Syrian Crisis: What Will Happen Next?

Guest Post by Brandon Smith

The Syrian crisis and the confluence of clashing interests there was entirely predictable. In fact, I wrote an article on my former website in 2010 outlining the potential for Syria as a high value catalyst for global conflict titled “Will Globalists Trigger Yet Another World War?”

In it, I summarized the dubious history of wars initiated over the past century, including the nature of false flags and false paradigms created by globalists designed to divide nations and peoples and turn them against each other. This strategy of engineered war (along with engineered economic collapse) has been used time and time again by the elites to artificially generate chaos and then consolidate and centralize power while the masses are blinded by confusion.

Even back then, the problem with Syria seemed obvious:

“…We have a nuclear armed Israel itching to attack Iran. We have Iran engaged in a defense pact with Syria against Israel. We have Syria with Russian navy bases and weapons on its soil, and we have the U.S. rampaging through the Middle East encroaching on the borders of Pakistan and Yemen, essentially pissing off everyone. What we have is a Globalist made recipe for disaster, using the same ingredients they have used for the last several major wars…”

Only a year after I published the piece the civil uprising in Syria began, starting with the “Daraa protest movement”, aided by covert intelligence agencies including the CIA.

In 2012, I decided to reexamine my original theory on Syria as a global catalyst in my article “Syria And Iran Dominoes Lead To World War.”

In that article, I felt it was necessary to summarize trends in the region, where they might lead, and how globalists might exploit each scenario to achieve a false conflict between East and West. I predicted that the entire Syrian insurgency was conjured out of the ether by NATO interests, due to the suspicious nature of the Council On Foreign Relations and their public statements suddenly SUPPORTING Al-Qaida in Syria. U.S. involvement in the funding and training of the organization we now know as ISIS (or al-Qaida 2.0) has been proven.

I predicted that U.S. ground troops would enter Syria. This has happened, though the U.S. government maintains that their role and numbers will be “limited.”

I suggested that once U.S. troops were deployed in any capacity in the region, Iran would join forces with the Syrian government under their already existing mutual defense pact. Today, Iranian troops are entering Syria en masse for combat operations.

I also predicted that U.S. involvement in Syria would eventually elicit a military response from Russia and a financial response from China. Though China has not yet used the conflict as an excuse to accelerate the dumping of U.S. treasuries, Russia is now fully committed to airstrikes and is preparing a ground invasion, possibly exceeding 150,000 troops.

Some developments I suggested in my previous articles have not yet surfaced, though I believe there is more than enough momentum for them to be triggered. For instance, I believe Israel is still the ultimate wild card in the Syrian crisis. A military response from Israel is more than possible, particularly against Iran in retaliation for flooding into the region. Further U.S. involvement, including the greater commitment of major naval assets, is likely. And if the U.S. or Israel escalate, I believe Iran will shut down the Strait of Hormuz, perhaps even with the aid of Russia.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has hinted that Israeli activity in Syrian airspace will be obstructed, and reports of some “near misses” between Russian and Israeli fighters have surfaced.

Currently, U.S. “relations” with Russia are at lows not seen since the Cold War. In the meantime, the globalists have created a perfect storm of conflicting interests that could very well lead to outright world war. That said, there are different brands of warfare. And, as I pointed out five years ago, the elites do not necessarily need the threat of nuclear war to open the door to collapse.

Economic warfare would be just as devastating to many parts of the globe and the U.S. in particular, causing massive population reduction through starvation in the span of a few months while leaving large areas of infrastructure intact. Economic warfare is also a perfect distraction of the public eye away from the crimes of international financiers. Our fiscal structure is already in the middle of an implosion set in motion by deliberately destructive central banking policies. But in the midst of economic warfare, such monetary atrocities can simply be blamed on “the treachery of the East.”  The Syrian debacle makes an economic battle scenario between East and West “believable” for many people around the world.

Still, wider regional warfare of the shooting variety is certainly guaranteed in the near future.

Saudi Arabia has denounced Russian and Iranian involvement in Syria and has increased support to “moderate rebels.” Of course, as we have seen repeatedly in the past couple of years, there are in fact NO moderates in Syria as rebel groups continue to obtain Western money and weapons and then join the ranks of ISIS.

The Saudis have made it clear that they will never accept a situation in which the Assad regime continues to hold power in Syria. They have threatened a military response in the event that Assad gains superiority over the insurgency. Keep in mind that the Saudis have already committed forces to Yemen.

Tensions are also increasing between Saudi Arabia and Iran over Syrian involvement, despite recent Saudi support for the U.S./Iran nuclear deal. The European Council On Foreign Relations has warned that there are now no “mediators for deescalation” in the region. Of course, this is exactly the way they prefer it.

Turkey is also now a factor, with Turkish officials claiming airspace violations by Russia, and Turkish forces operating in at least a limited capacity in Syria and Iraq.  Syria is a gasoline soaked mess and there are too many potential sparks to keep track of.  The globalists have conjured an environment in which a disastrous domino effect is almost guaranteed.

Another rather unexpected consequence of the Syrian crisis is the now active effort by the elites to initiate a Cloward-Piven strategy using so-called Syrian “refugees” to destabilize the EU and perhaps even the U.S.  Already, the suggested immigration count for such refugees, many of whom are not even from Syria, has risen from 10,000 bound for the U.S. to 100,000.  I believe as the crisis continues to grow this number will be increased to 1 million refugees or more bound for the U.S.  Expect many extremist elements to be shipped into our borders along with them.

It is absolutely imperative to remember regardless of what happens next, almost every element of this crisis has been staged. War and economic despair are the ultimate expedient world-changing tools. They wipe the slate nearly clean, as it were, and mold public perception through fear. That which you thought impossible today becomes rather reasonable tomorrow after crisis takes hold; and this includes the final deconstruction of constitutional values, the militarization of our society, the loss of financial prosperity, the extreme degradation of living standards and the ultimate centralization of everything.

It is also important to realize that there are no sides in this conflict. The East/West paradigm is a sham of epic proportions and always has been. False sides are meant to distract and bewilder the public. They are designed to create counterfeit cross-sections of blame. They are an anathema to truth.

For further and deeper analysis on possible future developments on a global scale please read my articles “The Economic End Game Explained” and “Has America Been Set Up As History’s Ultimate Bumbling Villain?”

The question today is merely one of timing. How long before a negative trigger is introduced? How long before Israeli planes come into contact with Russian or Iranian fighters? How long before U.S. troops come into contact with Russian troops? How long before Israel or Saudi Arabia strike Iran? And if the U.S. backs out completely, how long before the entire dynamic of the Middle East is flipped and America loses petro-status for the dollar? With the speed of events forming a fiscal-political riptide, it is hard to imagine we will be waiting very long to find out.


 

28
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Iska Waran
Iska Waran

Let’s just hope we don’t do anything because everything we do is wrong.

Desertrat
Desertrat

Syria’s government is a member of the UN. It is as legal a government as any other thugocracy of which there are many. It invited the Russians in, as it has a legal right to do so. Syria and Iran have a mutual-assistance agreement, so Iranian involvement is legal under international law.

The U.S. has no legal right to meddle in Syria. Nor is there a national interest, in the usual definition of that term.

kokoda
kokoda

““NATO is ready and able to defend all allies,…”

Empty words – without the U.S., NATO is a hollowed out tombstone.
Don’t believe anything the U.S. gubbermint proclaims; or any gov’t.

Stucky

comment image?itok=Yp4MpgyI

Turkey entered the Syrian war …. and who did THEY bomb? The Kurds! We didn’t say a fuckin’ word about it. So much for the motherfuckin hypocrisy of the USA!USA!USA! crying about the Russians not bombing ISIS.

Moments ago some motherfucking warmongering sack of shit on Fux Newz just said, —- “The United States could blast Russian planes out of the sky in no time at all, if we were allowed to”. WTF??? Delusional cocksucker.

Can’t win in Afghanistan for ten fucking years against a bunch of ragheads with no Air Force. Believes it can kick Russia’s ass. We REALLY ARE an exceptional nation!!

RiNS

I don’t understand how there can be so many deluded so called experts when it comes to the capabilities of Russia.

There is a joke I heard the other day. It goes like this.

Question

Who are Russia’s neighbours?

Answer

Whoever they want to be their neighbours.

They should make everyone in West watch the video of those ships launching cruise missiles at ISIS the other day. The Russians aren’t going to be fighting us with machine guns and RPG’s. This is a modern country every bit as capable as us at blowing things up.

I posted previous that the problem in Middle East is Turkey. It looks to me like they are trying to recreate the Ottoman Empire. Maybe not in form but at least in function. How can experts on Middle East overlook what has and is still happening to Kurds. 45 million people who don’t have a state.

Anyways at least the Russians have a plan in Syria unlike NATO. How can you tell who are the good guys. There is no way that I can see. In Syria the old adage “the enemy of my enemy is my friend doesn’t work because it has become a sectarian clusterfuck.

I hope that at some point Assad wins this war . Then hopefully at post war conference he can step aside if that is what the majority of Syrians want. I suspect though that if there is an election that is fair many will vote for him.

Sensetti
Sensetti

The above author mentioned the petro dollar at the end of his article, something I harp on over and over again. If you understand the petro dollar and how it enables the U.S. to print money almost at will you understand a collapse of the petro dollar means a collapse of our financial system as we know it. Our free shit nation will collapse, society will break down.

I disagree with the author on his point “there is no right side here” when young ,American males are being drafted by the tens of thousands to fight and die in the coming World War we will see if sides matter, I bet it ends up mattering a whole lot!

Peaceout
Peaceout

From the article:

“The question today is merely one of timing. How long before a negative trigger is introduced? How long before Israeli planes come into contact with Russian or Iranian fighters? How long before U.S. troops come into contact with Russian troops? How long before Israel or Saudi Arabia strike Iran? And if the U.S. backs out completely, how long before the entire dynamic of the Middle East is flipped and America loses petro-status for the dollar? With the speed of events forming a fiscal-political riptide, it is hard to imagine we will be waiting very long to find out.”

The last line of this paragraph appears to be very true, the question I have ‘is the world ready for this?’ It seems that the trigger event that starts the chain of events that will ultimately shape the re-alignment of global economic power may be just days or weeks away. Things are aligning very quickly.

Winter is coming.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr

The US State Dept of NEOCONs specializes in divide, decapitate, destroy and dominate (DDDD). Right now, Russia and allies are kicking the NEOCON Mafia’s associates asses in Syria like J. Edgar Hoover and Eliot Ness. Of course, the NEOCONs helped create the terrorist and supplied them for their own evil purposes so they do not want the terrorist destroyed and fighting to end. The US PTB are licking their wounds but beware their immutable treachery: they will no doubt conspire to turn this situation to their advantage by some “Gulf of Tonkin” event blown all out of proportion by their MSM
to enlarge the conflict. Their goal is by hook and crook to draw the US and allies into WWIII with Iran, Russia, China and all Islam to mutually decimate all their Gentile enemies.

Stucky

FUN NEWS!

Germany just announced it would remove their missile defense batteries from Turkey ———- https://www.rt.com/news/312559-germany-withdraws-missiles-turkey/

A couple months ago Putin announced Russia will get 40 new ICBMs —– https://www.rt.com/news/267514-putin-ballistic-missiles-army/

The already formidable S-300 anti-aircraft missile system will be upgraded to the next generation. The S-350 will carry 12 missiles instead of 4 … faster and more powerful missiles .. and improved radars …. making airspaces literally impenetrable ———— https://www.rt.com/news/272341-s350-vityaz-air-defense/

comment image

Meanwhile in da ‘Murikan military newz ……

…….. just released data show yet another problem has cropped up with that fuckin’ AWESOME F-35 …. the engines shut down when the fuel gets too hot. lmfao

War with Russia … fun for the whole family!!

Stucky

US: The World’s Silliest Empire …. It would be humorous if people weren’t dying because of it

by Dmitry Orlov

comment image?itok=_hJCM9bU

I couldn’t help but notice that over the past few weeks the Empire has become extremely silly—so silly that I believe it deserves the title of the World’s Silliest Empire. One could claim that it has been silly before, but recent developments seem to signal a quantum leap in its silliness level.

The first bit of extreme silliness surfaced when Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, the head of the United States Central Command, told a Senate panel that only a very small number of Syrian fighters trained by the United States remained in the fight—perhaps as few as five.

The tab for training and equipping them was $500 million. That’s $100 million per fighter, but that’s OK, because it’s all good as long as the military contractors are getting paid. Things got even sillier when it later turned out that even these few fighters got car-jacked by ISIS/al Qaeda in Syria (whatever they are currently calling themselves) and got their vehicles and weapons taken away from them.

General Austin’s previous role as as Lt. General Casey in Tim Burton’s film Mars Attacks! It was already a very silly role, but his current role is a definite career advancement, both in terms of rank and in terms of silliness level.

The next silly moment arrived at the UN General Assembly meeting in New York, where Obama, who went on for 30 minutes instead of the allotted 15 (does Mr. Silly President know how to read a clock?) managed to use up all of this time and say absolutely nothing that made any sense to anyone.

But it was Putin’s speech that laid out the Empire’s silliness for all to see when he scolded the US for making a bloody mess of the Middle East with its ham-handed interventions. The oft-repeated quote is “Do you understand what you have done?” but that’s not quite right.

The Russian «Вы хоть понимаете теперь, чего вы натворили?» can be more accurately translated as “How can you even now fail to understand what a mess you have made?”

Words matter: this is not how one talks to a superpower before an assembly of the world’s leaders; this is how one scolds a stupid and wayward child. In the eyes of the whole world, this made the Empire look rather silly.

What happened next is that Russia announced the start of its bombing campaign against all manner of terrorists in Syria (and perhaps Iraq too; the Iraqi request is in Putin’s in-box).

What’s notable about this bombing campaign is that it is entirely legal. The legitimate, elected government of Syria asked Russia for help; the campaign was approved by the Russian legislature.

On the other hand, the bombing campaign that the US has been conducting in Syria is entirely illegal. There are exactly two ways to legally bomb the territory of another country: 1. an invitation from that country’s government and 2. a UN Security Council resolution. The US has not obtained either of them.

Why is this important? Because the UN, with its Security Council, was instituted to prevent war, by making it difficult for nations to engage each other militarily without all sorts of international economic and political repercussions. After World War II it was thought that wars are rather nasty and that something should be done to prevent them.

But the US feels that this is rather unnecessary. When a Russian correspondent (Gayane Chichakyan from RT) asked the White House press secretary under what legal authority the US was bombing Syria, he at first pretended to not understand the question, then babbled incoherently, looking rather silly.

You see, the US likes to fight wars (or rather, its military contractors like to fight wars, because that’s how they make money, and they happen to own a big piece of the US government). But the US can’t win any wars, and that makes its entire war effort rather silly (in a murderous sort of way).

In spite of American recalcitrance, the UN does in fact prevent wars. Recently it prevented the US from mounting a “limited strike against the Assad regime in response to the brazen use of chemical weapons” (or so said Obama during his UN speech). This was helped by a deft bit of Russian diplomacy, in the course of which Syria voluntarily gave up its chemical weapons stockpiles. Undeterred by diplomacy, the US squeezed off a couple of cruise missiles in the general direction of Syria, but the Russians promptly shot them out of the sky, triggering a major rethink at the Pentagon and, of course, making the US look rather silly.

But once you make a fool of yourself, why stop? Indeed, Obama shows no intention of stopping. Just about the entire audience at the UN General Assembly knew that the Syrian government’s chemical attack on its own people never happened. The chemicals were provided by the Saudis and were unwittingly used by the Syrian rebels on themselves. Lying, when everybody knows that you are lying, and knows that you know that you are lying: what could possibly be sillier?

Ok, how about continuously prattling on about “freedom and democracy”—in the Middle East, after throwing the whole region into chaos through their brain-dead interventions? The only voice of reason in the US seems to be that of Donald Trump, who recently declared that the Middle East was more stable under Saddam Hussein, Moammar Khaddafi and Bashar al Assad. Indeed it was. The fact that the only non-silly politician left in the US is Trump—that bloviating moneybag—sets a rather high bar for silliness for the country as a whole.

Prattling on about “freedom and democracy” in the Middle East is also silly because the entire region is tribal—has been tribal for a few thousand years, and will be tribal for a few thousand more. In each locale, some tribe is on top. If the idea is to carve it up into sovereign territorial units (none of which qualifies as a nation, because each one ends up being multinational) then each territorial unit ends up being ruled by some tribe while others grumble. Blunder in and exploit their grumbling to bring about “regime change”—and the whole place invariably burns down.

A case in point is Israel: it’s got the top dog tribe—the Jews, and they can shoot or bomb anybody else with impunity. It is considered “democratic” because the Jews get to vote, which is very nice for the Jews. The Alawites in Syria get to vote too—and vote for Bashar al Assad—so why isn’t that good enough? Because of American hypocrisy and double standards.

It’s like that right down the line. Saudi Arabia is owned by one tribe—the House of Saud, and everybody else is disenfranchised. Iraq used to be run by the Sunnis from Saddam Hussein’s tribe, but the Americans dislodged them, and now what remains of it is ruled by the Shia from the south of the country while the Sunnis ran off and joined ISIS. This can all seem like super-simple stuff, but not for the Americans, because it runs counter to their ideology, which dictates that the world must be remade in America’s image. And so they keep trying to do this (or keep pretending to be trying, because results don’t matter as long as their military contractors get paid) and don’t seem to care one bit that this is making them look very silly.

And so the typical pattern has been this: the US bombs a country to smithereens, mounts a ground invasion, sets up a puppet regime and, promptly or not so promptly, pulls out. The puppet regime falls apart, and then you have either ungovernable chaos or some new, especially nasty form of dictatorship, or a little of each: a failed state, like Libya, and Yemen, and much of Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. It doesn’t much matter that this is the result (as long as the military contractors are getting paid) because America’s motto seems to be “Look Silly and Carry On.” Wreck a country—and it’s on to the next bombing campaign.

But this is where it all gets meta-silly: in Syria they can’t even achieve that. The Americans have been bombing ISIS for a year now; meanwhile, ISIS has gotten stronger and occupied more territory. But they haven’t gotten around to overthrowing Assad; instead, the ISIS boys have been busy prancing around the desert in black head rags and white basketball shoes taking selfies, blowing up archaeological sites, enslaving women and beheading anyone they don’t like.

But now it appears that the Russians have achieved in five days of bombing what the Americans couldn’t in a year and the ISIS boys are running away to Jordan; others want to go to Germany and ask for asylum. This has made the Americans upset, because, you see, the Russians were bombing “their” terrorists—the ones the Americans recruited, armed and trained… and then bombed? I know, silly—but true. The Russians will have none of that, because their approach is, if it looks like a terrorist and quacks like a terrorist, then it is a terrorist, so let’s bomb it.

But it is understandable that this approach is unpopular with the Americans: here they were carefully pumping the place full of weapons and equipment, and bombing carefully around the edges so as not to blow up any of it, and the Russians just blunder in and blow it all up! The Saudis are absolutely livid, because it was they who paid for much of it. Plus the terrorists are their own Wahhabi-Takfiri brethren—the ones who like to declare various other Muslims that they don’t happen to like to be infidels, in direct violation of their own Sharia law. Does that remind you of anyone? Anyone silly?

But it doesn’t appear that the US can do anything to stop the Russians, or the Chinese who also want to get a piece of ISIS to stuff and mount, or the Iranians and the Hezbollah fighters who are ready to march in and mop up what remains of ISIS once the bombing missions destroy all the war materiel it has amassed. And so it’s time for Americans to start an information war by accusing the Russians of causing civilian casualties.

Of course, being Americans, they have to prosecute this information war in the silliest way possible. First, you trot out your claims of civilian casualties before the Russians fly a single sortie. Oops! Then you stuff the social media with fake pictures of wounded children produced beforehand by performers in white helmets paid for by George Soros. And then, when asked for evidence, you refuse to provide any.

So far so good, but let’s get even sillier. Immediately after screaming loudly about Russians causing civilian casualties, the Americans blow up a hospital in Afghanistan that was run by Medecins sans Frontières, in spite of being informed of its location both before and during the bombing. “Don’t kill civilians… like this!” Could it get any sillier than that? Of course it can: the US can start blatantly, nakedly lying about the event: “There were Taleban fighters hiding in that hospital!”—no, there weren’t; “The Afghans told us to bomb that hospital!”—no, they didn’t. Bombing that hospital was an actual war crime—so says the UN. Are are the Russians now going to listen to criticism from war criminals? Don’t be silly!

It’s really hard to tell, but anything seems possible now. For example, the US no longer seems to have a foreign policy: the White House says one thing, the State Department another, the Pentagon a third, Samantha Power at the UN pursues a foreign policy of her own using Twitter, and Senator John McCain wants to arm Syrian rebels to shoot down Russian planes. (All five of them? John, don’t be silly!) In response to all this confusion, America’s political puppets in the European Union are starting to twitch uncontrollably and go off-script, because the nerve center in Washington is no longer sending them clear signals.

How is this all going to end? Well, since we are all just being silly, let me make a humble suggestion: the US should bomb everything inside the Beltway in Washington, plus a few counties in Virginia. That should significantly degrade the country’s capability for being extremely silly. And if that doesn’t work—so what? After all, it is clear that results don’t matter. As long as the military contractors are getting paid, it’s all good.

Stucky

Chicken-shit coward cockroaches always run and hide when someone fights back.

comment image?itok=ntCPWWby

Anonymous
Anonymous

an Iranian copy of a 70’s Russian anti-tank missile can blow a US made Abrams M1a2 like if it was a shitpile. I think it is time for the US citizens to calm down or eradicate their fucking 1% of so called elite. if not, they will experience the bad taste of defeat and destruction against a Sino-russian axis that is already a reality.

Anonymous
Anonymous
overthecliff

Saudi Arabia is not a military factor. They can’t handle Yemen. Their military is only for one thing, keeping a boot on the common peoples necks. Now that Assads enemies are out in the open, Russians and Iranians will dispatch them efficiently. The Russians have already accomplished their goals and Obama knows it. After Assads opposition is crushed eveything will go quiet.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr

Overthecliff: For peace to happen, the NEOCONs would all have to be crushed first or they will instigate more chaos.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster

This smells like a crock pot brewing up WWIII. You couldn’t concoct a nastier scenario…all the majors and “axis of evil” participating in one theater of war. I hear even China is sending their Navy.

Meantime, the Wolfowitz doctrine is dead, killed by Putin according a piece I saw on Zerohedge.

Stucky

Yet ANOTHER slap in the face to the Indispensable Nation …..

=============================================

“According to the head of Iraq’s parliament’s defence and security committee, Baghdad may soon request Russian air support in battling the Islamic State.

MOSCOW (Sputnik) – Iraq may turn to Russia for military help in the fight against the Islamic State (ISIL) if Russian airstrikes in Syria prove successful, the head of the Iraqi Parliament’s Defense and Security Committee told Sputnik on Wednesday.

“Iraq may turn to Russia with a request to conduct airstrikes against the positions of Islamic State militants in Iraq if Russia is successful in Syria, that is if the airstrikes are effective and actual, and if we see that Russia [is operating] effectively in Syria,” Haqim Zamli said.”

=============================================

Stucky

Iraqis LOVE Hajji Putin!! hahahahaha

==================

With Russian missile strikes dealing significant damage to IS infrastructure in Syria, many Iraqis are beginning to question the effectiveness of the US-led coalition.

“I have been waiting for Russia to get involved in the fight against Daesh,” Mohammed Karim Nihaya, a painter living in Baghdad, told Agence France-Presse, using the Arabic acronym for ISIL.

“They get results. The United States and its allies on the other hand have been bombing for a year and achieved nothing.”

As he spoke, Nihaya applied the finishing touches to a portrait of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

He’s not the only one. Putinmania has swept across the Iraqi population.

“We should give Putin Iraqi and Syrian citizenship because he loves us more than our own politicians,” Mohammed al-Bahadli, a student in Najaf, told AFP.

“Muslims bomb us because we are Rafidha,” said Saad Abdullah, an Iraqi store owner, using a term employed by IS to refer to Shiites.

“Meanwhile Putin, who is an Orthodox man, is defending us…Maybe he really is a Shiite and we didn’t know it.”

The Russian president has also become a bit of an Iraqi Internet celebrity, with some circulating rumors that Putin may be able to trace his roots back to the Middle East.

While in no way accurate, the story suggests that Putin’s father was an Iraqi grocer, who because of specializing in figs – “tin” in Arabic – he became known as “Abu Tin.” Moving to the Soviet Union after World War II, he married “a blonde Russian girl” and named their child Abdulamir.

From there, Abdulamir Abu Tin was russified to Vladimir Putin.

The fiction proves the endearing support by the Iraqi people for the Russian airstrikes, and for “Putin the Shiite.”

“I thank Putin because he convinced me to stay in Iraq,” said Ali al-Rammahi, an Iraqi cab driver. “Hajji Putin is better than Hussein Obama.”

IndenturedServant

The USA! USA! USA! called on the world to join us in the global war on terror and guess what? They’re beginning to show up! The world NEEDS Russia, China and Iran to get involved in world affairs like this. We need partners who don’t discriminate between terrorist groups by getting back to basics and killing them all.

I’ll take anything that buffers our propensity to run roughshod over the planet with impunity. I can gar-an-fucking-tee our so called intelligence community NEVER saw this shit coming. We have absolutely no plan to counter it except to put Obammy out front to flap his cock-holster while our ambitions get cut off at the knees. We’re like the school yard bully who is finally getting a well deserved kick in the nuts. It is very entertaining to watch too!

Stucky

Any coverage about this on CuNNt or Fux? hmmmm? Of course not. Right this moment the Fux whores are discussing if whole milk is really healthy. Catatonic Wolfdick Blitzer is talking about North Korea’s upcoming military parade. All really important stuff.

Anyway …. will China actually enter the Syrian was on Russia’s side? Or, is it just bluster? I mean, they don’t want to piss off the US!USA!USA! … right? Even if they go, what will they send? A small ship and a handful of troops?

ummmmm ……. they’re already there!! Like … it’s DOCKED.

That’s according to DEBKAfile …. an Israeli military intelligence website located in Jerusalem.

The Chinese sent an aircraft carrier. This one ….
comment image

Oh … yeah … it’s also accompanied by a guided missile cruiser.

Oh …. yeah …. actual Chinese battle troops to arrive also.

Oh …. yeah …. a few days ago military and intelligence sources reported that China sent word to Moscow on Oct. 2, that J-15 fighter bombers would shortly join the Russian air campaign.

Woo Hoo!!!!!!!!!! Let’s party!

http://www.debka.com/article/24909/A-Chinese-aircraft-carrier-docks-at-Tartus-to-support-Russian-Iranian-military-buildup-

Peaceout
Peaceout

Yes, if this is substantiated, this milestone event is moving very quickly indeed. How long have we been over there getting nothing done? Wow, well played Putin. Putin is about to go checkmate and Obama I still trying to figure out where to move his pawn.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote

All this could have been avoided if we’d listened to McStain.
Too bad he had to lie about it and now they can’t walk back the lie that we were fighting ISIS.
McPutin is also fighting ISIS.

Our government is like a bitch, we have to guess what they really want.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote

Stucky says: Turkey entered the Syrian war …. and who did THEY bomb? The Kurds! We didn’t say a fuckin’ word about it.

Stuck, that’s the deal Turkey wanted, we use their territory and shut the fuck up about their doing the same shit we hanged Saddam for doing, killing Kurds.

Overthecliff
Overthecliff

Robert ,the neo cons know Americans don’t have the stomach to fight a real war with 500 casualties/ week. They aren’t going to fight a real military unless it is an existential threat. The Russians are not the usual 3 rd world armies and civilians we usually fight with. I think the neocons will lick their wounds and try something they can win easier.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr

Overthecliff: Good points; but it worries me anyway. Russia, China, Iran, Syria etc could get bold and go for a little accidental pay back given any little opportunity. I’m sure they are mindful of their airliner shot down over the Persian Gulf, the airliner the Ukrainians shot down and several mystery explosions in Iran and China just as we are the one shot down over NYC and the missile launched off the California coast. About the surprise cruise missile launches, the Russians shouldn’t have to check first with US: back in the day, we had satellites that immediately picked up the heat from missile launches (called fast walkers compared to slow walker jets). A lot of weapons and players in this theater capable of destroying high priority targets and creating False Flags not to mention US Affirmative Action morons that sometimes blow up Chinese Embassies in Serbia, milk processing plants in Egypt and even our own hospitals.

Overthecliff
Overthecliff

Bankers know it is hard to make money when standing in a pile of radioactive ash. They like it better when they can spend a trillion dollars to have a war with say Grenada. Very little risk and lots of reward.

Overthecliff
Overthecliff

I am assuming those assholes are corrupt and evil but rational. That may be the greatest risk of all.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading