WTF COPFUK STORY OF THE DAY

Via The Modesto Bee

Modesto agrees to pay nearly $750,000 to settle lawsuit, but plaintiff is now dead

Patricia Mugrauer sued Modesto last year after a police officer entered her home without her permission or a warrant and pushed the frail, disabled senior, causing her to fall and break her hip.

She settled her lawsuit last month for nearly $750,000, but Mugrauer won’t collect a dime. She died Jan. 26, a week after her settlement, at the age of 69. But one of her attorneys says Modesto is not off the hook and owes the money to his client’s estate.

Mugrauer’s lawsuit came from one of the worst calls police officers handle: a civil dispute between a landlord and a tenant. This story is based on the lawsuit and the officers’ body camera footage provided by the Police Department. The department edited the footage so it only shows part of the officers’ interaction with Mugrauer.

Mugrauer was renting a room to a man whose girlfriend had moved in with him. The couple broke up on the morning of Jan. 12, 2015, and the girlfriend wanted to retrieve her belongings that day. The boyfriend was to keep renting the room and, at his request, Mugrauer would not let the girlfriend in until the boyfriend was there so there would be no misunderstandings about the belongings. The boyfriend was expected soon.

The girlfriend called police. Officers John C. Lee and Randy Raduechel responded. Their body camera footage shows Lee standing at the front door talking with Mugrauer. She is standing just inside her home, with the door open.

WATCH VIDEO:

http://www.modbee.com/news/local/crime/article132755449.html

The Police Department released edited versions of body camera footage from officers John C. Lee and Randy Raduechel of their response to a landlord-tenant dispute in 2015. The landlord, Patricia Mugrauer, sued the city after officers entered her home without her permission, and Lee pushed her, causing her to fall and break her hip. The city agreed to pay nearly $750,000 last month to end her litigation.

Lee explains that Mugrauer has to let the young woman get her belongings and that the boyfriend does not need to be there. Mugrauer says she wants the boyfriend there, that he works nearby and that the police could summon him. Mugrauer’s adult son appears. Wade Mugrauer says the police cannot enter without a warrant. “No, that’s not true,” Lee says.

Patricia Mugrauer places her hand on the door. Lee – who appears to be at least twice as big as Mugrauer – pushes the door open with his left hand, while pushing Mugrauer with his right arm, and enters the home. Mugrauer stumbles backward and hits the floor with a thud.

“There is no reason for you to go to slam that door on me. There is no reason for you to do that,” Lee apparently says to Patricia Mugrauer, who is on the floor, saying, “All right, there’s a lawsuit.” The body camera footage does not appear to show she was trying to slam the door. Lee may have been speaking to Wade Mugrauer, who enters a nearby room and closes the door. Raduechel enters the home as well and follows Wade Mugrauer.

“The police tactics were misguided,” said Sanjay Schmidt, one of the Mugrauers’ attorneys, in an email, “and we hope that the MPD and other departments will train officers in the future regarding what they are, and are not, permitted to do in such situations. … Through their words and actions, the (officers) abandoned neutrality and transformed the encounter into a ‘curbside courtroom,’ during which my clients’ Fourth Amendment rights were violated.”

UC Davis School of Law professor Floyd Feeney – who reviewed the body camera footage at The Bee’s request – said the officers should not have entered the home unless they had a warrant or there was an emergency. He said Patricia Mugrauer was calm and reasonable and simply setting the circumstances under which the young woman could retrieve her belongings. But it would not have mattered if she had been rude and slammed the door on the officers.

He said many police departments do not get involved in civil matters involving landlords and tenants because they can be time-consuming, often messy, and it can be complicated to determine which party has the law on its side.

In this instance, Mugrauer’s property rights were greater than the young woman’s, said Raquel Aldana, a professor and associate dean for faculty scholarship at the McGeorge School of Law. “This is a close case, but the entry is likely illegal,” she said in an email. “… The issue is not whether the tenant has a right to her property but under what circumstances she can have access.”

When asked whether Lee was too aggressive, Feeney said: “I’ve never been a police officer, but you just don’t do that. I’ve spent a lot of time with police departments in California and in other states and spent 1 1/2 years working with Scotland Yard and other police departments in Great Britain. That is very aggressive (behavior). Police officers don’t like to have their authority questioned. They have a very hard job, but there is no basis for doing that. There was no emergency going on here.”

Modesto police Chief Galen Carroll defended Lee in an email. “I believe he wasn’t even thinking about entering the house. He was trying to make sure she didn’t close the door and didn’t intend for her to fall. In a split second, I don’t think there is a whole lot of thinking about options. It’s more of a reaction.”

Carroll agreed that calls such as these are among the worst for officers. “We aren’t there to violate anyone’s rights or take enforcement action,” he said. “We are there because the two parties can’t agree, and no matter what we do, one or both parties are mad.”

The Mugrauers sued Modesto in federal court in April 2016. Their civil rights lawsuit says their rights to free speech and freedom from unlawful search and unreasonable force were violated. It also alleges disability discrimination, assault and battery, false arrest and imprisonment, and failure to summon medical care. The lawsuit claims Raduechel wrongly handcuffed Wade Mugrauer and pushed a Taser and-or firearm against his head.

Modesto offered to end Patricia Mugrauer’s part of the lawsuit last month by paying her $745,651.01 plus her legal costs if she would dismiss her allegations against the city. She accepted the offer and a judgment was entered in the court in her favor and against the city on Jan. 19. Modesto did not admit to any liability.

Modesto agreed to pay nearly $750,000 in part because Mugrauer fell and broke her hip and because of the medical expenses resulting from her injury, said Blake Loebs, an attorney with the Meyers Nave law firm and the lead attorney representing the city.

Schmidt said the judgment remains in place even though Mugrauer has died. “Judgment was entered in her favor before she tragically passed away,” he said in an email. “There was at that time – and still is – a valid and fully enforceable judgment, which is now an asset of her estate.”

Loebs said in an email that the city’s attorneys have looked at the effect – if any – Mugrauer’s death has on the case. He declined to comment further because of the issues that have not been resolved.

The attorneys for both sides have to determine how much Modesto owes for Mugrauer’s legal costs. If they cannot, then the judge will decide. And Wade Mugrauer’s portion of the lawsuit has not been resolved. That’s why the police did not release the body camera footage related to his allegations. Schmidt said Mugrauer would not comment while his portion of the lawsuit is active.

Patricia Mugrauer had struggled to make ends meet and died after a flu she caught developed into pneumonia, said JeAnne Stoops, Mugrauer’s sister.

“I’m brokenhearted,” Stoops said. “I’m sick to my stomach because she was getting her food from the food banks. She was getting her clothes from the clothes closet. She was so excited, (saying) ‘I think I’m going to get some money.’ The first thing she was going to do was buy some new clothes. And she never had a chance. It’s incredibly sad.”

Stoops said her sister had worked as a machine operator at the Hershey’s chocolate plant in Oakdale starting when she was 18. She said her sister quit when her son was born but returned to the plant years later. Stoops said her sister became disabled in her 40s and had osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis.

Stoops described her sister as having a bubbly personality but said she was never the same after her encounter with the police. She said her sister was set to have another surgery related to her hip. Mugrauer used a walker after breaking it. “She never fully recovered,” Stoops said. “I think this is what helped her pass. It was like a domino effect when she got injured from the officer.”

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
kokoda - the most deplorable
kokoda - the most deplorable
February 26, 2017 4:30 pm

“Lee – who appears to be at least twice as big as Mugrauer – ”

If I was writing this piece, I would also have stated that he was a male vs a female; specified the age difference and whether the cop lifted weights at the gym.

IOW, the ‘twice as big’ just doesn’t cut it for me.

I agree with the verdict. Isn’t Modesto bankrupt?

General
General
February 26, 2017 4:51 pm

Except the money should come out of the cops pension funds. Not the taxpayers.

Gloriously Deplorable Paul
Gloriously Deplorable Paul
  General
February 26, 2017 10:34 pm

This is a fantastic idea that I think should be enacted (by ballot proposition because spineless legislators and Moonbeam would never do it) to require police pension fund participation along with the responsible city/county/state/federal agencies involved.

Kelly the Deplorable
Kelly the Deplorable
  Gloriously Deplorable Paul
February 28, 2017 8:43 pm

I wholeheartedly agree. It’s fucking ridiculous that taxpayers get stuck footing the bill for many of the situations where the government agency and/or it’s officers/employees involved are found to be at fault.

I understand that cops have a tough job; they deal with many assholes throughout their days. But it also seems like the LEO profession in general attracts the type of people who enjoy having power, at some point tend to (in whatever way) abuse that power, and always seem to over-react when they have that power questioned.

Start making these aggressive bastards take cuts to their salaries, bonuses, and pensions when they’re in the wrong, and maybe they’ll start being more careful when it comes to dealing with the public at large, the majority of whom just want to go on about their business unmolested. The better image they have with the public, the less tense their daily encounters will become.

P.S. – On a side note, I once heard a family member discuss the fact that some municipal/county/state agencies carry some sort of insurance coverage that covers actions like this where the officer/agency is found at fault. But I believe he was discussing in relation to the Steven Avery case in WI.

Does anyone know anything about the “Wrongful Action Insurance” that some governments and/or agencies carry? Is any of it required by law?

PatrioTEA
PatrioTEA
February 26, 2017 5:01 pm

Police do seem to use excessive force against all, including innocent, unarmed citizens. Legal rights to access do not seem clear at the time and the authority should have backed off until clear. I fear for my autistic son if there is ever an encounter, because he does not respond promptly to directives or inquiries, and we have seen many times that the Police demand immediate, un-delayed obedience or else they exert undue force; regardless of race. That’s not right.

anarchyst
anarchyst
February 26, 2017 6:14 pm

Apologies to those who have seen this previously…I repost this in order to encourage changes that protect BOTH civilians and police…

If anything, police should be held to a higher standard than that of the public…As it stands now, police can commit crimes with impunity because, in most situations, they investigate themselves…Behavior that would get an ordinary citizen charged, convicted and incarcerated is routinely ignored by “the powers that be” because police are considered to be “above the law” as the “law” is whatever they say it is, the Constitution be damned…
Ever notice that police unions are “fraternal”? This should tell you something. The “thin-blue-line” is a gang, little different than street gangs–at least when it comes to “covering-up” their questionable and quite often, illegal and criminal behavior.
In today’s day and age, “officer safety” trumps de-escalation of force. This, in part, is due to the militarization of the police along with training in Israeli police tactics. This becomes a problem, with the “us vs. them” attitude that is fosters, along with the fact that Israel is a very different place, being on a constant “war footing”, and by necessity, its police tactics are very different.
There are too many instances of police being “given a pass”, even when incontrovertible video and audio evidence is presented. Grand juries, guided by police-friendly prosecutors, quite often refuse to charge those police officers who abuse their authority.
Police officers, who want to do the right thing, are quite often marginalized and put into harms way, by their own brethren…When a police officer is beating on someone that is already restrained while yelling, “stop resisting” THAT is but one reason police have a “bad name” in many instances…this makes the “good cops” who are standing around, witnessing their “brethren in blue” beating on a restrained suspect, culpable as well…
Here are changes that can help reduce police-induced violence:
1. Get rid of police unions. Police unions (fraternities) protect the guilty, and are responsible for the massive whitewashing of questionable police behavior that is presently being committed.
2. Eliminate both “absolute” and “qualified” immunity for all public officials. This includes, prosecutors and judges, police and firefighters, code enforcement and child protective services officials, and others who deal with the citizenry. The threat of being sued personally would encourage them to behave themselves. Require police officers to be “bonded” by an insurance company, with their own funds. No bond= no job.
3. Any public funds disbursed to citizens as a result of police misconduct should come out of police pension funds–NOT from the taxpayers.
4. Regular drug-testing of police officers as well as incident-based drug testing should take place whenever an officer is involved in a violent situation with a citizen–no exceptions.
5. Testing for steroid use should be a part of the drug testing program. You know damn well, many police officers “bulk up” with the “help” of steroids. Steroids also affect users mentally as well, making them more aggressive. The potential for abuse of citizens increases greatly with steroid use.
6. Internal affairs should only be used for disagreements between individual officers–NOT for investigations involving citizen abuse. State-level investigations should be mandatory for all suspected abuses involving citizens.
7. Prosecutors should be charged with malfeasance IF any evidence implicating police officer misconduct is not presented to the grand jury.
8. A national or state-by-state database of abusive individuals who should NEVER be allowed to perform police work should be established–a “blacklist” of abusive (former) police officers.
9. Most people are unaware that police have special “rules” that prohibit them from being questioned for 48 hours. This allows them to “get their stories straight” and makes it easier to “cover up” bad police behavior. Police must be subject to the same laws as civilians.
10. All police should be required to wear bodycams and utilize dashcams that cannot be turned off. Any police officers who causes a dash or body cam to be turned off should be summarily fired–no excuses. Today’s body and dash cams are reliable enough to withstand harsh treatment. Body and dashcam footage should be uploaded to a public channel “on the cloud” for public perusal.
11. All interrogations must be video and audio recorded. Police should be prohibited from lying or fabricating stories in order to get suspects to confess. False confessions ARE a problem in many departments. Unknown to most people, police can lie with impunity while civilians can be charged with lying to police…fair? I think not…
12. Any legislation passed that restricts the rights of ordinary citizens, such as firearms magazine capacity limits, types of weapons allowed, or restrictive concealed-carry laws should apply equally to police. No special exemptions to be given to police. Laws must be equally applied.
Police work is not inherently dangerous…there are many other professions that are much more dangerous.
A little “Andy Taylor” could go a long way in allaying fears that citizens have of police.
That being said, I have no problem with police officers who do their job in a fair, conscientious manner…however, it is time to call to task those police officers who only “protect and serve” themselves.

Wip
Wip
  anarchyst
February 26, 2017 7:17 pm

Keep posting it.

James
James
  anarchyst
February 26, 2017 7:22 pm

Anarchyst,do you mean to say you are “regifting”,I am stuck in reruns?!The nerve,Damn!

ASIG
ASIG
February 26, 2017 9:48 pm

It seems there was some misunderstanding. If both the guy and the girlfriend’s names were on the rental agreement then I would have to assume she would have a key in which case she could simply let herself in without having the landlady being involved. If the girl was asking the landlady to let her in and she is not on the rental agreement then the landlady is correct in not letting her in without the permission of the guy who is the legal renter. The landlord cannot unlock the apartment to anyone that has visited sometime in the past. It seems that that distinction wasn’t clear to the LEO and it appears he simply assumed the girl was one of the renters.

I’ve been a landlord for over 45 years and if a renters ‘friend/visitor’ who is not on the rental agreement asks or insists to be let into the apartment when the legal renter instructed me to not let the person in, I would not let them in, actually I would have no right to let them in. If the person is on the rental agreement and they for some reason lost their key, no question I let them in.

David
David
February 26, 2017 10:13 pm

As if the city cares, they will just raise taxes on everyone to pay, including on the victim’s son.

acetinker
acetinker
February 26, 2017 11:05 pm

Anarchyst,
I read and liked your comment, but I believe you have a fundamental misunderstanding of who police ‘protect and serve’. It’s not you and me, buttercup- it’s the corporation that writes their paychecks.
You see, under color of law, you and I are merely assets of the various and sundry administrative districts we happen to live/work in. The cops are employed to help manage those assets for the benefit of those administrative districts which are themselves corporations.
Their primary purpose is to limit liability to their employer. Any benefit that might accrue to you is purely coincidental.
In this, and many other cases, the grand plan backfired- but on the whole, most people obey the arbitrary notions of their perceived betters- and the cops play a vital role in making that so. But I can smell a storm a-brewin’. BLM and SJW’s notwithstanding, the Saxon is learning, once again, to hate.

Not quite sober
Not quite sober
  acetinker
February 27, 2017 5:57 pm

And when Saxons get pissed off AND organized bad shit happens to those who pissed them off.

anarchyst
anarchyst
  acetinker
February 27, 2017 6:27 pm

I was just trying to be “nice ” to the so-called “law enforcement community”. Of course they serve themselves and their masters–certainly not us mundane citizens.
Regards,

racistwhiteguy
racistwhiteguy
February 27, 2017 4:12 pm

I see this kind of thing and it makes me hate this world that much more.