VETS VIEWS ON LEOS PLAYING SOLDIER IN FERGUSON

 

WHAT COMBAT VETERANS SEE IN 

FERGUSON, MISSOURI

Farrell
The author, center, while serving in Afghanistan

 
by Matthew Farwell

August 16, 2014

Watching the tragedy-turned-drama of this week unfold in Ferguson, Missouri—five hours up the road from my home in Arkansas—an eight-year-old scene kept replaying in my mind.

It was a little after dawn on Thanksgiving morning when the Afghan National Army soldiers and the Afghan National Police officers pointed their AK-47s and rocket propelled grenades at each other, jabbering threats in angry Pashto and Dari. They were about 30 feet away from where I was monitoring the radios in the passenger seat of my gun-truck. Suddenly, the hot turkey dinner my infantry platoon had been promised that afternoon at our remote outpost in the middle of Taliban-country in Ghazni province seemed pretty far away, given the inevitable turkey shoot. It had happened before, the A.N.A. and A.N.P. shooting at each other.

I set down the magazine I was reading and walked over to the tent reeking of farts and feet where the rest of my infantry platoon was sleeping to wake up my lieutenant.

“Uh, sir, the A.N.A and A.N.P. are. . . . well, you should get out here.”

Next I woke up our interpreter, who took one look at our poorly trained, trigger-happy, likely-stoned allies and said, “Fuck this shit, I go get my body armor first,” in his Hollywood-meets-Afghanistan voice. I walked back to the up-armored Humvee, shut the heavy steel-plated door as quietly as I could, got on the radio and told headquarters the fireworks would begin, oh, any minute.

My lieutenant, a jacked 24-year-old Puerto Rican guy from Queens, marched between the two groups, wearing nothing more than a t-shirt, fatigue pants and flip-flops, and pushed the barrels of the lead AK-47s to the ground. Then he grabbed an R.P.G. from the hands of a policeman, pointed, and shouted some choice phrases in universally understood English until the two factions dispersed, embarrassed and chagrined.

There’s a stale old joke—the difference between the Boy Scouts and the Army is that the Scouts have adult supervision—but on Thanksgiving Day, 2006, my Lieutenant proved that wasn’t true. As I observed the chaos in Missouri this week, I kept wondering where the adults were.

I couldn’t get past the fact that the police in Ferguson were wearing better battle-rattle and carrying more tricked-out weapons than my infantry platoon used in one of the most dangerous parts of Afghanistan. Looking at the lines of cops facing off against angry protesters, I was alarmed at their war-like paramilitary posturing.

In Afghanistan, as infantrymen facing a determined and dangerous, though largely faceless foe, our business was killing people and business was good that year. When people shot at us, we shot back until they were dead or their heads were down, then we got on the radio and dropped bombs or mortars on those heads until nothing remained but bits and pieces of bodies stuck in trees that still stood among the craters, black birds alighting on their branches for an easy meal. When people weren’t shooting at us, we passed out backpacks and sacks of rice and tried to win friends, which turned out to be a pretty hard thing to do for some reason.

To my eyes the police, whose business is peace, have no business strutting through the streets carrying M-4 carbines with reflexive-fire sights on top, surefire tactical flashlights on barrel-mounted rail systems slung from three-point harnesses, or white zip-tie flex cuffs over black-body armor, their eyes and faces obscured by gas masks and their heads covered with Kevlar helmets. A bunch of other combat veterans I stay in touch with online agreed. Indeed, besides black Americans, to whom these kind of disturbing images are hardly new, these veterans seemed the most irate, but also the most attuned to the danger posed by the cognitive dissonance of peace officers dressed for war—and not just in Ferguson, but in Boston in the wake of the marathon bombing.

I sent a message to a former Special Forces friend in Oregon.

“I was wondering what would happen if a bunch of us vets kitted up without weapons and stood in-between the cops and civs.”

His message came back: “I’m doing that this weekend! I’m kitting fully up armor helmet everything. And showing police what they look like. I fully support you!”

With another infantry veteran in Oklahoma on Wednesday night, I joked about “kitting up and going to Ferguson” to watch things unfold.

“No. I’m out now and I don’t do stuff that could get me killed anymore. I have, however, donated to the ACLU.”

**************

I called an old friend from the Army, Justin, who’d served with me in Afghanistan, as part of the 10th Mountain Division’s Delta Company, 2-87 Infantry (Catamounts!). Justin’s been a cop in a town in Iowa roughly the size of Ferguson for the past four years. I wanted his opinion as a cop planning to make it a career following his stint as the self-described “worst soldier in the Army.” (He wasn’t, he just didn’t give a hoot about the dog and pony show aspects of spit-and-polish soldiering.)

“The trend nowadays is thinking we’re in a police state, and we’re not,” he said. “Why are these cops lined up like Stalingrad?” That said, he is glad the equipment is available to those who have to serve high-risk warrants and respond to mass shootings. “We didn’t have this kind of gear 10 years ago because we didn’t need it then, but now, you’d be surprised what is out on the streets—we’re dealing with cartels, sophisticated criminals who didn’t exist on small-town radars before—there are SAWs [the same type of belt-fed, small caliber machine gun that killed Pat Tillman] missing from military arsenals.”

I asked him if he thought there was a difference between wearing the military style gear and the regular blue or brown police uniform and shield in how the officers regarded themselves—whether, in essence, the clothes make the man.

“Why they’re wearing woodland camo is beyond me,” he said, much less pointing their weapons at people. We’d both been well-trained that when you aimed your rifle at a person, that meant you were prepared to kill them. “If someone tells me what to do without telling me the reason, I’m liable to be resistant too. So, when I’m dealing with people I try to let them understand why, show them some compassion. If you don’t treat people like savages, you can get people to do anything.”

Justin has grown up quite a bit since the Army.

“Sometimes, it seems that everyone likes to imagine being a part of the military. . . . It must be great fun to imagine yourself a soldier without the risk of physical, mental, or moral damage,” wrote Paul Fussell, a veteran of infantry combat in World War II, in a chapter on “Weirdos” in his book, Uniforms: You are What You Wear.

“These people, having missed World War II, Korea, and Vietnam, never tasted the thrill of being machine-gunned and mortared and thus escaped, unlike former ground troops, lifelong bodily and spiritual damage,” Fussell wrote. “Not having endured real military experience, they get excited by faking it.” Fussell’s scorn was directed not at the police but at people dressing like G.I. JOE with far less serious repercussions: war re-enactors, couture design wearing models strutting down the runway in military-derived designs, hipsters wearing surplus Eisenhower jackets at coffee shops.

What would Fussell have made of all this? Boys with toys, I thought, dressing like Delta force wannabes, I thought, reading hyperventilating posts about police militarization on Wednesday and Thursday. Being a contrarian and an experience snob, I wasn’t sure what to make of all the outrage from people who’ve never had handcuffs slapped around their wrists and double locked. I didn’t have a seamless transition to civilian life after leaving the military and found myself wearing a jail jumpsuit a couple of times for non-violent misdemeanors. I’ve been arrested by cops that were assholes, and cops that were not, and it makes a difference.

As Fussell writes, “Playing soldiers used to be appropriate only among small boys.”

Many actual solders wish it had stayed that way.

5
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
VietVet
VietVet

Well said

Mike Moskos

Stefan Molyneux did a good podcast called “The Truth About Michael Brown”
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/fdr2775-truth-about-michael/id552010683?i=317797918&mt=2
or look on youtube.

I’m coming to increasingly believe this was a “good kill” (that the officer was threatened and justified in shooting).

BUT, the police department’s reaction after the fact is/was totally flawed. What should really scare all of us is that the same policies that led to the ongoing Rambo reaction are probably the same ones that exist in all of our cities. Those polices are in dry policy papers and department regulations that will never get read by the politicians who are supposed to watch out for us.

Like so many areas that endured riots 20+ years ago, Ferguson is toast as a city–can you imagine what that reaction is costing them alone in police overtime? Let’s not forget how many people and businesses will move out, leaving another wasteland of those left behind. The city council probably doesn’t know how else to react and it will cost their future dearly. Now might be a good time to get to those city council meetings and tell them they need to examine their own policies.

Nonanonymous

Billy could just as easily have written this article. So, let’s review, black teen gets shot by white LEO. By all accounts, the officer could have retreated and called for backup, with an ensuing stand off. The teen wasn’t armed and non-lethal measures could have been used to subdue him.

The entire neighborhood would have turned out for the standoff, and the mob could have ultimately turned on the police officers. Since TPTB don’t want to start shooting the peasants, it’s bad public relations, this officer has been trained it’s easier to shoot one and avoid escalation.

Now the peasants have had enough, perhaps rightfully so, and they start peaceably assembling in their own neighborhood. The police have formed their own line to keep them there, and the stand off continues.

It wasn’t a righteous shoot. You can’t gun someone down because of an irrational fear for your own safety. Yes, the kid was stupid, but that isn’t a capital crime, and the police aren’t judge and jury. The officer didn’t wait for backup and took it upon himself to take down someone who was physically intimidating, but the officers life wasn’t in danger when he pulled the trigger. The only way this was justified, is if the kid was charging the officer at the time he was shot. Waiting for backup would have taken away the lethality of the assault. You can’t shoot someone because you don’t want to get your hands dirty.

So, the question remains, why didn’t the officer call and wait for backup? We know the consequences, but why? Are the Ferguson police riding herd over the urban dwellers? Well, it is Missouri.

This officer insisted on getting out of his car, and now a black youth is dead. Either this young man’s life is worth something, or it’s not. If it’s not, then we’ve already become what we fear, a Machiavellian Police State. If it does, then the officer should be charged with manslaughter and let the courts do their job. Since the path of least resistance for TPTB is to do nothing, that’s what they’ll do. The main concern for everyone from the local police up to the Governor’s office is to keep their pensions, and wait for everything to return to normal.

The city council could engage police and community leaders to address the strong arm tactics being used against the urban dwellers in Ferguson, but we’re past that point. The local prosecutor most likely wants to keep his job past the next election cycle, so he’s going to do what his backers want him to do, which is nothing. Besides, it would set a bad precedence if prosecutors started prosecuting real crimes, or charging law enforcement for the consequences of using excessive force. Given the overwhelming number of reports in the news of police using excessive force, perhaps this is exactly what is needed. The only difficulty is this requires TPTB to police themselves, which they have thus far been proven incapable of doing.

Who knows, I might peaceably demonstrate under similar circumstances, but I probably wouldn’t do it in my own neighborhood. I would take it to the city council, and force them to cordon off city hall for every meeting for as long as it takes until the issue is addressed. It’s not like these community activists have anything better to do than what for next month’s EBT.

That’s my 10,000 foot view with no other facts than the combat veteran who penned this post. When the US started fighting limited wars, it was only natural for them to bring this experience to bear on the domestic front. After all, that’s what Barack Hussein Obama promised on the campaign trail, that’s what he’s doing, and it’s the only thing our federal government knows how to do well, keep people moving around from reservation to reservation, relying on handouts. So much for the plantation.

Copfuks? The term police derives from the Latin and means “public order”. The police are only doing their jobs. The root cause of the unrest is the establishment of a two tiered society of elites and the unwashed. Things have gotten quite desperate for those in the lower echelons of the social strata, and all the EBT cards and free stuff in the world can’t restore a person’s dignity.

It’s probably too late for successive generations of welfare recipients. But it’s not too late restore order, not on the streets, but in the board rooms, elected offices, and government at all levels. Or, maybe it is.

The protesters in Ferguson, Missouri aren’t the problem. It’s the killing of an unarmed teen by a police officer, only doing his job, that is the problem, and the use of excessive force.

Stucky

Nonanonymous = diarrhea of the mouth cock-gobbler.

You all would do well to just not read his bullshit.

Nonanonymous

Stukfuk, the original diarrheal cock gobbler. Thanks for your contribution.