The Do gooders in this country love wars.
War on Poverty
War on Drugs
War on Terrorism
Now the War on Guns
What could possibly go wrong?
Enough already!!!!
Posted on 9th January 2013 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues
The Do gooders in this country love wars.
War on Poverty
War on Drugs
War on Terrorism
Now the War on Guns
What could possibly go wrong?
Enough already!!!!
Posted on 25th July 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues
|
||||||||||||||||
Above is a clock showing how successful the War on Drugs has been YTD. We are spending $40 billion per year on the War on Drugs. Here are a couple of facts from the data above:
Based upon the facts above, the legalization of marijuana would save taxpayers about $20 billion per year. If we allowed it to be taxed, it would generate a few billion in tax revenue.
Is the war on marijuana worth it? Can we afford to fight this war? I wonder what SSS thinks?
Posted on 19th June 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues
Ron knows how it works in the real world. The government declares a war on drugs and promises to keep you safe from this terrible scourge on society. Before long they are kicking in your door without a search warrant, shooting innocent citizens, and imprisoning millions of minor criminals. The War on Drugs is complete bullshit. It is just another excuse for those in power to take away our liberty and freedom.
So much for a calm weekend on TBP. This will surely ruin SSS’ golf game. I can see him slicing into the trees on the 1st hole.
by Ron Paul
We have recently heard many shocking stories of brutal killings and ruthless violence related to drug cartels warring with Mexican and US officials. It is approaching the fever pitch of a full blown crisis. Unfortunately, the administration is not likely to waste this opportunity to further expand government. Hopefully, we can take a deep breath and look at history for the optimal way to deal with this dangerous situation, which is not unprecedented.
Alcohol prohibition in the 1920s brought similar violence, gangs, lawlessness, corruption and brutality. The reason for the violence was not that making and selling alcohol was inherently dangerous. The violence came about because of the creation of a brutal black market which also drove profits through the roof. These profits enabled criminals like Al Capone to become incredibly wealthy, and militantly defensive of that wealth. Al Capone saw the repeal of Prohibition as a great threat, and indeed smuggling operations and gangland violence fell apart after repeal. Today, picking up a bottle of wine for dinner is a relatively benign transaction, and beer trucks travel openly and peacefully along their distribution routes.
Similarly today, the best way to fight violent drug cartels would be to pull the rug out from under their profits by bringing these transactions out into the sunlight. People who, unwisely, buy drugs would hardly opt for the back alley criminal dealer as a source, if a coffeehouse-style dispensary was an option. Moreover, a law-abiding dispensary is likely to check IDs and refuse sale to minors, as bars and ABC stores tend to do very diligently. Think of all the time and resources law enforcement could save if they could instead focus on violent crimes, instead of this impossible nanny-state mandate of saving people from themselves!
If these reasons don’t convince the drug warriors, I would urge them to go back to the Constitution and consider where there is any authority to prohibit private personal choices like this. All of our freedoms – the freedom of religion and assembly, the freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, the right to be free from unnecessary government searches and seizures – stem from the precept that you own yourself and are responsible for your own choices. Prohibition laws negate self-ownership and are an absolute affront to the principles of freedom. I disagree vehemently with the recreational use of drugs, but at the same time, if people are only free to make good decisions, they are not truly free. In any case, states should decide for themselves how to handle these issues and the federal government should respect their choices.
My great concern is that instead of dealing deliberatively with the actual problems, Congress will be pressed again to act quickly without much thought or debate. I can’t think of a single problem we haven’t made worse that way. The panic generated by the looming crisis in Mexico should not be redirected into curtailing more rights, especially our second amendment rights, as seems to be in the works. Certainly, more gun laws in response to this violence will only serve to disarm lawful citizens. This is something to watch out for and stand up against. We have escalated the drug war enough to see it only escalates the violence and profits associated with drugs. It is time to try freedom instead.
Posted on 18th June 2011 by Administrator in Economy |Politics |Social Issues
You asked for it. A story to make SSS go ballistic. We spend $15 billion per year to fight drugs and drug usage is higher than ever. I think the story is wrong. The government doesn’t want to win the war on drugs. It employs too many government drones and they would lose their jobs if we actually won the war. This is as big a farce as the WAR ON TERROR.
Why don’t we have a WAR ON UGLY PEOPLE or a WAR ON BLITHERING IDIOTS or a WAR ON KITTENS or a WAR ON HOME PRICES FALLING? Oh yeah, we did have that war. And we lost that too.
WASHINGTON – Gina is in a treatment center on Long Island for opiates and crack. Her addictions have landed her in jail and nearly killed her.
She even used drugs while pregnant.
“Sitting in jail and not having your daughter, I think that’s the worst pain I ever felt in my life,” Gina told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson.
Her parents are heroin addicts who met at rehab. Dad Ralph is currently clean.
“We have to stop this cycle; it’s insanity,” Ralph said.
Two generations: casualties long after President Nixon declared the war on drugs 40 years ago.
“We must wage what I have called total war on public enemy number one,” Nixon said in June 1971.
We set to find out just how much has been spent on that war – and the results.
Back in 1971, the federal drug control budget was $155 million. Today it’s more than $15 billion a year or, after inflation, 17 times higher than in 1971.
There have been peaks and valleys in drug use over the years. But in recent decades, as the drug-fighting budget has ballooned, drug use hasn’t gone down – it’s gone up.
Many groups call for decriminalizing drugs and putting more emphasis on treatment.
One of them is the Global Commission on Drug Policy, made up of international politicians and business leaders. It claims the “war on drug has failed.”
It estimates cocaine use is up 27 percent, opiates up 34 percent.
In 1989, the first President Bush named Bill Bennett the first so-called “drug czar.” Today, he told us fighting the war is worth it.
“It’s like the war against ignorance or barbarism or anything else that’s horrible or persistent,” Bennett said. “When you let up the pressure, things get worse and when you keep the pressure on, often things can get better.”
Addict Ralph isn’t so sure.
“This war on drugs, I look at it from a civilian’s point, right okay. There’s still a lot of heroin, there’s still a lot of drugs on the street. What did it do? Second question is: if there wasn’t a war on drugs, how much more drugs would’ve been in here?” he said.
He also worries it could claim a third generation like his granddaughter.
Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
— Ludwig von Mises