The Nanny State

Nanny-State

nannystate1The FCC action with respect to the internet is pure nanny state behavior. But it is more than that! It is tyranny!

What does it say about freedom and liberty when five people can, without review of any elected officials, completely alter the internet? What does it say about the operation of government when the Chairman of the FCC refuses to appear before Congress to discuss what he is proposing? Just who is running this country and by what authority?

Does anyone believe the internet isn’t working properly? What is the purpose for this intervention? Are they fixing something not broken or is this infringement more ominous than that?

These questions reflect the imbalance between government and the people. Government no longer works for us. It is a force used to bend us to its will. It believes we work for them. As this decision shows, what we think does not matter. Furthermore, apparently what our so-called elected representatives don’t matter either.

The old USSR appears to have reconstituted itself on a different continent.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
taxSlave
taxSlave
March 1, 2015 5:13 pm

“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.”
― Groucho Marx

Fuck the bastards. They are ruining every fucking thing they touch.

Rise Up
Rise Up
March 1, 2015 5:36 pm

The author most likely knows or has a good idea to the answers of his questions. If not, I’ll help out:

“What does it say about freedom and liberty when five people can, without review of any elected officials, completely alter the internet?”

A. It says laws do not matter and unpromulgated rules can usurp legislation. As I said in another comment to a different post, Congress may as well go home and stay there. There is no need for them when the executive branch and their agencies overrule, overstep, and bypass Congress.

“What does it say about the operation of government when the Chairman of the FCC refuses to appear before Congress to discuss what he is proposing?”

A. It says the executive agencies are not accountable to the people’s representatives (Congress), and by proxy to the people themselves.

“Just who is running this country and by what authority?”

A. The Bilderbergers, Rothchilds, Rockefellers, aka, the shadow government.

“Does anyone believe the internet isn’t working properly?”

A. Only those in power who fear the ability of the people to publish the truth of their corruption.

“What is the purpose for this intervention?”

A. Censorship.

“Are they fixing something not broken or is this infringement more ominous than that?”

A. Both. “Ominous” is too soft a word for what’s coming.

[imgcomment image[/img]

[img]http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAcQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fryanmorrisonlaw.com%2Fthis-isnt-censorship-its-intelligence%2F&ei=u5PzVPaaO4zpoATt7YKoDg&psig=AFQjCNEdABiLX_zMfpsD5Cg-PTgraqF2-A&ust=1425335490997560[/img]