Guest Post by Eric Peters
Collectivists often say there is a “need” for something – and that coercion (i.e., government) must provide it.
As in the “need” for . . . insert here.
What’s interesting about this, beyond the often unnoticed fact that collectivism is really a kind of deformed individualism in that every “collective” is necessarily run by individuals (Stalin, for instance) who coerce the collective, is what’s admitted to by collectivists – without irony or understanding. That being if there is, in fact, a need for something, there is incentive (money to be made, profit) to provide it, arising from from the willingness of those who feel the need for that something to pay for it.
Put another way: If there is no incentive to provide it – because people aren’t willing to pay for it – it is persuasive evidence people aren’t especially interested in it.
In other words, people – as individuals – don’t really need it.
What coercive collectivists really mean is that they, the collectivists, want whatever it is.
Continue reading “On This “Need” Business”