning_the_Future continues. Comparing the Chinese reported trade surplus with the US and the US reported trade deficit with China we get just a 100%+ difference: $7.8 billion versus $18.8 billion. Gotta love two administrations that just make up numbers trying to reconcile their fraud. This number also means that Q1 GDP will see another major revision lower. And so will Q2, Q3 and so forth, leading to QE3. And while we are at it, let’s just make it stagflation: the US import price index surged from 1.4% to 2.7% on expectations of 2.1%: the largest rise since June 2009.

From the report:

Goods and Services

  • Exports decreased to $165.1 billion in February from $167.5 billion in January. Goods were $118.0 billion in February, down from $120.4 billion in January, and services were $47.2 billion in February, up from $47.1 billion in January.
  • Imports decreased to $210.9 billion in February from $214.5 billion in January. Goods were $177.3 billion in February, down from $180.7 billion in January, and services were $33.6 billion in February, down from $33.8 billion in January.
  • For goods, the deficit was $59.3 billion in February, down from $60.3 billion in January. For services, the surplus was $13.6 billion, up from $13.3 billion in January.

Goods by Category (Census basis)

  • The January to February decrease in exports of goods reflected decreases in automotive vehicles, parts, and engines ($1.0 billion); industrial supplies and materials ($0.6 billion); other goods ($0.5 billion); capital goods ($0.3 billion); consumer goods ($0.2 billion); and foods, feeds, and beverages ($0.2 billion).
  • The January to February decrease in imports of goods reflected decreases in automotive vehicles, parts and engines ($2.3 billion); capital goods ($2.1 billion); industrial supplies and materials ($1.4 billion); and other goods ($0.1 billion). Increases occurred in consumer goods ($2.3 billion) and foods, feeds, and beverages ($0.1 billion).

Services by Category

  • Exports of services were virtually unchanged from January to February. An increase in other private services ($0.1 billion), which includes items such as business, professional, and technical services, insurance services, and financial services, was partly offset by a decrease in other transportation ($0.1 billion), which includes freight and port services. Changes in the other categories of services exports were small.
  • The January to February decrease in imports of services was more than accounted for by decreases in other transportation ($0.2 billion) and travel ($0.1 billion). An increase in other private services ($0.1 billion) was partly offsetting. Changes in the other categories of services imports were small.

Goods by Geographic Area (Not Seasonally Adjusted)

  • The goods deficit with China decreased from $23.3 billion in January to $18.8 billion in February. Exports increased $0.4 billion (primarily passenger cars, soybeans, and steelmaking materials) to $8.4 billion, while imports decreased $4.1 billion (primarily computers and accessories; toys, games, and sporting goods; and electric apparatus) to $27.3 billion.
  • The goods deficit with the European Union increased from $5.6 billion in January to $6.9 billion in February. Exports decreased $0.3 billion (primarily nonmonetary gold; soybeans; and artwork, antiques and stamps) to $20.0 billion, while imports increased $1.1 billion (primarily pharmaceutical preparations, civilian aircraft, and household goods) to $26.9 billion.
  • The goods deficit with the Japan increased from $5.0 billion in January to $5.2 billion in February. Exports increased $0.3 billion (primarily metallurgical grade coal; civilian aircraft, engines, equipment, and parts; and corn) to $5.3 billion, while imports increased $0.6 billion (primarily automotive parts and accessories, computer accessories, and motorcycles and parts) to $10.5 billion.

THE GOOD NEWS IS……….

7 comments

Posted on 10th March 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues

, ,

Calculated Risk with a triple header of good news this morning. Home prices are accelerating to the downside rapidly. Remember the hundreds of billions of your tax dollars that your Obamanista Keynesian friends threw at the housing market in 2009 in order to save us? Home prices are now 1.6% below the March 2009 low. They pissed away all of your money for nothing. It’s gone. Home prices will continue to go down until they reach their natural level. The Federal government has proved once again that they are clueless, stupid and wasteful with your tax dollars. Based on my scientific assessment of the chart below, I’d conclude we have a fucking long way to fall.

More good news on the trade front. The deadly combination of moronic consumers buying shit on credit again and higher oil prices led to a surge in our trade deficit to an annualized $555 billion. That isn’t close to our previous high of $700 billion, but give us time. When oil reaches $150 a barrel, we’ll give $700 billion another run for its money. Who says we can’t borrow and spend our way to prosperity. It didn’t work the first time, but I’m sure it might work the next time. Deficits don’t matter.

The trifecta of good news was that unemployment claims went back up to 397,000 last week. These are levels reached during the 2001 and 1991 recessions. Don’t these dumb companies know we are in a recovery? Obama tells them every day. They are being un-American by firing people. Maybe Congress can legislate that companies can no longer fire people. I’m going to get on the horn to Boner with that idea.

I’m sure CNBC is all over these stories like white on rice or a priest on an altar boy.    

CoreLogic … January Home Price Index (HPI) which shows that home prices in the U.S. declined for the sixth month in a row. According to the CoreLogic HPI, national home prices, including distressed sales, declined by 5.7 percent in January 2011 compared to January 2010 after declining by 4.7 percent in December 2010 compared to December 2009. Excluding distressed sales, year-over-year prices declined by 1.6 percent in January 2011 compared to January 2010 and by 3.2 percent in December 2010 compared to December 2009. Distressed sales include short sales and real estate owned (REO) transactions. This is the sixth straight month of year-over-year declines, and the seventh straight month of month-to-month declines. The index is now 1.6% below the previous post-bubble low set in March 2009.

[T]otal exports of $167.7 billion and imports of $214.1 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $46.3 billion, up from $40.3 billion in December, revised. January exports were $4.4 billion more than December exports of $163.3 billion. January imports were $10.5 billion more than December imports of $203.6 billion.

In the week ending March 5, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 397,000, an increase of 26,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 371,000. The 4-week moving average was 392,250, an increase of 3,000 from the previous week’s revised average of 389,250.