Moral Befuddlement in Ferguson

Guest Post by Patrick J. Buchanan

“It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.”

Edmund Burke’s insight returned to mind while watching cable news coverage of the rampage in Ferguson, Missouri, after St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert McCulloch announced that officer Darren Wilson would not be indicted in the shooting death of Michael Brown.

The rioting, looting, arson and gunfire that began after McCulloch relayed the grand jury’s decision, a decision long predicted and anticipated, revealed the unspoken truth about Ferguson.

The problem in Ferguson is not the 53-man police department. The problem is the hoodlum element those Ferguson cops have to police, who, Monday night, burned and pillaged the stores on the main streets of their own community.

The police were portraits in restraint as they were cursed and showered with rocks, bottles and Molotov cocktails. If the police were at fault at all, it was in their refusal to use the necessary force to stop a rampaging mob that destroyed the lives and livelihoods of honest businessmen and women of Ferguson.

Many will not be able to rebuild their stores. Many will not be able to get insurance. Many will give up and move away, the investment of a lifetime lost in a night of thuggery.

One recalls that the Detroit riot of 1967 was the beginning of the end of Motown. And it was decades before D.C. fully recovered from the riot and arson that followed the assassination of Dr. King.

In the wake of the Ferguson riot, some seek absolution for the rioters by redistributing responsibility to police and prosecutor.

Why, they demand, did McCulloch wait until 8 p.m., St. Louis time, to report the grand jury findings? Why did he wait until after dark?

Well, perhaps it was to give time for kids to get home from school and off the playgrounds, for businesses to close and shutter down, for rush hour to end. Hoodlums from Ferguson earlier stormed onto I-70 and shut down the Interstate — the way home for tens of thousands of St. Louisans.

Whatever reason McCulloch had for waiting until 8 p.m. does not explain or excuse the rampant criminality that lasted until midnight.

“No justice, no peace!” has been a howl of the protesters.

What they mean is strikingly clear: Michael Brown, one of us, is dead. Therefore, this cop, Darren Wilson, must go on trial for his life.

But this is not justice in America.

We have a legal process to determine who was in the right and who in the wrong, and whether a crime has been committed by a policeman in the use of deadly force.

“No justice, no peace” is an encapsulation of the lex talionis, an eye for an eye. Do we really want to go back to race-based lynch law?

That 10 o’clock split screen of Obama in the White House briefing room calling for peaceful protest and greater efforts by police to understand “communities of color,” side by side with graphic video of mob mayhem in Ferguson, tells a sad truth.

America’s election of a black president has not closed and, for some, has not even narrowed the racial divide.

We are now half a century on from the Civil Rights Act of 1964. African-Americans have risen out of poverty and the working class to become successes as actors, artists, athletes, executives, politicians, TV anchors, journalists, scholars, generals, authors, etc.

But if the hate we saw on the streets of Ferguson, and heard from many voices on cable Monday night, are a reflection of sentiment in the black community, the racial divide in some parts of America is as great as ever.

Indeed, we may be slipping backwards.

“Where is the black leadership now?” asks Juan Williams of Fox News. Indeed, where?

Unfortunately, many are openly pandering to the crowd, denouncing the prosecutor, denouncing the grand jury, denouncing the Ferguson cops, but tongue-tied when it come to denouncing the thuggery of black youth on the streets of Ferguson.

The morning after the riot in Ferguson, President Cornell William Brooks of the NAACP called the grand jury decision not to indict Wilson “salt in the wound of a brutal injustice. … The people in this community and across the country are … saddened and outraged.”

Where, from the president on down, do we hear any thunderous condemnation of what went on in Ferguson Monday night and of those responsible, coupled with a clarion call for the restoration of law and order in Ferguson, as an essential precondition of any civilized society?

Here is Eric Holder’s venture into moral equivalency when the grand jury decision came down:

“It does not honor [Michael Brown’s] memory to engage in violence or looting. In the coming days it will likewise be important for local law enforcement authorities to respect the rights of demonstrators, and deescalate tension by avoiding extreme displays — and uses — of force.”

Now there’s a lion of the law.

IMAGE NOTES: The image above is an artistic remix by Linda Muller for buchanan.org. Attribution (CC-BY-SA-4.0)
PHOTO CREDIT: By Loavesofbread [CC-BY-SA-4.0], via Wikimedia Commons

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
November 28, 2014 12:01 pm

I heard on radio (probably NPR) some Ferguson resident asking “why won’t they give us some jobs? ” Aside from the patently ridiculous belief that society or government can just give out jobs, who in God’s name would want to open a business in an inner city location so that it can be burned down when someone gets shot after punching a cop in the face and trying to grab his gun?

Stucky
Stucky
November 28, 2014 12:12 pm

“We have a legal process to determine who was in the right and who in the wrong, and whether a crime has been committed by a policeman in the use of deadly force. “No justice, no peace” is an encapsulation of the lex talionis, an eye for an eye. Do we really want to go back to race-based lynch law?” ————— from the article

Lynching? Complete and utter bullshit !!!!

It would be a “lynching” IF THERE WAS A TRIAL. But there was only a closed grand jury, all kinds of secret shit, no cross-examination of witnesses. It seems to me that “they” went all out to defend a copfuk.

From what I’ve read, the grand jury was heavily swayed by the copfuk’s testimony. WTF? Copfuks lie as a matter of record. A possible murdering copfuk fighting to stay out of life (and death) in prison ….. why the fuck would anyone believe his testimony??? I don’t get it. For the grand jury to conclude there isn’t enough evidence to get a conviction smacks of utter bullshit. I have no idea as to the guilt or innocence of EITHER the thug or copfuk. Neither do you.

The black community fucked up championing THIS case. There are PLENTY of cases that CLEARLY show copfuk brutality. How about that mentally challenged black man in New York who was choked to death because he couldn’t understand a simple order. How about SWAT raids conducted, oops, on the wrong house and people die? Soooo many clear-cut cases of copfuk brutality, and they chose this one. How stupid was that?

dan
dan
November 28, 2014 3:27 pm

the ‘Legal Process ” in this country has been corrupted as everything else has been since the ‘Clinton days’…….LEO and National Guard only protect the ‘GOVERNMENT ‘ buildings and property…even though the ‘citizens’ pay taxes for ‘services’ such as police protection…it is not there….one question is never answered if it is even asked…WHY do the LEO ..NOT shoot looters and fire bombers…on sight when they are involved it that task…….still waiting for that to be addressed since the ‘Watts Riots’…..the only mass killing of unarmed students protesting was at Kent State by the National Guard…..and they were not looting and/or fire bombing anything..but still received the death sentence for their actions….so until this countries ‘citizens’ understand ..WHO benefits from ‘civil strife’…we as a nation will continue to see PRIVATE PROPERTY destroyed and FREEDOM and LIBERTY eroded…..while our ‘hired and paid for protectors’…watch and do nothing…..imho

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
November 28, 2014 4:35 pm

Stuck,

The cop’s story of the kid grabbing for the gun was authenticated by the powder residue on the kid’s hand and the kid’s blood inside the car. There were at least a couple witnesses who said the kid charged the cop. There was blood 26 feet behind the kid’s body, which would corroborate the testimony that the kid had been coming at the cop at the end, although his rate of speed may not be provable via forensics. I would have preferred a trial, but a conviction would be virtually impossible given multiple testimonies of the kid charging and the forensic evidence.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
November 28, 2014 4:37 pm

PS, as with Trayvon, I agree that they picked the wrong martyr when there are so many true copfuk victims.

indialantic
indialantic
November 29, 2014 3:55 pm

Now the cops are double villains? They ‘murdered’ the unarmed choir boy Michael Brown…..and they “did nothing” to stop the mayhem and destruction in Ferguson after the ‘no indictment” verdict. Guys, LE was told to stand down by Obama/Holder and Missouri Governor Nixon. You can’t see what’s going on? (This is a race baiter’s wet dream.)

MEANWHILE: whitey replaces Team Skippy under the heat lamp…and the nation is distracted while the next disaster if being planned in DC behind closed doors.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading