TAKE THIS JOB AND SHOVE IT

Barack Obama and his minions were out in force on Friday declaring that the 216,000 jobs added in February are proof of a recovering economy. The unemployment rate fell to 8.8%, down from 9.8% in April 2010. All it took was 2.8 million Americans to leave the labor force to achieve this fabulous reduction in the unemployment rate. The percentage of Americans in the labor force of 64.2% is the lowest since 1983. The employment to population ratio of 58.5% is also the lowest since 1983. These atrocious figures are after a supposed economic recovery that has been underway for the last 18 months.

There are now 1.8 million more people employed than at the depths of this Greater Depression. The working age population has grown by 3.2 million people since 2009. Inexplicably, the civilian workforce has actually declined by 736,000 over this same time frame. The government drones at the BLS want us to believe these people voluntarily left the workforce. Obama apologists declare this is because Baby Boomers are leaving the workforce as they retire into the sunset. That is laughable, as all studies show Boomers have not saved enough to retire and will be forced to work into their 70’s.

The manipulation of data in order to spin the economic situation in this country in the best light possible has become so blatant that only the most ignorant could possibly believe it. The corporate mainstream media dutifully reports the propaganda, without ever critically assessing what is being distributed by the government. The percentage of the American working population in the workforce consistently ranged between 66% and 67% from 1998 through 2008. Then, suddenly in 2008, after the economy went in the tank, a couple million Americans found better things to do with their spare time and left the workforce. Anyone with an ounce of brains knows these people gave up and are really unemployed. The percentage of people in the labor force should be 66.5%. Using this 20 year average would add 5.5 million people to the civilian labor force and the unemployment rolls. This exercise in reality gives a real unemployment rate of 12%.

It is interesting that Obama and his top economic propagandist Austin Goolsbee were out in full force on Friday, taking credit for the “tremendous” job gains, but had nothing to say earlier in the week with a much more revealing government report. There is now an all-time high of 44.2 million Americans and 20.7 million households in the food stamp program. This is 14.3% of the American population and 18% of all the households.

I’d like to hear the Administration spin for the SNAP program. Since the supposed end of this economic recession in late 2009, the number of people added to the food stamp rolls has increased by 8 million. The annual cost for this program will reach $70 billion this year, up from $33 billion in 2007. If the economy is recovering and people are voluntarily leaving the workforce, why have the number of people on food stamps increased by 22% since the official start of the recovery? Why does the number of people going on food stamps go up every month? The answer is that there has been no economic recovery for the average American. Wall Street bankers and the ultra-wealthy elite are the only people who have experienced a recovery.

SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
( Data as of March 31, 2011)
Fiscal PARTICIPATION BENEFIT AVERAGE MONTHLY BENEFIT
Year Persons Households COSTS Per Person Per Household
FY 2011 43,766,713 20,501,213 23,348,337,586 133.37 284.73
FY 2010 40,301,666 18,618,363 64,704,748,421 133.79 289.61
FY 2009 33,489,975 15,232,115 50,359,917,015 125.31 275.51

The true picture of the American economy is that in 2007 there were 146 million Americans employed, or 63% of the working age population. Today, there are 139.9 million Americans employed, or 58.5% of the working age population. Over this time frame, an additional 7.1 million Americans entered the working age population. In 2007 there were 26.3 million Americans on food stamps, or 8.6% of the US population. Today there are 44.2 million Americans on food stamps, or 14.3% of the US population. To call the current economic disaster a recovery is to practice the art of the Big Lie.

Real Median Household Income, which is calculated using the dodgy government CPI, has not grown in 14 years. Using a true, non-manipulated inflation figure and real median household income is no higher than it was in 1987. The mainstream media reports the headline figures like the good lapdogs they are. The BLS Establishment data going back to 1965 is a treasure trove of interesting data. The average hourly wages have declined for the last three months and are essentially flat in the last year.

real median household income

Decades of Decay

The current state of disarray in the job market did not occur overnight. It took decades of bad choices, willful ignorance and delusion. By charting BLS data over the last five decades, a picture of an empire in decay appears before your very eyes. We aren’t the first empire to experience this decay and won’t be the last. It is only in retrospect that it becomes clear that all empires gravitate from producing and creating to finance, debt and lending. The hubris of great empires leads them to believe they have been chosen by God as a special nation destined for eternal wealth and success. The seventeenth century Spanish empire thought so. The Dutch and their glorious maritime empire thought so. The all-powerful British Empire thought so. Do you hear much about these empires anymore? They all sacrificed productive activities and embraced the glories of a debt based society. Kevin Phillips details these declines in his brilliant book American Theocracy :

“Understandable as this cockiness might be, history teaches a crucial distinction: nations could marshal the necessary debt-defying high wire walks and comebacks during their youth and early middle age, when their industries, exports, capitalizations, and animal spirits were vital and expansive, but they became less resilient in later years. During these periods, as their societies polarized and their arteries clogged with rentier and debt buildups, wars and financial crises stopped being manageable. Of course, clarity about this develops only in retrospect. However, even though war related debt seems to have been part of each fatal endgame, the past leading world economic powers seem to have made another error en route. They did not pay enough attention to establishing or maintaining a vital manufacturing sector, thereby keeping a better international balance and a broader internal income distribution than financialization allowed.”

The chart below paints a clear picture of decay, debt and delusion. In 1961 the population of the United States was 184 million. There were 54 million employed Americans, with 15 million of them manufacturing goods for America and the rest of the world. Today the population of the United States is 310 million. There are 11.7 million people manufacturing goods, mostly weapons for export to our favorite despots. The population has grown by 68%, while manufacturing jobs have declined by 22%. Consumer spending accounted for 62.8% of GDP in 1961. Investments totaled 14.3% of GDP and we ran a trade surplus of $4.9 billion. Today, consumer spending accounts for 71.1% of GDP. Investments total 12.5% of GDP and we are running a $500 billion trade deficit. Over the course of 50 years, we’ve devolved from a production and exporting society into a consuming and borrowing society.

 

1961 1970 1980 1990 2000 2007 2010 Mar-11
Total Employment 54,106 71,005 90,530 109,487 131,786 137,599 129,819 130,738
Mining 728 677 1,077 765 599 724 705 758
Construction 2,908 3,654 4,454 5,263 6,787 7,630 5,526 5,514
Manufacturing 15,011 17,848 18,733 17,695 17,263 13,879 11,524 11,667
 Total Goods Producing 18,647 22,179 24,264 23,723 24,649 22,233 17,755 17,939
Trade, Transport, Utilities 11,040 14,144 18,413 22,666 26,225 26,630 24,605 24,797
Information 1,693 2,041 2,361 2,688 3,630 3,032 2,711 2,681
Finance 2,590 3,532 5,025 6,614 7,687 8,301 7,630 7,610
Professional & Business Services 3,744 5,267 7,544 10,848 16,666 17,942 16,688 17,075
Education & Health Serv. 3,030 4,577 7,072 10,984 15,109 18,322 19,564 19,875
Leisure & Hospitality 3,468 4,789 6,721 9,288 11,862 13,427 13,020 13,156
Other Services 1,188 1,789 2,755 4,261 5,168 5,494 5,364 5,439
Government 8,706 12,687 16,375 18,415 20,790 22,218 22,482 22,166
   Total Service Producing 35,459 48,826 66,266 85,764 107,137 115,366 112,064 112,799

A perusal of the chart shows the dramatic downturn has really occurred since 1980. Goods producing jobs have declined by 6.3 million in the last 30 years, while service jobs have grown by 46.5 million. Who would want to get their hands dirty on an assembly line when they could shuffle papers, invent CDOs, MBOs, and CDSs, create financial models to destroy the world, bribe rating agencies, file frivolous lawsuits, teach Keynesianism, or use the 60,000 page IRS code to help GE pay no taxes on their $14 billion of income. Alan Greenspan and many other “thought leaders” declared that America could succeed through its ingenuity and creative thought process. The rest of the world could handle the messy business of building things. So goes the hubris of an empire that has peaked. To get a clearer view of the conversion from a productive society to a consumption society, converting the above chart to a percentage basis is useful.

1961 1970 1980 1990 2000 2007 2010 Mar-11
Total Employment 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Mining 1.3% 1.0% 1.2% 0.7% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6%
Construction 5.4% 5.1% 4.9% 4.8% 5.2% 5.5% 4.3% 4.2%
Manufacturing 27.7% 25.1% 20.7% 16.2% 13.1% 10.1% 8.9% 8.9%
   Total Goods Producing 34.5% 31.2% 26.8% 21.7% 18.7% 16.2% 13.7% 13.7%
Trade, Transport, Utilities 20.4% 19.9% 20.3% 20.7% 19.9% 19.4% 19.0% 19.0%
Information 3.1% 2.9% 2.6% 2.5% 2.8% 2.2% 2.1% 2.1%
Finance 4.8% 5.0% 5.6% 6.0% 5.8% 6.0% 5.9% 5.8%
Professional & Business Services 6.9% 7.4% 8.3% 9.9% 12.6% 13.0% 12.9% 13.1%
Education & Health Serv. 5.6% 6.4% 7.8% 10.0% 11.5% 13.3% 15.1% 15.2%
Leisure & Hospitality 6.4% 6.7% 7.4% 8.5% 9.0% 9.8% 10.0% 10.1%
Other Services 2.2% 2.5% 3.0% 3.9% 3.9% 4.0% 4.1% 4.2%
Government 16.1% 17.9% 18.1% 16.8% 15.8% 16.1% 17.3% 17.0%
   Total Service Producing 65.5% 68.8% 73.2% 78.3% 81.3% 83.8% 86.3% 86.3%

In 1961 America was a well balanced economic powerhouse. Goods production accounted for 34.5% of all jobs, with manufacturing making up 27.7% of all jobs. Goods production now accounts for a pitiful 13.7% of all jobs in the country. The slack was picked up by financial analysts, accountants, lawyers, tax specialists, and bankers. They surged from supporting roles in a production society with 11.7% of the jobs in 1961 to the dominant big dogs today, with 18.9% of the jobs. The rest of the slack was taken up by teachers, school administrators, nurses, cabana boys and waitresses as they surged from 12% in 1961 to 25.3% of all jobs today. There is one problem with this shift. We have millions more educators, but our school systems churn out millions of functionally illiterate non-critical thinking drones. We have millions more healthcare professionals and are the most obese, unhealthy nation on earth even though we spend more per person than any other country. A country that employs one quarter of their workers in jobs that do not increase the wealth of the country is a country in decline. This shift has also pushed people into lower paying jobs.

1965 1970 1980 1990 2000 2007 2010 Mar-11
Total Private Industry $2.63 $3.40 $6.85 $10.20 $14.02 $17.43 $19.07 $19.30
Mining $2.87 $3.77 $8.97 $13.40 $16.55 $20.97 $23.83 $24.68
Construction $3.23 $4.74 $9.37 $13.42 $17.48 $20.95 $23.22 $23.36
Manufacturing $2.49 $3.23 $7.15 $10.78 $13.55 $17.26 $18.61 $18.90
   Total Goods Producing $2.63 $3.52 $7.66 $11.46 $15.27 $18.67 $20.28 $20.48
Trade, Transport, Utilities $2.94 $3.65 $7.04 $9.83 $13.31 $15.78 $16.83 $16.99
Information $4.47 $5.25 $9.47 $13.40 $19.07 $23.96 $25.86 $25.99
Finance $2.38 $3.07 $5.82 $9.99 $14.98 $19.64 $21.49 $21.63
Professional & Business Serv. $3.28 $4.04 $7.22 $11.14 $15.52 $20.15 $22.78 $23.10
Education & Health Services $2.12 $2.88 $5.93 $10.00 $13.95 $18.11 $20.12 $20.45
Leisure & Hospitality $1.17 $1.82 $3.98 $6.02 $8.32 $10.41 $11.31 $11.38
Other Services $1.25 $2.01 $5.05 $9.08 $12.73 $15.42 $17.08 $17.23
   Total Service Producing $2.63 $3.34 $6.43 $9.72 $13.62 $17.11 $18.81 $19.05
Consumer Price Index 31.50 38.80 82.40 130.70 172.20 207.34 218.06 221.31

The insidious effects of Federal Reserve generated inflation can be seen in the above chart. The BLS Establishment data going back to 1965 reveals much about the hidden impact of inflation over time. In 1965 the average hourly wage was $2.65. Back then, Americans put in a full work week, averaging 38.6 hours per week. The average American was making $101.52 per week. This was enough for a family to live comfortably on with only one spouse working. Fast forward to today and we have an average wage of $19.30 per hour and work week of 33.4 hours. This yields an average weekly pay of $644.62. It is also necessary for most households to have two working spouses to make ends meet. I added the government reported CPI at the bottom of the chart to provide some perspective on our 50 years of middle class wage compression. Applying the change in CPI since 1965 to the change in average weekly earnings provides the clearest view of what has been done to our country by the Federal Reserve and the government/corporate oligarchy. It would have taken weekly wages of $713.25 to have kept up with inflation since 1965. The average worker today is making 10% less than they did in 1965, on an inflation adjusted basis.

Wages in the service industries fell behind by even more, with the exception of bankers, doctors and teachers. The finance sector wages and the healthcare/education sector wages are 25% higher than their inflation adjusted wages in 1965. You reap what you sow. The country has decided that bankers, doctors, and teachers are relatively more important to our economy than people who make products, create wealth, and increase the productive capacity of the country. Any impartial outcome based assessment of these choices would conclude these choices have been an unmitigated failure.

The financial/ banking sector has peddled debt to the masses that didn’t realize their standard of living has been declining for 50 years, and blew up the worldwide financial system through their greed and fraudulent business practices. We spend more per child on education than any country in the world and test scores are lower than they were 40 years ago. Our children graduate high school with no critical thinking skills and the inability to decipher propaganda from truth. We spend more per person on healthcare than any other country, but obesity, diabetes, and heart disease are rampant. Administrative bureaucracy and vast amounts of rules and regulations consume billions in these sectors of our economy. The simple art of creating and producing things that other people need or want has been cast aside by a country who thought they could borrow and spend their way to long-term prosperity.

So, here we find ourselves 18 months into a “recovery” and the country has added 1.3 million jobs in the last year. We’ve added 529,000 lawyers, accountants, consultants and tax specialists. We’ve added 420,000 teachers, nurses and administrators. We’ve added 193,000 waitresses and hotel busboys. And we’ve added 238,000 Wal-Mart clerks. Our well balanced economy is back in gear. What could go wrong?

The truth is that the country remains in a 50 year death spiral of bad choices, delusion and fraud, created to benefit the few at the expense of the many. The average American wallows in a reality of low wages and high debt. Some of this reality has been self inflicted. Willful ignorance is a choice. Educating yourself to the truth is available to every American. Spending less than you make is something everyone can do. But, at the end of the day, the 1% at the top of the food chain controls the levers in this country. While the average American has fallen behind over the last 50 years, the ultra-wealthy elite have prospered.   The top 1% takes home 25% of the national income and control 40% of the financial wealth in the country. Their lives have improved considerably. Twenty-five years ago, the ruling elite “earned” 12% of the national income and controlled 33% of the financial wealth. These are the people who control the message. They own the mainstream media. They run the Wall Street banks. They control the Federal Reserve. They write the laws and the tax code. They control the politicians like puppets on a string. An economic system based upon debt and Federal Reserve generated inflation benefits these chosen few, while destroying the middle class of America. We’ve chosen this path and are destined to experience the same fate as Spain, the Dutch, and Britain.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
71 Comments
bluestem
bluestem
April 4, 2011 2:26 pm

An interesting thing I learned several years ago was that Wash DC includes the production of ice cream as “manufacturing”, man what a stretch. John

KaD
KaD
April 4, 2011 3:50 pm

I produced scrambles eggs this morning; that must mean I’m in manufacturing!

howard in nyc
howard in nyc
April 4, 2011 4:03 pm

those 50,000 ‘new’ jobs at mcdonalds, too. manufacturing is back!

KobeMan
KobeMan
April 4, 2011 5:29 pm

Observation (not related to above):

Jim spends much time commuting each day.
Jim has wife.
Jim has kids.
Jim follows sports.
Jim has full-time job.
Jim keeps this site going which looks like a huge time investment.
Jim writes researched articles like above.

Jim must not sleep.

Tom
Tom
April 4, 2011 6:11 pm

The last I checked, assembling hamburgers at McDonalds was also included in the manufacturing index. What a country!

StuckInNJ
StuckInNJ
April 4, 2011 6:40 pm

I learned a new vocabulary word this week too:

Cocksucker. There was no definition. Just a picture of Obama.

Steve Hogan
Steve Hogan
April 4, 2011 7:05 pm

One nit: The value for FY 2011 benefit costs in the first table appears to be wrong. The average outlay per person is basically unchanged from the previous year, but the total number of people in the program increased by several million. The total cost should be significantly higher.

Welshman
Welshman
April 4, 2011 7:56 pm

Jim must not sleep
Jim on auto pilot
Jim gooooooooood man

Nonanonymous
Nonanonymous
April 4, 2011 8:14 pm

Howard,

You neglected to subtract the 25,000 jobs shed by Toyota, so that’s really on a net gain of 25,000.

How does Obama keep a straight face? Oh yeah, he’s the Joker! However, I don’t think the blame lies entirely there. There’s Bush, whose administration failed to oversee the Fannie, Freddie, and the SEC, who were only being laissez faire about the deregulated banking industry, thanks to William Jefferson Clinton’s adminstration, to address the enormous deficits of the Reagan years, who was only trying to overcome the last period of stagflation under Carter, the last president who gave a shit about anything but couldn’t beat the established bureacracy in Washington, and Nixon, who removed the last vestiges of the gold standard, but he’s not a crook, but LBJ was, after organized crime took out the Kennedy’s. Oh, for the military disestablishmentarianism of Eisenhour! Those were the good old days. It seems we’ve been lied to by almost every president going back to Washington, who couldn’t tell a lie. The only real solution here is chuck the federal government, and return to states rule. But by God, no one world totalitarian government. It only gets worse, the further up the ladder you go.

Punk in Drublic
Punk in Drublic
April 4, 2011 8:25 pm

Damn fine piece. I hear about massive taxes being applied to chinese imports to bring back our manufacturing jobs, I hear about ending unions to make american stuff more competitive, I hear about lowering corporate taxes and cutting regulations to make it easier to create businesses. All this from analysts and bloggers and people who are not in charge and when our representatives gather together to guide this nation they see fit to do things like increase funding to the small business administration, or some other dimwitted thing.

I don’t know what would reform our economy but it really seems the government is only good at creating more government.

Maybe we could export that…. Oh wait, we do that. It ain’t a money maker.

Opinionated Bloviator
Opinionated Bloviator
April 4, 2011 8:27 pm

This data is not that surprising, the time taken for the economy to “recover” the jobs lost due to economic downturns has increased dramatically in the last 3 recessions, it is now at the point where the “recovery” time is EXCEEDING the time BETWEEN recessions.

If this trend continues, it paints a very scary picture – a relentlessly increasing “chronic” unemployment rate that continues to grow and grow. Egypt has an unemployment rate of ~ 30%. Will this be US in the next 10 years?

Reverse Engineer
Reverse Engineer
April 4, 2011 8:47 pm

What could we manufacture to export the chindians will not produce for less? Unless you plan on paying $2/day to your slaves like they do, you can’t compete. What could we produce broke people around the world could afford to buy ? What money worth anything will they buy it with?

Forget the export trade model, it is history.

RE

Jmarz
Jmarz
April 4, 2011 9:59 pm

RE

We can’t compete with labor on cheap products but we can compete on innovation. Unfortunately, taxes and regulations are suffocating the US from ever having a chance to regain any type of manufacturing platform.

Reverse Engineer
Reverse Engineer
April 4, 2011 11:02 pm

@Jmarz

What are you going to “innovate” that anyone else can afford to buy and what money are you going to take in exchange for it? After you ‘innnovate” it, how are you going to stop the Chindians from copying it and selling it cheaper than you can?

RE

Jmarz
Jmarz
April 4, 2011 11:25 pm

RE

I would be a rich businessman if I had that answer. In regard to China copying, that is a serious issue. Technology is where America has done well with innovation but I don’t think the US will ever be able to compete on cheap low end products.

u doran
u doran
April 4, 2011 11:49 pm

The Banksters crimes on Fraudclosure laid oput last night on 60 minutes should hopefully have a lot of the large law firms slavating for the massive RICO of the big banksters crime syndicate.
The pathetic clip from Sheila Bair that “we need to put a box on this with a $20 Billion fund”.
$6 Billion of mortages that are say 25% undewater is say about a Trillion. The $20 B’s will do what?

The ONLY solution is the old saying froim the Vietnam days.
“The only way to save the village was to destroy it.”
Wipe out and start over.
How the heck can we let 535 criminal morons in ghe CONgress run and destroy the lives and fortunes of 300,000,000 sheeples? Apathy. When we hit 30% unemployment with the next down leg on stocks them the sheeples will perhaos rise up. Perhaps

Reverse Engineer
Reverse Engineer
April 5, 2011 12:28 am

@Jmarz

Along with the export model, I suggest you bag your fantasy of becoming a “rich bizness man”. That model also is going the way of the dinosaur. If you want to get rich in this world, you’ll have to do it the old fashioned way. you steal it.

RE

Luke
Luke
April 5, 2011 2:20 am

I don’t think we live in an oligarchy. We don’t even live in a kleptocracy (society where thieves rule).

Rather, I think we live in a mendacracy — a society based on LIES, where liars rule.

Surly1
Surly1
April 5, 2011 6:29 am

Excellent and to the point, referred to on another thread:
http://www.declineoftheempire.com/2011/04/a-resurgence-of-lousy-jobs.html

“In March, employment in the service-providing sector continued to expand, led by a gain of 78,000 in professional and business services. Most of the gain occurred in temporary help services (+29,000) and in professional and technical services (+35,000).

“Employment in leisure and hospitality rose by 37,000 over the month, with more than two-thirds of the increase in food services and drinking places (+27,000).

“In March, average hourly earnings for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls were unchanged at $22.87…

“I am delighted that many more bartenders, waitresses and dishwashers have been hired recently, a trend which reflects the need of so many Americans to eat & drink their way through the current disaster. However, it is that last BLS number, the average hourly wage, that hides the grim truth—half the jobs added during the “recovery” pay very low wages. Yahoo News recently reported the trend in Jobs returning — but good ones not so much.

“Lower-wage industries — things like retail and food preparation — accounted for 23 percent of the jobs lost during the recession, but 49 percent of the jobs gained over the last year, a recent study (pdf) by the National Employment Law Project [NELP] found. Higher-wage industries, by contrast, accounted for 40 percent of the jobs lost, but just 14 percent of the jobs gained. In other words, low paying jobs are increasing as a percentage of total jobs, while high-paying jobs are on the decline.”

One of the reasons food prep jobs account for so much of this so-called employment is that burger joint operators have to continually feed the funnel and keep hiring to reduce their staff churn.

Quite a “recovery.”

T
T
April 5, 2011 7:16 am

Masterfully researched. Masterfully written, except for the use of the word “affect” as in:

“The insidious affects of Federal Reserve generated inflation can be seen in the above chart.”

Per Strunk, William, Jr. and White, The Elements of Style, V. WORDS AND EXPRESSIONS COMMONLY MISUSED:

“To affect something is to cause it to change in some way. To effect something it to cause it to come into being.”

The sentence should read:

“The insidious effects of Federal Reserve generated inflation can be seen in the above chart.”

Arthur G. Brina
Arthur G. Brina
April 5, 2011 8:03 am

The process of decline can be reversed. Tax rates would not have to be raised, and social welfare programs would not have to be cut. The solution would not be painless, however. It can best be described by two phrases: No Subsidies and High Tariffs.

ALL subsidies of every type must be eliminated. The country should not pick favorites by retaining some subsidies but not others. This eliminates not just subsidies for the rich and for corporations; but alo all itemized tax deductions, as well as deductions for state and local taxes.

A pervasive system of tariffs must be placed on ALL goods and services being imported into the United States. These tariff rates should be uniform and punitive, since the country should not protect some industries and not others, or that some countries would be favored over others. The rates should be high enough so as to make it economically infeasible for imports to compete against domestic output. Imports would become a luxury.

The net effects: prices will go up and so would incomes. Employment and wages would go up and food stamps and welfare would go down. The private sector -not the government- would be the main driver of our economy. Also, government would have a freer hand in imposing evironmental and occupational safety standards, if enterprises are unable to shift production to offshore sources to meet domestic demand.

By expanding the private sector, and adding revenues brought in by tariffs (which would decline substantially over time as the domestic output -and thereby taxable income- would increase), tax revenues to the government would increase without raising tax rates.

eugend66
eugend66
April 5, 2011 8:14 am

Not a word about the price of raw materials being imported, Mr Brina.
” Also, government would have a freer hand in imposing evironmental and occupational safety standards, if enterprises are unable to shift production to offshore sources to meet domestic demand.” On that you may hate the lack of the EDIT feature.
– 1, Mr.

Surly1
Surly1
April 5, 2011 8:43 am

“Plutarchy” and “mendacracy:” +1 each.

Dick
Dick
April 5, 2011 9:15 am

>Rather, I think we live in a mendacracy — a society based on LIES, where liars rule.

So, what are the “lies” from your point of view?

Surly1
Surly1
April 5, 2011 10:05 am

Lies?

Only when their mouths are moving, e.g.:

Anything Bernanke says…
Corporations are people…
The economy is recovering…
Your vote counts…

Pick your poison.

newsjunkie
newsjunkie
April 5, 2011 10:23 am

I say it’s a Totalitarian Corporatocracy.

Dave
Dave
April 5, 2011 10:34 am

Lot of people here are in denial. There’s no magic solution to America’s problems until their is a re-distribution of the wealth, the elimination of professional politicians, and the innovation of a new system of economics that is sustainable. The rest is mental masturbation.

Surly1
Surly1
April 5, 2011 10:43 am

Another popular lie:
“Nothing to see here citizen. Move along.”

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/curious-case-fed-analyst-fired-after-asking-too-many-questions

Reverse Engineer
Reverse Engineer
April 5, 2011 11:13 am

@Dave

It’s the wealth redistribution probl which gives most of the well to do demographic here fits. Nobody wants their wealth redistributed.

RE

DexterMorgan
DexterMorgan
April 5, 2011 11:53 am

If it weren’t for sites such as this one.. our only source for information on the economy would be the government Mininistry of Propaganda…. (MSM just propogates the lies)…what a scary thought !

Arthur G. Brina
Arthur G. Brina
April 5, 2011 11:55 am

Raw materials, especially oil, must be taxed too. I would rather that the U.S. government acquired all the tax revenue, that it is currently getting at the gas pump, from the point of entry instead. This would make local production even more attractive and would stimulate alternative sources of energy development nd production. None of these should have any tax subsidies attached to them, however. Let them prove their worthiness solely in economic terms.

Improving Lifestyles
Improving Lifestyles
April 5, 2011 2:24 pm

Way too simplistic and narrow, absurdly biased and ignoring the massive and accelerating advances in knowledge.

What about the Internet? What about our science and technology?

What about the rest of the world stealing our intellectual property (software, movies, games, music) while we pay for their products?

What about the effect of slave labor wages in Asia causing loss of jobs here?

How about over population, massive species extinction and loss of wilderness habitat?

What about the end of the cold war?

To conclude a decay in a civilation based on a linear interpretation of limited unemployment data is just not being very insightful. We live in a globally interconnected and unfathomably complex world. We should to try to make sense of it, but do not pretend to know the answers with such a narrow, biased view.

Tweechiezone
Tweechiezone
April 5, 2011 2:32 pm

Jim is probably my favorite blogger. His talent and ability to bring together the proper way to present all of this is uncanny. Trying to make my local community understand any of this is like trying to shoot pool with a rope. When does the light bulb come on after paying $4.00 for a tomato or $1.59 for one Lime to put in my Corona? We all know people who are out of work and struggling. We all know people who are in menial lowpaying jobs where they are 10 times overqualified. Still I don’t think even 10% of the masses have a clue what is coming down the pike. None of this is Gloom and Doom. It is all fact.

Here is a tip that many of you who are in the know will like. There is over 39 Trillion fiat dollars stuck in the nation’s pension funds. To date, less than 1% of that money has diversified into PMs/Gold and Silver. What will happen when these pension funds finally realize their dollars are worth less and less each day. The stampede has not yet begun but it will be just like with the home buying mania of the last decade. Remember, the herd always buys at the highest prices.

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
April 5, 2011 4:03 pm

Improving Lifestyles:

You shouldn’t try to improve on Lifestyles.

I mean the condoms. I was using Improved Lifestyles when I was banging your bitch. The fucking thing popped like a shaving cream balloon. Don’t come looking to me for child support though, I had a vasectomy.

John
John
April 5, 2011 4:18 pm

“The average worker today is making 10% less than they did in 1965, on an inflation adjusted basis.”

Yea, and thats from a fantasy land inflation statistic provided by the Government . Reality is probably way north of 10% less then 1965.

Muck About
Muck About
April 5, 2011 5:24 pm

Long ago and far away – back in 1962, I was a young engineer with RCA working out of the Cape up and down the Atlantic Missile Range. 24 years old, 2 kids, a new car and a pretty good 2BR/2BA home in Satellite Beach, FL. My sweetie stayed home and mothered me and my kids and I worked my ass off.

But I made enough to support a wife and family for the next 40 years – one earner household – comfortable but not rich. No real savings until 1970 when I moved overseas to work so I wouldn’t have to pay taxes.

In the 1980’s things began to change. Women started to work more outside the home. Pretty soon, they had to work at two jobs – home making and a paying gig just to make ends meet and maintain the life style.

The standard of living of the American public was silently cut in half between 1980 and 1990. Now, with two people working full time outside the home, things are getting tight financially again. Pretty soon, instead of college, kids will have to go to work to keep groceries on the family table. Then it will be three or four family members working to maintain a semblance of what I was able to do in 1962 all by myself.

The standard of living is still dropping, people. You know it is just by looking around you at the people scratching for a living any way they can and many have simply given up and sucking off the Federal and State teats of welfare and the FSA.

It is one of those things that will keep happening until it stops. When it stops, we will all be in the soup, regardless of your political point of view. I hope to be at least short dead before things grind to a halt.

MA

Reverse Engineer
Reverse Engineer
April 5, 2011 5:35 pm

Death is the EZ way out MA. You should stock up on Cat Food with the rest of the Seniors in case you live another decade or two..

RE

Punk in Drublic
Punk in Drublic
April 5, 2011 6:04 pm

“The standard of living of the American public was silently cut in half between 1980 and 1990.”

That’s an interesting way to put it, you’re right, too. Many people would disagree, what with all the advances in technology and knowledge, that our standard of living has increased. I would have, not long ago, when I was not aware of the trade off that had been made that went along with it. But if you look at it that way, you kind of have to wonder.

Muck About
Muck About
April 5, 2011 7:38 pm

Thanks, Punk.. I’ve thought about it a lot over the years as I watched it happen. When it became _required_ that a wife work out side the home (not necessarily by choice) I decided right then that our standard of living, in general, had been cut in half. Those ladies that wanted to work were a different story – more education, independence, self reliance et al is a good thing and they’re welcome to it. I personally could never figure out how a female could put herself at such a disadvantage and dependency in an “old fashioned” marriage.

My sweetie told me — more than once — she wanted to be a stay at home Mom and that’s what she did. I would not have managed nearly as well if she hadn’t been either.. Took me a while to figure that one out but it’s true.

So, yeah… I’ll stand by what I said. It probably started earlier than 1980 – perhaps after the crash in 1974, it just wasn’t as visible then as in the 80’s. Funny how we went on the skids starting right after Tricky Dicky Nixon slammed the gold window on everybody’s fingers, isn’t it?

Sounds to me like an unsound money contributes greatly to an unsound society and that’s where we find ourselves today – 40 years later..

MA

Reverse Engineer
Reverse Engineer
April 5, 2011 8:14 pm

The skids started well before the 70s MA, you need to go back to the cold war at least.

RE

Punk in Drublic
Punk in Drublic
April 5, 2011 9:50 pm

fiat currency, globalization, peak American oil, computerization, punk rock…. Too many factors to really lay blame on one event.

Colma Rising
Colma Rising
April 5, 2011 9:56 pm

Hippies. I blame everything on hippies.

Jmarz
Jmarz
April 5, 2011 10:03 pm

MA

You make some great points. Were you invested in gold or silver during the last precious metals bull market during the 70’s?

Shadows
Shadows
April 5, 2011 10:04 pm

MuckAbout

Well, I’m not sure that our standard of living has been reduced, remember, standard of living is not the same thing as wealth, although they are correlated. It is impossible to quantify the quality of life improvements from things like Youtube and improved medicine, for example. Or even things like the end of the Cold War, removing the fear of a nuclear Armageddon from American’s lives. But your’re right about one thing, on an inflation-adjusted basis, the income of the median American man has gone DOWN since 1970, though not by as much as a half. And I agree that has had a lot to do with driving American women into the workforce. They have been forced by necessity to make up for the stagnating wages of their husbands. Sometimes I wish I had been born when you were.

Surly1
Surly1
April 5, 2011 10:33 pm

Admin

Two-shot foul on your mugging of Improving Lifestyle. Not clear on why you threw an elbow.

It is not at all a lack of critical thinking to suggest that the world is a complex place, and that a variety of factors enter affect the unfolding clusterfuck. The people who gather here probably read many of the same sites, and share common beliefs: disdain for the Chairsatan, mistrust of all MSM propaganda outlets, a belief that government is out of control and wholly unresponsive to anything except deep-pocketed lobbyists, Wall Street banks, and corporations, plus a realization that the burdens of Empire are no longer supportable.

I have a friend who is a science writer, very plugged in to technology, who remains an indefatigable optimist in the face of the daily “news.” Fresh from reading a Kunstler rant, over lunch I engaged him on the premise of Peak Oil, $10 gas and TEOTAWKI. He truly believes that necessity is a mother, that $10 gas will be the midwife of a cornucopia of alt energies. We agreed to disagree, although I readily defer to his superior knowledge of the field.

Point being that “critical thinking” can lead in directions different from those who hold with the Austrian/Chicago school orthodoxy.

For example, I would posit that “the effect of slave labor wages in Asia causing loss of jobs here” is fundamental to the distress of American labor and real wage deflation. We’ve been exporting American manufacturing since the 70s (and MA has the time frame right about the slide). Combine the globalism enabled by NAFTA and GATT, coupled with ever so helpful legislation fashioned by the craven lickspittles in Congress that accelerated the export of American manufacturing with tax breaks, and we have a perfect storm for breaking the American middle class.

No lack of dot-connecting here. And perhaps a reason that compels many to gather here.

So, intentional foul? But it’s your ball and your court.

Muck About
Muck About
April 6, 2011 11:54 am

@Jmarz: You betcha.. Although it was illegal for US citizens to own gold at the time, there were ways to get around it – like gold mining shares, Swiss Franc accounts, etc. One could leagally own a Swiss Account which was declared on your income tax form. Then you instructed the Swiss Bank to hold your funds in whatever you wanted.

I legally (and paid some taxes) on gold investments back in the early 70’s and got out as gold was passing $600 on the way up.

A small bit of advise. The gold and silver mining shares markets absolutely dwarf the metal markets themselves. When the time comes (and it will) when gold and silver keep moving higher and higher and the share prices of the producers thereof stagnate or even drizzle off, that’s a divergence that spells the end of the PM boom. That doesn’t mean sell all your physical gold and silver, it just means don’t buy any more. Sell the shares and skip the top 10% of the metal rise as it goes into a parabolic (and therefore unsustainable) rise.

So you might say I’ve been there and done that but sadly, this time the credit bubble and quadrillion $$ derivative bubble (world wide) is far, far, way and ahead worse than the minor stupidity of the mid 70’s and early 80’s. When these (and it will) implode, I somehow suspect that “money” will be destroyed at a far faster rate than it can be honestly created, leaving only dishonestly created money left..

We are in unchartered territory here on a global scale. Never before have the economies of the numerous countries of the world been tied together in such a web of interdependence. Used to be, one country could go bust (and did regularly) and it would be a hickup globally. Now, I’m not so sure it could be contained to any single region or continent or small group of countries.

I suspect we will sink or swim together – some making it to the shore and some drowning on the way. We are damned to live in interesting times and I, for one, am getting tired of it.

MA

Muck About
Muck About
April 6, 2011 12:04 pm

@Shadows: You have an interesting way of disagreeing with me! By the middle of your post you started taking my side and finished up right where I was!

I thoroughly agree with everything you said – so there. I also stand pat on what I said – so there two..

The only thing I disagree with you one is that I still fear nuclear Armageddon. The weapons are still there (in somewhat reduced numbers – but they need to be GONE) and are spreading like a fungus in less and less reliable hands.

To me, a suitcase nuke set off in a container in Long Beach woud be Armageddon as far as our existence is concerned. Our country would morph into a fascist state faster than you could blink and we’d strike out (with nukes) at everyone we thought even contributed the equivalent of a dime to the holocaust that would follow such a blow. It is not a pretty picture to contemplate.

I’m afraid that with the irrational thinking that goes hand in hand with religion, it is more likely to happen than not. I don’t want to be around when it does..

MA

TeresaE
TeresaE
April 6, 2011 2:02 pm

And this article is yet another reason why I love Admin.

Theft. Plain and simple.

The elite and their minions have stolen the American Dream and we, the people, happily made the exchange while distracted by bright, shiny, thought-killing toys.

I found out that starting last January, the food stamps date has been pushed back by over a week. Guess how many millions are sitting looking at empty cupboards and refrigerators today, waiting for their new rations next Tuesday and they have done NOTHING to prepare for what will happen if (when) the politicians shut down the government this week.

My, oh my, how much fun will Admin’s 30 blocks be by next Friday? I live way too close to Detroit and I am scared to death of what may occur in the next week.

Meanwhile, the recovery is growing, we all should charge up a new (Asian-made) tv and party-on.

llpoh
llpoh
April 6, 2011 8:53 pm

The sons of bitches couldn’t lie straight in bed.

I am disappointed that another excellent work by the Admin has gotten so few comments. What the fuck is going on? Yes, we have lost a major catalyst, but you bastards need to get off your fat asses and get the shit moving. There are targets aplenty around – RE is still mouthing off, and I saw Flash lurking somewhere as well. He is always happy to meet all comers with a few thousand words of cut-and-paste. And brann – don’t think I have forgotten you, my little RE wannabe.

llpoh
llpoh
April 6, 2011 9:07 pm

Admin – I caught a range of the usually bluewater stuff – wahoo/macks/GTs/yellowfin/etc. It was good to get away, but good to get back to my family. The welcome lasted about 2 seconds, then it was busines as usual.

I am pleased to hear there are newbies to harass. I expect that they have receved the standard warm welcome – but I will do my best to sort them out.

Thanks for the warm welcome!