This Is Where Whites In America Are A Minority

To Zygon, since you asked…Anarchy 101, the (relatively) short version….

Absolute personal liberty for a solitary hermit is the exercise of any action, because none of the actions of a hermit cause adversity with the aggressive repression of freedom for anyone else. All aggressive action within a social relationship of two or more people, does the reverse, destroying absolute freedom, with one or more profiting from aggression and one or more suffering the corollary diminishment of possessions and opportunities.

Thus aggressive interaction is called “slavery” and “criminality” when practiced privately and mistaken for “freedom” when practiced within a government relationship, in which most are aggressively oppressed for the benefit of a few politically connected others, and their political enablers. There is no other way to gain power over all, except by profitably oppressing some for the benefit of others, while maintaining that power by escaping the usual retaliation against aggression, when recognized as such, with the deceit of “good intentions.”

Thus, discriminatory governmental oppression, favoring some, repressing others, always with the collective identity scam of some people categorized as a universal threat to others, in turn appearing to require the oppression of those stereotyped as the threat, including classes, races, tribes and nations as threats to others categorized with these labels, is never “absolute freedom,” indeed, not freedom at all, which by definition is universal, all inclusive freedom _from_ aggression, no exceptions.

It follows that the establishment and maintenance of all inclusive absolute freedom, limits the interactions within a government-free relationship to “cooperation.” There are no leaders, because nothing happens outside of interpersonal agreement between all those, but only those, affected by all actions, which is a few people, not the billions affected by politically enforced laws. It is only the aggressive opposite of cooperation that requires leaders to decide who will benefit and who will pay for same, which is not anarchy. Instead all people affected by any action, intended or taken by any individual, are either already in agreement, or will cooperatively compromise in their goals, so as to maintain the agreement based, universality of freedom for all. When actions are taken outside of these agreements, these are recognized as the aggressive destruction of freedom, which is then penalized in some way by “defensive” actions, in order to preserve this cooperative relationship.

That does not mean that anarchists rush out guns a’blazing when children steal apples, as “comprehension” of the difference between aggression and cooperation is also necessary to preserve the cooperative relationship; comprehension which is inhibited by the 100% potential of fallible human beings to make errors, as well as the ignorance of youth and mental incompetence. Thus, initial conversational reconciliation establishes error or intent, the latter regarded as intended or actual actions outside of these agreements, which will be the personally identified intent (an armed thief breaking into your house, does not have to kill your family and steal all your possessions to recognize aggressive intent) or actual physical attacks, theft and fraud, all requiring defensible action as the preservation of this cooperative society.

This relationship has never been established anywhere in history, including Somalia, where government free aggressive theft is often redefined as “anarchy.” Likely that is because the financial profits of anarchy are much smaller than those of aggressive oppression. No one acquires massive wealth with the legal freedom to steal, nor with regulatory destruction of competition, nor is anyone aggressively pauperized into penury. What is not recognized is that the result of absolute global freedom is “global peaceful prosperity” in which none are prohibited from reaching 100% of their economic potential with absolute freedom’s non-aggressive, exclusively cooperative and _mutually_ profitable exchanges of time, skills, property and innovative inventions, excluding from the resulting profits only politicians and thieves (a redundancy.) Such a relationship _is_ peace and 100% universal aggression-free productive work and trade cannot fail to result in prosperity.

So, hollering “anarchy” in a crowded theater operating in such a relationship would incite no reactive terror, while hollering “governmentalist” would shut down the movie and turn on the lights to find the thief, in order to explain to him that his plan primarily enriches and empowers politicians, who necessarily enforce aggressive redistribution of profits, so as to benefit from same, while the rest eat up all the remaining profits and then starve to death because reciprocal theft encourages no one to produce anything at all. This interaction is historically recorded as the “rise and fall of civilization,” as after the inevitable fall, people are free of the aggressive restraints needed to produce the wealth necessary to profitable exploitation, aggression which then multiplies into another fall.

But if you find a crowded theater of anarchists be sure and let me know, I know of only two or three; albeit there are a large number of people who hope to personally profit from the practice of enforced profit redistribution, by using the label of “anarchy” to pretend they are not “aggressive governmentalists.”

Finally, if one is having trouble comprehending the difference between the freedom of anarchy and the inevitable oppression of governments, it is always a failure to understand the every human being exists individually with a uniquely personal identity, existing in one place in space and time, separating one individual entity from all other entities. Thus human beings can cooperate as groups, but they cannot “exist” as groups with collective identities.

These individuals all act in an immutably existing reality, in which each individual human being chooses goals _mentally_ but must realize all of their goals by _physically_ acting in the _mentally unalterable_ physical circumstance of cause and effects, in which all effects, including those choices desired by human beings, are the exclusive result of a physical cause. That cause in all social relationships is the variations in human action as means in pursuit of goals, variations of means that will either succeed or fail.

Thus, establishing a desired effect is indisputably controlled by the human actions, referenced as means in pursuit of same. The means implemented as human action _in pursuit of a much desired, harmonious prosperity_, are necessarily limited to cooperation, including that of charity, or aggression, there are no other choices; cooperation as means resulting in successful goal achieving action, while aggression as means not only fails to establish same, but does the exact opposite, because all human actions operate as a physical cause of consequences exclusively determined by reality’s cause and effect physical circumstances. In turn this establishes anarchy’s absolute freedom from aggression as the sole means to the much desired goal of universal peaceful prosperity, while aggression, governmental or personal, results in opposite consequences. The same circumstances of accurate means resulting in desired ends, inaccurate means, the opposite, applies to all human goals, in both social relationships and interaction with the material world, such as futile attempts to extinguish a campfire with a can of gas, which also has a 100% failure rate, as well as causing opposite consequences.

I welcome your objectively derived evidence of error in the above as personally beneficial.